Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Routerone/A paradise of skepticism: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Duke53 (talk | contribs)
Line 5: Line 5:
*'''Keep, tag as essay''' Ultimately, once you cut through the religious crap, it's an essay about Wikipedia. Essays about Wikipedia are explicitly allowed. [[WP:SOAP]] doesn't apply to essays about Wikipedia in userspace. The religious tinge here doesn't really violate any other policy or guideline that I can think of. In my opinion, calling Wikipedia paradise of skepticism is kind of a compliment, anyway. [[User:Gigs|Gigs]] ([[User talk:Gigs|talk]]) 01:37, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
*'''Keep, tag as essay''' Ultimately, once you cut through the religious crap, it's an essay about Wikipedia. Essays about Wikipedia are explicitly allowed. [[WP:SOAP]] doesn't apply to essays about Wikipedia in userspace. The religious tinge here doesn't really violate any other policy or guideline that I can think of. In my opinion, calling Wikipedia paradise of skepticism is kind of a compliment, anyway. [[User:Gigs|Gigs]] ([[User talk:Gigs|talk]]) 01:37, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
*<B>STRONG DELETE</B> It is way more than an essay ... if you click on the links at the bottom of the page you will see that it is also an attack page against some WP editors. Cheers. <font face="raphael" color="green">[[User:Duke53|Duke53]] | <sup>[[User talk:Duke53|Talk]]</sup></font> 02:52, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
*<B>STRONG DELETE</B> It is way more than an essay ... if you click on the links at the bottom of the page you will see that it is also an attack page against some WP editors. Cheers. <font face="raphael" color="green">[[User:Duke53|Duke53]] | <sup>[[User talk:Duke53|Talk]]</sup></font> 02:52, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
*'''Speedy delete as G11''': Clearly does nothing but promote a religion, and has no place on wikipedia. <span id="sig" style="background:#FFFFC0">'''[[User:Giftiger wunsch|<font face="Verdana" color="#900000">Giftiger<font color="#FF0000">Wunsch</font></font>]]''' [[User talk:Giftiger wunsch|<font face="Tahoma" color="#0060A0">[TALK]</font>]]</span> 07:15, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:15, 20 October 2010

User:Routerone/A paradise of skepticism

WP:NOT a soapbox. Willking1979 (talk) 18:30, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment - Any member of any religious group could post a similar page for the purpose of explaining why their religion is "better" than everyone else's. As such, it is hopelessly drenched in POV, and has no possibility of ever becoming an article. The picture looks nice, though. It would be sufficient to have that picture on the user's main page captioned with "I am a devout Mormon". Spare us the sermons. If we wanted to hear a sermon, we could find one. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 19:44, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, tag as essay Ultimately, once you cut through the religious crap, it's an essay about Wikipedia. Essays about Wikipedia are explicitly allowed. WP:SOAP doesn't apply to essays about Wikipedia in userspace. The religious tinge here doesn't really violate any other policy or guideline that I can think of. In my opinion, calling Wikipedia paradise of skepticism is kind of a compliment, anyway. Gigs (talk) 01:37, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • STRONG DELETE It is way more than an essay ... if you click on the links at the bottom of the page you will see that it is also an attack page against some WP editors. Cheers. Duke53 | Talk 02:52, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete as G11: Clearly does nothing but promote a religion, and has no place on wikipedia. GiftigerWunsch [TALK] 07:15, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]