Wikipedia:Bot Approvals Group/nominations/Hersfold

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Fastily (talk | contribs) at 16:18, 10 August 2011 (→‎Discussion: s). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

BAG Nomination: Hersfold

Per Slakr's recent self-nomination, it looks like the BAG could use a bit more help, especially from active 'crats. I run three bots, two on en.wiki (User:HersfoldBot and User:HersfoldArbClerkBot); I'm an admin and crat; I have a toolserver account; I'm experienced in coding, most particularly in Java, C, and PHP. Anything else you'd like to know, please feel free to ask. :-) Hersfold (t/a/c) 18:32, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Questions

How many and which BRfAs have you been involved with other than your own? Searching, I can only find Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/DuckBot, are there any others? - Kingpin13 (talk) 10:23, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Off the top of my head, that would be it. I've read through a good number when working on my bots, but that's the only other one I've commented on. Hersfold (t/a/c) 14:51, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

  • No concerns here. –xenotalk 18:48, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Sounds good to me. MBisanz talk 18:59, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yup. Tim1357 talk 19:01, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • No problems here. /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 19:16, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Considering that the main reason you ran for 'crat was to assist with bot stuff, I certainly would think that this makes sense. Sven Manguard Wha? 19:53, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • This is a no-brainer support. OhanaUnitedTalk page 20:29, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Of course. — The Earwig (talk) 21:28, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - the offer to assist is appreciated - shoe in/snow in - Off2riorob (talk) 21:40, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Excellent history with Wikimedia Commons and their bots. TeleComNasSprVen (talkcontribs) 17:22, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - considering based on the workload you've already taken on and complete well, I've been sure for quite some time that you're a well functioning, self adaptable, well programmed bot - thusI see no problems with this. ;-) ROBERTMFROMLI | TK/CN 06:02, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Why not? -FASTILY (TALK) 16:18, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]