Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive 14) (bot |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{/Header}}{{User:MiszaBot/config |
{{/Header}}{{User:MiszaBot/config |
||
|archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}} |
|||
|counter = 7 |
|||
| |
|counter = 14 |
||
|algo = old(20d) |
|||
|maxarchivesize = 200K |
|||
|minthreadstoarchive = 1 |
|||
|minthreadsleft = 4 |
|||
|archive = Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive %(counter)d |
|archive = Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive %(counter)d |
||
}} |
}} |
||
== Arbitration motion regarding ''Skepticism and coordinated editing'' == |
|||
== Mailing list delays == |
|||
The Arbitration Committee has [[Special:Permalink/1219893912#Skepticism_and_coordinated_editing_motion|resolved by motion]] that: |
|||
We are advised that there currently are delays in e-mails to and from WMF mailing lists, including Arbcom-l. Both incoming and outgoing mail to and from the list are affected, including both internal committee communications and mails to or from other editors. The issue will hopefully be resolved shortly but obviously that is not within the Committee's control. In the interim, editors who have e-mailed us and not yet received a response are advised that this may be one of the reasons. (The fact that several arbitrators have had end-of-summer vacations or are about to may be another.) [[User:Newyorkbrad|Newyorkbrad]] ([[User talk:Newyorkbrad|talk]]) 14:48, 2 September 2011 (UTC) |
|||
{{ivmbox|1=For violations of their topic ban and for continued editing which violate the conflict of interest guidelines, Rp2006 is blocked for 1 month. This block may be appealed only to the Arbitration Committee.}} |
|||
For the Arbitration Committee, [[User:Dreamy Jazz|Dreamy <i style="color:#d00">'''Jazz'''</i>]] <sup>''[[User talk:Dreamy Jazz|talk to me]]'' | ''[[Special:Contribs/Dreamy Jazz|my contributions]]''</sup> 14:20, 20 April 2024 (UTC) |
|||
: Archived discussion at: '''{{slink|Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive 51|Arbitration motion regarding Skepticism and coordinated editing}}'''<!-- [[User:ArbClerkBot|ArbClerkBot]] ([[User talk:ArbClerkBot|talk]]) 14:21, 20 April 2024 (UTC) --><!--Template:hes--> |
|||
== Arbitration motion regarding [[Sri Lanka]] == |
|||
:'''[[Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive 15#Mailing list delays|Archived discussion]]''' |
|||
The Arbitration Committee has resolved by [[Special:Permalink/1219893542#Sri_Lanka_motion|motion]], in resolution of [[Special:Permalink/1219893542#Designating_Sri_Lanka_as_a_contentious_topic|a case request]], that: |
|||
== Audit Subcommittee community member changes == |
|||
{{ivmbox|1=This case request is resolved by motion as follows: |
|||
Pursuant to the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive 7#Advanced permissions and inactivity|motion concerning advanced permissions and inactivity]], the appointment of {{user|Bahamut0013}} to the Audit Subcommittee is terminated effective 3 September 2011 and his Checkuser and Oversight permissions shall be withdrawn. The committee has been unable to contact Bahamut0013, and this action is taken on the basis that he is not currently active on this project. |
|||
Sri Lanka, broadly construed, is designated as a contentious topic.}} |
|||
{{user|AGK}} is appointed in his place in accordance with the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive 7#Audit Subcommittee appointments (2011)|April 2011 Audit Subcommittee appointments motion]]. The Arbitration Committee thanks Bahamut0013 for his contributions to the Audit Subcommittee during his tenure, and thanks AGK for agreeing to accept full membership in the subcommittee for the remainder of Bahamut0013's term. |
|||
For the Arbitration Committee, [[User:Firefly|<span style="color:#850808;">firefly</span>]] <small>( [[User talk:Firefly|t]] · [[Special:Contributions/Firefly|c]] )</small> 14:38, 20 April 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:'''Supporting motion:''' Casliber; Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry; David Fuchs; Elen of the Roads; Jclemens; John Vandenberg; Newyorkbrad; PhilKnight; Risker; SirFozzie; Xeno. |
|||
: Archived discussion at: '''{{slink|Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive 51|Arbitration motion regarding Sri Lanka}}'''<!-- [[User:ArbClerkBot|ArbClerkBot]] ([[User talk:ArbClerkBot|talk]]) 14:38, 20 April 2024 (UTC) --><!--Template:hes--> |
|||
:'''Not voting/inactive:''' Cool Hand Luke; Coren; Iridescent; Kirill Lokshin; Mailer diablo; Roger Davies. |
|||
== Dovidroth unbanned == |
|||
For the Arbitration Committee, –[[user:xeno|<font face="verdana" color="black">'''xeno'''</font>]][[user talk:xeno|<font color="black"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 22:00, 3 September 2011 (UTC) |
|||
Following a successful appeal of his [[Special:Permalink/1197461960#Dovidroth|site ban]] to the Arbitration Committee, {{user|Dovidroth}} is unbanned. The [[Special:Permalink/1197461960#Dovidroth_topic_ban|topic ban]], which was passed at the same time as the site ban, remains in force. |
|||
:'''[[Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive 15#Audit Subcommittee community member changes|Archived discussion]]''' |
|||
Support: Barkeep49, Guerillero, HJ Mitchell, Maxim, Primefac, Sdrqaz, ToBeFree |
|||
== oversight-l closed for business == |
|||
Oppose: Firefly, Moneytrees |
|||
Further to [[#Finalizing the changeover to the oversight requests email address|the previous announcement]], the <code>[[mail:oversight-l|oversight-l]]</code> mailing list has been closed to non-subscribers. It auto-responds to incoming correspondence from non-members with instructions to visit [[WP:RFO|Requests for Oversight]] to request suppression. The Wikipedia page provides several methods of requesting suppression, including emailing {{nospam|oversight-en-wp|lists.wikimedia.org}}, which is an [[WP:OTRS|OTRS]] queue. <span style="font-variant:small-caps">[[User:John Vandenberg|John Vandenberg]] <sup>'''([[User talk:John Vandenberg|chat]])'''</sup></span> 01:07, 4 September 2011 (UTC) |
|||
For the Arbitration Committee, [[User:Maxim|Maxim]] ([[User talk:Maxim|talk]]) 15:19, 26 April 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:'''[[Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive 15#oversight-l closed for business|Archived discussion]]''' |
|||
: Archived discussion at: '''{{slink|Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive 51|Dovidroth unbanned}}'''<!-- [[User:ArbClerkBot|ArbClerkBot]] ([[User talk:ArbClerkBot|talk]]) 15:19, 26 April 2024 (UTC) --><!--Template:hes--> |
|||
== Changes to the functionaries team, May 2024 == |
|||
== [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Manipulation of BLPs]] closed == |
|||
Following a request to the Arbitration Committee, the Oversight access of [[User:Dreamy Jazz|Dreamy Jazz]] is removed. The Committee sincerely thanks Dreamy Jazz for their service as a member of the Oversight team. |
|||
An arbitration case regarding Manipulation of BLPs has now closed and the final decision is viewable at the link above. The following is a summary of the remedies enacted: |
|||
#Editors who edit biographies of living persons and other articles referring to living persons are reminded that all editing of these articles must comply with [[Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons|the biographies of living persons policy]] and with the principles set forth in this decision; |
|||
#Administrators and other experienced editors are urged to take a proactive approach in addressing violations and alleged violations of the BLP policy, and to watchlist [[WP:BLP/N|the BLP noticeboard]] and participate in discussing and resolving issues raised on that noticeboard; |
|||
#To the extent that parties to this case have been engaged in protracted disputes and quarrels with other parties, the feuding parties are urged to avoid any unnecessary interactions with each other, except to the extent necessary for legitimate purposes such as dispute resolution; |
|||
#If disputes concerning editing of biographical articles by parties to this case persist, appropriate dispute resolution methods should be pursued. To the extent possible, such dispute resolution should be led and addressed by editors who have not previously been involved in the disputes. If a specific serious dispute persists and other means of dispute resolution do not resolve them, a new and specifically focused request for arbitration may be filed not less than 30 days from the date of this decision. |
|||
On behalf of the Committee, [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 14:27, 1 May 2024 (UTC) |
|||
: Discuss this at: '''{{slink|Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard|Changes to the functionaries team, May 2024}}'''<!-- [[User:ArbClerkBot|ArbClerkBot]] ([[User talk:ArbClerkBot|talk]]) 14:27, 1 May 2024 (UTC) --><!--Template:hes--> |
|||
== [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Mzajac]] closed == |
|||
An arbitration case regarding [[User:Mzajac]] has now closed. The Arbitration Committee resolved by motion in February to suspend the case, which could be unsuspended if Mzajac requested it within three months. Because Mzajac has not requested that the case be unsuspended, the case has been automatically closed. The motion which has now closed the case is [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Mzajac#Motion to suspend]]. |
|||
== Arbitration motion regarding [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Date delinking]] == |
|||
For the Arbitration Committee, [[User:Aoidh|Aoidh]] ([[User talk:Aoidh|talk]]) 21:00, 7 May 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Resolved by <span class="plainlinks">[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Amendment&oldid=449207107#Motion motion]</span> at [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Amendment]] that: |
|||
: Discuss this at: '''{{slink|Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard|Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Mzajac closed}}'''<!-- [[User:ArbClerkBot|ArbClerkBot]] ([[User talk:ArbClerkBot|talk]]) 21:01, 7 May 2024 (UTC) --><!--Template:hes--> |
|||
The [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Date_delinking|''Date delinking'']] case is amended as follows: |
|||
<blockquote> |
|||
Remedies 16 and 18 (as amended) are terminated, effective immediately. [[User:Ohconfucius|Ohconfucius]] is reminded that this subject remains within the jurisdiction of the Arbitration Committee, and that he is expected to abide by all applicable policies and guidelines, especially those concerning the editing and discussion of policies and guidelines, and the use of alternate accounts. </blockquote> |
|||
For the Arbitration Committee, [[User:AlexandrDmitri|Alexandr Dmitri]] ([[User talk:AlexandrDmitri|talk]]) 16:51, 9 September 2011 (UTC)<br> |
|||
:'''[[Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive 15#Arbitration motion regarding Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Date delinking|Archived discussion]]''' |
|||
== [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Cirt and Jayen466]] closed == |
|||
An arbitration case regarding the conduct of [[User:Cirt]] and [[User:Jayen466]] has been closed and may be viewed at the link above. The following is a summary of enacted remedies: |
|||
# Cirt is topic-banned indefinitely from making any edits to articles related to new religious movements, their adherents, and any related biographies of living people, broadly construed. |
|||
# Cirt is further restricted on biographies of living people if the articles are substantially about, or Cirt's edits introduce material relating to: politics, religion, or social controversy. Cirt is permitted to edit articles incidentally related to such topics provided the articles, and Cirt's edits, are not biographical in nature. The Committee may extend this restriction if BLP-related problems continue, and Cirt may request relaxation of this restriction after one year from this date if there are no further problems. |
|||
# Cirt is desysopped for admitted violations of the [[WP:NPOV|neutral point of view]] and [[WP:BLP|biographies of living people]] policies. He may reapply for adminship through [[WP:RFA|requests for adminship]] at any time. |
|||
# Jayen466 is reminded to strictly adhere to dispute resolution processes in any future disputes. |
|||
# Cirt and Jayen466 are subject to an interaction restriction wherein they may not communicate with each other, nor comment on each other, or each other's actions or edits, directly or indirectly, anywhere on Wikipedia. Comments on the same page are permissible provided the previously mentioned restrictions are upheld. Neither party may respond directly to any violations of this or any other remedy, but shall report any violations via email directly to the Arbitration Committee. |
|||
# Any violation of these restrictions may be enforced by block, to be logged at [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Cirt and Jayen466#Log of blocks, bans, and restrictions]]. |
|||
For the Arbitration Committee, [[User:Hersfold|'''''<em style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:blue">Hers</em><em style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:gold">fold</em>''''']] <sup>([[User:Hersfold/t|t]]/[[User:Hersfold/a|a]]/[[Special:Contributions/Hersfold|c]])</sup> 00:30, 10 September 2011 (UTC) |
|||
:'''[[Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive 15#Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Cirt and Jayen466 closed|Archived discussion]]''' |
|||
== 2011 CheckUser and Oversight appointments: Call for applications == |
|||
The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee]] is [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/CheckUser and Oversight/2011 CUOS appointments|seeking to appoint additional users]] to the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/CheckUser and Oversight|CheckUser and Oversight teams]]. Experienced editors are invited to apply for either or both of the permissions, and current holders of either permission are also invited to apply for the other. |
|||
Successful candidates are likely to be regularly available and already familiar with local and global processes, policies, and guidelines especially those concerning [[wikipedia:CheckUser|CheckUser]] and [[wikipedia:Oversight|Oversight]]. CheckUser candidates are expected to be technically proficient, and previous experience with [[OTRS]] is beneficial for Oversight candidates. Trusted users who frequent IRC are also encouraged to apply for either permission. All candidates must at least 18 years of age; have attained legal majority in their jurisdiction of residence; and be willing to identify to the Wikimedia Foundation prior to receiving permissions. |
|||
;Current demand for users with regional knowledge: Because of the increasing activity from the South Asian, Southeast Asian, or Middle Eastern regions, CheckUser applications are particularly sought from people who not only meet our general requirements but also are familiar with the ISPs and typical editing patterns of any of these regions. |
|||
If you think you may be suitably qualified, please see the '''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/CheckUser and Oversight/2011 CUOS appointments|appointments page]]''' for further information. The application period is scheduled to close 18 September 2011. |
|||
For the Arbitration Committee, –[[user:xeno|<font face="verdana" color="black">'''xeno'''</font>]][[user talk:xeno|<font color="black"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 16:40, 12 September 2011 (UTC) |
|||
:'''[[Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive 15#2011 CheckUser and Oversight appointments: Call for applications|Archived discussion]]''' |
|||
== Appeal to BASC: Iantresman == |
|||
The Ban Appeals Subcommittee has allowed the appeal of: |
|||
:{{user|Iantresman}} |
|||
The text of the decision has been posted on the editor's talk page. |
|||
For the Arbitration Committee, [[User:Mailer diablo|Mailer Diablo]] 11:29, 18 September 2011 (UTC) |
|||
:'''[[Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive 15#Appeal to BASC: Iantresman|Archived discussion]]''' |
|||
== Appeal to BASC: Nelsondenis248 == |
|||
The Ban Appeals Subcommittee has allowed the appeal of: |
|||
:{{user|Nelsondenis248}} |
|||
The text of the decision has been posted on the editor's talk page. |
|||
For the Arbitration Committee, <font color="#cc6600">[[User:David Fuchs|Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs]]</font><sup><small>(<font color="#ff6600">[[User talk:David Fuchs|talk]]</font>)</small></sup> 14:40, 19 September 2011 (UTC) |
|||
:'''[[Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive 15#Appeal to BASC: Nelsondenis248|Archived discussion]]''' |
|||
== 2011 CheckUser and Oversight appointments: Invitation to comment on candidates == |
|||
The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee]] is [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/CheckUser and Oversight/2011 CUOS appointments|seeking to appoint additional users]] to the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/CheckUser and Oversight|CheckUser and Oversight teams]], and is now seeking comments from the community regarding the candidates who have volunteered for this role. |
|||
Interested parties are invited to review the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/CheckUser and Oversight/2011 CUOS appointments|'''appointments page''']] containing the nomination statements supplied by the candidates and their answers to a few standard questions. Community members may also pose additional questions and submit comments about the candidates on the individual nomination subpages or privately via email to {{NoSpam|arbcom-en-b|lists.wikimedia.org}}. |
|||
Following the consultation phase, the committee will take into account the answers provided by the candidates to the questions and the comments offered by the community (both publicly and privately) along with all other relevant factors before making a final decision regarding appointments. |
|||
The consultation phase is scheduled to end 23:59, 4 October 2011 (UTC), and the appointments are scheduled to be announced by 10 October 2011. |
|||
For the Arbitration Committee, –[[user:xeno|<font face="verdana" color="black">'''xeno'''</font>]][[user talk:xeno|<font color="black"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 14:00, 26 September 2011 (UTC) |
|||
:'''[[Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive 15#2011 CheckUser and Oversight appointments: Invitation to comment on candidates|Archived discussion]]''' |
|||
== [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Senkaku Islands]] closed == |
|||
An arbitration case regarding Senkaku Islands has now closed and the final decision is viewable at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted: |
|||
#[[User:Tenmei]] is <u>indefinitely</u> topic banned from the subject of Senkaku Islands, widely construed. The topic ban includes talk pages, wikipedia space and userspace. |
|||
#Tenmei is advised that his unusual style of communication has not been conducive to resolving this dispute. Accordingly, Tenmei is urged to develop a different style of communication, which is more similar to that used by experienced Wikipedia editors. Until this happens, Tenmei is advised not to engage in topics which are the subject of a dispute. |
|||
#Tenmei is banned for one year. |
|||
#[[User:Bobthefish2]] is topic banned from the subject of Senkaku Islands, widely construed, for <u>one year</u>. The topic ban includes talk pages, wikipedia space and user space. |
|||
#[[User:STSC]] is warned to avoid any sexualisation of discussions, especially during disputes. |
|||
#The parties are reminded that attempts to use Wikipedia as a battleground may result in the summary imposition of additional sanctions, up to and including a ban from the project. |
|||
#The topic covered by the article currently located at [[Senkaku Islands]], interpreted broadly, is placed under [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions|standard discretionary sanctions]]. Any uninvolved administrator may levy restrictions as an [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement action]] on users editing in this topic area, after an initial warning. |
|||
#An uninvolved administrator may, after a warning given a month prior, place any set of pages relating to a territorial dispute of islands in East Asia, broadly interpreted, under [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions|standard discretionary sanctions]] for six months if the editing community is unable to reach consensus on the proper names to be used to refer to the disputed islands.<p>While a territorial dispute is subject to discretionary sanctions due to this remedy, any uninvolved administrator may levy restrictions as an [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement|arbitration enforcement action]] on users editing in these topical areas, after an initial warning. |
|||
For the Arbitration Committee, [[User:AlexandrDmitri|Alexandr Dmitri]] ([[User talk:AlexandrDmitri|talk]]) 21:30, 5 October 2011 (UTC) |
|||
:'''[[Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive 15#Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Senkaku Islands closed|Archived discussion]]''' |
|||
== 2011 CheckUser and Oversight appointments & personnel changes == |
|||
The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee]] has resolved to appoint five editors to the [[Wikipedia:CheckUser|CheckUser]] team and three editors to the [[Wikipedia:Oversight|Oversight]] team pursuant to the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/CheckUser and Oversight|CheckUser and Oversight appointment procedures]] and following the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/CheckUser and Oversight/2011 CUOS appointments|2011 CUOS appointments]] process. |
|||
Subject to their providing identification satisfactory to the Wikimedia Foundation, the Arbitration Committee hereby resolves to: |
|||
(a) appoint the following editors as checkusers: |
|||
* {{admin|AGK}}<sup>†</sup> |
|||
* {{admin|Courcelles}}<sup>†</sup> |
|||
* {{admin|Elockid}} |
|||
* {{admin|Keegan}}<sup>†</sup> |
|||
* {{admin|WilliamH}} |
|||
(b) appoint the following editors as oversighters: |
|||
* {{admin|Courcelles}}<sup>†</sup> |
|||
* {{admin|Fluffernutter}} |
|||
* {{admin|WilliamH}} |
|||
:<small>† Previously identified member of the [[Wikipedia:Audit Subcommittee|Audit Subcommittee]] who will retain the specified permission(s) upon the conclusion of their terms.</small> |
|||
The committee thanks the other candidates ([[User:28bytes|28bytes]], [[User:HelloAnnyong|HelloAnnyong]], [[User:Kww|Kww]], and [[User:Mentifisto|Mentifisto]]); those who applied but were not put forward as candidates; and the community in bringing this appointment process to a successful conclusion. |
|||
The committee also recognizes the departures of [[User:Dominic|Dominic]] and [[User:Nishkid64|Nishkid64]] from their dual roles on the CheckUser and Oversight teams; along with [[User:EVula|EVula]], [[User:Howcheng|Howcheng]], & [[User:Mr.Z-man|Mr.Z-man]] from the Oversight team; and thanks these editors for their diligent service as functionaries and their extensive contributions elsewhere on the project. |
|||
At the request of arbitrator [[User:Iridescent|Iridescent]], checkuser and oversight permissions will be removed from their account until such time as Iridescent is able to return to active participation. |
|||
:'''Supporting motion:''' Casliber; Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry; Coren; David Fuchs; Jclemens; John Vandenberg; Kirill Lokshin; Mailer diablo; PhilKnight; Newyorkbrad; Roger Davies; Risker; SirFozzie; Xeno |
|||
:'''Not voting/inactive:''' Cool Hand Luke; Elen of the Roads; Iridescent |
|||
For the Arbitration Committee, –[[user:xeno|<font face="verdana" color="black">'''xeno'''</font>]][[user talk:xeno|<font color="black"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 13:00, 13 October 2011 (UTC) |
|||
:[[Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard#2011 CheckUser and Oversight appointments & personnel changes|'''Discuss this''']] |
|||
Latest revision as of 17:52, 8 May 2024
| Wikipedia Arbitration |
|---|
 |
|
|
| Track related changes |
This noticeboard is for announcements and statements made by the Arbitration Committee. Only members of the Arbitration Committee or the Committee's Clerks may post on this page, but all editors are encouraged to comment on the talk page.
Arbitration motion regarding Skepticism and coordinated editing
The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:
For violations of their topic ban and for continued editing which violate the conflict of interest guidelines, Rp2006 is blocked for 1 month. This block may be appealed only to the Arbitration Committee.
For the Arbitration Committee, Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 14:20, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Archived discussion at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive 51 § Arbitration motion regarding Skepticism and coordinated editing
Arbitration motion regarding Sri Lanka
The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion, in resolution of a case request, that:
This case request is resolved by motion as follows:
Sri Lanka, broadly construed, is designated as a contentious topic.
For the Arbitration Committee, firefly ( t · c ) 14:38, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Archived discussion at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive 51 § Arbitration motion regarding Sri Lanka
Dovidroth unbanned
Following a successful appeal of his site ban to the Arbitration Committee, Dovidroth (talk · contribs) is unbanned. The topic ban, which was passed at the same time as the site ban, remains in force.
Support: Barkeep49, Guerillero, HJ Mitchell, Maxim, Primefac, Sdrqaz, ToBeFree
Oppose: Firefly, Moneytrees
For the Arbitration Committee, Maxim (talk) 15:19, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Archived discussion at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive 51 § Dovidroth unbanned
Changes to the functionaries team, May 2024
Following a request to the Arbitration Committee, the Oversight access of Dreamy Jazz is removed. The Committee sincerely thanks Dreamy Jazz for their service as a member of the Oversight team.
On behalf of the Committee, Primefac (talk) 14:27, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard § Changes to the functionaries team, May 2024
An arbitration case regarding User:Mzajac has now closed. The Arbitration Committee resolved by motion in February to suspend the case, which could be unsuspended if Mzajac requested it within three months. Because Mzajac has not requested that the case be unsuspended, the case has been automatically closed. The motion which has now closed the case is Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Mzajac#Motion to suspend.
For the Arbitration Committee, Aoidh (talk) 21:00, 7 May 2024 (UTC)