RK: Difference between revisions

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Content deleted Content added
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''''On Wikipedia [[user:RK]], rather compiled and commented evidence of inappropriate and "intolerable" behaviour and complaints against him. This page and all subpages are not to be edited by RK himself--all edits by he should be reverted.'''''
'''''On Wikipedia [[user:RK]], rather compiled and commented evidence of inappropriate and "intolerable" behaviour and complaints against him. This page and all subpages are not to be edited by RK himself--all edits by he should be reverted.'''''


:That's ridiculous. Anyone can edit anything, this is wikipedia. In particular, a page which purports to be
:That's ridiculous. Anyone can edit anything, this is wikipedia. In particular, a page which purports to be gathering evidence against someone must be open to due process by that person to respond. RK can edit this if he wants to, and of course he should. [[User:Jimbo Wales|Jimbo Wales]] 02:53, 28 Aug 2003 (UTC)
gathering evidence against someone must be open to due process by that person to respond. RK can edit this if he wants to, and of course he should. [[User:Jimbo Wales|Jimbo Wales]] 02:53, 28 Aug 2003 (UTC)


[[RK/notes]] - from Wikipedia:Community case RK
[[RK/notes]] - from Wikipedia:Community case RK

Revision as of 02:53, 28 August 2003

On Wikipedia user:RK, rather compiled and commented evidence of inappropriate and "intolerable" behaviour and complaints against him. This page and all subpages are not to be edited by RK himself--all edits by he should be reverted.

That's ridiculous. Anyone can edit anything, this is wikipedia. In particular, a page which purports to be gathering evidence against someone must be open to due process by that person to respond. RK can edit this if he wants to, and of course he should. Jimbo Wales 02:53, 28 Aug 2003 (UTC)

RK/notes - from Wikipedia:Community case RK RK/notes 2 - from Wikipedia talk:Community case RK

Threatening NetEsq with a ban

On 24 Aug, RK wrote in an edit summary, on two occasions: "Netesq is now added to list of those risking a ban".

Context

Netesq restored the page on four occasions, following attempts by RK to blank it. Those occasions are:

  • 01:02, 24 Aug 2003 . . RK (Reverting harassment. WikiEn list has been notified. Netesq is now added to list of those risking a ban.)
  • 01:00, 24 Aug 2003 . . Netesq (RV to last edit by Jiang)
  • 00:56, 24 Aug 2003 . . RK (Reverting harassment. WikiEn list has been notified. Netesq is now added to list of those risking a ban.)
  • 00:55, 24 Aug 2003 . . Netesq (Rv to last edit by Jiang)

(skipping intervening edits)

  • 00:37, 24 Aug 2003 . . Netesq (Reverting RK's page blanking)
  • 00:35, 24 Aug 2003 . . RK (Reverting harassment. Sysop WikiEn list has been notified of this abuse.)
  • 00:29, 24 Aug 2003 . . Netesq (Reverting RK's page blanking)
  • 00:26, 24 Aug 2003 . . RK (Removing sick and hateful comments by some rather sick, disturbed people. Sysops, I am requesting an official vandalism alert.)
  • 00:24, 24 Aug 2003 . . Netesq

The edit by NetEsq at 00:24 consisted of adding the following comment:

What Martin said. As the diversity and number of complaints about RK's behavior increases, it is only a matter of time before he takes note of this fact and figures out how to peacefully co-exist with other Wikipedians. -- NetEsq 20:45, 23 Aug 2003 (UTC)

Prior to this point, NetEsq was editing the creationism and creationism (theology) articles, in an entirely blameless fashion.

References