Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous edit
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Noticeboard for edit warring}}
<center>'''Do not continue a dispute on this page: Please keep on topic.'''</center>
<!--Adds protection template automatically if semi-protected--><noinclude>{{#if:{{PROTECTIONLEVEL:edit}}|{{pp|small=yes}}}}__NEWSECTIONLINK__{{no admin backlog}}{{/Header}}[[Category:Non-talk pages that are automatically signed]] [[Category:Wikipedia edit warring]]
{{Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRHeader}}
{{pp-move|small=yes}}
<!-- BEGIN WERDNABOT ARCHIVAL CODE --><!-- This page is automatically archived by Werdnabot-->{{User:Werdnabot/Archiver/Linkhere}} <!--This is an empty template, but transcluding it counts as a link, meaning Werdnabot is directed to this page - DO NOT SUBST IT --><!--Werdnabot-Archive Age-3 DoUnreplied-Yes Target-Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive31--><!--END WERDNABOT ARCHIVAL CODE-->
{{User:MiszaBot/config
|archiveheader = {{Administrators' noticeboard navbox all}}
|maxarchivesize = 250K
|counter = 482
|algo = old(2d)
|key = 0a3bba89e703569428f2aab1add75bd7d7d1583d2d1f397783aee23fda62b06f
|archive = Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive%(counter)d
}}</noinclude><!--
NOTE: THE *BOTTOM* IS THE PLACE FOR NEW REPORTS. -->


== [[User:MylowattsIAm]] reported by [[User:Moxy]] (Result: Blocked 72 hours) ==
==Violations==


'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Germany}}
Please place new reports '''at the bottom'''.


'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|MylowattsIAm}}
===[[User:Radiant!]] reported by User:[[User:John254|John254]] (Result: Warning)===


'''Previous version reverted to:'''
[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Wikipedia:Discuss, don't vote}}. {{3RRV|Radiant!}}:


'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
* Previous version reverted to: complex partial reversions
# {{diff2|1221857738|12:05, 2 May 2024 (UTC)}} "Maybe just leave it in there and then start the talk page thingy like I suggested several times before? Would be kinda cool if you took other users into consideration."
# {{diff2|1221857213|12:00, 2 May 2024 (UTC)}} "Undid revision [[Special:Diff/1221854606|1221854606]] by [[Special:Contributions/Moxy|Moxy]] ([[User talk:Moxy|talk]])"
# {{diff2|1221853428|11:20, 2 May 2024 (UTC)}} "I saw what was linked but it still doesnt explain anything. What I meant is that if other articles also mention vice-chancellors and vice-presidents then it would only make sense if this did too. It would make sense for certain types of articles to follow a certain pattern. After I last revered Nikkimaria there were edits by several other editors and noone seemed to have a problem with the vice-chancellor being mentioned. If you want it so bad for it to be removed then discuss it on talk page."
# {{diff2|1221777159|22:54, 1 May 2024 (UTC)}} "Undid revision [[Special:Diff/1221768509|1221768509]] by [[Special:Contributions/Nikkimaria|Nikkimaria]] ([[User talk:Nikkimaria|talk]]) That doesnt explain anything. Please stop edit warring and making unreasonable reverts. Discuss it on talk page whether it should be removed or not. Otherwise it can stay as is."
# {{diff2|1221672885|09:08, 1 May 2024 (UTC)}} "Undid revision [[Special:Diff/1221622634|1221622634]] by [[Special:Contributions/Nikkimaria|Nikkimaria]] ([[User talk:Nikkimaria|talk]]) If we can show the vice-president of US in the infobox of USA as well as vice-presidents of other countries in their infobox then there is no reason why the German vice-chancellor cant be shown in the infobox for being the third highest ranking official of Germany. Some countries even have up to five leaders in the infobox anyways."


'''Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:'''
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ADiscuss%2C_don%27t_vote&diff=96397083&oldid=95689211 09:37, 25 December 2006] removes disputed tag with red question mark previously [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ADiscuss%2C_don%27t_vote&diff=95689211&oldid=95588018 added to page]
# {{diff2|1221858104|12:10, 2 May 2024 (UTC)}} "Warning: Three-revert rule on [[:Germany]]."
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Discuss%2C_don%27t_vote&diff=next&oldid=96405109 12:06, 25 December 2006] removes "There has been no consensus" language added in [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Discuss%2C_don%27t_vote&diff=prev&oldid=96405109 the previous edit]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Discuss%2C_don%27t_vote&diff=next&oldid=96405991 12:11, 25 December 2006] restores "This page is a clear and accurate description of how Wikipedia works.", which was removed in the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Discuss%2C_don%27t_vote&diff=prev&oldid=96405991 previous edit]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Discuss%2C_don%27t_vote&diff=next&oldid=96406326 12:17, 25 December 2006] removes "essay", and replaces it with "page", undoing the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Discuss%2C_don%27t_vote&diff=prev&oldid=96406326 previous edit]


'''Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:'''
''' Comments:''' The [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ADiscuss%2C_don%27t_vote&diff=96406624&oldid=96406535 fourth edit] by [[User:Netscott|Netscott]] is not a reversion. [[User:John254|John254]] 15:42, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
no ongoping tlak in this cases at time of this post ...but we have talked about honorary titles before.
:John, there has been a technical violation here, but I'm not keen on blocking an established editor with no prior blocks over a tag dispute on a project page. Also, the first revert is arguably an edit. I'd prefer just to leave a note for him asking him to watch the reverting in future. [[User:SlimVirgin|SlimVirgin]] <sup><font color="Purple">[[User_talk:SlimVirgin|(talk)]]</font></sup> 11:25, 26 December 2006 (UTC)


<u>'''Comments:'''</u>
::He's an administrator and should know better. If he's keen on reversing things under discussion (I have seen him do this before) that is inappropriate. If he is in violation, he should be treated as any other editor would be and get a block. He should not be given special treatment and held to lesser standards of behavior because he's an administrator. -[[User:THB|THB]] 12:46, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Somewhat new editor...if there willing to go to talk perhaps block can be avoided. '''NEW TALK''' [[Talk:Germany#Honorary titles in infobox]]<span style="font-weight:bold;color:darkblue">[[User:Moxy|Moxy]]</span>🍁 12:22, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
*{{AN3|b|72 hours}}. [[User:Bbb23|Bbb23]] ([[User talk:Bbb23|talk]]) 13:46, 2 May 2024 (UTC)


== [[User:197.231.201.171]] reported by [[User:Neuropol]] (Result: ) ==
:::It's for a number of reasons, THB. First, the report is ambiguous, because it's not clear that the first revert is a revert, and anyway if you look at the edits, you'll see they're inching toward a resolution; it's not just a pointless back and forth. Secondly, this is an established editor (admin has nothing to do with it) with no blocks to his name, despite being here since Feb 2005. Third, it was a dispute over a tag on a project page. For those three reasons jointly, I believe a note on his page is appropriate here. [[User:SlimVirgin|SlimVirgin]] <sup><font color="Purple">[[User_talk:SlimVirgin|(talk)]]</font></sup> 13:39, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
::::I totally agree. -- ''[[User:FayssalF|<font size="2px" face="Verdana"><font color="DarkSlateBlue">Szvest</font></font>]]'' - <small>[[User talk:FayssalF|<font style="background: gold"><sup>''Wiki me up ®''</sup></font>]]</small> 13:45, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
:::::Good call by [[User:SlimVirgin]]. I agree that technically it was a vio... but SlimVirgin's reasoning is essentially sound with the slight caveat that [[User:Radiant!]]'s page/activity sat rather [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Radiant%21&oldid=38684932 dormant] for months. {{User:Netscott/s1.js}} 15:52, 26 December 2006 (UTC)


'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Ishaaq bin Ahmed}}
===[[User:Mamin27]] reported by User:<tt class="plainlinks">[[User:Khoikhoi|Khoi]][[User talk:Khoikhoi|khoi]]</tt> (Result: 24 hours)===


'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|197.231.201.171}}
[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Han_Chinese}}. {{3RRV|Mamin27}}:


* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Han_Chinese&oldid=95471393 06:39, 20 December 2006]
'''Previous version reverted to:'''
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Han_Chinese&diff=96384442&oldid=95742286 06:25, 25 December 2006]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Han_Chinese&diff=96489774&oldid=96435146 02:43, 26 December 2006]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Han_Chinese&diff=96499711&oldid=96499064 04:08, 26 December 2006]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Han_Chinese&diff=96501643&oldid=96500902 04:24, 26 December 2006]


'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
''' Comments:''' <!-- Optional -->
# {{diff2|1221867807|13:32, 2 May 2024 (UTC)}} "Undid revision [[Special:Diff/1221867506|1221867506]] by [[Special:Contributions/Neuropol|Neuropol]] ([[User talk:Neuropol|talk]])"
Please check his block log. <tt class="plainlinks">[[User:Khoikhoi|Khoi]][[User talk:Khoikhoi|khoi]]</tt> 05:34, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
# {{diff2|1221867421|13:30, 2 May 2024 (UTC)}} "Undid revision [[Special:Diff/1221866547|1221866547]] by [[Special:Contributions/Neuropol|Neuropol]] ([[User talk:Neuropol|talk]])"
:1ne blocked him for 24 hours. [[User:SlimVirgin|SlimVirgin]] <sup><font color="Purple">[[User_talk:SlimVirgin|(talk)]]</font></sup> 11:20, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
# {{diff2|1221866389|13:23, 2 May 2024 (UTC)}} "Undid revision [[Special:Diff/1221861674|1221861674]] by [[Special:Contributions/Neuropol|Neuropol]] ([[User talk:Neuropol|talk]])"


'''Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:'''
===[[User:Chuck0]] reported by User:[[User:Your honor|Your honor]] (Result: Page protected)===
# {{diff2|1221866596|13:24, 2 May 2024 (UTC)}} "Warning: Edit warring on [[:Ishaaq bin Ahmed]]."
<!-- If your signature has additional fonts, please enter only your username manually -->
# {{diff2|1221867545|13:31, 2 May 2024 (UTC)}} "Warning: Edit warring on [[:Ishaaq bin Ahmed]]."


'''Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:'''
[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Chuck Munson}}. {{3RRV|Chuck0}}:
<!-- USE UNDERSCORE INSTEAD OF SPACE! -->


* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chuck_Munson&diff=96503793&oldid=96381654]
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to. For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert. -->
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chuck_Munson&diff=96503793&oldid=96502930 04:44, 26 December 2006]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chuck_Munson&diff=96505641&oldid=96505005 05:00, 26 December 2006]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chuck_Munson&diff=96507590&oldid=96506038 05:20, 26 December 2006]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chuck_Munson&diff=96509027&oldid=96508374 26 December 2006]
<!-- These MUST be DIFFS, not OLDIDs. Look up [[Help:Diff]] if you do not know what a diff is. -->
3RR warning just a short while ago previously by an administrator on his talk page: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AChuck0&diff=96490096&oldid=96217559]


<u>'''Comments:'''</u>
<!--
# Update: User has initiated a discussion with me on [[User talk:Neuropol|my talk page]].
- * Necessary only for new users: A diff of 3RR warning _before_ this report was filed here.
Your report may be ignored if it is not placed properly.
-->


== [[User:128.92.27.115]] reported by [[User:Neuropol]] (Result: Blocked 31h) ==
''' Comments:''' <!-- Optional -->
:This doesn't appear to be a 3RR violation, as the first revert above appears to have been the first edit. It's a moot point anyway because Will Beback has protected the page. [[User:SlimVirgin|SlimVirgin]] <sup><font color="Purple">[[User_talk:SlimVirgin|(talk)]]</font></sup> 11:18, 26 December 2006 (UTC)


'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Kenosha unrest shooting}}
===[[User:Hillock65]] reported by [[User:Humus sapiens]] (Result: 24 hours)===


'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|128.92.27.115}}
[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|History of the Jews in Ukraine}}. {{3RRV|Hillock65}}:


'''Previous version reverted to:'''
* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=History_of_the_Jews_in_Ukraine&oldid=96401044 02:46, 25 December 2006]
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to. For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert. -->
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=History_of_the_Jews_in_Ukraine&diff=96401990&oldid=96401874 03:01, 25 December 2006]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=History_of_the_Jews_in_Ukraine&diff=96403806&oldid=96403447 03:31, 25 December 2006]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=History_of_the_Jews_in_Ukraine&diff=96407136&oldid=96404642 04:27, 25 December 2006]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=History_of_the_Jews_in_Ukraine&diff=96500974&oldid=96492917 20:19, 25 December 2006]
* 5th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=History_of_the_Jews_in_Ukraine&diff=96505070&oldid=96501256 20:55, 25 December 2006]
* 6th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=History_of_the_Jews_in_Ukraine&diff=96515782&oldid=96510371 22:44, 25 December 2006]


'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
Warning: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Hillock65&diff=prev&oldid=96527838 01:08, 26 December 2006]
# {{diff2|1221896379|17:04, 2 May 2024 (UTC)}} ""
# {{diff2|1221893660|16:45, 2 May 2024 (UTC)}} ""
# {{diff2|1221893355|16:43, 2 May 2024 (UTC)}} ""
# {{diff2|1221893071|16:40, 2 May 2024 (UTC)}} ""
# {{diff2|1221750853|19:39, 1 May 2024 (UTC)}} ""


'''Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:'''
:He's also been blocked before for 3RR, so 24 hours. [[User:SlimVirgin|SlimVirgin]] <sup><font color="Purple">[[User_talk:SlimVirgin|(talk)]]</font></sup> 11:10, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
# {{diff2|1221894835|16:53, 2 May 2024 (UTC)}} "Warning: Edit warring on [[:Kenosha unrest shooting]]."


'''Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:'''
===[[User:Rajsingam]] reported by [[User:Lahiru_k]] (Result: 3h)===
<!-- If your signature has additional fonts, please enter only your username manually -->


[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Anton Balasingham
}}. {{3RRV|Rajsingam}}:
<!-- USE UNDERSCORE INSTEAD OF SPACE! -->


<u>'''Comments:'''</u>
* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Anton_Balasingham&oldid=96482443 01:43, December 26, 2006 ]
*Blocked for 31h by {{U|EvergreenFir}} for disruptive editing.--[[User:Bbb23|Bbb23]] ([[User talk:Bbb23|talk]]) 17:52, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to. For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert. -->
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Anton_Balasingham&diff=96509718&oldid=96482443 05:41, December 26, 2006 ]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Anton_Balasingham&diff=96531814&oldid=96530840 10:03, December 26, 2006]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Anton_Balasingham&diff=96534806&oldid=96533906 10:49, December 26, 2006]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Anton_Balasingham&diff=96553258&oldid=96552120 14:40, December 26, 2006]
* 5th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Anton_Balasingham&curid=4092099&diff=96555469&oldid=96554931 14:58, December 26, 2006]
* 6th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Anton_Balasingham&curid=4092099&diff=96564844&oldid=96564077 16:09, December 26, 2006]
* 7th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Anton_Balasingham&diff=96568215&oldid=96566975 16:36, December 26, 2006]
* 8th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Anton_Balasingham&diff=96570427&oldid=96570052 16:53, 26 December 2006]
* 9th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Anton_Balasingham&diff=96736231&oldid=96734959 13:37, 27 December 2006]


== [[User:ActionHeroesAreReal]] reported by [[User:Mac Dreamstate]] (Result: No violation; try [[WP:ANI]]) ==
<!-- These MUST be DIFFS, not OLDIDs. Look up [[Help:Diff]] if you do not know what a diff is. -->


'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Naseem Hamed}} <br />
<!--
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|ActionHeroesAreReal}}
- * Necessary only for new users: A diff of 3RR warning _before_ this report was filed here.
Your report may be ignored if it is not placed properly.
-->


'''Previous version reverted to:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Naseem_Hamed&diff=1221740848&oldid=1221727117] – stable edition, correctly labelling Hamed as British only.
''' Comments:''' He is three month older wikipedian who holds 589 total edit count and can be seen on some [[Sri Lanka]] related controversial topics. So I don't think that he does need any 3RR warning prior to the report.[http://tools.wikimedia.de/~interiot/cgi-bin/Tool1/wannabe_kate?username=Rajsingam&site=en.wikipedia.org] --[[User:Lahiru_k|<font color="blue">'''♪♫ ĽąĦĩŘǔ ♫♪'''</font>]] [[User talk:Lahiru_k|<font color="blue"><sup>Walkie-talkie</font>]]</sup> 15:26, 26 December 2006 (UTC)


'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
:'''Note''' - He was reverting unreliably sourced info in the correct manner. I dont see why he couldnt use rediff though.<b>[[User:Bakasuprman|<font color="purple">Baka</font>]][[User talk:Bakasuprman|<font color="red">man</font>]]</b> 16:49, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
#[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Naseem_Hamed&diff=1213433739&oldid=1212423311] – first revert, with a spurious edit summary of "Not constructive".
#[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Naseem_Hamed&diff=1213615662&oldid=1213554283]
#[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Naseem_Hamed&diff=1221723572&oldid=1218262058] – not a revert, but re-adding the disputed content with a new source rather than discussing at article talk page.
#[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Naseem_Hamed&diff=1221764710&oldid=1221740848] – reverting my revert, with no response to [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AActionHeroesAreReal&diff=1221744077&oldid=1221356709 talk page message] left for them, inviting them to continue discussion at [[Talk:Naseem Hamed#British / British-Yemeni|article talk page]].


'''Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AActionHeroesAreReal&diff=1221901706&oldid=1221744077]
:'''comment''' the user Rajsingam is actually running a mock at the Anton Balasigham article..He had reverted other peoples edits, '''without making any comments in the talk page'''.Making comments at the talk page,before reverting is a general rule in wikipedia and I don't think we should allow this user to break this fundamental principal.Further,he reverted my edits 3 times,within last hour, thus making the total number of violations over 7.
--[[User:Iwazaki|Iwazaki]] 17:41, 26 December 2006 (UTC)


'''Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:''' [[Talk:Naseem Hamed#British / British-Yemeni|Discussion at article talk page]]. No responses to my most recent posting after almost two months.
:'''comment''' I strongly urge the admins to take action against this individual to prevent needless revert wars. He has been persistently removing cited commentrary from a reliable source critical of the famous terrorist advisor Anton Balasingham. He has been warned several time to desist, but he has not.[[User:Kerr avon|Kerr avon]] 13:43, 27 December 2006 (UTC)


'''Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AActionHeroesAreReal&diff=1221902303&oldid=1221901706]
Seems to have gone quiet now. 3h block as a token [[User:William M. Connolley|William M. Connolley]] 20:45, 28 December 2006 (UTC)


<u>'''Comments:'''</u> <br />
===[[User:61.68.119.205]] reported by [[User:Coelacan]] (Result: no block)===
<!-- If your signature has additional fonts, please enter only your username manually -->


User:ActionHeroesAreReal mistakenly insists on [[Naseem Hamed]] being labelled as British-Yemeni. Hamed was born in the UK, is a British national, has never lived in Yemen (from where his parents hail), is not notable for his ethnicity, and has only ever competed under a British boxing licence. User chooses to ignore all the various BLP lead section guidelines including [[MOS:ETHNICITY]], [[MOS:IDENTITY]], and [[MOS:FIRSTBIO]]. After initially using an [https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-news/prince-naseem-boxing-film-paddy-considine-mena-massoud-1235309354/amp/ unreliable content aggregator] as a source, they have now brought up [https://variety.com/2024/film/global/pierce-brosnan-amir-el-masry-agc-prince-naseem-hamed-giant-sylvester-stallone-1235971227/amp/ one source] which labels him as such, but the sole inclusion of this fails NPOV, [[WP:WEIGHT]], and [[WP:FRINGE]].
[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|What_the_Bleep_Do_We_Know!?}}. {{3RRV|61.68.119.205}}:
<!-- USE UNDERSCORE INSTEAD OF SPACE! -->


I briefly considered WP:DR, but believe it is unnecessary because this is a clearcut case of a user not understanding the above guidelines, and refusing to engage in discussion. Without making this a conduct issue, they do appear to make a habit out of not using sources correctly or misinterpreting them, and have received numerous warnings by other experienced users. [[User:Mac Dreamstate|Mac Dreamstate]] ([[User talk:Mac Dreamstate|talk]]) 17:41, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=What_the_Bleep_Do_We_Know%21%3F&diff=96062640&oldid=95674350 06:38, 23 December 2006]
*{{AN3|nv}}. There was edit-warring in March, but there is no violation weeks later. Based on a very cursory review of {{U|ActionHeroesAreReal}}'s edits, I think the best place to address the user's edits is [[WP:ANI]]. Include whatever evidence you feel is appropriate, but at a minimum you should include previous edit-warring, not only on this article but on others, and you should also note personal attacks in edit summaries. I'm not comfortable unilaterally blocking without more evidence, and this is not the board to provide that evidence.--[[User:Bbb23|Bbb23]] ([[User talk:Bbb23|talk]]) 18:02, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to. For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert. -->
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=What_the_Bleep_Do_We_Know%21%3F&diff=96409550&oldid=96344599 13:09, 25 December 2006]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=What_the_Bleep_Do_We_Know%21%3F&diff=96458704&oldid=96427560 22:06, 25 December 2006]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=What_the_Bleep_Do_We_Know%21%3F&diff=96477428&oldid=96469791 01:01, 26 December 2006]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=What_the_Bleep_Do_We_Know%21%3F&diff=96551955&oldid=96490557 14:28, 26 December 2006]


== [[User:Bharatian Mapping]] reported by [[User:MiasmaEternal]] (Result:Blocked via [[WP:ANI]] by Dennis Brown ) ==
''' Comments:''' This user has multiple IPs, at the least [[User:61.68.119.205]] [[User:61.68.191.123]] and [[User:61.68.177.89]]. Was warned at [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:61.68.119.205&diff=96500441&oldid=96498613 this talk page]. Doesn't wait for consensus, insists that because a message has been left on the talk page (which was disputed by other editors), this is license to add anything at whim. Was asked to slow down and wait for consensus, but won't. The four reverts occur over 25 hours and 19 minutes, but [[WP:3RR]] says "Users may be blocked for edit warring or disruption even if they do not revert more than three times per day" and in light of the warning and disputatious nature of talk page edits (user also had to be warned twice for NPA), I think this is a special case. &mdash;&nbsp;[[User:Coelacan|coe<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">l</span>acan]] [[User talk:Coelacan|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">t</span>a<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">lk</span>]] &mdash; 15:40, 26 December 2006 (UTC)


'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Azad Hind}}
:User has moved on to new IP at [[User:210.10.150.170]]. &mdash;&nbsp;[[User:Coelacan|coe<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">l</span>acan]] [[User talk:Coelacan|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">t</span>a<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">lk</span>]] &mdash; 17:35, 27 December 2006 (UTC)


'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|Bharatian Mapping}}
Given that this was not within 24h, and is now fairly stale, and its multiple IPs, I can't see any point in a block. Bring it back if it recurrs [[User:William M. Connolley|William M. Connolley]] 20:41, 28 December 2006 (UTC)


'''Previous version reverted to:'''
===[[User:Hipocrite]] reported by [[User:Netscott]] (Result: no block)===


'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
*rv1 [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ADiscuss%2C_don%27t_vote&diff=96538824&oldid=96470184 11:48, 26 December 2006]
# {{diff2|1221992046|06:28, 3 May 2024 (UTC)}} "This the real info, flag and emblem Azad Hind and it is not a vandal"
*rv2 [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ADiscuss%2C_don%27t_vote&diff=96545191&oldid=96545049 13:12, 26 December 2006]
# {{diff2|1221893917|16:47, 2 May 2024 (UTC)}} ""
*rv3 [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ADiscuss%2C_don%27t_vote&diff=96559627&oldid=96558811 15:30, 26 December 2006]
# {{diff2|1221849489|10:33, 2 May 2024 (UTC)}} ""
*rv4 [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ADiscuss%2C_don%27t_vote&diff=96560774&oldid=96560241 15:39, 26 December 2006]
# {{diff|oldid=1221724739|diff=1221737441|label=Consecutive edits made from 17:11, 1 May 2024 (UTC) to 18:12, 1 May 2024 (UTC)}}
## {{diff2|1221727146|17:11, 1 May 2024 (UTC)}} ""
## {{diff2|1221737441|18:12, 1 May 2024 (UTC)}} "Emblem change"
# {{diff|oldid=1221702716|diff=1221717193|label=Consecutive edits made from 14:54, 1 May 2024 (UTC) to 16:09, 1 May 2024 (UTC)}}
## {{diff2|1221706915|14:54, 1 May 2024 (UTC)}} ""
## {{diff2|1221716005|16:01, 1 May 2024 (UTC)}} ""
## {{diff2|1221717193|16:09, 1 May 2024 (UTC)}} ""


'''Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:'''
Time reported: 17:24, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
# {{diff2|1222004808|08:43, 3 May 2024 (UTC)}} "Caution: Unconstructive editing on [[:Azad Hind]]."


'''Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:'''
'''Comments:''' The first three are just straight reverts across three separate editors (the third is where I tried to restore a previously stable version of the page) but the last shows that this user undid '''most''' of my last edit. According to my understanding of [[WP:3RR]] this is a revert as well. I brought this [[User_talk:Hipocrite#Discuss_don.27t_vote|to the attention]] of this editor and he disagreed that it was a revert. [[User:Hipocrite]] is a user in good standing and if I am correct about these reverts then I would not want him to be blocked (just warned much like [[User:Radiant!]] [[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/3RR#User:Radiant.21_reported_by_User:John254_.28Result:_Warning.29|above]]) but I would appreciate if those with a bit more authority could clarify this. Thanks. {{User:Netscott/s1.js}} 17:24, 26 December 2006 (UTC)


: My fourth edit, fixing your horribly broken english, is not remotely a revert. [[User:Hipocrite|Hipocrite]] - [[User talk:Hipocrite|&laquo;<small>Talk</small>&raquo;]] 17:26, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
: Additionly, my second edit is not a direct revert, as it adds the word "Many users," which seems to have satisfied you, at the very least. [[User:Hipocrite|Hipocrite]] - [[User talk:Hipocrite|&laquo;<small>Talk</small>&raquo;]] 17:29, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
::You might like to abide by CIV as well there Hipocrite... if I'm right I don't expect that your lack of civility is going to help you any. {{User:Netscott/s1.js}} 17:30, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
::: I am sorry that I called your edit "horribly broken english." I should have written instead that it was "obviously improper grammar." For this I apologize. Now, could you stop wasting everyones time trying to get useless warnings and cautions placed on users pages and refer to the talk page in question? Thanks. [[User:Hipocrite|Hipocrite]] - [[User talk:Hipocrite|&laquo;<small>Talk</small>&raquo;]] 17:35, 26 December 2006 (UTC)


<u>'''Comments:'''</u>
3R; I can't see why the 4th is a rv [[User:William M. Connolley|William M. Connolley]] 20:37, 28 December 2006 (UTC)


I am reporting this user due to repeated addition of suspected original research. User has refused to communicate regarding warnings by other users. Also triggered edit filter: [[Special:AbuseLog/37631579]]. [[User:MiasmaEternal|<span style="background-color: blue; color:white; padding:3px">'''''MiasmaEternal'''''</span>]][[User_talk:MiasmaEternal|<span style="background-color: black; color: white; padding:3px">☎</span>]] 08:50, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
===[[User:Venom-smasher]] reported by User:TKD (Result:24 hour block)===
<!-- If your signature has additional fonts, please enter only your username manually -->


:{{comment}} This user has already been reported at [[WP:ANI#NOTHERE disruption]] &ndash; [[Special:Contributions/2804:F14:80EE:5A01:C1B6:4511:8DE3:83A7|2804:F14:80EE:5A01:C1B6:4511:8DE3:83A7]] ([[User talk:2804:F14:80EE:5A01:C1B6:4511:8DE3:83A7|talk]]) 08:53, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
* {{AN3|b| indef}} by me for [[WP:NOTHERE]] after investigating at ANI. [[User:Dennis Brown|<b>Dennis Brown</b>]] - [[User talk:Dennis Brown|<b>2&cent;</b>]] 11:45, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
{{Article|Star_Wars_Episode_II:_Attack_of_the_Clones}}. {{3RRV|Venom-smasher}}:
<!-- USE UNDERSCORE INSTEAD OF SPACE! -->

* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Star_Wars_Episode_II:_Attack_of_the_Clones&oldid=96497678 22:51, December 25, 2006]
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to. For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert. -->
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Star_Wars_Episode_II:_Attack_of_the_Clones&diff=96497678&oldid=96496196 23:01, December 25, 2006]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Star_Wars_Episode_II:_Attack_of_the_Clones&diff=96505768&oldid=96503650 00:02, December 26, 2006]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Star_Wars_Episode_II:_Attack_of_the_Clones&diff=96569830&oldid=96555034 11:48, December 26, 2006]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Star_Wars_Episode_II:_Attack_of_the_Clones&diff=96582480&oldid=96580508 13:23, December 26, 2006]
<!-- These MUST be DIFFS, not OLDIDs. Look up [[Help:Diff]] if you do not know what a diff is. -->

<!--
- * Necessary only for new users: A diff of 3RR warning _before_ this report was filed here.
Your report may be ignored if it is not placed properly.
-->
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Venom-smasher&diff=96554048&oldid=96317166 Warned previously].

''' Comments:''' <!-- Optional -->This user and {{user|The Filmaker}} have been going back and forth on a few of the ''Star Wars'' movie pages for a couple of days. I tried article protection on the ''Episode I'' page to calm things down, and warned that resumption of edit warring would result in blocks. However, I think that, having since joined relevant discussion, I should defer to someone else to block for the continuing revert war. Times are UTC -5. — [[User:TKD|TKD]]::[[User talk:TKD|Talk]] 19:53, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

:Both users blocked for 24 hours. If they continue, I'll protect the page. --[[User:Robdurbar|Robdurbar]] 22:38, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

===[[User:The_Filmaker]] reported by User:TKD (Result:24 hours)===
<!-- If your signature has additional fonts, please enter only your username manually -->

[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Star_Wars_Episode_II:_Attack_of_the_Clones}}. {{3RRV|The_Filmaker}}:
<!-- USE UNDERSCORE INSTEAD OF SPACE! -->

* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Star_Wars_Episode_II:_Attack_of_the_Clones&oldid=96495441 22:32, December 25, 2006]
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to. For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert. -->
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Star_Wars_Episode_II:_Attack_of_the_Clones&diff=96496196&oldid=96495994 22:38, December 25, 2006]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Star_Wars_Episode_II:_Attack_of_the_Clones&diff=96498251&oldid=96497678 22:56, December 25, 2006]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Star_Wars_Episode_II:_Attack_of_the_Clones&diff=96503650&oldid=96498867 23:43, December 25, 2006]
* New base version: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Star_Wars_Episode_II:_Attack_of_the_Clones&oldid=96555034 09:55, December 26, 2006]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Star_Wars_Episode_II:_Attack_of_the_Clones&diff=96580508&oldid=96569830 13:09, December 26, 2006]
* 5th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Star_Wars_Episode_II:_Attack_of_the_Clones&diff=96585105&oldid=96582480 13:40, December 26, 2006]
<!-- These MUST be DIFFS, not OLDIDs. Look up [[Help:Diff]] if you do not know what a diff is. -->

<!--
- * Necessary only for new users: A diff of 3RR warning _before_ this report was filed here.
Your report may be ignored if it is not placed properly.
-->

''' Comments:''' <!-- Optional -->Times are UTC -5. See above for the other half of this revert war ({{user|Venom-smasher}}). I [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:The_Filmaker&diff=96317556&oldid=96252721 warned about 3RR] when I unprotected the Episode I article, but have since entered discussion myself, so I don't feel comfortable applying blocks in this dispute. I was hoping that there would be a better solution to this, but, as the diffs show, it's gotten pretty ugly. — [[User:TKD|TKD]]::[[User talk:TKD|Talk]] 19:53, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

:As above. --[[User:Robdurbar|Robdurbar]] 22:39, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

===[[User:12.170.101.194]] reported by User:[[User:Baristarim|Baristarim]] 21:00, 26 December 2006 (UTC) (Result: 12 hours)===
<!-- If your signature has additional fonts, please enter only your username manually -->

[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Baklava}}. {{3RRV|12.170.101.194}}:
<!-- USE UNDERSCORE INSTEAD OF SPACE! -->

* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Baklava&diff=prev&oldid=96450728]
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to. For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert. -->
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Baklava&diff=next&oldid=96450728]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Baklava&diff=next&oldid=96501901]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Baklava&diff=next&oldid=96517129]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Baklava&diff=next&oldid=96524650]
<!-- These MUST be DIFFS, not OLDIDs. Look up [[Help:Diff]] if you do not know what a diff is. -->


3RR warning on a different article was made this morning [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3A12.170.101.194&diff=96504665&oldid=96503719].

''' Comments:''' This is an IP that has been edit warring in a number of hot ethnic disputes. Even though he is an anon, he seems to know Wiki policies well. I had warned him of the 3RR before in another disputed article [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3A12.170.101.194&diff=96504665&oldid=96503719]. User targets mainly articles concerning one ethnicity and has been making numerous extremely POV edits like the one here [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nureddin_Pasha&diff=96614628&oldid=89954417] [[User:Baristarim|Baristarim]] 21:00, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

*I have blocked the user for 12 hours per [[WP:3RR]]. [[User:Alphachimp|<span style="color:MidnightBlue">'''alphachimp.'''</span>]] 23:31, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

===[[User:ramdrake]] reported by User:[[User:Benio76|Benio76]] (Result:<s>No Block</s> 24h)===
<!-- If your signature has additional fonts, please enter only your username manually -->

[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|foie gras}}. {{3RRV|ramdrake}}:
<!-- USE UNDERSCORE INSTEAD OF SPACE! -->

* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Foie_gras&oldid=96581455 18:16, December 26, 2006]
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to. For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert. -->
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Foie_gras&diff=96581751&oldid=96581455 18:18, December 26, 2006]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Foie_gras&diff=next&oldid=96584029 18:39, December 26, 2006]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Foie_gras&diff=96596995&oldid=96595087 20:01, December 26, 2006]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Foie_gras&diff=next&oldid=96598092 20:11, December 26, 2006]
<!-- These MUST be DIFFS, not OLDIDs. Look up [[Help:Diff]] if you do not know what a diff is. -->

<!--
- * Necessary only for new users: A diff of 3RR warning _before_ this report was filed here.
Your report may be ignored if it is not placed properly.
-->

''' Comments:''' The user ramdrake reverted my contribution to a scientifical description of foie gras (as an effect of steatosis pathology) pretending that it "imparts a strong negative bias". But my contribution was a description of a fact, which he recognizes, and there were not any subjective valuations. Telling facts does not impart negative bias, just like telling that Saddam Hussein killed people is not a negative bias but just "letting the facts speak for themselves", as recommanded in [[WP:NPOV]].

*These are different reverts in different areas of the article. If Benio76 wants to call these a 3RR on Ramdrake, he himself has got 6RR on everybody else. Multiple users are reverting Benio76 on multiple sections of this article. Benio76 is a [[Special:Contributions/Benio76|single purpose account]] to push an agenda at that article [[User:SchmuckyTheCat|SchmuckyTheCat]] 22:55, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

**The [[WP:3RR|policy]] says "The policy states that an editor must not perform more than three reversions, in whole or in part, on a single Wikipedia page within a 24 hour period." Ramdrake did four reversions in less than two hours. [[User:Benio76|Benio76]] 23:51, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

:These strictly speaking aren't reverts. The diffs between versions are sufficiently different that I don't consider them reverts. If another admin has a different opinion, by all means, issue a block.--[[User:CSTAR|CSTAR]] 20:23, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

'''These four edits by Ramdrake clearly ''are'' reverts.''' They are the plainest reverts you can get!

*Edit 1, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Foie_gras&diff=96581751&oldid=96581455 18:18, December 26, 2006]: Ramdrake deleted the phrase "''and a number of countries and local jurisdictions''" from the intro paragraph. I had just put that phrase in. To see that just go back to the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Foie_gras&diff=prev&oldid=96581455 preceeding edit].

*Edit 2, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Foie_gras&diff=next&oldid=96584029 18:39, December 26, 2006]: Same thing again, concerning the same phrase, except that Ramdrake also botched up the sentence by removing an additional piece. To see that it is a revert just go back to the two preceeding edits [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Foie_gras&diff=prev&oldid=96583812] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Foie_gras&diff=prev&oldid=96584029].

*Edit 3, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Foie_gras&diff=96596995&oldid=96595087 20:01, December 26, 2006]: Ramdrake deleted the sentence "''Its name refers to the pathology called [[fatty liver]] or [[steatosis]], which induces an abnormal growth of the liver.''" and an additional two words that had just been put in by user benio76. To see that it is a revert just go back to the two preceeding edits [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Foie_gras&diff=prev&oldid=96594130] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Foie_gras&diff=prev&oldid=96598092].

*Edit 4, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Foie_gras&diff=next&oldid=96598092 20:11, December 26, 2006]: Same revert again. To see that just go back to the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Foie_gras&diff=prev&oldid=96598092 preceeding edit].

If these are not reverts, both in the strict sense of the term and in the spirit of the 3RR guidelines, I really do not know what might qualify as a revert!

Ramdrake, along with other users, is counting on the strict enforcement of the 3RR rule against those who disagree with them, while being able to do exactly what they want to the foie gras page. Do the rules not apply to them? Is it NPOV for one party to be able to do what it wants, while the other sits paralyzed?

[[User:Olivierd|David Olivier]] 23:16, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

: The revised report specifies that this is a complex revert (reversion to previous, but not identical states.) 24h.--[[User:CSTAR|CSTAR]] 01:49, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

===[[User:Aminz]] reported by User:[[User:Beit Or|Beit]] [[User talk:Beit Or|Or]] (Result: No Block)===

[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Historical_Persecution_by_Jews}}. {{3RRV|Aminz}}:

* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Historical_Persecution_by_Jews&diff=96539852&oldid=96539678 12:03, 26 December 2006] removal of NPOV tag, added by another user at [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Historical_Persecution_by_Jews&diff=96535849&oldid=96535769 11:04, 26 December 2006]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Historical_Persecution_by_Jews&diff=96622386&oldid=96615202 22:40, 26 December 2006] restoration of the passage "Jews were involved in a war during 66-70 AD against Rome under the lead of [[Bar Cochba]], whom they had accepted as [[Messiah]]. This war caused a cleavage among Christians and Jews. Christians, opposing militarism, didn't help Jews in the war. They found zealot militarism contradictory with the teachings of Jesus. The murderous slaughters by Jews in Cyprus and Cyrenaica only increased the cleavage. [[Bar Cochba]] and his followers regarded the war as a national war and heavily penalized Christians for not helping their Jewish brethens. Christians's rejection of the militarism was also due to the fact that acceptance of [[Bar Cochba]] as Messiah, left no place for [[Jesus]] to be the Messiah." removed by another user at [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Historical_Persecution_by_Jews&diff=96615202&oldid=96540646 21:58, 26 December 2006]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Historical_Persecution_by_Jews&diff=96706998&oldid=96703012 08:02, 27 December 2006] restoration of the sentence "In addition, according to the book of Esther (8:14), a large number of Persians converted to Judaism out of fear of Jews during the events of [[Purim]]." removed by another user at [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Historical_Persecution_by_Jews&diff=96641256&oldid=96624089 00:31, 27 December 2006]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Historical_Persecution_by_Jews&diff=96714233&oldid=96708475 09:25, 27 December 2006] restoration of the words "tend to regard toleration as a sign of weakness or even wickedness towards whatever diety they worship. Among the religous, toleration is demanded by the persecuted who need it if they are ever to become triumphant, when, all too often, they start to persecute in their turn." removed by another user at [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Historical_Persecution_by_Jews&diff=96708475&oldid=96707958 08:17, 27 December 2006]

''' Comments:'''
*This does not appear to be a 3RR violation at all. Just additions of content.—[[User:Ryulong|Ryūlóng]] ([[User talk:Ryulong|<font color="gold">竜龍</font>]]) 10:18, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
**Actually, reverts 2, 3, and 4 were ''re''-additions of content previously removed by other users. Waiting for an admin to deal with this report. [[User:Beit Or|Beit]] [[User talk:Beit Or|Or]] 10:55, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
:: '''Comment'''. This doesn't qualify as a 3RR vio, then. There have to be more than 3 reverts.--[[User:CSTAR|CSTAR]] 20:13, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
:::What about the first revert, then? [[User:Beit Or|Beit]] [[User talk:Beit Or|Or]] 20:21, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
:::: That doesn't look like a revert to me. Consider the diffs between the versions of the first two: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Historical_Persecution_by_Jews&diff=96622386&oldid=96539852]: These versions substantially different--[[User:CSTAR|CSTAR]] 20:29, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
:::::Reverts need not be to the same version. The second revert that you've linked above seems clear: edit summary ''restore the war issue...'' restoring the passage beginning with the words "Jews were involved in a war." Chabuk removed this passage[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Historical_Persecution_by_Jews&diff=96615202&oldid=96540646], then Aminz restored it[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Historical_Persecution_by_Jews&diff=96622386&oldid=96615202]. It's clearly a revert. [[User:Beit Or|Beit]] [[User talk:Beit Or|Or]] 20:37, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
:::::: I don't think so. According to the definition [[WP:Revert]]
:::::::''However in the context of the English Wikipedia three revert rule, a revert is defined far more broadly as any change to an article that partially or completely goes back to any older version of an article.''
::::::The action taken on the second edit by Arminz does not take it back to the same version as the first edit. Please note also, that in filing a 3RR report, it is desirable that a "reverted to version" also be provided. In any case I don't see these as being reversions, but if you disagree, ask another admin to review my interpretation.--[[User:CSTAR|CSTAR]] 20:56, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

:::::: One further comment: I tried looking at the diffs suggested by your comparisons of additions and removals. The diffs of these versions don't appear to me to be the same. But again as I said, please feel free to ask someone else.--[[User:CSTAR|CSTAR]] 21:09, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

My only purpose was to add content to the article. The first edit for example is not a revert. As one can see from the talk page User: Charlie added the tag because he thought the title of the article is inherently POV. However I argued that we have articles on [[Historical Persecution by Christians]] and [[Historical persecution by Muslims]] and removed the tag. Later he added the tag again commenting that: "''I overreacted, perhaps.'' But I still think that much of the content is very POV..." As soon as he pointed out the content dispute, I didn't remove the tag. I didn't mean the removal of the tag to be a ''revert''. There is a story behind each other edits. I was about to add more content to the new section I've created which specifically ties the section to Judaism but couldn't do that because I was afraid it would be considered a revert. My feeling of the situation is that Beit Or is only removing whatever I add. --[[User:Aminz|Aminz]] 11:21, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
: ''''Warning'''. Whether or not there is a story behind a revert is irrelevant. The point of the 3RR linit is to avoid edit warring; in this instance I didn't see a 3RR vio, it is pretty clear that you have engaged in edit warring. Next time, if there is evidence of edit warring, I will block you regardless of whether it's technically a 3RR vio or not.--[[User:CSTAR|CSTAR]] 21:20, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

===[[User:89.172.195.192]] reported by User: [[User:Dahn|Dahn]] 13:07, 27 December 2006 (UTC) (Result:24h)===

[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Krashovani}}. {{3RRV|89.172.195.192}}:

* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Krashovani&oldid=96685850 05:10, 27 December 2006]
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to. For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert. -->
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Krashovani&diff=96719275&oldid=96712319 10:25, 27 December 2006]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Krashovani&diff=96729279&oldid=96726149 12:21, 27 December 2006]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Krashovani&diff=96731305&oldid=96730656 12:43, 27 December 2006]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Krashovani&diff=96731644&oldid=96731477 12:47, 27 December 2006]
* 5th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Krashovani&diff=96732032&oldid=96731910 12:51, 27 December 2006]

*Evidence of warning: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3A89.172.195.192&diff=96731569&oldid=96731450 First edit on the talk page, blanked by user; 12:45, 27 December 2006], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3A89.172.195.192&diff=96731713&oldid=96731569 clarified further; 12:47, 27 December 2006].
*Blocked 24h. --[[User:CSTAR|CSTAR]] 20:10, 27 December 2006 (UTC)


===[[User:Beit Or]] reported by User:[[User:Hillock65|Hillock65]] (Result: '''rejected''')===
<!-- If your signature has additional fonts, please enter only your username manually -->

[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Ukrainian-German collaboration during World War II}}. {{3RRV|Beit Or}}:
<!-- USE UNDERSCORE INSTEAD OF SPACE! -->

* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ukrainian-German_collaboration_during_World_War_II&oldid=96805867]
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to. For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert. -->
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ukrainian-German_collaboration_during_World_War_II&diff=96750185&oldid=96749991 21:21, 27 December 2006]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ukrainian-German_collaboration_during_World_War_II&diff=96805867&oldid=96798070 15:34, 27 December 2006]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=History_of_the_Jews_in_Ukraine&action=history 15:28, 27 December 2006]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=History_of_the_Jews_in_Ukraine&diff=96701526&oldid=96695522 07:10, 27 December 2006]

* Evidence of warning:[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ABeit_Or&diff=96817273&oldid=95922222 22:23, 27 December 2006]

*'''Rejected'''. Two of those reverts are to [[History of the Jews in Ukraine]]. [[User:Bucketsofg|<font color="#DF0001"><b>Buck</b></font><b><font color="green">ets</font></b><font color="grey"><b>ofg</b></font>]] 22:54, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
<!-- These MUST be DIFFS, not OLDIDs. Look up [[Help:Diff]] if you do not know what a diff is. -->

<!--
- * Necessary only for new users: A diff of 3RR warning _before_ this report was filed here.
Your report may be ignored if it is not placed properly.
-->

''' Comments:''' <!-- Optional -->

===[[User:jd2718]] reported by User:[[User:Jd2718|Jd2718]] (Result:No Block)===

[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Allegations_of_Israeli_Apartheid}}. {{3RRV|jd2718}}:

* Previous version reverted to: different versions, but 3 of the 4 were removal of the same paragraph

* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Allegations_of_Israeli_apartheid&diff=96844348&oldid=96842076]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Allegations_of_Israeli_apartheid&diff=next&oldid=96844348]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Allegations_of_Israeli_apartheid&diff=next&oldid=96847054]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Allegations_of_Israeli_apartheid&diff=next&oldid=96877206]

No evidence of warning, but [[user:jd2718]] has been a wikipedian for over half a year and has nearly 1000 edits.

''' Comments: There were no other edits between the 1st and 2nd revert, so perhaps they make up a single revert, in two pieces. But insofar as [[user:jayjg]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AAllegations_of_Israeli_apartheid&diff=96880303&oldid=96878958 warned me] I thought I should bring this here to be enforced or dropped.'''
* No block. --[[User:CSTAR|CSTAR]] 15:40, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

===[[User:TheFarix]] reported by User:[[User:68.1.78.129|68.1.78.129]] 06:42, 28 December 2006 (UTC) (Result: No violation)===

[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|List_of_anime_conventions}}. {{3RRV|TheFarix}}:

* Previous version reverted to: removal of listed convention

* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_anime_conventions&diff=96771143&oldid=96762794 17:53, 27 December 2006]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_anime_conventions&diff=96780312&oldid=96775957 18:52, 27 December 2006]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_anime_conventions&diff=96791942&oldid=96781965 20:05, 27 December 2006]

;Comments
*There's an ongoing discussion of this on the talk page, and there has to be four reverts for one to be blocked for this. I only see three.--[[User:Vercalos|Vercalos]] 07:23, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
**Not to mention the second edit was a reversion to the correct link for that particular convention.--[[User:Vercalos|Vercalos]] 07:26, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
:::*This doesn't look like a violation. [[User:SlimVirgin|SlimVirgin]] <sup><font color="Purple">[[User_talk:SlimVirgin|(talk)]]</font></sup> 09:01, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
*Attempts have been made to reason with the anon editor regarding the listing criteria, however s/he still insists that his/her convention should be included regardless of the criteria (using logic such as western Florida is not part of the same state as the rest of Florida because it is in different time zones). A localized RfC with [[WP:Anime]] has been called to help settle the matter.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Anime_and_manga&diff=prev&oldid=96994143] --'''[[User:TheFarix|TheFarix]]''' ([[User talk:TheFarix|Talk]]) 01:03, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

===[[User:Fighting_for_Justice]] reported by User:[[User:196.15.168.40|196.15.168.40]] (Result: Page protected)===

[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|David_Westerfield}}. {{3RRV|Fighting_for_Justice}}:

* Previous version reverted to: Starting point [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=David_Westerfield&oldid=96321732], “Fighting for Justice” first deleted the last two links in the article, then reverted not only all attempts to reinstate them, but also all other additions to the article, while making just one small addition himself.

* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=David_Westerfield&oldid=96679900]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=David_Westerfield&oldid=96696578]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=David_Westerfield&oldid=96713315]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=David_Westerfield&oldid=96786699]

* “Fighting for Justice” is very familiar with the 3RR, having both warned and been warned (and recently, too).

''' Comments:'''

This is part of a long-standing dispute. For simplicity, I have given only his last four reverts.

::This is a frivolous addition. [[User:196.15.168.40]] is doing this as revenge because I got an administrator to protect a page in which, we've had an edit war going on. In addition one of the above links isn't a revert. I removed useless links. Before you consider banning me for 24 hours, look into the history of the [[David Westerfield]] article. [[User:Fighting for Justice|Fighting for Justice]] 08:04, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

:::196, you need to provide diffs showing four reverts, not links to the entire article. [[User:SlimVirgin|SlimVirgin]] <sup><font color="Purple">[[User_talk:SlimVirgin|(talk)]]</font></sup> 09:00, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
:::It's protected anyway. [[User:SlimVirgin|SlimVirgin]] <sup><font color="Purple">[[User_talk:SlimVirgin|(talk)]]</font></sup> 09:04, 28 December 2006 (UTC)


===[[User:Noah30]] reported by User:// [[User:Laughing Man|Laughing Man]] (Result: 24h)===
<!-- If your signature has additional fonts, please enter only your username manually -->

[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Kosovo Protection Corps}}. {{3RRV|Noah30}}:
<!-- USE UNDERSCORE INSTEAD OF SPACE! -->

* Previous version reverted to: [http://VersionLink VersionTime]
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to. For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert. -->
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kosovo_Protection_Corps&oldid=96757021 16:22, December 27, 2006]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kosovo_Protection_Corps&oldid=96764447 17:09, December 27, 2006]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kosovo_Protection_Corps&oldid=96779673 18:48, December 27, 2006]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kosovo_Protection_Corps&oldid=96801505 20:57, December 27, 2006]
* 5th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kosovo_Protection_Corps&oldid=96962304 17:31, December 28, 2006]
* 6th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kosovo_Protection_Corps&oldid=96978575 19:08, December 28, 2006]
* 7th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kosovo_Protection_Corps&oldid=96986977 19:55, December 28, 2006]

3RR warning (since removed from users talk page)
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Noah30&diff=96803871&oldid=96595735 21:10, December 27, 2006 ]

''' Comments:'''
lots of warring on this article, all parties should be blocked for 3RR.

''2006-12-28T20:47:05 Robdurbar (Talk | contribs | block) blocked "Noah30 (contribs)" with an expiry time of 24 hours (3rr violation)'' and ''2006-12-28T20:47:10 Robdurbar (Talk | contribs | block) blocked "KosMetfan (contribs)" with an expiry time of 24 hours (3rr violation)'' [[User:William M. Connolley|William M. Connolley]] 20:49, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

:Ah, you move too quickly for me Will. Edit conflicted with - :Both [[User:Noah30]] and [[User:KosMetfan]] blocked for 24 hours. I've protected the pag too as one or two other users have been invovled. --[[User:Robdurbar|Robdurbar]] 20:51, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

===[[User:Ymous]] reported by User:[[User:Orangemarlin|Orangemarlin]] (Result:No violation)===
<!-- If your signature has additional fonts, please enter only your username manually -->

[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Creationism}}. {{3RRV|Ymous}}:
<!-- USE UNDERSCORE INSTEAD OF SPACE! -->

* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Creationism&oldid=97000110]
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to. For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert. -->
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Creationism&diff=97001525&oldid=97000110 12:51, December 28, 2006]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Creationism&diff=96998746&oldid=96998147 13:00, December 28, 2006]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Creationism&diff=96997094&oldid=96948571 13:14, December 28, 2006]
<!-- These MUST be DIFFS, not OLDIDs. Look up [[Help:Diff]] if you do not know what a diff is. -->

<!--
- * Necessary only for new users: A diff of 3RR warning _before_ this report was filed here.
Your report may be ignored if it is not placed properly.
-->

''' Comments:''' <!-- Optional -->
*There must be four reverts to create a violation. [[User:Stifle|Stifle]] ([[User talk:Stifle|talk]]) 22:35, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
*Also, no warning was given. I've given him one myself though.--[[User:Wildnox|Wildnox]][[User talk:Wildnox|(talk)]] 22:40, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
*Thanks, I didn't know either point, but when I reread the "rules" I understood more clearly. I'm afraid that this user would have accused me of being a demon if I made the warning, so I'm glad someone else did. Thanks for your help. [[User:Orangemarlin|Orangemarlin]] 03:03, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

===[[User:Oleh Petriv‎]] reported by [[User:Bucketsofg]] (Result:)===

[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Ukrainian-German collaboration during World War II}}. {{3RRV|Oleh Petriv‎}}:
<!-- USE UNDERSCORE INSTEAD OF SPACE! -->

* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ukrainian-German_collaboration_during_World_War_II&oldid=96749991 15:33, 27 December 2006]
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to. For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert. -->
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ukrainian-German_collaboration_during_World_War_II&diff=96755061&oldid=96749991 16:08, 27 December 2006]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ukrainian-German_collaboration_during_World_War_II&diff=96798070&oldid=96770674 20:39, 27 December 2006]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ukrainian-German_collaboration_during_World_War_II&diff=96815659&oldid=96798070 22:14, 27 December 2006]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ukrainian-German_collaboration_during_World_War_II&diff=96938236&oldid=96880763 14:56, 28 December 2006]
<!-- These MUST be DIFFS, not OLDIDs. Look up [[Help:Diff]] if you do not know what a diff is. -->


''' Comments:''' Second revert is by an IP 65.94.19.47, which is "likely" him: [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser#Oleh_Petriv]]. He has subsequently admitted the edit is his ([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FIncidents&diff=96939579&oldid=96939130 diff]) [[User:Bucketsofg|<font color="#DF0001"><b>Buck</b></font><b><font color="green">ets</font></b><font color="grey"><b>ofg</b></font>]] 22:56, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

===[[User:SchmuckyTheCat]] reported by User:[[User:Olivierd|David Olivier]] (Result:)===
<!-- If your signature has additional fonts, please enter only your username manually -->

[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Foie_gras}}. {{3RRV|SchmuckyTheCat}}:
<!-- USE UNDERSCORE INSTEAD OF SPACE! -->

* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Foie_gras&oldid=96620353 26 Dec. 22:29]
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Foie_gras&diff=prev&oldid=96621829 26 Dec. 22:37]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Foie_gras&diff=prev&oldid=96632908 26 Dec. 23:43]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Foie_gras&diff=prev&oldid=96784390 27 Dec. 19:18]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Foie_gras&diff=prev&oldid=96814603 27 Dec. 22:08]
* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Foie_gras&oldid=96832472 27 Dec. 23:50]
* 5th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Foie_gras&diff=next&oldid=96832472 27 Dec. 23:56]
* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Foie_gras&oldid=96834716 28 Dec. 00:03]
* 6th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Foie_gras&diff=next&oldid=96834716 28 Dec. 00:12]

''' Comments:''' <!-- Optional -->

The first four reverts were done by SchmuckyTheCat in less than 24 hours, on the same item: he repeatedly put back the "good article" template on the talk page of the foie gras article. Each time, he also relisted the article on the GA page. He also at least once (such as in [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Foie_gras&diff=prev&oldid=96772723 this diff]) deleted the TotallyDisputed template from the main foie gras page. Strictly speaking, he has thus done a lot more than 4 reverts in those 24 hours.

Those reverts are on an issue that in itself shouldn't be disputed, which is the fact that the foie gras page ''is'' disputed. SchmuckyTheCat appears unable to recognize even the ''existence'' of disagreeing voices.

SchmuckyTheCat was warned by me after the fourth revert (see [[Talk:Foie_gras#Just_for_the_record|here]] on the talk page) but he only sneered, and went on to perform two other reverts that same evening, on other issues.

I do not think the controversy on the foie gras page is to be resolved by revert counting; however, there are rules, and the liberties that SchmuckyTheCat and others repeatedly take with those rules gives them an unfair advantage, allowing them to go on editing the page in a totally POV manner while remaining completely oblivious of all attempts to discussion. This is why I now ask measures to be taken against SchmuckyTheCat.

[[User:Olivierd|David Olivier]] 00:05, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

:I encouraged David Olivier to file this complaint [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Foie_gras&diff=96819106&oldid=96818618]. David is on the losing side of a POV war on [[Foie gras]]. David attempted to use the Good Article status of the article as a battle. The GA process has a review process to remove articles. When David didn't follow the process, I restored the GA template to the talk page. I then followed what David should have done and filed the GA review for him [[Wikipedia:Good_articles/Review#Foie_gras]]. Removing the tag in a POV war is underhanded vandalism. Restoring the tag, and listing the article for review when you don't think it should be reviewed, is good faith editing.
:Note on the article itself I'm not being strict about counting, but I'm trying generally to follow 1RR per issue. David's 5th and 6th revert have nothing to do with each other. [[User:SchmuckyTheCat|SchmuckyTheCat]] 00:23, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

:To whoever is reviewing this report - please be advised that there is an ongoing edit war revolving around two users (Oliverd, Benio76) engaged in a '''radical''' POV pushing ([[PETA]] activism). The issue has been discussed in length on article's Talk page and the user who's changes were reverted repeatedly ignored other editor's arguments. [[User:Apankrat|Alex Pankratov]] 00:28, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

As per [[WP:GA/R]], the GA tag is to be removed when a user sees that the article does not satisfy the criteria. The review process is for ''relisting'' the article. That there is an ongoing edit war is uncontroversial, and it is particularly absurd to try to dispute the fact that the article is disputed. To call vandalism an edit by someone who disagrees with you is just rhetoric. [[User:Olivierd|David Olivier]] 01:13, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

::There is a huge conflict about the neutrality of [[foie gras]]. A small group of editors are regularly boycotting other editors' improvements, in order to preserve a positive bias pushing commercialization of foie gras. These people ignore arguments, sources and quotation of WP guidelines furnished by other editors, and they have gone as far as accusing me of having created a sock puppet, which is false. Since the article does not satisfy the GA criteria, the reverts made by SchmuckyTheCat are unjustified, [[User:Benio76|Benio76]] 01:51, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

===[[User:Starwars1955]] reported by [[User:Aviper2k7]] (Result:)===

[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Brett_Favre}}. {{3RRV|Starwars1955}}:

* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Brett_Favre&oldid=97014120 16:23, December 28, 2006 by PSUMark2006]
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to. For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert. -->
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Brett_Favre&diff=97028661&oldid=97014120 17:44, December 28, 2006 ]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Brett_Favre&diff=97034318&oldid=97033345 18:15, December 28, 2006 ]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Brett_Favre&diff=97038290&oldid=97037558 18:35, December 28, 2006]

''' Comments:''' User has been [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Starwars1955 blocked] two or three times before, at least once for violating 3RR. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/3RRArchive33#User:Starwars1955_reported_by_User:Aviper2k7_.28Result:24h.29 here's the first time he was blocked.] He's reverting to a version with no citations, which violates [[WP:CITE]] and then says that listing citations twice is against the rules. See [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Brett_Favre&action=history Brett Favre history] and our discussion on the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Brett_Favre talk page] which he seems to ignore.++[[User:aviper2k7|<span style="color:green;font-weight:bold;">aviper2k7</span>]]++ 00:49, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

*Also, note that that this editor has been brought up at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Editor being uncivil|ANI]]. [[User:Heimstern|Heimstern Läufer]] 02:51, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

===[[User:R9tgokunks]] reported by [[User:LUCPOL]] (Result:)===

[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Metropolis}}. {{3RRV|R9tgokunks}}

* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Metropolis&oldid=95501234 11:45, December 20, 2006]
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Metropolis&diff=96777927&oldid=96735636 18:37, December 27, 2006]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Metropolis&diff=96868257&oldid=96801859, 03:44, December 28, 2006]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Metropolis&diff=96992795&oldid=96917667 20:27, December 28, 2006]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Metropolis&diff=97037301&oldid=96998493 00:30, December 29, 2006]
* 5th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Metropolis&diff=97053080&oldid=97039294 02:02, December 29, 2006]

''' Comments:'''
[[User:R9tgokunks]] (Hrödberäht) vandalise (edit war, 3RR) arcicles: [[Metropolis]], [[Silesia City]], [[Ostrava]], [[List of famous German Americans]], [[Father of the Nation]] etc, etc. He's always revert. See history in arcicles (all edit war R9tgokunks vs all users in all arcicles): [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Upper_Silesian_Metropolitan_Union&action=history], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ostrava&action=history], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Metropolis&action=history], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_famous_German_Americans&action=history], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Father_of_the_Nation&action=history] etc. Please help. Please blocked this user on month (or more). [[User:LUCPOL|LUCPOL]] 00:54, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
PS: He manipulates, it lets old links (see highly - links discussion from... september etc). [[User:LUCPOL|LUCPOL]] 00:54, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
:First, please use the template provided. Second, you also violated 3RR in at least one of the articles. You're both violating 3RR, and if either of you get blocked, you both get blocked. --[[User:Wildnox|Wildnox]][[User talk:Wildnox|(talk)]] 01:08, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

I will repeat. He leads many edit wars and 3RR! Not one or two - many. Please help (except Wildnox). [[User:LUCPOL|LUCPOL]] 01:56, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
:PS. This is data (links) with end of December 2006 (actually), I did not look for older. [[User:LUCPOL|LUCPOL]] 02:00, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

How can the vandal get blocked, ''and'' the contributor who reverted the vandalism also get blocked? Surely this doesn't happen elsewhere on Wikipedia, does it?[[User:R9tgokunks|-- Hrödberäht]] 02:08, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

===[[User:LUCPOL]] reported by [[User:R9tgokunks]] (Result:)===

[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|Metropolis}}. {{3RRV|LUCPOL}}

* Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Metropolis&oldid=95501234 11:45, December 20, 2006]
* 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Metropolis&diff=96801859&oldid=96777927 20:59, December 27, 2006]
* 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Metropolis&diff=96917667&oldid=96868257 11:42, December 28, 2006]
* 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Metropolis&diff=96998493&oldid=96992795 20:58, December 28, 2006]
* 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Metropolis&diff=97039294&oldid=97037301 00:40, December 29, 2006]
* 5th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Metropolis&diff=next&oldid=97053080 02:50, December 29, 2006]

''' Comments:'''
Background on the situation(although it might be irrelevant to the actual report):[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Arthur_Rubin#Please_Help_ME.21],[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Jadger#Possible_sock_puppet]
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:LUCPOL],[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:R9tgokunks],[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Wildnox]
[[User:R9tgokunks|-- Hrödberäht]] 03:11, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

'''It is lie!''': 1st revert - 27 December, 3rd and 5th revert is not revert. This is actualization. This is previous version [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Metropolis&oldid=95501234], letter is reverts from R9tgokunks (Hrödberäht). I did not make 3RR: see: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Upper_Silesian_Metropolitan_Union&action=history], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Metropolis&action=history] - My 3 corner edition and 3 reverts from R9tgokunks (Hrödberäht) - in draught 24h, 28 december 2006. I did not make 3 reverts, this is 3 corner edition. [[User:LUCPOL|LUCPOL]] 03:12, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

:Oh yes, just above the actual report is [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/3RR#Please_help.21 this further discussion][[User:R9tgokunks|-- Hrödberäht]] 03:22, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Let me condense what I said above.(I Removed it) '''BOTH''' users appear to have violated 3RR on the article in question. --[[User:Wildnox|Wildnox]][[User talk:Wildnox|(talk)]] 03:51, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

=== Sample violation report to copy ===

<pre>

===[[User:USERNAME_VIOLATION]] reported by User:~~~ (Result:)===
<!-- If your signature has additional fonts, please enter only your username manually -->

[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on
{{Article|ARTICLE_NAME}}. {{3RRV|VIOLATOR_USERNAME}}:
<!-- USE UNDERSCORE INSTEAD OF SPACE! -->

* Previous version reverted to: [http://VersionLink VersionTime]
<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to. For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert. -->
* 1st revert: [http://DIFFS DIFFTIME]
* 2nd revert: [http://DIFFS DIFFTIME]
* 3rd revert: [http://DIFFS DIFFTIME]
* 4th revert: [http://DIFFS DIFFTIME]
<!-- These MUST be DIFFS, not OLDIDs. Look up [[Help:Diff]] if you do not know what a diff is. -->

<!--
- * Necessary only for new users: A diff of 3RR warning _before_ this report was filed here.
Your report may be ignored if it is not placed properly.
-->

''' Comments:''' <!-- Optional -->
</pre>

Note on completing a 3RR report:
* Copy the template above, the text within but not including <nowiki><pre>...</pre></nowiki>
* Replace <nowiki>http://DIFFS</nowiki> with a link to the [[Help:Diff|diff]] and the DIFFTIME with the timestamp
* We need to know that there are at least four reverts. List them, and replace <nowiki>http://VersionLink</nowiki> with a link to the version that the first revert reverted to. If the reverts are subtle or different, please provide an explanation of why they are all reverts. Even if the reverts are straightforward, it's helpful to point out the words or sentences being reverted.
* Warnings are a good idea but not obligatory

Latest revision as of 15:27, 3 May 2024

    Welcome to the edit warring noticeboard
    Shortcuts
    Update this page

    This page is for reporting active edit warriors and recent violations of restrictions like the three-revert rule.

    You must notify any user you have reported.

    You may use {{subst:An3-notice}} ~~~~ to do so.

    You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

    Additional notes
    • When reporting a user here, your own behavior will also be scrutinized. Be sure you understand WP:REVERT and the definitions below first.
    • The format and contents of a 3RR/1RR report are important, use the "Click here to create a new report" button below to have a report template with the necessary fields to work from.
    • Possible alternatives to filing here are dispute resolution, or a request for page protection.
    • Violations of other restrictions, like WP:1RR violations, may also be brought here. Your report should include two reverts that occurred within a 24-hour period, and a link to where the 1RR restriction was imposed.
    Definition of edit warring
    Edit warring is a behavior, typically exemplified by the use of repeated edits to "win" a content dispute. It is different from a bold, revert, discuss (BRD) cycle. Reverting vandalism and banned users is not edit warring; at the same time, content disputes, even egregious point of view edits and other good-faith changes do not constitute vandalism. Administrators often must make a judgment call to identify edit warring when cooling disputes. Administrators currently use several measures to determine if a user is edit warring.
    Definition of the three-revert rule (3RR)
    An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Violations of this rule normally attract blocks of at least 24 hours. Any appearance of gaming the system by reverting a fourth time just outside the 24-hour slot is likely to be treated as a 3RR violation. See here for exemptions.

    Sections older than 48 hours are archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

    Click here to create a new report

    User:MylowattsIAm reported by User:Moxy (Result: Blocked 72 hours)[edit]

    Page: Germany (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

    User being reported: MylowattsIAm (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to:

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    1. 12:05, 2 May 2024 (UTC) "Maybe just leave it in there and then start the talk page thingy like I suggested several times before? Would be kinda cool if you took other users into consideration."
    2. 12:00, 2 May 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1221854606 by Moxy (talk)"
    3. 11:20, 2 May 2024 (UTC) "I saw what was linked but it still doesnt explain anything. What I meant is that if other articles also mention vice-chancellors and vice-presidents then it would only make sense if this did too. It would make sense for certain types of articles to follow a certain pattern. After I last revered Nikkimaria there were edits by several other editors and noone seemed to have a problem with the vice-chancellor being mentioned. If you want it so bad for it to be removed then discuss it on talk page."
    4. 22:54, 1 May 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1221768509 by Nikkimaria (talk) That doesnt explain anything. Please stop edit warring and making unreasonable reverts. Discuss it on talk page whether it should be removed or not. Otherwise it can stay as is."
    5. 09:08, 1 May 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1221622634 by Nikkimaria (talk) If we can show the vice-president of US in the infobox of USA as well as vice-presidents of other countries in their infobox then there is no reason why the German vice-chancellor cant be shown in the infobox for being the third highest ranking official of Germany. Some countries even have up to five leaders in the infobox anyways."

    Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

    1. 12:10, 2 May 2024 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule on Germany."

    Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: no ongoping tlak in this cases at time of this post ...but we have talked about honorary titles before.

    Comments: Somewhat new editor...if there willing to go to talk perhaps block can be avoided. NEW TALK Talk:Germany#Honorary titles in infoboxMoxy🍁 12:22, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    • Blocked – for a period of 72 hours. Bbb23 (talk) 13:46, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    User:197.231.201.171 reported by User:Neuropol (Result: )[edit]

    Page: Ishaaq bin Ahmed (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

    User being reported: 197.231.201.171 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to:

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    1. 13:32, 2 May 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1221867506 by Neuropol (talk)"
    2. 13:30, 2 May 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1221866547 by Neuropol (talk)"
    3. 13:23, 2 May 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1221861674 by Neuropol (talk)"

    Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

    1. 13:24, 2 May 2024 (UTC) "Warning: Edit warring on Ishaaq bin Ahmed."
    2. 13:31, 2 May 2024 (UTC) "Warning: Edit warring on Ishaaq bin Ahmed."

    Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:


    Comments:

    1. Update: User has initiated a discussion with me on my talk page.

    User:128.92.27.115 reported by User:Neuropol (Result: Blocked 31h)[edit]

    Page: Kenosha unrest shooting (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

    User being reported: 128.92.27.115 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to:

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    1. 17:04, 2 May 2024 (UTC) ""
    2. 16:45, 2 May 2024 (UTC) ""
    3. 16:43, 2 May 2024 (UTC) ""
    4. 16:40, 2 May 2024 (UTC) ""
    5. 19:39, 1 May 2024 (UTC) ""

    Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

    1. 16:53, 2 May 2024 (UTC) "Warning: Edit warring on Kenosha unrest shooting."

    Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:


    Comments:

    User:ActionHeroesAreReal reported by User:Mac Dreamstate (Result: No violation; try WP:ANI)[edit]

    Page: Naseem Hamed (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
    User being reported: ActionHeroesAreReal (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to: [1] – stable edition, correctly labelling Hamed as British only.

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    1. [2] – first revert, with a spurious edit summary of "Not constructive".
    2. [3]
    3. [4] – not a revert, but re-adding the disputed content with a new source rather than discussing at article talk page.
    4. [5] – reverting my revert, with no response to talk page message left for them, inviting them to continue discussion at article talk page.

    Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [6]

    Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: Discussion at article talk page. No responses to my most recent posting after almost two months.

    Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: [7]

    Comments:

    User:ActionHeroesAreReal mistakenly insists on Naseem Hamed being labelled as British-Yemeni. Hamed was born in the UK, is a British national, has never lived in Yemen (from where his parents hail), is not notable for his ethnicity, and has only ever competed under a British boxing licence. User chooses to ignore all the various BLP lead section guidelines including MOS:ETHNICITY, MOS:IDENTITY, and MOS:FIRSTBIO. After initially using an unreliable content aggregator as a source, they have now brought up one source which labels him as such, but the sole inclusion of this fails NPOV, WP:WEIGHT, and WP:FRINGE.

    I briefly considered WP:DR, but believe it is unnecessary because this is a clearcut case of a user not understanding the above guidelines, and refusing to engage in discussion. Without making this a conduct issue, they do appear to make a habit out of not using sources correctly or misinterpreting them, and have received numerous warnings by other experienced users. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 17:41, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    • No violation. There was edit-warring in March, but there is no violation weeks later. Based on a very cursory review of ActionHeroesAreReal's edits, I think the best place to address the user's edits is WP:ANI. Include whatever evidence you feel is appropriate, but at a minimum you should include previous edit-warring, not only on this article but on others, and you should also note personal attacks in edit summaries. I'm not comfortable unilaterally blocking without more evidence, and this is not the board to provide that evidence.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:02, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Bharatian Mapping reported by User:MiasmaEternal (Result:Blocked via WP:ANI by Dennis Brown )[edit]

    Page: Azad Hind (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

    User being reported: Bharatian Mapping (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to:

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    1. 06:28, 3 May 2024 (UTC) "This the real info, flag and emblem Azad Hind and it is not a vandal"
    2. 16:47, 2 May 2024 (UTC) ""
    3. 10:33, 2 May 2024 (UTC) ""
    4. Consecutive edits made from 17:11, 1 May 2024 (UTC) to 18:12, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
      1. 17:11, 1 May 2024 (UTC) ""
      2. 18:12, 1 May 2024 (UTC) "Emblem change"
    5. Consecutive edits made from 14:54, 1 May 2024 (UTC) to 16:09, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
      1. 14:54, 1 May 2024 (UTC) ""
      2. 16:01, 1 May 2024 (UTC) ""
      3. 16:09, 1 May 2024 (UTC) ""

    Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

    1. 08:43, 3 May 2024 (UTC) "Caution: Unconstructive editing on Azad Hind."

    Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:


    Comments:

    I am reporting this user due to repeated addition of suspected original research. User has refused to communicate regarding warnings by other users. Also triggered edit filter: Special:AbuseLog/37631579. MiasmaEternal☎ 08:50, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

     Comment: This user has already been reported at WP:ANI#NOTHERE disruption – 2804:F14:80EE:5A01:C1B6:4511:8DE3:83A7 (talk) 08:53, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring&oldid=1222048252"