Stewards/Elections 2014/Votes/Ajraddatz: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Older edit Newer edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 16:24, 9 February 2014

The following discussion is closed: This election is closed and these pages are an archive of that event.

Ajraddatz (Adrian Raddatz)

ContentsYes • No • Neutral

Ajraddatz talk • contribs • SULutil (accounts) / stalktoy • globalcontribs • crosswiki-ness • confirm eligibility
translate: translation help, statement, template, headings

English:

Languages: en-ca-N, fr-1
Personal info: Hello, I'm Adrian Raddatz. I've been editing Wikimedia since 2009 on the account Adragon111 (made when I was rather young), and more recently on Ajraddatz since 2010. I am active primarily with counter-vandalism at a global level and contributing to Wikidata, where I'm an administrator. I like to volunteer my time in areas where I perceive need. To this end, the majority of my use of the steward tools would be around global anti-spam and counter-vandalism. This includes reverting and globally (b)locking accounts and IPs, and running checkusers as needed on accounts whose pattern of behaviour have indicated that they are in a group of spambots. I've already been active in this area for over three years, including two and a half as a Global Sysop. I would also respond to requests on the steward request pages here on meta; I check meta quite often, so it would be easy for me to address requests of any kind (except requests for the bot flags) as they arise. I fully understand the privacy policy and the policies on CU/OS, and have applied my knowledge in roles as an oversighter on Wikidata, an OTRS volunteer and a former member of enwiki's ACC team. I don't have much local admin experience on Wikimedia, because I started off on Wikia, and moved here after serving as a local admin on a couple of Wikia's larger projects. I've never found a "niche" in the form of a specific wiki to work on until Wikidata was founded in October 2012, and since I've been consistently active there. It should be noted that my lack of local wiki admin experience is more than made up for in my practical experience in steward areas. I've been working with stewards for the last three years, am fully aware of the policies surrounding the use of steward rights, and have seen what those policies look like in action. I am also very good at reading French, though I'm still working on my ability to write and speak in it effectively. In real life I'm a full-time student studying political science in the third year of my undergrad, as well as a reserve officer in the Royal Canadian Navy. As such, my time can sometimes be quite limited, but I'm still active enough to be able to work effectively as a steward. I edit from MST (UTC - 7), and there are often no stewards on when I do the bulk of my editing (2300 - 0400 UTC). Thanks for your consideration, and please, ask lots of questions! Ajraddatz (Talk) 05:45, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2014/Questions#Ajraddatz

Yes

Vogone (Verification pending) • Ok. Vogone talk 18:00, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
PiRSquared17 (Verification pending) • Yes, definitely. His work in the small wiki monitoring team is very good, he is a global sysop, and his work on Wikidata (where he is an OS) has been great. I think he has all the qualities I would expect from a steward. PiRSquared17 (talk) 18:04, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Alan (Verification pending) • Alan ^(talk) 18:06, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
LlamaAl (Verification pending) • Very active and experienced user in global countervandalism, will be a great steward. LlamaAl (talk) 18:07, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Ayratayrat (Verification pending) • Ayratayrat (talk) 18:14, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Wiki13 (Verification pending) • Wiki13 _talk 18:19, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Mh7kJ (Verification pending) • Mh7kJ (talk) 18:19, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Érico Júnior Wouters (Verification pending) • Great user. Érico Wouters ^msg 18:21, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
JurriaanH (Verification pending) • JurriaanH (talk) 18:22, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Rettelo (Verification pending) • I'm trust you. You will be perfect steward. Rettelo (talk) 18:26, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Brateevsky (Verification pending) • Brateevsky (talk) 18:38, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Odder (Verification pending) • PiRSquared17 summed it up for me. odder (talk) 18:42, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Michaeldsuarez (Verification pending) • I believe in his abilities and trust his sense of right and wrong. Michaeldsuarez (talk) 19:02, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
분당선M (Verification pending) • Why not DangSunM (talk) 19:02, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
DerHexer (Verification pending) • Okay. —DerHexer (Talk) 19:07, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Żyrafał (Verification pending) • Żyrafał (talk) 19:08, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
MoiraMoira (Verification pending) • MoiraMoira (talk) 19:12, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Ralgis (Verification pending) • --Allan Aguilar·/t/ 19:17, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Vituzzu (Verification pending) • Vituzzu (talk) 19:25, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Stryn (Verification pending) • Stryn (talk) 19:28, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Jasper Deng (Verification pending) • Jasper Deng (talk) 19:31, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Eminn (Verification pending) • Emin • message 19:34, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Guycn2 (Verification pending) • Guycn2 (talk) 19:45, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Rzuwig (Verification pending) • Rzuwig^► 20:17, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Marmase (Verification pending) • --Marmase (talk) 20:21, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Rome2 (Verification pending) • No problem Rome2 (talk) 20:29, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Techman224 (Verification pending) • Techman224^Talk 20:43, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
APerson (Verification pending) • APerson (talk) 20:46, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Ebe123 (Verification pending) • ~~EBE123~~ ^talk_Contribs 20:47, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Jfblanc (Verification pending) • Jfblanc (talk) 20:59, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
D Eaketts (Verification pending) • D Eaketts (talk) 21:07, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Chewbacca2205 (Verification pending) • Chewbacca2205 (talk) 21:15, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Ladsgroup (Verification pending) • Amir (talk) 21:50, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Sjoerddebruin (Verification pending) • Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 22:05, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Davey2010 (Verification pending) • →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 22:11, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Legoktm (Verification pending) • Definitely. Legoktm (talk) 22:30, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Southparkfan (Verification pending) • Southparkfan 22:46, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Trijnstel (Verification pending) • Looks qualified. Trijnstel_talk 22:49, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Danny B. (Verification pending) • Didn't I tell you to do so ages ago?
— Danny B. 23:02, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hosiryuhosi (Verification pending) • Hosiryuhosi (talk) 23:23, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
DanielTom (Verification pending) • DanielTom (talk) 23:31, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
AGK (Verification pending) • AGK [•] 23:46, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Kolega2357 (Verification pending) • Kolega2357 (talk) 23:53, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Aftab1995 (Verification pending) • Aftab1995 (talk) 00:22, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
SamanthaPuckettIndo (Verification pending) • Ok. SamanthaPuckettIndo (talk) 00:37, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Daniel Mietchen (Verification pending) • Have good experience with him from Wikidata. Daniel Mietchen (talk) 01:03, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Teles (Verification pending) • —Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 02:20, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Armbrust (Verification pending) • Armbrust (talk) 03:35, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Maathavan (Verification pending) • Maathavan (talk) 04:03, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hym411 (Verification pending) • —레비 Revi 04:05, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Liuxinyu970226 (Verification pending) • Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:24, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
David1010 (Verification pending) • David1010 (talk) 05:47, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Ivan Štambuk (Verification pending) • Ivan Štambuk (talk) 08:32, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Conny (Verification pending) • Conny (talk) 08:51, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Mihewag (Verification pending) • Mihewag (talk) 08:51, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Dede2008 (Verification pending) • Definitely yes! Dede2008 (talk) 11:29, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Jon Harald Søby (Verification pending) • Jon Harald Søby (talk) 11:34, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Bene* (Verification pending) • Bene* (talk) 11:36, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Clockery (Verification pending) • Clockery Fairfeld (talk • enWS) 12:39, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
ApatitM (Verification pending) • ApatitM (talk) 12:43, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Laaknor (Verification pending) • Laaknor (talk) 13:00, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Steinsplitter (Verification pending) • Steinsplitter (talk) 13:23, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Inkowik (Verification pending) • IW 16:24, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No

John F. Lewis (Verification pending) • This is more of a personal reason than a competence one. In my opinion, I feel Adrian takes situations too far when it comes to simple matters which can be solved with a 'Why did you do this' and then an explanation. I don't have issues trusting them at all, it is just I feel they escalate simple situations too far. So, I am going to say it is a not now from me though I'll probably support them if they run next year or if they pass, at the next reconfirmations. John F. Lewis (talk) 18:04, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
İncelemeelemani (Verification pending) • Not very active İncelemeelemani (talk) 18:19, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@İncelemeelemani: Can you please clarify why you think CentralAuth shows he is not active? PiRSquared17 (talk) 18:21, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Of course. :)... Since 2010, his contributions have contributed less and only in certain areas.--İncelemeelemani (talk) 09:03, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, thanks for the clarification. :-) PiRSquared17 (talk) 12:24, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Rubin16 (Verification pending) • I see better candidates and would vote for them rubin16 (talk) 19:20, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
INeverCry (Verification pending) • Insensitive and dismissive of the concerns of other editors here. A keep vote with the rationale "Offended persons should be advised to look somewhere else" doesn't demonstrate the maturity I look for in a prospective steward. INeverCry 19:56, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Dick Bos (Verification pending) • Dick Bos (talk) 22:07, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Gryllida (Verification pending) • Little remarks on non-vandalism work and interaction with contributors, in the application. I think that's required. Gryllida 02:22, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I tried to keep my statement short, so I focussed on experience related to the role of a steward. I would be glad to explain some of my other on-wiki work and interactions, the best forum for this probably being on the questions page. Regards, Ajraddatz (Talk) 02:43, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
John Vandenberg (Verification pending) • Not enough involvement in small wikis or other languages. John Vandenberg (talk) 04:47, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Are you serious? Check out Special:CentralAuth/Ajraddatz. He has edits on many wikis. He has more than 1 edit on 490 wikis, more than 5 edits on 112 wikis. Compare to my stats. Ajr is one of the most cross-wiki users, is a global rollbacker, member of Small Wiki Monitoring Team, and a global sysop. Please clarify your oppose. Do you mean content edits, or just anti-vandalism? It's clear he's got antivandal and other maintenance experience IMO. PiRSquared17 (talk) 04:50, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
John generally opposes based on lack of content edits cross-wiki, so I think that's what he's referring to. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 07:09, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Георгий Суворов (Verification pending) • Only for approx. 4 years in Wikipedia, knows only 2 languages. Георгий Суворов (talk) 07:47, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

Snowolf (Verification pending) • Ajraddatz's dedication to the SWMT is unquestionable and unwavering, and he is a very good vandal and spam fighter, but, and perhaps, that's just me, I haven't seen a more policy or mediation side of him yet, which I think a steward maybe ought to have. I also haven't seen him around as much as he used to be. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 19:39, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Custinne (Verification pending) • Custinne (talk) 22:31, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Karol Karolus (Verification pending) • Karol Karolus (talk) 14:49, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 66: / Line 66: @@
 # {{Se-vote|2014|Laaknor|checked=|cb=}}  [[User:Laaknor|Laaknor]] ([[User talk:Laaknor|talk]]) 13:00, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
 # {{Se-vote|2014|Steinsplitter|checked=|cb=}}  [[User:Steinsplitter|Steinsplitter]] ([[User talk:Steinsplitter|talk]]) 13:23, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
+# {{Se-vote|2014|Inkowik|checked=|cb=}} [[User:Inkowik|IW]] 16:24, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
 ==== {{sr-heading|no}} ====