Wikipedia:Requests for comment/History and geography: Difference between revisions

Edit links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous edit
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Legobot (talk | contribs)
Bots
1,626,615 edits
Legobot (talk | contribs)
Bots
1,626,615 edits
 
(86 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
{{rfclistintro}}
{{rfclistintro}}
</noinclude>
</noinclude>
'''[[Talk:Markos Botsaris#rfc_AB1CBC1|Talk:Markos Botsaris]]'''
'''[[Talk:Russian Civil War#rfc_B5D3EF0|Talk:Russian Civil War]]'''
{{rfcquote|text=
{{rfcquote|text=
We seem to have two different ideas about how much information should be in the infobox for this article. Here are the two most recent versions. Which do you prefer? [[User:WhatamIdoing|WhatamIdoing]] ([[User talk:WhatamIdoing|talk]]) 00:01, 22 May 2024 (UTC)}}
As this talk page shows, there has been an intractable debate on whether the subject should be described as Greek (or Albanian etc) and what spelling his name should have and connected questions. This RfC hopes to solve this issue. The issues are as follows:
'''[[Talk:Yasuke#rfc_AFC003D|Talk:Yasuke]]'''
* '''How should the subject of the article be named? '''
:* Is the Albanian-language version of his name necessary or appropriate?
:* What prominence should be given to the Albanian-language version of his name?
* '''Is it appropriate to describe him in the lead as Greek?'''
⚫
[[User:Jtrrs0|Jtrrs0]] ([[User talk:Jtrrs0|talk]]) 12:23, 1 April 2024 (UTC)}}
'''[[Talk:Reconquista#rfc_68AA61B|Talk:Reconquista]]'''
{{rfcquote|text=
{{rfcquote|text=
Should the viewpoint of Lockley (and others), that Yasuke was a samurai, be presented as a significant minority view at or towards the bottom of the Documented life in Japan section? [[User:RomeshKubajali|RomeshKubajali]] ([[User talk:RomeshKubajali|talk]]) 23:13, 21 May 2024 (UTC)}}
With regard to [[WP:Verifiability]], [[WP:NPOV]], and current academic consensus, should the article present the Reconquista as a matter of historical fact at face value or as historiographical narrative?
⚫
'''[[Talk:Joe Biden#rfc_82C4B78|Talk:Joe Biden]]'''
⚫
{{rfcquote|text=
Should Biden's building of a port to facilitate American aid to Palestinians be mentioned in the lead?

* '''Option #1:''' No.
* '''Option #2:''' Yes.
* '''Option #3:''' Aid in general should be mentioned. Not the port itself.


⚫
Does it merit inclusion? [[User:KlayCax|KlayCax]] ([[User talk:KlayCax|talk]]) 20:24, 21 May 2024 (UTC)}}
This has been a perennial discussion (such as [[Talk:Reconquista/Archive 3#Lead|here]]), and the article would benefit from some stabilizing, somewhat binding consensus. I am hoping for robust engagement with the latest scholarship and the most reliable sources. [[User:إيان|إيان]] ([[User talk:إيان|talk]]) 20:11, 29 March 2024 (UTC)}}
'''[[Talk:Sir Charles Trevelyan, 1st Baronet#rfc_06CE9EC|Talk:Sir Charles Trevelyan, 1st Baronet]]'''
'''[[Talk:Israel–Hamas war#rfc_2977057|Talk:Israel–Hamas war]]'''
{{rfcquote|text=
{{rfcquote|text=
Should we include the following in the lead, directly after listing casualties:
There is a question into the validity of a quote in the article
''Reports of [[Sexual and gender-based violence in the 2023 Hamas-led attack on Israel|widespread rape and sexual violence]] committed by Hamas-led militants emerged.''
[[Sir Charles Trevelyan, 1st Baronet]] as shown in difference
[[Special:Diff/1215143082]]. [[User:Edmund Patrick|Edmund Patrick]] &ndash;<small> [[User talk:Edmund Patrick|'''confer''']]</small> 08:33, 26 March 2024 (UTC)}}
[[User:Willthorpe|Will Thorpe]] ([[User talk:Willthorpe|talk]]) 12:22, 20 May 2024 (UTC)}}
'''[[Talk:Minneapolis#rfc_1449716|Talk:Minneapolis]]'''
'''[[Talk:Rafida#rfc_E8A6B7C|Talk:Rafida]]'''
{{rfcquote|text=
{{rfcquote|text=
⚫
Should the [[Minneapolis]] article begin its first section with '''A)''' an overview of the Native Americans who lived in the area (as it does now) with the heading "Dakota homeland, city founded", or '''B)''' the first European to view the area that became Minneapolis (as it does in [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Minneapolis&oldid=1215066590#Dakota_people,_city_founded this version]) under the heading "Dakota people, city founded"? -[[User:SusanLesch|SusanLesch]] ([[User talk:SusanLesch|talk]]) 23:15, 23 March 2024 (UTC)}}

'''[[Talk:Sri Lanka Armed Forces#rfc_BF0AC61|Talk:Sri Lanka Armed Forces]]'''
Should the following sentence be restored to the [[WP:LEDE|lede paragraph]] of the article on [[Rafida]]:
⚫
{{rfcquote|text=
{{tqb|The charge that Shias have rejected the Truth is frequently cited by Sunni extremists to justify their acts of violence against the Shia community.}}
Should the following sentence be included after the heading '''Deployments in Peacekeeping Missions''':
{{tqb|Sri Lankan peacekeepers have been embroiled in a child sex ring scandal in Haiti, with at least 134 soldiers being accused of sexually abusing nine children from 2004 to 2007.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2017-04-12 |title=AP Investigation: UN troops lured kids into Haiti sex ring |url=https://apnews.com/article/7ccc5fbc05124fa9b0f42ce2edb62d9d |access-date=2024-02-23 |website=AP News |language=en}}</ref>}}
?
?
[[User:Robert McClenon|Robert McClenon]] ([[User talk:Robert McClenon|talk]]) 02:50, 19 March 2024 (UTC)}}
[[User:Robert McClenon|Robert McClenon]] ([[User talk:Robert McClenon|talk]]) 02:45, 20 May 2024 (UTC)}}
'''[[Talk:1977 anti-Tamil pogrom#rfc_D09A041|Talk:1977 anti-Tamil pogrom]]'''
'''[[Talk:Russo-Ukrainian War#rfc_F854C08|Talk:Russo-Ukrainian War]]'''
{{rfcquote|text=
{{rfcquote|text=
⚫
Should [[Belarus]] be listed in the infobox (and accordingly described in other parts of this article) concerning the [[Russian invasion of Ukraine|events since 24 February 2022]]: '''A)''' no (as at present); '''B)''' as "Supported since 2022 by: {{flag|Belarus}}" (in Russia's side).
The last paragraph on the [[1977_anti-Tamil_pogrom#Presidential_Commission_of_Inquiry|Presidential Commission of Inquiry]] currently reads:


Please enter your answer to the question in the Survey section with a brief statement. Please do not respond to the statements of other editors in the Survey section. Back-and-forth discussion is permitted in the Discussion section (that's what it's for).
{{tqb|Following his inquiry, Justice Sansoni submitted his report, which was known as the "Sansoni Report" to President Jayewardene in July 1980.<ref name="presidential commission" /> The riots were explained in the Sansoni Report in terms of "Sinhalese reaction to Tamil separatist demands, terrorist acts committed in the name of separatism, and anti-Sinhalese statements allegedly made by Tamil politicians in the course of the 1977 general election campaign".<ref name="Kearney">{{cite journal |last1=Kearney |first1=Robert N. |date=March 1986 |title=Tension and Conflict in Sri Lanka |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/45315688 |journal=Current History |volume=85 |issue=509 |pages=110}}</ref> The Sansoni Report has been criticized for pro-government bias,<ref>{{Cite book |last=Hoole |first=Rajan |url=https://www.uthr.org/Book/CHA02.htm#_Toc527947390 |title=Sri Lanka: The Arrogance of Power : Myths, Decadence & Murder |publisher=University Teachers for Human Rights (Jaffna) |year=2001 |chapter=Chapter 2: Antecedents of July 1983 and the Foundations of Impunity}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Sabaratnam |first=T. |date=23 November 2003 |title=Pirapaharan: Vol.1, Chap. 18 Tamils Lose Faith in Commissions |url=https://sangam.org/pirapaharan-vol-1-chap-18-tamils-lose-faith-in-commissions/ |website=Ilankai Tamil Sangam}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |last=Sivanayagam |first=S. |title=Sri Lanka: Witness to History - A Journalist's Memoirs, 1930-2004 |date=2005 |publisher=Sivayogam |isbn=978-0-9549647-0-2 |location=London |page=283}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |last=Manoharan |first=N. |title=Democratic Dilemma: Ethnic Violence and Human Rights in Sri Lanka |date=2008 |publisher=Samskriti |isbn=9788187374503 |location=New Delhi |page=90}}</ref> being hampered by political interference<ref>Amnesty International, June 11, 2009 Index Number: ASA 37/005/2009
Sri Lanka: Twenty years of make-believe. Sri Lanka’s Commissions of Inquiry, p.9, https://www.amnesty.org/en/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/asa370052009eng.pdf</ref><ref>Kishali Pinto Jayawardena, Sunday Times, Feb 17th 2008, Focus on Rights, Further reflections on commission inquiries and rights violations - Part Three, https://www.sundaytimes.lk/080217/Columns/focus.html</ref><ref>Kishali Pinto Jayawardena, Sunday Times, Oct 28th 2007, Discussing mock turtles and commissions of inquiry, https://www.sundaytimes.lk/080217/Columns/focus.html</ref> and for "[[victim blaming]]" Tamils.<ref>{{Citation |last=de Silva |first=Premakumara |title=Ethnicity and Violence in Sri Lanka: An Ethnohistorical Narrative |date=2019 |work=The Palgrave Handbook of Ethnicity |page=16 |editor-last=Ratuva |editor-first=Steven |url=https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-981-13-0242-8_47-1 |access-date=2024-03-12 |place=Singapore |publisher=Springer |language=en |last2=Haniffa |first2=Farzana |last3=Bastin |first3=Rohan}}</ref>}}


Note to closer and other participants: this RFC was started because the [[Talk:Russo-Ukrainian_War#RFC_on_Listing_of_Belarus|previous similar RFC]] (started on 16 March 2024) was [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Russo-Ukrainian_War&diff=prev&oldid=1224318558 closed] on 17 May 2024 without a clear consensus regarding options A and B, but the uninvolved closer Compassionate727 stated that "Finally, there seems to be a consensus that if added, Belarus should be added with a note that its support began in 2022, although there is no reason that shouldn't be confirmed in the next RfC, which I assume will be forthcoming shortly". -- [[User:Pofka|<span style="color:#fdb913;"><strong>Po</strong></span><span style="color:#006a44;"><strong>fk</strong></span><span style="color:#c1272d;"><strong>a</strong></span>]] ([[User talk:Pofka|talk]]) 20:27, 19 May 2024 (UTC)}}
One editor wants the last paragraph to be changed to the following, as he believes both the Kearney and Manogaran sources have "accepted" the reasons attributed by Sansoni for the riots, whereas other editors believe that those sources are merely summarising Sansoni's reasons, and are not personal approvals. Do you agree with the proposed change below?
'''[[Talk:Havana syndrome#rfc_9FB246D|Talk:Havana syndrome]]'''
⚫
{{rfcquote|text=
There is ongoing discussion about how to best present the content of the ''Insider investigative report'' on a Russian connection to Havana Syndrome. Two versions have been proposed, and we seek wider community input on which should be included in the article. The discussion has raised concerns about the due weight of content relating to allegations of secret weapons use by Russian military intelligence's GRU Unit 29155.


'''Version 2.1:'''
{{tqb|Following his inquiry, Justice Sansoni submitted his report, which was known as the "Sansoni Report" to President Jayewardene in July 1980.<ref name="presidential commission" />
{{talkquote|On March 31, 2024, ''[[The Insider (website)|The Insider]]'', in collaboration with ''[[60 Minutes]]'' and ''[[Der Spiegel]]'', published an investigative report reigniting speculation that hostile Russian action was responsible for the syndrome.<ref name="kremlin-dismisses">https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/kremlin-dismisses-report-russia-behind-havana-syndrome-2024-04-01/</ref><ref name=":4">{{Cite web |title=Havana syndrome: Report links mystery illness to Russian intelligence unit |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-68706317 |access-date=2024-04-02 |website=www.bbc.com}}</ref> The Kremlin Press Secretary dismissed the report as "nothing more than baseless, unfounded accusations by the media." In response to the report, the White House Press Secretary said that a "foreign adversary is very unlikely." Following the report, several U.S. Senators, including [[Susan Collins]], [[Jeanne Shaheen]], and [[Mark Warner]], sent a letter to the President calling for further investigation into the cause of the anomalous health incidents.}}


'''Version 3.1:'''
Over the years the Sansoni Report has been recived diffrent reviews. Robert N. Kearney found that the Sansoni Report explained the riots in terms of "Sinhalese reaction to Tamil separatist demands, terrorist acts committed in the name of separatism, and anti-Sinhalese statements allegedly made by Tamil politicians in the course of the 1977 general election campaign".<ref name="Kearney">{{cite journal |last1=Kearney |first1=Robert N. |date=March 1986 |title=Tension and Conflict in Sri Lanka |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/45315688 |journal=Current History |volume=85 |issue=509 |pages=110}}</ref> According to Chelvadurai Manogaran, the Sansoni Report attributed many factors as the cause of the riots, including "TULFs anti-Sinhalese proganda advocating separatism, Sinhalese extremists' statements claiming that Tamils intended to wipe out the Sinhalese and acts of violence committed by the liberation Tigers". The immediate cause of the violence Manogaran finds is rumor of Sinhalese policemen been attacked in Jaffna by Tamil militants. He further states that due to the violance (in Augest 1977) and events that followed many Tamils both extreme and moderate were convinced the need to establish a separate state<ref name="Chelvadurai">{{cite book |last1=Manogaran |first1=Chelvadurai |title=Ethnic Conflict and Reconciliation in Sri Lanka |date=1987 |publisher=University of Hawaii Press |location=Honolulu |pages=63-65 |url=https://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/4f3811e7-1962-495d-bad0-12f31e6754d9/content |access-date=12 March 2024}}</ref>
{{tqb|On March 31 2024, ''[[The Insider (website)|The Insider]]'', in collaboration with ''[[60 Minutes]]'' and ''[[Der Spiegel]],'' published an investigative report claiming that the syndrome was caused by actions of [[GRU (Russian Federation)|Russian military intelligence]].<ref name="kremlin-dismisses"/><ref name=":4"/><ref name="guardian-report"/> The report states that members of the [[GRU Unit 29155]], known for undertaking foreign operations<ref name=":4"/>, received awards and promotions for work related to the development and deployment of "[[Directed-energy weapon|non-lethal acoustic weapons]]", and that telephone and travel data pinpointing the locations of these agents correlated with the timings and locations of Havana Syndrome incidents worldwide.<ref name="Dobrokhotov"/><ref name=":3"/><ref name="SpiegelMarch2024"/><br /><br />The [[Kremlin Press Secretary]] dismissed the report as "nothing more than baseless, unfounded accusations by the media."<ref name="kremlin-dismisses"/> In response to the report, the [[White House Press Secretary]] said that a "foreign adversary is very unlikely."<ref name="us-not-moved"/><br /><br />Following the report, in a letter addressed to the [[President of the United States|President]] several U.S. Senators called for further investigations into the causes of the anomalous health incidents.<ref name="letter-request-senators">{{Cite web |last=Chasan |first=Aliza |date=2024-04-17 |title=Senators call for renewed Havana Syndrome assessment after 60 Minutes report - CBS News |url=https://www.cbsnews.com/news/senators-urge-renewed-havana-syndrome-assessment-60-minutes/ |access-date=2024-04-24 |website=www.cbsnews.com |language=en-US}}</ref>}}


Please provide your opinions and rationale for supporting either version 2.1 or 3.1 and please ensure your responses are based on Wikipedia's content policies and guidelines. ([[User:FailedMusician|FailedMusician]] ([[User talk:FailedMusician|talk]]) 02:29, 25 April 2024 (UTC)}}
The Sansoni Report has been criticized for pro-government bias by [[Rajan Hoole]] of the [[University Teachers for Human Rights]]<ref>{{Cite book |last=Hoole |first=Rajan |url=https://www.uthr.org/Book/CHA02.htm#_Toc527947390 |title=Sri Lanka: The Arrogance of Power : Myths, Decadence & Murder |publisher=University Teachers for Human Rights (Jaffna) |year=2001 |chapter=Chapter 2: Antecedents of July 1983 and the Foundations of Impunity}}</ref> and T. Sabaratnam in his biography of [[Velupillai Prabhakaran]].<ref>{{Cite web |last=Sabaratnam |first=T. |date=23 November 2003 |title=Pirapaharan: Vol.1, Chap. 18 Tamils Lose Faith in Commissions |url=https://sangam.org/pirapaharan-vol-1-chap-18-tamils-lose-faith-in-commissions/ |website=Ilankai Tamil Sangam}}</ref>}}
'''[[Talk:SpaceX Starship flight tests#rfc_E154D11|Talk:SpaceX Starship flight tests]]'''
[[User:Oz346|Oz346]] ([[User talk:Oz346|talk]]) 00:54, 19 March 2024 (UTC)}}
'''[[Talk:Sri Lanka Armed Forces#rfc_391BB84|Talk:Sri Lanka Armed Forces]]'''
{{rfcquote|text=
{{rfcquote|text=
Hi everyone, this RfC is to retrieve consensus regarding the addition of mission outcome to the Orbital/Intergated launch wikitable, as well as adding the associated chart in the same section.
The first sentence of the section on alleged war crimes in the Sri Lankan Civil War currently reads:
{{tqb|The Armed Forces along with the LTTE have been accused of committing war crimes during the war, particularly during the final stages. A panel of experts appointed by UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon to advise him on the issue of accountability with regard to any alleged violations of international human rights and humanitarian law during the final stages of the civil war found "credible allegations" which, if proven, indicated that war crimes and crimes against humanity were committed by the Sri Lankan Armed Forces and the LTTE, with most civilian casualties in the final phases of the war being blamed on Sri Lankan Army shelling, with the LTTE preventing the civilian from leaving as they used them as human shields and attempted to create an humanitarian crises.}}
Should the last phrase read:
:'''A''' {{tq|with most civilian casualties in the final phases of the war being blamed on indiscriminate Sri Lankan Army shelling and the LTTE being blamed for using civilians as a human buffer.}}
:OR
:'''B''' {{tq|with the LTTE accused of significantly adding to the death toll in the final stages of the war, by using civilians as a human buffer and shooting civilians attempting to escape the conflict zone.}}
?
[[User:Robert McClenon|Robert McClenon]] ([[User talk:Robert McClenon|talk]]) 23:06, 18 March 2024 (UTC)}}
'''[[Talk:Mohamed Hadid#rfc_5ED71D4|Talk:Mohamed Hadid]]'''
⚫
{{rfcquote|text=
How should the place of birth of Mohamed Hadid be described? [[Talk:Mohamed Hadid/Archives/2018|Prior RfC]]


'''Context:''' IFT-3 has ben the subject of confusion and debate here in Wikipedia. The confusion between Launch outcome and Mission outcome has led editors to think of the two as one, despite those being different things. This article also doesn't show the launch outcome alongside mission outcome, meaning editors and readers alike might see the green "success" entry in the launch column/chart and believe the mission succeded, not reading the other text to learn that the mission wasn't a full success. This factor will lead to confusion among Wikipedia editors, and confused editors can't properly write a wiki.
# Nazareth (now Israel)
# Nazareth (Israel)
# Nazareth (Palestine)


'''The question:''' Should we list the mission outcome as clearly as we list the launch outcome?
[[User:FortunateSons|FortunateSons]] ([[User talk:FortunateSons|talk]]) 08:15, 18 March 2024 (UTC)}}
'''[[Talk:Russo-Ukrainian War#rfc_F3BC84D|Talk:Russo-Ukrainian War]]'''
{{rfcquote|text=
⚫


If you wish to dispute this RfC, please raise your concerns over at the appropriate [[WP:DRN]] and [[WP:PUMP]] noticeboards. You may also bring this discussion up at [[WP:DfD]] and [[WP:AN]], and if all discussions go wrong or end up with no real result, you can contact the [[Wikipedia Arbitration Committee]]. But bear in mind, contacting the Arbitration Committee is a last resort option that should not be done for minor reasons, so only contact them if the discussions go '''very''' wrong. Thanks, [[Special:Contributions/179.251.80.181|179.251.80.181]] ([[User talk:179.251.80.181|talk]]) 22:59, 20 April 2024 (UTC)}}
⚫
Should [[Belarus]] be listed in the infobox, and accordingly described in other parts of the article concerning the [[Russian invasion of Ukraine|events since 24 January 2024]]: (a). no (as at present); (b) as ''supported by''; (c) as a co-belligerent; (d) without qualification?
[[User:Robert McClenon|Robert McClenon]] ([[User talk:Robert McClenon|talk]]) 07:27, 16 March 2024 (UTC)}}
'''[[Talk:Monarchy of Canada#rfc_607717A|Talk:Monarchy of Canada]]'''
{{rfcquote|text=
Should it be mentioned in this article, that the Canadian monarch resides in the United Kingdom? [[User:GoodDay|GoodDay]] ([[User talk:GoodDay|talk]]) 21:37, 13 March 2024 (UTC)}}
'''[[Talk:1948 Palestine war#rfc_647AC09|Talk:1948 Palestine war]]'''
{{rfcquote|text=
Should we mention the [[Jewish exodus from the Muslim world|exodus of Jews from Arab countries]] during and immediately after the war in the lede of this article? [[User:Alaexis|Alaexis]]<sub>[[User_talk:Alaexis|¿question?]]</sub> 23:05, 7 March 2024 (UTC)}}
⚫
'''[[Talk:Bhagat Singh#rfc_F827CFD|Talk:Bhagat Singh]]'''
{{rfcquote|text=
Should the descriptor "charismatic" be used in the first lead paragraph, and if so, where? [[User:AirshipJungleman29|&#126;~ AirshipJungleman29]] ([[User talk:AirshipJungleman29|talk]]) 19:13, 7 March 2024 (UTC)}}
'''[[Talk:Israel–Hamas war#rfc_5DB920B|Talk:Israel–Hamas war]]'''
{{rfcquote|text=
In the lede, after the first casualty mentions, should we mention that some of the Israeli and Palestinian casualties were caused by friendly fire? If so, should we include this as a footnote or as direct text?

Specific wording would be determined through normal editing, but may be along the lines of:
*For Israeli Casualties: {{tq|This includes an unknown number killed by friendly fire or as a result of the [[Hannibal Directive]]}}
*For Palestinian Casualties: {{tq|This includes an unknown number killed by the approximately ten to twenty percent of militant rockets that fall short}}

04:07, 7 March 2024 (UTC)}}
'''[[Talk:COVID-19 pandemic#rfc_4679B35|Talk:COVID-19 pandemic]]'''
{{rfcquote|text=
Is [[Talk:COVID-19_pandemic#Current_consensus]] #14 still valid?. It says: "Do not mention the theory that the virus was accidentally leaked from a laboratory in the article. (May 2020)" [[User:Jtbobwaysf|Jtbobwaysf]] ([[User talk:Jtbobwaysf|talk]]) 21:02, 4 March 2024 (UTC)}}
{{RFC list footer|hist|hide_instructions={{{hide_instructions}}} }}
{{RFC list footer|hist|hide_instructions={{{hide_instructions}}} }}

Latest revision as of 20:01, 22 May 2024

The following discussions are requested to have community-wide attention:

Talk:Russian Civil War

Talk:Yasuke

Talk:Joe Biden

Talk:Israel–Hamas war

Talk:Rafida

Talk:Russo-Ukrainian War

Talk:Havana syndrome

Talk:SpaceX Starship flight tests


  1. ^ a b c https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/kremlin-dismisses-report-russia-behind-havana-syndrome-2024-04-01/
  2. ^ a b c "Havana syndrome: Report links mystery illness to Russian intelligence unit". www.bbc.com. Retrieved 2024-04-02.
  3. ^ Cite error: The named reference guardian-report was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  4. ^ Cite error: The named reference Dobrokhotov was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  5. ^ Cite error: The named reference :3 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  6. ^ Cite error: The named reference SpiegelMarch2024 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  7. ^ Cite error: The named reference us-not-moved was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  8. ^ Chasan, Aliza (2024-04-17). "Senators call for renewed Havana Syndrome assessment after 60 Minutes report - CBS News". www.cbsnews.com. Retrieved 2024-04-24.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/History_and_geography&oldid=1225172322"