User talk:ComputerHotline

Archive 1	Archive 2	Archive 3	Archive 4	Archive 5	Archive 6
Archive 7	Archive 8	Archive 9

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-03-16 23-17-56-startrails-1-5f-9min-1d.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice. --Moonik 11:49, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-03-14 20-55-20-m45-19f-1.6s-13d-13o.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Oh starry, starry night. Mattbuck 22:38, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-03-14 20-53-50-orion-40f-1.6s-13d-13o.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Paint your palette blue and grey Mattbuck 22:38, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-03-14 20-49-10-jupi-venus-52f-1.6s-13d-13o.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Look out on a summer's day with eyes that know the darkness in my soul… Mattbuck 22:38, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-03-21 23-20-56-circumpolaire.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good choice of foreground. Nicely executed. My favorite of the series. --Saffron Blaze 14:00, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-03-21 21-58-06-m45-6f-60s-3d-13o.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Interesting. --Jkadavoor 06:20, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:2012-03-14 21-42-55-file-etoiles-14f-2min-3d.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2012-03-14 21-42-55-file-etoiles-14f-2min-3d.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-03-16 22-02-35-startrails-4f-9min-1d.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. --Mattbuck 18:51, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-03-25 00-26-31-uma-4fov-9f-5s-ISO640-72d-27o-ann.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good, well executed and very useful--Jebulon 15:35, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-03-24 21-15-43-lion-5fov-9f-5s-iso640-72d-27o-ann.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good, well executed and very useful--Jebulon 15:35, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-03-20 15-19-58-reduit-bosmont.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 16:13, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-03-16 22-22-42-startrails-3f-9min-1d.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Love it, but what are the radial spikes? --Mattbuck 18:51, 25 March 2012 (UTC) In the sky, there are stars. --ComputerHotline 08:27, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-03-25 00-26-31-uma-4fov-9f-5s-ISO640-72d-27o.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 14:59, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-03-25 19-39-30-conj-lune-jupi-12f-2.5s-8d-f5.6-iso200-42mm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Yann 07:38, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-03-21 21-34-00-startrails.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Is the really long one at the bottom and the broken one at the top(different angle) really startrails? They look like aircraft contrails.--Gauravjuvekar 06:28, 23 March 2012 (UTC) It's startrails. --ComputerHotline 07:27, 28 March 2012 (UTC) QI for me. --Kadellar 14:25, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-04-06 21-18-08-m45-venus-18f-13d-16o.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carschten 21:37, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-04-03 16-43-53-amaryllis-sp.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Holleday 18:34, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-04-15 09-38-34-electronique-15f.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Technically ok, but lacks detailed description. --Smial 10:38, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-04-15 09-49-00-electronique-63f.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Technically ok, but lacks detailed description. --Smial 10:38, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-04-15 09-54-15-electronique-51f.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Technically ok, but lacks detailed description. --Smial 10:38, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-04-15 15-41-06-ft-vezelois.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 11:32, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-04-15 15-45-01-ft-vezelois.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good work. --Smial 10:42, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-04-15 15-47-40-ft-vezelois.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 11:32, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-04-15 16-09-58-ft-vezelois.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 11:32, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-04-15 16-46-31-ft-vezelois.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 11:32, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-04-27 07-19-41-nature.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK with me. Please add english description to all your QI candidates. --Iifar 11:34, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-05-02 14-47-19-batterie-nord.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perfect atmospheric photo. --Florstein 19:19, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-04-27 09-03-15-theatre-gallo-romain-mandeure.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Coyau 14:07, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-04-27 08-49-35-theatre-gallo-romain-mandeure.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Coyau 14:07, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-04-27 08-44-09-theatre-gallo-romain-mandeure.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Coyau 14:07, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-05-02 15-54-25-boulangerie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Some CA at the right, but still good. - A.Savin 23:35, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-05-11 14-10-42-sun.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Yann 18:16, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-05-10 16-15-53-nymphe-feu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Morray 17:27, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-05-11 21-18-07-timelapse-nuages-belfort-47,651795-6,846655.ogv, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very inresting doc of cloud formation I believe QI --Moroder 15:29, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-05-10 14-38-07-agrion-elegant.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 06:08, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-05-24 15-19-19-Salticus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Mattbuck 16:15, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-05-24 14-43-49-Coenagrion puella.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Mattbuck 16:15, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-05-24 15-11-14-Panorpa communis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Mattbuck 16:15, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-05-24 15-10-08-Panorpa communis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 16:15, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-05-24 15-00-34-Pyrrhosoma nymphula.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 16:15, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-05-29 12-45-57-cadenas-amour.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Selbymay 20:19, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-05-29 16-50-30-Porte mordelaise.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Selbymay 20:11, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

QI - Volucella

Please id your Volucella nominations on QI. They are most likely Volucella bombylans var. bombylans.  B.p. 11:44, 5 June 2012 (UTC)