Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zack Heart

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Cirt (talk) 05:16, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Zack Heart

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable actor. I'm unable to find any reliable, secondary sources that discuss the subject of this article. Mesoderm (talk) 05:12, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Unable to find any sources other than Facebook, which we all know is unacceptable. Also, the actor does not seem to be as well know in their work. Tootalldk (talk) 15:25, 4 July 2011

Point Of Information: About a month ago I added this page to several Australian TV lists, to get more people familiar with Australian TV working on it (I'm Canadian). At the time I checked the list of work that they had in hand, and it did not appear that they would get around to looking at the page before the end of the year. Like everyone else, they are suffering from a lack of volunteers. UrbanTerrorist (talk) 21:42, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Point Of Information: Krystic1 who is responsible for most of the work on the Zack Heart page has posted a couple of confused comments here and here indicating that he couldn't find the Articles for Deletion page. I've left links for him to follow, which hopefully will allow him to make his way to this page. Note that he's still having some difficulties with Wikimarkup like we all did when new to Wikipedia. UrbanTerrorist (talk) 01:12, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Point Of Information: I've just noticed that Krystic1 has a talk page, but no 'about' page. That's why his name shows up in red. UrbanTerrorist (talk) 01:15, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. — —Tom Morris (talk) 11:33, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. — —Tom Morris (talk) 11:33, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The first 130 search pages give the IMDB entry or clones, this link which says he made the bush fire wildlife TV special, and this link where Wildlife Victoria thanks him for it. I could find nothing else of any substance, nothing in News, Books or Scholar. Not notable. Aymatth2 (talk) 19:01, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Lacks any reliable independent sources that confirm notability. WWGB (talk) 00:09, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per lack of notable mentions, both a Google and Yahoo search don't have any standing out that is notable. SwisterTwister talk 05:20, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Editors, I am new to wikipedia and am the person that created Mr Heart's page. I am a fan and intern and have been helped along with the page by editor Bgwhite. I have been away only to return and find this page up for deletion. Before I went away I was advised by Bgwhite that the page had enough references with imdb providing more than two, and now other editors have said imdb's not a valid information source. If actors haven't worked on tv or film productions they cannot get credited on imdb so i dont understand why other editors say its no good. My intention was to do get the page up to a stage where it looked fine and I would continue working on it when I returned. Urbanterrorist went to Mr Hearts page and created all the citations and things the page didn't have to satisfy his own personal issues with Mr Heart who he doesn't even know and in a matter which has nothing to do with him. He has pushed this page as far as he could and now its here. This isn't fair. There are so many wikipedia pages on living people that have no references what so ever and very little information and they've been left alone for years. I am about to add more information, references of articles, tv news, celebrity sites etc on Mr Heart so could you please give me the chance to do this? I don't understand the correct way to format references but I will do my best. Thank you (Krystic1 (talk) 06:24, 12 July 2011 (UTC))[reply]

Point Of Information The entry above this line is a "RETAIN", the person who wrote is does not understand how an AfD works and therefore didn't tag it as such. I also wanted to bring to your attention that the References section on the page has been heavily expanded in the last few days. If you look at this comparison you will see what I mean. UrbanTerrorist (talk) 03:01, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

What is wrong with you people?? I added numerous valid references and you deleted the page! Did you even bother to look??!! I followed the Wikipedia guidelines and you self appointed editors just do what ever the hell you want. Thanks Mr Borean