Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Four Times of the Day

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Qp10qp (talk | contribs) at 21:37, 14 June 2007 (support). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Four Times of the Day

Probably not one of Hogarth's more famous series, these four pictures provide a light-hearted snapshot of 18th century London. ALoan and I have tried to pick out the details. I hope you find it interesting (and that ALoan returns to help me out with any objections). Yomanganitalk 16:26, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Interesting article, congratulations. Comments:
    • This sentence is, I think, misleading/difficult: Four Times of the Day was the first set of prints that Hogarth had published since his two great successes A Harlot's Progress (1732) and A Rake's Progress (1735) and one of the first to be published after the Engraving Copyright Act 1734 (which Hogarth had helped push through Parliament) had come into force. (1) It makes it seem like the prints were among the first in general to be printed, when really there must have been hundreds of prints published between 1735-8. (2) A Rake's Progress was published after the Act came into force; indeed, Hogarth held it back for this reason. The words 'one of the first' make is seem like Hogarth was making an important innovation when he printed Four Times of the Day, when really he was just doing the same as he had for at least one major set of prints already.
      I thought that phrasing made it clearer that it was one of Hogarth's first publications since the act rather than one of the first in general, but obviously not. I've rephrased it. Yomanganitalk 00:44, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • The background paragraph contains the comment 'Find ref in Paulson', which presumably needs dealing with
      Fixed (I knew I missed one). Yomanganitalk 00:44, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • The article doesn't say much about the history of the paintings after they were painted. According to the Dictionary of National Biography, Morning and Night are kept at Upton House, Warwickshire and Noon and Evening are in a private collection. It would be nice, if possible, to include something about how they got there. The article on Upton House contains some info.
Ycdkwm 19:37, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This is tricky. The other two are in the Ancaster Collection at Grimsthorpe Castle, never having been resold, but the two at Upton House seem to have left little trail between Heathcote buying them at the auction and Bearsted gifting them to the National Trust. I've filled in a little detail. Yomanganitalk 00:44, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • 'Support. Another fine article by Yomangani, who is making a considerable contribution to the visual arts area on Wikipedia, a much neglected area. I didn't so much read this article as pore over it, opening up all the images and comparing them with each other and the text, as well as feeling prompted to read connected articles and bits and pieces in books about Hogarth. In the latter case, I found the text to be fully supported by the secondary sources I could get hold of. qp10qp 21:37, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]