Talk:Energy accounting

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 77siddhartha (talk | contribs) at 08:09, 17 June 2007 (Archived old comments). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Incorrect criticisms

I'm going to remove this from the Article, because Technocrats do not argue this, and thus the opposition view is pointless.

"The technocrats would agree that, economically, every person would be equal. In this way, they share some communist ideals, but technocrats argue that the post-cold war era has given the term Communism a negative connotation. They say that communism and capitalism are both systems evolved from scarcity, and that mankind has never attempted to implement a system based on abundance. An opponent of technocracy might counter-argue that it is not post-cold war capitalists who have given communism a bad name, but rather communism's own dismal track record which has ruined its credibility as an economic system."

I will attempt to restate it somehow. --Hibernian 23:11, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This article is so poorly written that my initial edits on the top have helped (skip sievert 17:51, 29 May 2007 (UTC))[reply]

This article needs to be renamed. Energy Accounting.(skip sievert 04:26, 17 June 2007 (UTC))[reply]