Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Whitmore 8621: Difference between revisions
Eaglestorm (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Eaglestorm (talk | contribs) →Evidence submitted by Eaglestorm: added diff |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
======<span style="font-size:150%"> Evidence submitted by [[User:Eaglestorm|Eaglestorm]] </span>====== |
======<span style="font-size:150%"> Evidence submitted by [[User:Eaglestorm|Eaglestorm]] </span>====== |
||
IP has been used in meatpuppetry several months ago (mentioned in previous SPI) and in circumventing current block, usually in removing confirmed sockpuppet template on IP userpage. Sockmaster, who was reprimanded by at least three editors before for his actions, has [https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AWhitmore_8621&action=historysubmit&diff=378686316&oldid=378676531 admitted using the IP] in arguing his unblock request for another matter. This is not a case of harassment; it's about helping the community reel in errant editors who run afoul of the project time and time again despite many chances to reform. IP and sockmaster's history exhibit same editing patterns, such as blanking of talk page. [[User:Eaglestorm|Eaglestorm]] ([[User talk:Eaglestorm|talk]]) 15:37, 17 August 2010 (UTC) |
IP has been used in meatpuppetry several months ago (mentioned in previous SPI) and in [https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Special:Contributions/122.107.214.146 circumventing current block], usually in removing confirmed sockpuppet template on IP userpage. Sockmaster, who was reprimanded by at least three editors before for his actions, has [https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AWhitmore_8621&action=historysubmit&diff=378686316&oldid=378676531 admitted using the IP] in arguing his unblock request for another matter. This is not a case of harassment; it's about helping the community reel in errant editors who run afoul of the project time and time again despite many chances to reform. IP and sockmaster's history exhibit same editing patterns, such as blanking of talk page. [[User:Eaglestorm|Eaglestorm]] ([[User talk:Eaglestorm|talk]]) 15:37, 17 August 2010 (UTC) |
||
======<span style="font-size:150%"> Comments by accused parties </span>====== |
======<span style="font-size:150%"> Comments by accused parties </span>====== |
||
Revision as of 15:42, 17 August 2010
Whitmore 8621
- Whitmore 8621 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Populated account categories: confirmed
– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.
17 August 2010
Suspected sockpuppets
Evidence submitted by Eaglestorm
IP has been used in meatpuppetry several months ago (mentioned in previous SPI) and in circumventing current block, usually in removing confirmed sockpuppet template on IP userpage. Sockmaster, who was reprimanded by at least three editors before for his actions, has admitted using the IP in arguing his unblock request for another matter. This is not a case of harassment; it's about helping the community reel in errant editors who run afoul of the project time and time again despite many chances to reform. IP and sockmaster's history exhibit same editing patterns, such as blanking of talk page. Eaglestorm (talk) 15:37, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.