User talk:Liftarn

This discussion page may contain trolling. Before you post any reply, consider how you might minimize the effects of trollish comments. Simply ignoring certain comments may be the best option. If you must respond, a temperate response is always best, whether trolling is suspected or not.

Archives
/Archive 1 /Archive 2 /Archive 3 /Archive 4 /Archive 5

Might be interested

I noticed that you took part in State terrorism by United States of America argument for deletion. You may be interested that there is a user right now who is deleting large portions of the article. 69.150.209.15 17:43, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Seven Builder link

I notice you keep deleting this resource link. I very confused as to your reason why as I've been a Lotus Seven enthusiast for almost a decade now, and my brother was a design engineer for Lotus Engineering. We are planning to build one and find Seven Builder to be quite relevant and it's regularly updated with high quality articles, pictures and is a useful resource. Please add it back. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nickgomez (talk • contribs)

It is not a relevant link in every article about a sevenesque car. // Liftarn

Image:Tetragrammaton-related-Masoretic-vowel-points.png

Why did you move it to commons when it has little use outside of an English-language context? AnonMoos 14:59, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

User wanted ;-)

Hi Liftarn, we want to contact the original uploader of this image [1] for further questions. Unfortunatly there is no user page. Is the page probably deleted? Can you help somehow? -- Stahlkocher 18:12, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

The user may not have made a user page. The user seems to exist, see Special:Contributions/Michael.katzmann so you could go to User talk:Michael.katzmann and leave a message, but the user doesn't seem to be very active. // Liftarn

Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg

Thanks for moving it to the Commons, but due to the high use of the image here, I ask not to be deleted from en.wikipedia at this time. Thanks. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 17:38, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

No problem (I'm not an admin so I can't delete it anyway) and the image on Commons is not the same as here. // Liftarn

Your moves of many articles

In the future before you move pages, suggest it on the talk page and get consensus to do so first.--Sefringle 20:47, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

You think you are funny with edits like this?

Do you honestly think this edit was in good faith and would be kept?--Sefringle 00:52, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Yes, anti-racism is a component of anti-zionism. It's true that there are other reasons to oppose zionism, but anti-racism is one of them. // Liftarn

This section really begs the question. Arrow740 06:59, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

"the spaghetti's not al dente? Cook's an anti-Semite. Loses a bet on a horse. Secretariat? Anti-Semitic. Doesn't geta good seat at the temple. Rabbi? Anti-Semite."[2] // Liftarn

3RR

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. ←Humus sapiens ^ну? 20:20, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

3RR

You have been blocked for violating the three revert rule on Anti-Zionism after previous 3RR blocks for a period of 48 hours. To contest this block, please reply here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} along with the reason you believe the block is unjustified, or email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Selket ^Talk 22:57, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Liftarn (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

no reverts to same version

Decline reason:

Not relevant. See WP:3RR. — Yamla 13:57, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

So you're only allowed three edits per article per day? // Liftarn

WP:SIG

Please take your time to read WP:SIG, which says: "Signatures on Wikipedia identify you as a user, and your contributions to Wikipedia. They encourage civility in discussions by identifying the author of a particular comment, and the date and time at which it was made." Your practice of signing your posts only with your username contravenes WP:SIG, so please consider changing your signature accordingly. Beit Or 18:00, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

muwahahaha

All I have to say is, you're quite a card (def #2), re: Image:Jewish Encyclopedia Arnon Gorge.jpg.  :-p Cheers, Tomer^talk 07:55, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Moving images to Commons is amusing? Then you should have a look at Wikipedia:WikiProject Moving free images to Wikimedia Commons. // Liftarn

If you look at what's been going on regarding that image, it's pretty funny. 75.17.198.36 16:30, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Moving to commons

Great effort moving images to commons, but please remember to find a suitable category or article for the images that you move to commons, or at least use the {{uncat}} template. If the image is not in a category or an article the local copy on :en can't be deleted according to CSD I8.

Angular (typeface)

A "{{prod}}" template has been added to the article Angular (typeface), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but yours may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Psychonaut 19:52, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

3rr

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. ←Humus sapiens ^ну? 08:31, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Coming from you that's a joke. // Liftarn

Notability of Onkel Kånkel

A tag has been placed on Onkel Kånkel, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. tomasz. 10:41, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Onkel Kånkel

I've restored the article. It would probably stop people tagging it for deletion if those references were all in there. Best, Neil ╦ 16:25, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Project Palestine

If house demolition is project Palestine, suicide bombing will also be Project Palestine. You seem to want double standards. eternalsleeper

No. And it's not up to you to decide anyway. // Liftarn

It is imperative that we maintain neutrality here. Please remember that. This is not "trolling." I am going to join Project Palestine so I can use their banner.

eternalsleeper

I do not think you are allowed to remove this from your discussion. But I see why you would want to.

eternalsleeper

Post to a user page?

Hi. I noticed that you posted a message about the upload of an image to the userpage User:Ludvikus. I may be missing something here, but should it not go on his talk page instead, as per convention? The other mystifying thing is that he is currently blocked until August 2007, yet still appears to be active, if he is uploading material. Again, I could be missing an important point or two in this. Thanks. Ref ^(chew)(do) 19:30, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Yes, but his talk page appears to be locked so I couldn't put it there. // Liftarn

Fair use rationale for Image:1K ZX Chess - Sinclair - ZX81.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:1K ZX Chess - Sinclair - ZX81.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Dual Freq 13:14, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Stonkers - Imagine.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Stonkers - Imagine.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:14, 16 June 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Dual Freq 13:14, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Stonkers - Imagine.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Stonkers - Imagine.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Dual Freq 13:14, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Back to the future 02.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Back to the future 02.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Dual Freq 13:14, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:BackToTheFuture.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:BackToTheFuture.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Dual Freq 13:14, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Molly-RajRaj.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Molly-RajRaj.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Dual Freq 13:14, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Molly-Mollyfied.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Molly-Mollyfied.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Dual Freq 13:14, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:VolvoT6.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:VolvoT6.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Dual Freq 13:14, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Volvos40racing screenshot.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Volvos40racing screenshot.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Dual Freq 13:14, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Clocklogo.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Clocklogo.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Dual Freq 13:14, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:ArrowPhoto0Half.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:ArrowPhoto0Half.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Dual Freq 13:14, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:SaabQuantum.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:SaabQuantum.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Dual Freq 13:14, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Jenin jenin.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Jenin jenin.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Dual Freq 13:14, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:CharlieAndTheChocolateFactory.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:CharlieAndTheChocolateFactory.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Dual Freq 13:14, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Friday the 13th.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Friday the 13th.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Dual Freq 13:14, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

House Demolition revert

Someone has removed the following quote from House demolition:

"The thinking is that a national threat calls for a national response, invariably aggressive. Accordingly, a Jewish house without a permit is an urban problem; but a Palestinian home without a permit is a strategic threat. A Jew building without a permit is ‘cocking a snook at the law’; a Palestinian doing the same is defying Jewish sovereignty over Jerusalem."

with a claim "that the material has nothing to do with the material that preceded it, nor followed it, nor anything to do with the section itself that it was placed in. Please explain the relevance".

But I fully understand the relevance of having it in. The UN describes what is happening in Jerusalem as "ethnic cleansing" (the ADL reminds us of this, see [3]). The whole Palestinian thing is likely the longest and best documented case of ethnic cleansing in history, it seems reasonable to put in a short reference to the beginning of it and another short reference to what is happening 60 years later. Your clip doesn't actually specify "ethnic cleansing", but it's more "useful" and/or "readable" than many that do. It's a good description of the process and thinking behind it, and the encyclopaedia will benefit from having it in. PalestineRemembered 07:58, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

I don't having large quoutes, but that may provide more context. However, it's being discussed at the talk page so that is probably the best way to deal with it. // Liftarn

Canvassing for reverts

Please stop canvassing for reverts. Thanks. Jayjg ^(talk) 15:57, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Huh? Are you totally paranoid? I specificly reccomend using the talk page. // Liftarn

Jerry Klein

I have responded to your comments on Talk:Jerry Klein’s 2006 Radio Experiment about whether it belongs in the Antisemitism category. Please review and respond.

--Wowaconia 23:14, 18 June 2007 (UTC)