Wikipedia:Vim mappings: Difference between revisions
put under Wikipedia/foo ? |
Larry Sanger (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
" mapping to change visual highlighted text into a Free Link<br> |
" mapping to change visual highlighted text into a Free Link<br> |
||
vmap ;f c[[]]<Esc>hhp<br> |
vmap ;f c[[]]<Esc>hhp<br> |
||
" mapping to make the two next words into an ordinary ugly link a la |
" mapping to make the two next words into an ordinary ugly link a la |
||
<nowiki>UglyLink</nowiki><br> |
<nowiki>UglyLink</nowiki><br> |
||
map! ,u <nowiki>gUlwgUlhx</nowiki><br> |
map! ,u <nowiki>gUlwgUlhx</nowiki><br> |
||
Hope they are helpful. Please add more. |
Hope they are helpful. Please add more. |
||
---- |
---- |
||
Is this an encyclopedia article? I'm confused. |
Is this an encyclopedia article? I'm confused. |
||
---- |
---- |
||
Perhaps we need a page under Wikipedia, rather than clutter up the "article" namespace; |
Perhaps we need a page under Wikipedia, rather than clutter up the "article" namespace; |
||
say [[Wikipedia/Tools]] or [[Wikipedia/ToolTips]], or ... |
say [[Wikipedia/Tools]] or [[Wikipedia/ToolTips]], or ... |
||
---- |
|||
I see! Yes, would be good to move it. And then to add an article called [[Vim mapping]] (to which [[Vim mappings]] can be redirected :-) ). I would do this myself, except that I have not a clue what a Vim mapping is (or even if "Vim" should be capitalized); I could be the butt of your cruel joke, in fact...I mean, if "Vim mapping" happens to be total nonsense, I would be none the wiser. :-) --[[LMS]] |
Revision as of 12:53, 12 June 2001
" mapping to change visual highlighted text into a Free Link
vmap ;f c[[]]<Esc>hhp
" mapping to make the two next words into an ordinary ugly link a la
UglyLink
map! ,u gUlwgUlhx
Hope they are helpful. Please add more.
Is this an encyclopedia article? I'm confused.
Perhaps we need a page under Wikipedia, rather than clutter up the "article" namespace; say Wikipedia/Tools or Wikipedia/ToolTips, or ...
I see! Yes, would be good to move it. And then to add an article called Vim mapping (to which Vim mappings can be redirected :-) ). I would do this myself, except that I have not a clue what a Vim mapping is (or even if "Vim" should be capitalized); I could be the butt of your cruel joke, in fact...I mean, if "Vim mapping" happens to be total nonsense, I would be none the wiser. :-) --LMS