Wikipedia:Featured sound candidates/Suite du Premier Ton: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 02:31, 14 April 2011

Template:Multi-listen item A fine performance of a piece by a notable 18th-century organist.

Another fine performance, on a different organ.

Nominate and support either or both. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 20:12, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support what a delightful performance. Very high quality recording. —Ancient Apparition • Champagne? • 5:46pm • 07:46, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I'll leave a message on your talk page. It's been pointed out we have two, and both are very good. 17:27, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
Support both or either--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 13:57, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I think both are very nice performances; if we really want to choose just one to feature, I prefer the first file, as the second sounds muddier (perhaps due to the characteristics of the room it was recorded in). Kat Walsh (spill your mind?) 02:31, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 20: / Line 20: @@
 **I'll leave a message on your talk page. It's been pointed out we have two, and both are very good. 17:27, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
 *'''Support both or either'''--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|C]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|BIO]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:FOUR]]) </small> 13:57, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
+*I think both are very nice performances; if we really want to choose just one to feature, I prefer the first file, as the second sounds muddier (perhaps due to the characteristics of the room it was recorded in). [[User:Mindspillage|Kat Walsh]] [[User talk:Mindspillage|(spill your mind?)]] 02:31, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
 <!-- additional votes go above this line -->
 <br style="clear:both;" />