Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Green restaurants: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Green restaurants: always look before speaking
Line 12: Line 12:
*'''Delete''' - This article is mostly a collection of copyright violations. Each citation in the article points to the website from which the content was copied or paraphrased. However, despite copyright violations, the article is about a non-notable intersection of [[Environmentalism]] and [[Restaurant]]. [[User:Snottywong|<span style="font:13px 'Copperplate Gothic Light';border:#AAAACC 1px inset;background-color:#F2F9FA;color=#DD0000">Snotty<font color="#648113">Wong</font></span>]]&nbsp;<sup><small>[[User talk:Snottywong|babble]]</small></sup> 20:17, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' - This article is mostly a collection of copyright violations. Each citation in the article points to the website from which the content was copied or paraphrased. However, despite copyright violations, the article is about a non-notable intersection of [[Environmentalism]] and [[Restaurant]]. [[User:Snottywong|<span style="font:13px 'Copperplate Gothic Light';border:#AAAACC 1px inset;background-color:#F2F9FA;color=#DD0000">Snotty<font color="#648113">Wong</font></span>]]&nbsp;<sup><small>[[User talk:Snottywong|babble]]</small></sup> 20:17, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' The green restaurant concept is quite notable and I have cited a couple of encyclopedia to demonstrate this. The article title would be better as ''Green restaurant'' per [[WP:SINGULAR]]. Any objections if I move it, as part of the process of clean up and improvement? [[User:Colonel Warden|Colonel Warden]] ([[User talk:Colonel Warden|talk]]) 12:50, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' The green restaurant concept is quite notable and I have cited a couple of encyclopedia to demonstrate this. The article title would be better as ''Green restaurant'' per [[WP:SINGULAR]]. Any objections if I move it, as part of the process of clean up and improvement? [[User:Colonel Warden|Colonel Warden]] ([[User talk:Colonel Warden|talk]]) 12:50, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' Before trying to decide if something is notable or not, its best to spend a brief moment clicking on the Google news search at the top of the AFD. Notice that many news sources have covered this concept, they thus notable enough for a Wikipedia article about them. 265 results. Just read through the titles and the summaries and some stand out right away. Like the one from the [[Houston Chronicle]] titled [http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/life/main/6679306.html The Haven of green restaurants]. [[User:Dream Focus | '''<span style="color:blue">D</span><span style="color:green">r</span><span style="color:red">e</span><span style="color:orange">a</span><span style="color:purple">m</span> <span style="color:blue">Focus</span>]]''' 17:10, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:10, 21 November 2010

Green restaurants

Green restaurants (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

How-to guide with little encyclopedic content and no indication of notability Mean as custard (talk) 12:21, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Of course being "green" is a good thing for a restaurant, as for any other human endeavour, but not really notable as a topic. Same as "inexpensive restaurant" of "green drug store" would not be. Or any other combination of adjective and noun unless some new meaning is created beyond that of each word. Borock (talk) 15:50, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:03, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:04, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:04, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete (even though I am a greenie!) per all the above comments. There may be, however, room for a Sustainability in the food service industry article at some point in the future. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 18:59, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - This article is mostly a collection of copyright violations. Each citation in the article points to the website from which the content was copied or paraphrased. However, despite copyright violations, the article is about a non-notable intersection of Environmentalism and Restaurant. SnottyWong babble 20:17, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep The green restaurant concept is quite notable and I have cited a couple of encyclopedia to demonstrate this. The article title would be better as Green restaurant per WP:SINGULAR. Any objections if I move it, as part of the process of clean up and improvement? Colonel Warden (talk) 12:50, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Before trying to decide if something is notable or not, its best to spend a brief moment clicking on the Google news search at the top of the AFD. Notice that many news sources have covered this concept, they thus notable enough for a Wikipedia article about them. 265 results. Just read through the titles and the summaries and some stand out right away. Like the one from the Houston Chronicle titled The Haven of green restaurants. Dream Focus 17:10, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]