User talk:Venu62: Difference between revisions
Gaia2767spm (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
Gaia2767spm (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
Some materials are copyrighted and external links needed. People have bias, perhaps u r right that TITUS and the Indo-european database may not be valuable to the pages. But there is to contribute and no mean to spam,[[User:Gaia2767spm|Gaia2767spm]] 01:07, 15 June 2007 (UTC) |
Some materials are copyrighted and external links needed. People have bias, perhaps u r right that TITUS and the Indo-european database may not be valuable to the pages. But there is to contribute and no mean to spam,[[User:Gaia2767spm|Gaia2767spm]] 01:07, 15 June 2007 (UTC) |
||
A double revert by u may be needed for u r point. |
|||
1. For a language, relevant sample texts are helpful for readers to know more about the language. So are now in external links of many other languages wikipages. |
|||
2. For a modern language, an external link of radio would be better examples, so TITUS may not be relevant. For old languages, the readers may want to know more, e.g. for big structure and word list, the external links supports wikipedia pages, for reasons of copyright, completion of ideas and limitation in size of wikipedia pages, the less important information may be links for further reading of the readers. |
|||
3. The TITUS and the The Indo-European Database have been suggested by contributors earlier, e.g. in pages [[Proto-Indo-European language]]&[[Lydian language]], so there should be some value in that.[[User:Gaia2767spm|Gaia2767spm]] 10:48, 15 June 2007 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 10:48, 15 June 2007
|
|---|
| 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 |
==The site TITUS have some old texts of old languages not available elsewhere, e.g. the Khotanese language, there is no elsewhere site give the samples==Gaia2767spm 23:54, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
There are sample texts in TITUS project. The wikipedia page do not have a text sample and TITUS project has. There are links of glossaries that helps readers. For the less known languages, isn't the samples and the glossaries useful?Gaia2767spm 00:28, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
Some materials are copyrighted and external links needed. People have bias, perhaps u r right that TITUS and the Indo-european database may not be valuable to the pages. But there is to contribute and no mean to spam,Gaia2767spm 01:07, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
A double revert by u may be needed for u r point. 1. For a language, relevant sample texts are helpful for readers to know more about the language. So are now in external links of many other languages wikipages. 2. For a modern language, an external link of radio would be better examples, so TITUS may not be relevant. For old languages, the readers may want to know more, e.g. for big structure and word list, the external links supports wikipedia pages, for reasons of copyright, completion of ideas and limitation in size of wikipedia pages, the less important information may be links for further reading of the readers. 3. The TITUS and the The Indo-European Database have been suggested by contributors earlier, e.g. in pages Proto-Indo-European language&Lydian language, so there should be some value in that.Gaia2767spm 10:48, 15 June 2007 (UTC)