Commons:Upload Wizard feedback: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Browse history interactively
← Older editNewer edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Kelisi (talk | contribs)
1,399 edits
→‎Upload Wizard: new section
Line 2,289: Line 2,289:


This is thoroughly useless. Ditch it. [[User:Kelisi|Kelisi]] ([[User talk:Kelisi|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 23:35, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
This is thoroughly useless. Ditch it. [[User:Kelisi|Kelisi]] ([[User talk:Kelisi|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 23:35, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

== Adding categories with colons in them ==

<small>User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/5.0</small>

The category autocomplete doesn't work properly for categories with colons in them. The part of the category name after the colon doesn't show up in the list of options.

For example, I found this problem when trying to add the category:
Photographs by User:99of9 [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 05:18, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:18, 2 August 2011

Add your story (in the appropriate section)

This page is a place for you to tell the Wikimedia developers what issues you encounter when using the prototype Upload wizard interface.

Please also read the Questions and Answers page and check the list of existing bugs to let us all focus on the issues we're not already working on.

We welcome your ideas, but please focus on the issues rather than on possible solutions.

Bugs

Upload errors

Photos

  • I've tried to upload a file but after I click "Continue" button, nothing happening. Maybe it's something with JS. Wizardist (talk) 17:49, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Chrome Debugger says: 
    Uncaught Error: Parse error at position 48 in input: Ня ўсе ліцэнзіі Creative Commons дапушчальныя ў {{GRAMMAR:месны|{{SITENAME}}}}. Пераканайцеся, што ўладальнік аўтарскіх правоў выбраў адну з гэтых ліцэнзіяў.
    I suggest that GRAMMAR is not supported in this message. I think that such a support should be implemented. Until it's done, I'll get out of GRAMMAR in Mwe-upwiz-license-cc-subhead in translatewiki.net. Wizardist (talk) 17:53, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • When trying to upload a .jpg the up-loader just keeps ticking up for time to upload and never uploads. Granitecitytool (talk) 16:55, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Helpfull for uploading more than 1 picture, but I got errors today Sanko (talk) 15:08, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • I tried to upload 9 files, give them a sound description, categorization, coords, .. and was interrupted by dinner. After dinner, I could finish the input of necessary data, and try to apply the description to the already uploaded images. But the progress wheel kept spinning and never returned. So I lost all the work of about one hour! Nice. My question: Is there a time limit? Can it be set in a way that it does not hurt, if you have to go away for some hours? Herzi Pinki (talk) 19:22, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Sadly there is and it's very short, it's 20 minutes or less. This is not a deliberate policy, it's because we are storing information somewhere that's rather volatile before we enter it into the database. It's our fault that we haven't implemented this in durable storage yet. NeilK (talk) 21:38, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • I am very happy with the wizard. However, I had problems as I was uploading some photos. After an error occurred I had to go back and select the photos to upload again as yet it was only one that had no description. thank you. Stephen wanjau (talk) 13:41, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've received some errors, when i was uploading photo at step "Describe" and i couldn't continue the upload:
mw.Api error: http[16:0156261]
mw.DestinationChecker::checkUnique> error in checkUnique result: http
  • Misiek2 (talk) 14:04, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    I'm seeing this a lot too. But I never saw that before today. It's strange because nothing in our application has changed with regards to checking the filename. I suspect the issue is with the server. NeilK (talk) 21:26, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Its looks simple. BUT it is impossible to follow the transfer process, I have not found or there is no activity window. The warning sings are not clear, Therefore its not clear if there is a problem or its takes too much time to transfer. Tjaarke maas (talk) 20:11, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • I tried to upload a file titled "Marek Wojciech Chmurzyński.jpg". The upload wizard answered "This looks like a file you obtained from another imagehost. Please make the title more meaningful.". I don't know, what's going on. I made this photo by myself today, and it cannot be found anywhere else. It seems, that the wizard doesn't accept any file name starting from Marek. It's a pity, because Marek is a Polish equivalent of Mark, and a lot of people uses this name. Finally, I made the title less meaningful and I managed to upload the same photo as File:Chmurzyński.jpg. Olaf (talk) 22:37, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Video

  • I've tried to upload a 22 MB .ogv video file using Upload Wizard; however, it got stuck at the "Getting file information and previews..." stage (i.e. after the actual uploading, I suppose). I waited for approximately 20 minutes, but it stayed at "Getting file information and previews...", so I used the "Remove" link to cancel and uploaded the file in the "classical" way using Special:Upload, it's now at File:Saltstraumen.ogv. Tested with SeaMonkey 2.0.11 on Windows Vista. Gestumblindi (talk) 21:50, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Video upload seems to work now. I was able to successfully upload File:Maschine La Suisse.ogv (37.89 MB) using the Upload Wizard. Apart from the message "The upload succeeded, but the server could not get a preview thumbnail" there was no problem. Gestumblindi (talk) 02:09, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

General interface

  • When set for Spanish language (as for account AlejandroLinaresGarcia) it does not automatically go to the Wizard. It still has the page with the old upload and request to help test the wizard.

Navigation

Tutorial

  • The "learn" letter type does absolutely not invite to read. I don't think the symbols are very clear. Especially the OK and STOP symbols are often to small. I also think a red cross and a green "v" are much clearer Josq (talk) 13:14, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File selection

Upload

  • After an error at step 3, beginning again: There is another file already on the site with the same content and one cannot act on the files from the previously aborted upload. (After investigation, one finds these files already uploaded...)
  • Upload times seem longer compared to using the standard upload. -- KlausFoehl (talk) 13:42, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed. For three files of 5, 3 and 9MB a cumulative time of 14 minutes rather high. -- KlausFoehl (talk) 10:52, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Licensing

Description and categories

  • I'm liking the new image wizard, particularly its ability to upload multiple photos in one go as opposed to one upload at a time. One problem, though. When I was uploading a batch after adding the descriptions and related data (Describe tab), the second of six images came up with a warning symbol (exclamation mark in inverted triangle), but then froze up completely, and I had to back out and start again. I think I forgot to rename the file from the camera's default, and my guess is that it choked on this. Maybe a warning/autodetect that prevents the uploader from clicking on "Next" down the bottom until the filename is changed from a blacklisted or previously-uploaded name. -- saberwyn 02:41, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • I always assumed that "date" meant the date of the work being uploaded; i.e., e.g., the scan of a page from a book published in 1904 would have the date "1904" entered; OR an image of a painting painted in 1872 would have the date "1872" entered... But the only options in the "date" dropdown menu or calendar do not go back that far. So what then does "date" refer to? It MUST be more than an upload date... That needs to be addressed... Londonjackbooks (talk) 03:23, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    • Looks like it's extracted from EXIF, as happened with some scans I uploaded—these I corrected to 1842, which I couldn't do earlier. Not going to make that much of a difference, since a lot of people just put the upload date anyway. —innotata 19:50, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • The Category I entered did not register, even though it was an existing, legitimate category which appeared as I typed... Londonjackbooks (talk) 03:23, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • When one accidentially gives the same filename twice, the script does show an exclamation mark, but it then freezes. No way to gracefully recover, entries are lost. -- KlausFoehl (talk) 13:21, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • When renaming, one should be told not to include the file extension but to give the first part of the name only. At least at the stage when typing the .jpg suffix. -- KlausFoehl (talk) 13:55, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • The screenshot speaks for itself. I have photographs of an object in 3 parts, so I wrote as titles "theobject part 1/3" etc. The wizard wrongly believes the titles are identical (they differ by numbers). The biggest problem is: At that point, I can not go back to change the titles. Clicking "Retry" has no effect. All of the metadata I entered for those 3 files is lost. Nicolas1981 (talk) 10:00, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • If too much time elapses between the upload and the final step, files won't be published (with the last step taking forever to complete, and not even an error message to let you know that something's wrong!). I think this is due to the fact that in the meanwhile the files you tried to upload were erased from the Upload Stash. What is really annoying isn't to have to upload them once again, but to lose the description and the categories you added to the files, as you're not allowed to take a step back. My proposed patch is to stretch the time uploaded files are kept in the Upload Stash; if this wasn't possible, at least the Wizard should be changed to show an error message in which the user is asked to pick up again the files from his computer; at this point the Wizard would upload the files and then publish it (with the filenames and description the user inserted before). --Una giornata uggiosa '94 · So, what do you want to talk about? 18:01, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Final step

  • On the "Use" tab, while the "Wiki Home Page" button works fine, the "Upload More Files" button does nothing. -- saberwyn 03:49, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • was making an upload, took long intermissions between stages, everything went ok til the final stage, which never completed & the upload did not go through. that is bad; either the upload should show that it has timed out/failed, OR it should not timeout/fail! Lx 121 (talk) 22:38, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Watchlist

Oh. It looks to me like an incompatibility with MSIE, Normally I use Google Chrome on Commons under Vista but today I used Internet Explorer v8.0.601.19048 and got the same failure. When in the modern default skin, I clicked on the white star for my File:South Side Presbyterian jeh.jpg and it failed to change color or indicate any action. Changing my preferences to the classic Monobook skin, I clicked again on the watch tab. It changed to "Watching..." and didn't complete it for minutes. So, yes, it suggests the presence of two bugs, such that images uploaded by the new upload wizard cannot be added to the user's watchlist, but only when we're using MSIE. The workarounds are:

  1. Install another browser which is nice anyway to see how pages will look to readers using their various browsers
  2. Set your Preferences to watch everything you upload

But of course it ought to be fixed in Commons. Anybody else succeeding in replicating this software failure? Jim.henderson (talk) 18:03, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback mechanism

  • I tried to send feedback, and after 10 minutes it is still spinning and saying "Adding feedback to page...". I think you miss a lot of feedback just because the feedback mechanism is not reliable. This is extremely frustrating to have your feedback lost. This might be because in the same page "Submitting details and publishing..." is also spinning endlessly. Nicolas1981 (talk) 04:50, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Upload wizard doesn't work for me in Opera 10.10/MacOSX

When viewing Special:UploadWizard in Opera, I get a spinner for a few seconds as things load, which vanishes, leaving me with a page containing only the standard header, footer, and sidebar. I'm using Opera 10.10 for MacOSX and the Classic skin. --Carnildo (talk) 23:04, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Feature and improvement requests

General interface

Navigation

  • browser back-button forgets about already done upload. I did a back to lookup the necessary license of the original. Upload lost? Non information about the current state. I want to be redirected to the state in the upload process I was in before. Herzi Pinki (talk) 20:43, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove the horizontal line. Make the "next" button on the "learn" page more visible. See hilight of a few remaining interaction design issues for details. Dodoïste (talk) 16:53, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • There's a nice principle in usability design which says that users shouldn't feel trapped. The interface should give them enough options, but afford them the possibility of changing their minds if necessary. Long story short, the uploader needs a Back button. Thanks for this very nice work! Ocaasi (talk) 18:39, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    I wouldn't have said it this way, but I agree with Ocaasi's idea. I strongly expected the steps ("learn", "upload"...) to be clickable, and in fact tried it several times. Not because I needed them badly for the precise task I was doing, but because I felt like it would be clickable. Also, newbies may want to go back to the "learn" step when they are at the "Release rights" step.
    "Affordance" doesn't seem to be the right word there, because the 5 steps doesn't look clickable. But the user may be used to click it. Dodoïste (talk) 00:15, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    I agree with the above. I also think a preview displayed at the end of the wizard, giving the user a chance to review and correct the final output, wouldn't be a bad idea. Currently the uploader doesn't see the description page they've created even once if they don't remember to go there themselves. It can be an optional step if you think it would be too intimidating to newbies. Lampak (talk) 09:28, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Froze up on Screen One (the one with Dizzney-style comics). No matter how I press "Upload" it just froze there. Again and again. And don't tell me "you had to scroll two screens down, and find a pale grey button below this wall of highly educational graphics." Nein. Everything must fit on one screen, especially when "everything" is a single button. Usability 101. NVO (talk) 17:27, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tutorial

File selection

  • Since it supports multiple files, it would be great if we could select multiple files directly in the select file dialog. Otherwise it is still very cumpersome to upload more than a few files --Waldir talk 22:34, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    • Being able to add multiple files to the upload in one go, would be awesome, instead of having to click the link, select the file, select "Open", then rinse and repeat. -- saberwyn 03:49, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Regarding my general feedback to the Wizard - it would be nice being able to add more files via the MS Windows dialog bog "Select file" after clicking "Select a media file to upload". Uploading multiple files is not user friendly. There is a question of file spam of course, there could be a reasonable limit for lets say 20 files. Also, there definitely should be a "review" page creatina extra step between "Describe" and "Use" - user could correct possible errors within description etc. A review (or check) is an important part of any workflow. --Kozuch (talk) 15:00, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It's not a deliberate omission -- we're getting a wizard that works with all browsers first, including old IEs and Firefox, and they can only do one at a time. The code is architected so we can do multiple uploads like that... hope I can get to it. As for reviewing stuff, well, I'm not sure it makes sense for an individual. 90% of the time it will just slow people down. The idea of a holding area for files that admins can access has been kicking around for 2 years now though, and although the WMF isn't allocating resources to it right now someone should do it. NeilK (talk) 21:33, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Upload

  • Adding a way to cancel or remove an image following the 'pre-upload' but before the image is uploaded with description to Commons would be good in case people accidently add multiple copies of the same image to the queue, or decide during the process that they don't want to continue on with a certain photo but not have to cancel out and lose all the other images in the batch -- saberwyn 03:49, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    • There should be a way to discard individual files, if they are no longer wanted during the wizard. Also, it's not clear how to cancel the whole wizard. Does just leaving the page delete the files from the server (Are they purged automatically)? Nerd65536 (talk) 03:05, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • A warning about a filename conflict appears only on the Describe step. Is it better for it to appear right after the user uploads the image, to avoid wasted effort on Release rights step? Cmglee (talk) 12:05, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Upon uploading an image with an EXIF rotation tag, it would be great to offer automatic rotation to the correct orientation. --MichaelBueker (talk) 17:31, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Licensing

  • When picking my licensing option, I was not able to select a website for the attribution. Also, I was not able to pick a country for the licensing, so it remained as unported. Apart from that, it seems a lot better then the previous method of uploading images. QFSE Media (talk) 22:33, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hi. I want to put the author as a link to give credit to someone on Picasa and the 50 characters limit prevents to do that. You should consider changing it. Otherwise I love it. Benoit. Badzil (talk) 20:12, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks. As for Picasa, I'm not sure I understand why you had that problem. Is their name really longer than 50 characters? Or were you trying to use a link to Picasa as the author? Anyway we can raise this, but what were you trying to enter? NeilK (talk) 04:27, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    I was trying to enter this: [https://picasaweb.google.com/cotevaroise.com cotevaroise.com] (cotevaroise.com is the name associated with the Picasa account). This is similar to the Flickr upload which links to the Flickr account of the author of the picture. Thanks. Badzil (talk) 18:31, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Fixed in r86869. Kaldari (talk) 17:21, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Great. Thanks. Keep up the good work. Badzil (talk) 20:18, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • I am unable to specify that I want to use the CC 2.5 license, in which wikinews requires. Phearson (talk) 14:49, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    I don't see any requirement for images to be CC 2.5 on Wikinews. In a few minutes I was able to find PD, US government work, and CC 3.0 licensed images. Actually, I was not able to find a CC 2.5 image. The link to upload images on Wikinews goes straight to Commons:Upload. NeilK (talk) 04:36, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • The phrase "Release rights", though 'verbed' as the other headings are, is somewhat misleading. I think a novice uploader could be scared away by the phrase, as it sounds like he/she is releasing all their rights (many people aren't okay with that). Of course, in the case of many free licenses the creator of the work still retains some rights even after uploading. And that doesn't even cover the myriad uploads where the uploader isn't in a position to release rights at all, as they aren't the creator of the work. A more friendly and accurate heading might be "Explain source" or "License work" (maybe not great suggestions, but that's 30 seconds of thinking!) Gump Stump (talk) 06:22, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Manually inserting licensing templates

  • There should be a way to manually insert licensing templates. I don't expect to see every one on the list, but if the list of options doesn't cover the one we need I would still like to move forward with the upload. As is, I simply select the wrong one and change it after it's uploaded. Not very efficient. Other than that, the upload wizard is a huge improvement and it's very easy to use. Swarm (talk) 21:19, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks for your comments -- I agree with you. This affects a small number of uploaders but they tend to be the most active. I have something half-ready to go, but I want to make sure it doesn't impede overall usability. NeilK (talk) 21:28, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • This is an issue for me, as most of my uploads are historic photos with a PD-NZ licence, and I'd like to enter that manually rather than choose the wrong licence and then amend the uploaded file later. Schwede66 01:06, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Agree completely. I was uploading images last night that were tagged {{PD-Canada}} and {{PD-1996}} and I had no choice but to upload them with an incorrect license and then go back and manually fix them. Some people won't even bother with the manual fix. There needs to an option to manually enter a license, as the current options are unhelpful and overly U.S.-centric. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 17:19, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
There are lots of custom licenses for different websites (like Comunismul în România). I want to be able to use those for uploading. NeilK, have you made any progress on that issue? Strainu (talk) 09:01, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I was wondering about the status of this as well. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 17:53, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • There is required too short description of the source like this: "This field is too long. Make it shorter than 200 characters." Make the size of this field unlimited. Snek01 (talk) 18:36, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Description and categories

  • I'm liking the ability to click on the images while in the "Describe" tab for a larger view. However, I missed it on my first pass and think this should be advertised with a "click to enlarge" label on/near each image. -- saberwyn 03:49, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • The system seems to assume you know every bit of information about the picture you are about to upload. If you know that a picture was taken in february 1994, you want to include that as the date but you only have the option to give a precise date. Yaamboo (talk) 09:29, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • When I upload a picture of The Bronx and start typing a category of "the bro..." the selector offers "The bronze..." but not "The Bronx..." presumably because I didn't capitalize the place name. Other programs with autocompletion don't mind whether we use caps or not and this one also should offer both upper and lower case completions. Jim.henderson (talk) 22:52, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks and reuse

Other

Praise

error message

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.16) Gecko/20110319 Firefox/3.6.16 ( .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET4.0E)

I get a lot of error messages when I try to upload more than three at a time. They vary. the last one was mw.Api error: badtoken AlejandroLinaresGarcia (talk) 15:39, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wizard needs to check for redundant extensions

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:2.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0

Just tried the wizard. It seems to work well, except that there was no indication that I should have stated the filenames without extensions. As a result, the files ended up with ".jpg.jpg" and will need to be renamed. The wizard should either advise uploaders not to add extensions, and/or should check for redundant extensions and remove them. — Cheers, JackLee –talk– 10:51, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nice

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.16) Gecko/20110319 Firefox/3.6.16

Nice work. Works brilliantly. Only problem is that text is a tad bit too small while autoselecting categories. Nice effort. Cheers. Rsrikanth05 17:28, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US) AppleWebKit/534.13 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/9.0.597.98 Safari/534.13

Duplicate uploads

One of the reasons that I currently see duplicate uploads (uploads of material already here) is that the user wants to fix the filename. Could the message, on this new wizard, that says "file already on the site with the same content" also have a suggestion that the uploader use {{Rename}} instead, if they are trying to give the existing file a better name? --Tony Wills (talk) 12:12, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Error messages

User agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; InfoPath.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET4.0C; .NET4.0E)

I tried the upload wizard a few times. I liked the look and feel of the wizard and found it easy to use when uploading one or more files. I received the following message:

DestinationChecker::checkUnique> error in checkUnique result

At which point, the upload wizard never returned with a message to retry. Victoriaedwards (talk) 15:29, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

multi-upload

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; ch; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110422 Ubuntu/10.04 (lucid) Firefox/3.6.17

good! but you should also give a multi-upload option where I can select more than one image with the same categories, description etc. ... trm (talk) 00:22, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GPS

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; ch; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110422 Ubuntu/10.04 (lucid) Firefox/3.6.17

GPS date from EXIF should be integrated trm (talk) 00:27, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It is already integrated, just not immediately. DschwenBot extracts GPS EXIF data and converts it to {{Location}}, daily, for all uploads, not just those using the wizard. Gestumblindi (talk) 20:22, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Complimenti

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; it; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101203 Firefox/3.6.13 ( .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET4.0C)

Mi piace questo tool, sarebbe comodo poter copiare in blocco tutta la descrizione, utile quando si caricano molte foto con parti in comune. Cruccone (talk) 11:25, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Trial upload last night

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.1; Trident/5.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0; MDDR; InfoPath.3; .NET4.0C; BRI/2)

The presentation is user friendly and easy to follow. Yeah !! Last night upload of 22MB file for DNB did not complete within the time constraints I was under. The file was uploaded using the existing system within a 5 minute window, while this wizard entered its 38th minute. That 2nd step of the wizard did not request a destination for the file. JamAKiska, Windows IE9. JamAKiska (talk) 16:24, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

2nd attempted upload.

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.1; Trident/5.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0; MDDR; InfoPath.3; .NET4.0C; BRI/2)

43 minutes and still running... JamAKiska Windows IE9 JamAKiska (talk) 19:39, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Upload

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.1; Trident/5.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0; MDDR; InfoPath.3; .NET4.0C; BRI/2)

1 hour 4 minutes and climbing... JamAKiska Windows IE9 JamAKiska (talk) 20:00, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

uploading and description must take place simultaneously

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/534.24 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/11.0.696.60 Safari/534.24

like Vimeo and YouTube Vnon (talk) 11:10, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

error

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110420 Firefox/3.6.17 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729)

just at the metadata/description screen and I have an error messgae and no continue button, which means I will lose all my work! Grrrrr!

mw.DestinationChecker::checkUnique> error in checkUnique result: http[13:5240015] Wikidwitch (talk) 13:00, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple upload

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:2.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0

Only category shown:"uploaded by upload wizard". Apparently does not show inserted category. AHert (talk) 15:12, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you sooooooooooo much

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0.1

"If you aren't absolutely sure what the intentions of the original author were then please do not upload this file to Wikimedia Commons. Press the button below to abandon this upload -- don't worry, nothing's been published yet."

<3 whoever added this in. It was much needed. ←fetchcomms 01:50, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

translation for nepali tutorial

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0.1

translation for nepali tutorial upload wizard is ready here Bhawani (talk) 10:39, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

doesn't appear to work

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 SeaMonkey/2.0.14

doesn't render at all in seamonkey

If I use the classic skin in firefox I don't even get the leave feedback link Genicoord (talk) 16:56, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Upload wizard does not start

The Upload wizard on Commons does not start. A spinner is running for mor than 10 minutes. It works/worked fine on the http://commons.prototype.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:UploadWizard HenkvD (talk) 17:38, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

my ssytem is probably:
User agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729)
taken from [1] HenkvD (talk) 17:51, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It worked fine this morning, when the UploadWizard was the default. HenkvD (talk) 18:05, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It does not work now, this evening, when the UploadWizard is not the default. HenkvD (talk) 18:08, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

derivatives don't link back to orginal

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1) AppleWebKit/534.24 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/11.0.696.60 Safari/534.24

I having to add links manually, unless I'm missing something 66.220.113.98 20:56, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kudos to simplifying the process

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1) AppleWebKit/534.24 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/11.0.696.65 Safari/534.24

nice work, makes the process more accessible to everyone -- btphelps (talk) (contribs) 21:05, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Error

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/534.24 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/11.0.696.65 Safari/534.24

I clicked on the link to help test the new upload wizard, and is said thank you for using our new upload tool, but nothing in between.

) Capiovae (talk) 00:08, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback? Uploading a new version of a drawing, or trying to

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0.1

The first screen I got was the feedback screen? So far, so good, I suppose. MartinGugino (talk) 00:37, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A wile ago I tried the same (see here). The conclusion is that the upload wizard is not designed for "reuploading". In cases like that it has to be done the old-fashioned way (Special:Upload). HenkvD (talk) 21:33, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No cancel button

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/534.24 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/11.0.696.60 Safari/534.24

I had second thought regarding the legality of my upload when I was at the Describe phase. I was looking for a Cancel button but only found Next. I huess I will just close the browser tab, hoping this would do the trick.

Ofra Hod (Ofrahod) Google Chrome Windows 7 Ofrahod (talk) 07:57, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good show

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_6_7) AppleWebKit/534.24 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/11.0.696.65 Safari/534.24

I just used your upload wizard to 'batch upload' photographs - works very well, thanks. It would be nice to have a few boxes allowing you to enter fields common for all the photographs.

Cheers, user:Umeshsrinivasan Umeshsrinivasan (talk) 17:03, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Licencing

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110420 Firefox/3.6.17

I generally like to Multi licence my work under a CCby3.0SA and GFDL, however the wizard doesn't allow me to do that, so I invariable have to edit the licence after updating. Otherwise this tool is excellent, EXCEPT for the small font size ... Rsrikanth05 (talk) 19:32, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Forgotten Cat

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0) AppleWebKit/534.24 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/11.0.696.65 Safari/534.24

When I don't put in a category, I get no warning, either at upload time or in the next few days. Jim.henderson (talk) 22:25, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

unable to post title for upload

User agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; msn OptimizedIE8;ENUS)

unable to post title for upload. When entering the title immedialtly goes red and will not acceop any upload Dmagicfjr (talk) 23:31, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

We're looking into this now. It may be an issue with the new blacklist detection.--Eloquence (talk) 00:56, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

unable to upload title

User agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; msn OptimizedIE8;ENUS)

2011Right Side.jpg

Bicycle saddles 

Dmagicfjr (talk) 23:32, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Batch selection and upload

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:6.0a1) Gecko/20110508 Firefox/6.0a1

Hello,

Currently the wizard does not allow selection of multiple files (via Ctrl and Shift+click) in the "Add another file" prompt. This would be extremely useful when uploading a batch of files.

Also, it does not allow for more than ten files in an upload. I think this limit should be removed or at least raised, to make it easier to add a series of images.

Both of these will make the uploader easier for uploading multiple files, and perhaps decrease reliance on bots for large series of files.

Thank you. InverseHypercube (talk) 03:28, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Usage of the word "Donate"

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:6.0a1) Gecko/20110508 Firefox/6.0a1

I notice the wizard uses the phrase "Donate media file". I object to this wording, because it implies that the uploader relinquishes all rights to Wikimedia Commons, which is not true. Also, the uploader may not be the creator of the file, and may feel it is "not theirs to give", even though it has a Creative Commons license. It should be reworded, perhaps to "Upload media file". InverseHypercube (talk) 03:32, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There are arguments on both sides. In my experience, users need to be hit with a sledgehammer to understand that they really are permanently allowing other people to use their works. Naive users (whose grasp of copyright is pretty shaky already) have a vague idea that they always have rights over their own works, no matter what happens. The "donate" wording was suggested by various people including a testing firm we hired. NeilK (talk) 22:15, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I see. I guess the sentiment is that it's better to be safe than sorry? InverseHypercube (talk) 23:02, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, but these are two very separate issues that are being conflated. Donation to me means something very specific - it's giving something away with no expectation of return. That's not what's happening here - uploaders are giving something away for free, but not necessarily with no expectation of returns (personally, when I upload images under CC-BY-SA, I expect attribution). In contrast, if your aim is to emphasise that an upload is in perpetuity, then simply say that - if necessary adding a check box to make sure that uploaders have read it. "Donating" does not solely mean "in perpetuity" - and to use it as that is fundamentally wrong. Mike Peel (talk) 19:19, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I don't understand why «they always have rights over their own works» should be incorrect. They actually do keep them, because licenses are not exclusive. The word "donation" implies a transfer of "ownership" i.e. of exclusive copyrights rights which applies only to the traditional publishers (but perhaps I'm confused by the meaning of the word in Italian, where it's unquestionably wrong). I wonder if that mysterious testing firm knows how free knowledge and licenses work. Nemo 19:38, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Both Nemo and Mike Peel are absolutely correct. Nobody is "donating" anything here, at least to Commons. Even people who use PD as license "donate" their works to public domain, not to Commons. I never donate anything to Commons or Public Domain except my time, and the copyright of my pictures remains with me. The word "donate" is absolutely wrong and misleading, and should be removed from there ASAP.--- Darwin Ahoy! 21:46, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Progress bar

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0.1

I think there should be a progress bar for each of the photo that user want to upload. It is very irritating to see a page for while without any progress and waiting for a msg for successful upload. Bellayet (talk) 04:26, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Add caption here

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.2.16) Gecko/20110319 Firefox/3.6.16 ( .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET4.0C)

It would be great if the description was used instead of "add caption here". I guess this could be added as a third option. Would same me time. James Heilman, MD (talk) 05:20, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

very slow timeconsuming

User agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; Trident/4.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0; HPDTDF; .NET4.0C)

Upload wizard is very slow and timeconsuming in use. Access to the basic upload form has to pass by the Upload wizard and has become timeconsuming also. Havang(nl) (talk) 08:44, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked by "one error"

All attempts to upload by the wizard end with "There is one error ...." but I don't see what is the error. --Havang(nl) (talk) 08:51, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Havang: maybe a screenshot might help me figure it out... NeilK (talk) 22:13, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Layout issue

Safari 4 on the mac, using from secure server: TheDJ (talk) 09:06, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This looks a tad sloppy.

Why my title is not suitable?

User agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; CognosRCP)

I don't understand. I'm trying to upload a photo and i can't do it. "Please make this tittle more meaningful? I tried like 100 different combinations. Help!! JICSerengil (talk) 10:07, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See above -- this looks like an IE bug we're looking into.--Eloquence (talk)
You can follow this issue at bugzilla:28918. NeilK (talk) 22:12, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Crashed my browser, Firefox 4

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0.1

This crashed my browser, and is not fit for use until thoroughly tested internally by Wikimedia -- Philcha (talk) 12:12, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

number of possible licenses

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0.1

The number of licenses is too restricted. There should be another option "More". Under this option special licenses such {{PD-author|name}} could be added. With the present wizard this is not possible and results in a loss of time by having to chose first a wrong license and then changing it afterwards when the file has been uploaded. Also the possibility of {{Licensereview}} should be easier to add. A plus in this wizard is the possibility of uploading several images at the same time.

JoJan (talk) 14:02, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cannot upload

In the past two hours when I hit "Upload" the new wizard is announced, then does nothing for five minutes, at which time I give up and use the old uploader. This is with both MSIE and Chrome browser. Both were working yesterday with the new upload wizard. Jim.henderson (talk) 15:53, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Use Firefox - it showed some animation for me! But I wonder what actually happened in the background, how many meg of data shuttled here and there... NVO (talk) 15:58, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It is bad that for standard wiki-use such advises are needed: (new) users are long gone before they discover that. I made tens of wizard upload trials, not one upload was succesfull yet. --Havang(nl) (talk) 16:16, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Special Upload Wizard

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1) AppleWebKit/534.24 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/11.0.696.68 Safari/534.24

Que ruim/que malo! Eu usava muito esse software para carregar minhas fotos. Esse software estava me ajudando muito. Eu carregava muitas fotos em pouco tempo. Esse software foi dar defeito. Alguem poderia/podria consertar/arreglar esse software? Esse software era muito/muy benefico para mim. Eduardo P (talk) 17:10, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Titles won't work.

User agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; InfoPath.2; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET4.0C; .NET4.0E)

I'm trying to upload 3 SVG files, created in inkscape, at the same time. It keeps telling me for each of them: "Please make this title more meaningful". Which ever titles I try it keeps breaking, so I can't upload anything! I'm using IE7.0.57 Pluke (talk) 10:43, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

We just pushed out the fix for this, can you try again?--Eloquence (talk) 12:43, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Uploading multiple files

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0.1

Final upload after "Describe" failed for the last of four files. Stündle (talk) 13:30, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

PS: The problematic file was File:Kraefteparallelogramm-schritt-4.svg
Today it worked to upload three files in a row. Stündle (talk) 08:27, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thumbs up

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0.1

This is very nice. Much easier for a novice to get right, and a good deal quicker even for an experienced user. Dcrjsr (talk) 14:19, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

+1 Stündle (talk) 15:41, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Upload wizard functionality

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0.1

Used the wizard again to upload a dozen pictures and liked it! - I suggest that the all inclusive license feature, where one license can be applied to several images, be also implemented for categories!!! That would really speed things up. - I just uploaded 8 images of the same categories (2 per image) and had to select them eight times. - On the other hand, if you wish me to test the form for new features, please feel free to contact me, because on the average I upload 150 images per week, all batched by categories. Thank you and good luck. User:Ineuw Ineuw talk page on en.ws 14:46, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

Where the heck is the real upload page?!

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0.1

What is this bleeping mess?!!! Where’s the link to the usual upload wizards? I want the derivatives wizard, where’s the link to it? What is is k12-syle sick joke? Tuvalkin (talk) 15:01, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Phew!

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0.1

I just noticed the link to "Back to the old form", yay! I’m gonna click it, and I’m going to wish I never even saw this sick joke of a an upload wizard. Thanks very much. Tuvalkin (talk) 15:03, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Upload wizard

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1) AppleWebKit/534.24 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/11.0.696.68 Safari/534.24

Please do keep the possibility for a quick upload (the basic upload form). Thank you. Ondřej Žváček (talk) 19:57, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; de; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 Firefox/3.5.19

I have a large numbers of files which are assigned a serial number by the camera. That I cannot apparently change in the new upload form, unless I misse something. That's a problem. Gryffindor (talk) 22:24, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Stuck after 4/10 images uploaded

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/534.24 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/11.0.696.68 Safari/534.24

My first try using this new upload wizard. On the fifth of 10 images, it has now been sitting on 'Submitting details and publishing...' for 10 minutes. It doesn't look like the page for this, or any of the other images after this, have been created. Jonathan ingram (talk) 22:47, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Two issues with the donate button

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10_5_8; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.20.25 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.4 Safari/533.20.27

First of all... "donate"? Wouldn't "upload" be a better term? Even as a regular contributor, this word stopped me in my tracks. It's a bit confusing.

Second, is it supposed to be a button? I was hovering the mouse all over it until I finally found the "link" which is somewhere at the top of the "donate" graphic. – Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies 02:45, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, now that I'm trying this, instead of "donate", how about "Add file". Because that's all you're doing. The next page says "add more?"... not "donate more" lol. Thanks. – Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies 02:51, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Despite other notices, some photographers are later surprised to discover that we have given the Foundation (and the world) part or all of our rights to our pictures. Better to pause now to consider the question, than regret later. Jim.henderson (talk) 12:19, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The problem, though also continues to the "Donate" link on the left column. Do I click "Donate" to upload a file, or "donate" to send money? But after reading the similar above discussion, I guess it makes sense. But I'm still having the same trouble that the button isn't entirely clickable. I'm using the "Modern" skin, maybe that's affecting it (since it seems to affect a lot of things), but the graphic should entirely be clickable, not just a random top third of it. – Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies 07:36, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Old version"

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10_5_8; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.20.25 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.4 Safari/533.20.27

Hmm, this just popped into my head: Would it be possible to have an "old version" button in the menu, next to the "Upload file" link? I would rather not have to click twice to get to the one page I'm going. (No need to clutter up my bookmarks either, lest that be suggested.) – Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies 02:49, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Should not be used for derivative images

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10_5_8; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.20.25 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.4 Safari/533.20.27

My mistake was using this for the first time with a derivative image, which I simply can't figure out. And it's certainly more time-consuming to be skipping around between two browser windows, trying to figure out everything that will need to be copy pasted in the end. Can there be a warning at the beginning that says Derivative Images should use the old form? – Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies 02:55, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I mean, just add a link to Derivative FX in the options, and voila, problem solved. – Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies 02:56, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Although that may seem like an obvious thing to do, we prefer not to add links to UploadWizard which would be very confusing to new users, nor is it clear that the UploadWizard process is the right place for derivative works uploads to be managed. Please see my comment below at #Deriviative_works.--Eloquence (talk) 23:38, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

cool but images not shown

User agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729)

the wizard is a great help when uploading multiple images although it couls support some functionaltiy to copy categories if images for the same categories are uploaded. Also during the uzpload the actual images were not shown, but could be used normally on wiki pages. Kurst (talk) 03:28, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Internal error: missing parameters on request.

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0.1

Attempted uploading 15 images from an article but the wizard limit seems to be 11. Regardless the process failed with the above error message. User:Ineuw Ineuw talk page on en.ws 09:49, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Problem solved. :) Ineuw talk page on en.ws 09:58, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Self template repeat

{{self|self|self|cc-zero}}

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_6_7) AppleWebKit/534.24 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/11.0.696.68 Safari/534.24

Should of coures just be one self not self|self|self|cc-zero}} Smallbones (talk) 14:47, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Likely from clicking the "Upload more files" twice - after the first time I clicked this button, it only had 2 "self" in the template. Smallbones (talk) 15:05, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Some quibbles

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0.1

I love it when uploading multiple files. However:

1) No links to DerivativeFX at all, Flinfo, and other tools at all. Users should be presented with those options as well.

You're right and this is a flaw. However, I'm not sure how to bring DerivativeFX into this flow without ruining the usability for the common case. NeilK (talk) 18:16, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

2) Over-reliance on flash thingies. Please provide an HTML version with the same steps for those of us with unreliable connections. Obsidi♠nSoul 16:26, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There's no Flash. This is all HTML+JavaScript. If we were allowed to use Flash this would have been 10x easier. As for unreliability we may have some better news for you soon. NeilK (talk) 18:16, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

sortorder

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1) AppleWebKit/534.24 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/11.0.696.68 Safari/534.24

Could you add the functionality of adding the sortorder to the categories? Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 21:10, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Upload not completed

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; de; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 Firefox/3.5.19

I have uploaded a number of images, released the rights, but when I get to the describe part, it starts publishing the first couple of images, but is not able to complete the last one or last two even. Which is annoying because it means I have to go back and re-upload the images that it was not able to do. Gryffindor (talk) 21:52, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There may be some API errors left that UW cannot handle yet, which cause these problems in the final step. We're planning to add at least a "remove" link ASAP, so when this happens, you can move on to the next file manually. If you notice a reproducible pattern, please report as much detail as possible -- which files failed (e.g. "the 3rd file failed, but when I tried again it worked" or "the 3rd file failed and I can't succeed uploading it through UW, but I could through the old form"). Thanks,--Eloquence (talk) 23:36, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Editing every single image

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; de; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 Firefox/3.5.19

I sometimes have a number of images that I upload with Commonist in one sequence, so basically different angles of one building for example. But on the upload "Wizard", I have to add each image individually and individually add the description and the categories, even though it's all the same. That works with Commonist, not on this one though, so it's a waste of time. Gryffindor (talk) 21:53, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, it's not a trivial user interface pattern to get right without adding clutter, but I hope we'll be able to add something like a simple "Copy details from above" button.--Eloquence (talk) 23:30, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Only up to 10 images?

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; de; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 Firefox/3.5.19

I can only upload a maximum of 10 images in one go? Not good... Gryffindor (talk) 22:23, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

UW currently has a maximum session length of 25 minutes (related to some backend architecture issues that we'll need to resolve), which I think is the reason for this hardcoded limit. It also doesn't deal with error situations in the final step very well yet. But I definitely agree that eliminating this restriction would be highly desirable.--Eloquence (talk) 23:32, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to be able to upload more than 10 in one go too Sweetie candykim (talk) 19:12, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The final step of vverification freezes

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0.1

There is no option to skip a frozen process in a batch upload. When this occurs with the 2nd image of a five image upload, the whole process must be repeated from the beginning which makes the process very time consuming. (The frozen image of the first try is successfully uploaded on the 2nd try). Ineuw talk page on en.ws 03:21, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

Guide translation

User agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; InfoPath.2; MS-RTC LM 8; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.648; .NET CLR 3.5.21022; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729)

Hi, I wanted to know what I have to do for translate the guide (the image) to galician?. Thanks!. Elisardojm (talk) 10:15, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See m:Licensing tutorial.--Eloquence (talk) 18:42, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done, thanks!, --Elisardojm (talk) 00:24, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Adding {{Flickrreview}}

I noticed that many files uploaded by the Upload wizard have {{Flickrreview}} added, while there is not the slightest relation to Flickr. In most cases these are files uploaded with a {{PD-USGov}}. Perhaps this is due to a software error. Kind regards, Lymantria (talk) 19:58, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There's a bug for this now: Bugzilla: 29346 NeilK (talk) 18:18, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

How to change the Help Desk link on File:Licensing tutorial XX.svg

On Italian version, the link to the Help Desk on the opening image should be changed to local Village Pump. How to do this? Thank you.--Trixt (talk) 20:46, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ugh, from a quick look at the code it looks like the URL is hardcoded :-(. Before that's fixed it can't be localized, sorry. But I'll make sure we fix this before the next update.--Eloquence (talk) 23:49, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed in the codebase and fix will be rolled out with the next deployment.--Eloquence (talk) 02:15, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Castel del Monte, 13th century castle

User agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1)

foto april 2010 geschonken door Hans Van Hoyweghen, Dendermonde, België Arthurcox (talk) 07:14, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deriviative works

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686) AppleWebKit/534.24 (KHTML, like Gecko) Ubuntu/10.04 Chromium/11.0.696.65 Chrome/11.0.696.65 Safari/534.24

Where, with this new wizard do I say that this is a derivative of something I found on wikicommons? (I redrew a png as svg because I believe svgs are better in this case.) Gregors (talk) 09:08, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's still on toolserver, http://toolserver.org/~luxo/derivativeFX/deri1.php
Within the new environment, you just have to write all the code yourself - similar to what Luxo's tool writes. I once managed to have it done in a single pass (using an external editor and copypasting from it into vampire fields). But since I had to come back to manually insert categories and remove added trash, why bother? A faster (but dirty) solution: use the simplest "own work" path to save time, then edit the template as you normally would, ASAP. NVO (talk) 11:41, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
In general, the old upload form is a cumulative nightmare of incremental feature and documentation additions supplemented with confusing hacks situated on the toolserver or in site-scripts. See usability study conducted during the development and a quick UploadWizard vs. old upload form comparison conducted via usertesting.com earlier this week. The tester comments in the second link about the old form speak for themselves: "Compared with other image upload processes you've seen, would you say this process was easy or difficult?" "This process is the most difficult I've ever used. "
So, UploadWizard has taken the approach of optimizing for the most common use cases first. We're continuing to focus on that as the main goal, and additional features like easier Flickr import and geo-tagging as a secondary goal. It's not necessarily clear that use cases like derivative works even belong there. An ideal implementation might be situated on the file description page for the file of which you'd want to upload a derivative.
What we're not going to do is turn UW into the old upload form by just throwing a bunch of links in there which would be very confusing to new users. That means that unfortunately, UW won't immediately be able to satisfy all needs/workflows. But tools like Luxo's remain available and usable, as does the old form.--Eloquence (talk) 23:28, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Catching up on my messages here... thanks for linking me to your answer! – Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies 07:38, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

How Can I Edit An Uploaded File?

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:5.0a2) Gecko/20110519 Firefox/5.0a2

When I'd realized that I'd misspelled important words after uploading, I didn't know what else to do but proceed. This was my first upload session. Please, what can I do to make necessary corrections? Chucksanjii (talk) 17:57, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have added some help on your talk page, let me know if that doesn't tell you what you needed to know. --Tony Wills (talk) 00:39, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New layout

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/12.0.742.60 Safari/534.30

Nice graphic! Wish it was here when I started. The upload button should be much more noticeable though. Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 19:44, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

+1--Gopal1035 (talk) 04:17, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Upload wizard

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 SeaMonkey/2.0.14

Get rid of this wizard crap, don't ever tell someone arbitrarily that some automated process thinks that - IN RED - I uploaded not my own work, then waste my time requiring a second upload, also rejected.......... Do not wast my valuable time. 

  Ssaco (talk) 03:21, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Handling of upload errors

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0.1

Kudos for your Upload Wizard efforts! - Several minor problems and suggestions:

  1. The number of images for a single upload batch is unknown. This would really help.
  2. Checking of duplicates should be rejected at the earliest - like prior to the initial upload.
  3. In case of an (by a duplicate) upload error, it jams up instead of bypassing/deleting the error.
  4. The date selection interferes with historical date, when only the year is known as in 1898.
  5. Option to apply the date and category to all the uploads in a batch

Thanks 

Ineuw talk page on en.ws 09:26, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for your comments. Can you clarify the duplicate file issue? Are you talking about a file with the same contents as an existing one? If so, the expected behavior is for it to be rejected immediately (in the first step) upon upload.--Eloquence (talk) 02:22, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Great work

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0.1

The new interface is quite an improvement.

I've been using the old interface for some time and I still remember the pain it was to read the instructions for my first upload :) Compare to the easy to read and understand graphic of the new Upload Wizard.

The User Interface/User Experience now is awesome.

But it feels slow- could have been my Internet or other issues.

Also, what will be the future of direct uploads from Flickr?

With best wishes Gopal Nothing is free in this world (talk) 04:14, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Upload Wizard breaks images

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0.1

Images constantly break during upload and their sizes are between 12Kb and 100Kb, and this causes tremendous waste of time. Ineuw talk page on en.ws 06:47, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

dont use calender for public domain uploads

User agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.0; GTB6.6; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; Media Center PC 5.0; eSobiSubscriber 2.0.4.16; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; OfficeLiveConnector.1.5; OfficeLivePatch.1.3; .NET4.0C)

Stop the default of using today's date, I want to upload 7 files all from 1584, same book, same description, why need to provide description and date for each files ???, I leave these repeats all blanks, the is the fault of this wizard Gisling (talk) 10:42, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • You can write whatever you want, although the field is too short for a typical case (say, one "date" for the photograph and two or three years of the primary work). Just write it in an external editor and copy-paste into the field. Usability = user's ability to prevail over usability efforts ;) NVO (talk) 17:26, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Select a media file to donate" button not a button

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10_5_8; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.20.25 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.4 Safari/533.20.27

The gray box that enwraps "select a media file to donate" should be made into a button, or at least the entire surface should be clickable, or the actual phrase should be clickable. As it stands, it's not intuitive because the link is almost mapped to be above the phrase. Only the very top portion of the button is clickable. On Vector skin, it's right above the words, but on Modern skin, it's way above the words. I keep swinging my mouse around searching for the link. – Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies 14:09, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That's not normal behavior -- the entire button area should be clickable. It sounds like a browser-specific issue. We'll investigate it.--Eloquence (talk) 02:12, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
As you can tell, I was using Safari. I also tried it on OmniWeb, but the same problem persists, though OmniWeb is to Safari as Mozilla was to Netscape (I think). So I wasn't really expecting it to be any different. I don't have any other browsers to test it on at the moment. – Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies 15:32, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Files lost + titleblacklist + license problems + watchlist

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US) AppleWebKit/532.0 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/3.0.195.33 Safari/532.0

I have just uploaded three files with this tool. I have seen the following problems:

  • I have seen that new tool has a mass upload and wanted to try it. It resulted in the fact that the first file was uploaded immediately, however, I have been waiting for the second one for well some 15 minutes. It looks like it got lost... How long does this wizard normally works?
    UPD. I received a message "Some uploads have failed" (it took this tool 15 minutes to realize it) and asked to try again. It keeps showing "Submitting details and publishing...". I can't stop, retry, come back etc. So finally after having waited for 25 minutes I closed this wizard, losing all the information I added (where is the Back button???) and leaving the photo uploaded... somewhere, I don't know exactly where. Thanks to developers for great 25 minutes I've spent making this tool work. However, the tool wins — NickK (talk) 23:06, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, failure in the final step is very annoying - sorry you experienced this. This is caused by API failures, some of which we may be able to catch, some of which we won't (but in which case we should fail more gracefully). We're working on a short-term fix to at least make it possible to remove uploads that are failing so that the entire batch doesn't get stalled, while working on tracking down more of the bugs that cause stalling in the final step.--Eloquence (talk) 02:09, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I think that the best short-term fix should be some kind of Back button. If your upload fails, you loose all description information you added. More files you upload at once, the higher is the possibility of bug (mine occured at 2nd of 2), so the higher is the possibility you'll have to type it once more... — NickK (talk) 00:03, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • For unknown reasons I couldn't add an OTRS permission to license field, moreover, there is no way to add a generic license like {{Victoria Sydorova}} (OTRS permission template), so I had to select the closest relevant license and add it to Other field, than change it manually. I tried selecting that none of the above choises is good, the useful wizard offered me to leave the form... Maybe it is really the only solution...
  • I don't know how the titleblacklist works. I tried to upload a photo of a footballer Junior Godoi. I've received a warning that this photo was taken from some external resource and I should change the name. Well, I did, thanks to someone's logics, Godoi Junior suprisingly worked. However, 15 minutes have passed, and this file hasn't arrived yet...
For debugging purposes, can you send me a copy of the file as originally named to erik(at)wikimedia(dot)org?--Eloquence (talk) 02:09, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Special:Upload had no problem uploading exactly the same file under exactly the same name: File:Junior Godoi2.jpg. Original URL is http://cs10102.vkontakte.ru/u12051500/135246113/x_ca4f5990.jpg, I saved picture locally as Junior_Godoi2.jpg (NOT as x_ca4f5990.jpg), I didn't change anything and tried uploading it with UploadWizard — NickK (talk) 00:03, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • I didn't find how to add the photo to the watchlist. I usually watch all my uploads, but this tool doesn't have this option. As it does not offer direct link to the file, I have to go through My Contributions, open the file and press "Watch". Or I can copy and paste file name, but this solution is not much better. Why this simple button was removed?
  • I don't mention the speed. It looks like it uploads interface longer than the files

So I have only one question. Although I have "Exclude me from feature experiments" and "Use the old-style upload form layout" marked in my preferences, I can't come back to old form by default. I would appreciate any advice on doing that. Thanks NickK (talk) 22:56, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The easiest thing to do is to just bookmark Commons:Upload, Special:Upload or whatever form you prefer (there are quite a few variants). Volunteers are actively developing a "NoUploadWizard" gadget which you can find in your preferences, but which may not quite be working yet.--Eloquence (talk) 02:09, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I've already found it, it works ok, thanks. I think that UploadWizard is a good idea, and I remember trying it during the previous campaign, it was like winter or spring 2010, but it was much faster and much more reliable — NickK (talk) 00:03, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
"Improved navigation. First osition: Disable UploadWizard" So true Bulwersator (talk) 23:21, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It is not working Bulwersator (talk) 23:22, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

uploading of derivative works

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0.1

Currently the given options make a bit confusing to upload a derivative of an already hosted in Commons image specially when the original image has some templates different from the top 3 or 4

There should be a simpler option on the "This file is not my own work" menu:

  • "This is a derivative image from another Commons file":

where you just put the filename and the wizard fills the data (whatever it is) from the original file, including the contributors history.

This would significantly improve the process and also foster Commons not just as a free image host but a host where images have a free license and therefore can be freely modified -- Magister Mathematicae 23:56, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think we should target two features:
1) making it easier to add custom templates of any sort;
2) adding more intuitive derivative/overwrite features directly to the file description page.
Adding 1) would deal with most of the inconveniences that people are immediately encountering using UploadWizard. Adding 2) would be the intuitive, user-friendly way to deal with derivatives. Ideally, the implementation of 2) would include automatically parsing the file's license, and suggesting it as the default for the new file. (But that's tricky given the lack of machine-readable metadata.)--Eloquence (talk) 00:15, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please return the old upload form to default

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0.1

This new upload wizard is really awkward and virtually unusable, at least to me. I tried to upload a derivative of a file from Commons and was unable to, and had to get back to the old form. This new thing really is a nuisance, please disable it or place it somewhere else, but return the old form to default. - Darwin Ahoy! 08:27, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I even tried to upload the image normally, but was barred by the wizard for whatever reason, it kept saying my upload failed. Indeed, I didn't even found out how to write down the image information, since it attempted to upload it right away (and then failed saying it dodn't had description, licence or wathever). My first experience with this was really bad and annoying, including the vast time it took to load that cartoon intro, or whatever it was, before being allowed to move to the old upload form. Maybe it's me, since so many people seem to like it. I'm not good with this "user experience" based stuff, I hate Vector as well, with all my heart.--- Darwin Ahoy! 14:45, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The new thing is terrible to upload derivative works contrary to old method Bulwersator (talk) 23:17, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Need support for multi-licensing

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:6.0a1) Gecko/20110523 Firefox/6.0a1

I prefer to multi-license my images under GFDL/CC-BY-SA, but this tool only allows you to select one license. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:22, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There's an argument that multi-licensing doesn't make a lot of sense as a recommended option, because a) it's not required for the media files to be usable in GFDL documents, at least not in the long-standing interpretation of the GFDL that WMF has followed, b) few projects outside WMF use GFDL in the first place, and it's a very odd license to use for media files. On the other hand, Wikimedia Commons has lots of users who have specific licensing preferences, or who upload batches of files with highly specialized licensing templates. For both those cases, UploadWizard should offer better support, perhaps with a standard customization tool.--Eloquence (talk) 23:36, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
There are many cases where multi-licensing makes sense. One of them is uploads of {{PD-old}} and {{PD-art}}, which can be complemented with licenses regarding the photo itself. Another is photographs under freedom of panorama, of works of art recently into public domain, etc. All of these may require additional licensing tags. And this is only the tip of the iceberg.--- Darwin Ahoy! 23:55, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yes -- my comment was referring to the implication of making GFDL+CC-BY-SA part of the default selection. We should definitely have a mechanism that allows for flexibly specifying templates that aren't in the default sets.--Eloquence (talk) 02:02, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Importation d'images

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; fr; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110420 Firefox/3.6.17

Comment utiliser l'ancien formulaire et en français, pour l'importation d'images. Je suis habitué à ce formulaire et ne veux rien savoir du nouveau.

I will say it in English too : I'm used to the old form, I don't want the new one. Please tell me how to obtain the old upload form automatically, not on demand, and in French!!!!!

Pierre cb (talk) 19:22, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I created a gadget fort that, NoUploadWizard. Jean-Fred (talk) 19:58, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Assistant d'Import

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0) AppleWebKit/534.24 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/11.0.696.68 Safari/534.24

C'est utile pour les nouveaux mais pénible pour les ancien il faut prévoir de pourvoir le débrayer pour ceux qui le souhaite Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:33, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Je viens de créer un gadget pour ça, justement nommé NoUploadWizard. Rendez-vous dans vos préférences. Jean-Fred (talk) 19:58, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ugtilisation de ce nouveau assistant

User agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.0; Trident/4.0; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; Media Center PC 5.0; eSobiSubscriber 2.0.4.16; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; .NET4.0C; Orange 8.0)

Ca marche comment ??? JMO (talk) 20:13, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nouveau formulaire d'importation

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0.1

Cool la possibilité de télécharger plusieurs fichiers. Le premier essai fut concluant, mais depuis le moment il patine à la soumission de la description du troisième fichier (sur quatre). Je vais avoir tout à refaire ... Mala suerte !

Dvillafruela Daniel Villafruela (talk) 20:27, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

First step "learn"

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0.1

After the little comic strip, the button is too small / not enough contrasted. I think a lot of people will not see it, and then don't share their works.

By the way, this upload wizard is brilliant! Trizek here or on fr:wp 20:31, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your positive feedback. :-)
None of our user tests have shown any issues with the size of the button. That said, I don't disagree that making it more noticeable could make the wizard friendlier. Currently the button/separation line at the bottom is consistently styled across all steps. It might make sense to make the first-step button more prominent.--Eloquence (talk) 23:32, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Planté

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0.1

Le formulaire de téléchargement pédale depuis 12 minutes, il est planté. Trop d'affluence sur le serveur ? J'ai oublier les précisions demandées Navigateur : Firefox Bécane : MacBook pro Core I7 8 Go de mem Dvillafruela 

Daniel Villafruela (talk) 20:35, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wizard should allow rename of files on first step

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0.1

I went back to this thing to find out what went wrong with my experience, and why I found it so annoying. I was trying to upload some derivatives of Commons files, which still had the same name of the original file. That's why it never allowed me to go after first steep.

This wizard should allow the rename of files, as any other upload tool that I know. If it remains as it is, besides not allowing the rename of files with the same name as files already on Commons, it will increase greatly the number of files with typos, wrong descriptions or pure nonsense. - Darwin Ahoy! 23:51, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The current behavior is that if you're uploading a file with the same name, you should definitely be able to get past the first step -- it'll only prompt you to change the title in the "Describe" step. It won't allow you to go past the first step if you're uploading a file with the same content as an existing one, or if you're uploading a file that was previously deleted. Can you confirm whether that's the behavior you're seeing?
Also see my comment above: #uploading of derivative works.--Eloquence (talk) 02:00, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm... I couldn't reproduce the behaviour in my test, and actually (unfortunately) managed to upload a file with the wizard for the first time. There were two things there that confused me: First it asked to upload a file before asking the licences and the rest of the stuff. I would expect that the command there would be next and not upload. Then before what I believed was a last step ("Use" or something like that), with a button saying next, it actually uploaded the thing, to my despair, since it was a test picture and I was expecting to cancel it in the end: File:HusenilMuhammadAfandia.jpg. It should be made more obvious that that "next" button is indeed the "upload" button, and you don't have another chance to cancel. On the other hand, the first "upload" is quite confusing, since it doesn't upload anything (at least to Commons). I also don't like that "donate" message, though I could live with that.--- Darwin Ahoy! 03:21, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The new Wizard should let users upload images using filenames of images deleted earlier. By now this is only permitted by the old form. This bug should be fixed. Regards, /Orrling (talk) 20:14, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

nouvel assistant d'importation

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0) AppleWebKit/534.24 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/11.0.696.71 Safari/534.24

Beaucoup plus commode, bravo ! Ordifana75 (talk) 12:36, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Source field: 255 letters

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; de; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110420 Firefox/3.6.17 ( .NET CLR 3.5.30729)

For an accurate source description 255 symbols is too short sometimes. Citing a book or journal + some interent reference quickly goes over this limit, for giving some example I randomly picked File:Stygiocaris stylifera.jpg. I tried the wizard myself yesterday and was not able to provide the full source for File:Franzen - Sala de música de la Excma Sra Duquesa Viuda de Bailén.jpg, I had to add the online source by hand. --Martin H. (talk) 17:56, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can't upload an image that starts with "Bildsten"

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110430 Iceweasel/3.5.19 (like Firefox/3.5.19)

en:Picture stone in Swedish is "bildsten". However I can't upload an image if the title starts with "Bildsten" - I suppose it reacts to images starting with "Bild". Not good. Plrk (talk) 10:20, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Stop this!

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0.1

This is ”pushy”, except newer. Shigeru23 (talk) 15:06, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bravo et merci

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X 10.5; fr; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110420 Firefox/3.6.17

C'est devenu un plaisir de téléverser en série… Jmh2o (talk) 16:16, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

FAL

The licensing option "Miscellaneous reasons" is a problem.

  • The only license in it, "Free Artistic License", not refers to an en:Artistic License but to the en:Free Art License, {{FAL}}.
  • The name of this license is ambigous, people also in the past often use it wrong to lable random artworks that are surely not licensed under FAL by their copyright holders but that are in many cases public domain and {{PD-Art}}. Infact the FAL license option is a big problem, the FAL license is very rare on the internet, the Category:FAL is a mixture of wrongly tagged files.
  • The section not refers to a "Miscellaneous reasons" but to something like "The copyright holder published this work with a suitable free license". There are no miscellaneous reasons reasons for uploading something to Commons, there are only public domain or free license reasons.

I suggest to:

  • rename the option "Free Artistic License" --> "Free Art License " (with a clear visible identification)
  • rename the section "Miscellaneous reasons" --> "The copyright holder published this work with another suitable free licence"
  • move the renamed section below the Creative Commons & flickr sections. Other suitable free licenses can be added to this section in future.

--Martin H. (talk) 18:22, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I can't upload the picture

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1) AppleWebKit/534.24 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/11.0.696.68 Safari/534.24

you website lack everytime when i upload the picture. how to solve the problem? KAPOMZ (talk) 21:02, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

SONGS FOR SOULS*SERIES ERRATA JOURNAL MUSIC OR COMPILED

User agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729)

These are for this Missionary seeking publication for Donations to: Claudiaanngoodwin-Humphrey, Composer, who haslegal right ownership (c) since 1976, 1980 and 2008 is releasing this for this medium of exposure regarding Missionary work and Charity:claudiasongministry@gmail.com P.O.Box 10465 Glendale, Ca 91209 Claudiasongwriter (talk) 01:28, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

uploading

User agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; yie8)

The new wizzard does not work: I got stuck with the information "wait, checking title for uniqueness" Clemensmarabu (talk) 06:22, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitrary addition of flickreview

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100722 Firefox/3.6.8

Seems like the wizard arbitrarily added {{flickrreview}} to non-flickr uploads File:Treedmarten.jpg, etc. Materialscientist (talk) 02:27, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I like it but

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0.1

Additional improvement I would like: posibility of adding the same category to all files uploaded at once and not file by file.

It's a very good tool, much better than the previous one. B25es (talk) 06:38, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Public Domain paintings

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1) AppleWebKit/534.24 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/11.0.696.60 Safari/534.24

To be more in line with the painting template, could there be a structured question for the public domain paintings for extra info (dimensions/inventory number/media (oil/canvas or oil/copper or oil/panel)?? otherwise, looks good! Keep up the good work! Jane023 (talk) 07:32, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Assistant de versement

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0.1

Je viens de l'utiliser pour la première fois, je le préfère de beaucoup à l'ancien qui me posait beaucoup de problèmes n'étant pas un "prodige" de l'informatique. Cordialement. Sam0646 (talk) 15:19, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

formulaire incomplet

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; fr; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110420 Firefox/3.6.17 GTB7.1 ( .NET CLR 3.5.30729)

Le nouvel outil a des qualités et des défauts. Notamment, il manque les formulaires permettant d'ajouter des précisions du type "otrs pending". Attendu qu'on ne peut pas y mettre toutes les informations contenues dans le précédent système, je ne gagne pas de temps en l'utilisant, puisque je dois revenir dessus. En conséquence, pour l'instant, je préfère utiliser l'ancien. JJ Georges (talk) 16:29, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

import d'images

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1) AppleWebKit/534.24 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/11.0.696.71 Safari/534.24

Outre des images de fleurs et d'insectes,je réalise des images artistiques à partir de diapositives montées en sandwich et pour les améliorer traitées avec un logiciel de retouche.Je les situe en "abstract art",c'est leur catégorie générale, mais je n'ai pas trouvé d'exacte sous-catégorie, aussi les ai-je signalées: category: Abstract art : coming from a photography. It's good for you ? Or, is it necessecery to have an other denomination ? Thank you to tell me what is the best denomination or category. My email is jeangadeyne@live.fr - Très cordialement. Sinon,j'apprécie la nouvelle méthode d'apport d'images, mais que deviennent-elles ensuite ? Bien à vous et encore bravo pour votre réalisation dont je profite en visitant Wikimedia très fréquemment. Jgad (talk) 16:45, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Problem with File:Licensing tutorial gl.svg

Hi. I have uploaded a version of that file a few days ago, but the Upload Wizard is using an old version. What's the problem?. --Elisardojm (talk) 00:49, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Coul somebody help me with this problem?. I can't solve it... Thanks in advance, --Elisardojm (talk) 20:25, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Last page options

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0.1

Should also have the option to go to page of the image you have just uploaded. Would like to see how the page text is set in case need to edit. Traveler100 (talk) 08:37, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Watch list

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0.1

Did I miss the option to add files uploaded automatically to my watch list? Traveler100 (talk) 08:46, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

awful

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0) AppleWebKit/534.24 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/11.0.696.71 Safari/534.24

May be useful for newbies, but for others it just gets in the way. Michig (talk) 09:29, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kategorie

User agent: Opera/9.80 (Windows NT 6.0; U; de) Presto/2.8.131 Version/11.10

hatte die Kategorie eingegeben, wurde aber nicht übernommen, habe es jetzt von hand nachgetragen Blonder1984 (talk) 11:21, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Haben Sie für die eingegebene Kategorie "ADD" activiert? --Havang(nl) (talk) 13:47, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Upload Wizard

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0.1

What was wrong with the old one? If it ain't broke, don't fix it. Delaywaves (talk) 13:39, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It was broken. Jean-Fred (talk) 14:03, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Limitation on Source size

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101203 Firefox/3.6.13

The Limitation of source size of 200 characters creates problems when the source is URL, which generally extends 200 characters Redtigerxyz (talk) 13:45, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File name warnings?

Shouldn't the Upload Wizard warn/deny if you try to upload an image with a meaningless name generated by the camera? I accidentally uploaded a file as "SDIM0525.JPG" (requested renaming), the wizard accepted it without any kind of warning. Gestumblindi (talk) 22:00, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Uploads hang

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0.1

Nice, usable, complete interface, so kudos for that. However, the uploads seem to hang on occasion, leaving me no option but to abort. Kleuske (talk) 10:08, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

CC SA 1.0

User agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.0; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; Media Center PC 5.0; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; .NET4.0C)

I created a derived work from an image that is licensed CC SA 1.0, but that license is not an option. I ended up uploading as my own work, with comment about the actual license and my intent to change it after uploading, if I can. Lambtron (talk) 21:30, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good but

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20110511 Firefox/4.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.1

I like the upload wizard. I have used it to upload 19 photos. It works well except for the description. Since I have used the wizard no description appears in that field of the file list. Shiftchange (talk) 09:58, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Catching date error

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:2.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0

When the copyright is indicated as expired due to age, the date field should ideally catch errors when the current date is used as publication date. Shyamal (talk) 14:54, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Public Domain and unknown author

The wizard doesn't give choice for Public Domain or unknown author. --ƒajro @ ♨ ★ 15:02, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Category komt niet mee ??

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/534.24 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/11.0.696.71 Safari/534.24

Volgens mij worden de categorieën niet meegenomen Rob K. aka pa3ems - erfgoedfotografie 17:45, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

PLEASE LET ME MOVE FORWARD

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0.1

I see the cartoon. I love the cartoon. I have no idea how to move to the next step. Clicking on the cartoon: no. Clicking on an 'OK' badge? no. Clicking on 'Upload' at the top? no. I have to scroll around and find a tiny uncolored 'Next'.

Can you put the Next at the top of the page AND make all of the 'OK' sections imagemap to the next step AND make the bar at the top take you to the next step?

Love. SJ --SJ+ 07:30, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I absolutely agree. SPQRobin (talk) 13:56, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

One error?

User agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; GTB7.0; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; InfoPath.2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729)

cant see what is not right, it says one error Kristoff1 (talk) 12:34, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Prefer old form

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10_6_7; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.21.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.5 Safari/533.21.1

The old form directed me to specific types of uploads, such as flickr, own work, derived from commons etc. The new form just makes uploads harder. agr (talk) 13:50, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1a2) Gecko/20060512 BonEcho/2.0a2 

Zabi Rashidi (talk) 15:37, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

How much time left ...

before normal upload form shutdown? Must be on FAQ! NVO (talk) 16:20, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean? The normal upload form can't be shut down, it's immensely more useful than this experiment or newbies toy. I'm not planning to use this damn Wizard as my choice of preference any time soon.--- Darwin Ahoy! 18:53, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Where do you think it's going to? A. Normal upload form is broken [2]. B. Sue Gardner said - gadgets and widgets. C. Who will use them when the normal tool is still around? Trust me, they'll kill it, the question is when. P.S. Why do you think they picked this word for title? Wizardry and sorcery are still mortal sins, aren't they? NVO (talk) 21:32, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
LOL No, they wouldn't dare.--- Darwin Ahoy! 22:14, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ok!

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0.1

Funziona benone, mi piace! sNappyml 19:56, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A suggestion

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0.1

A suggestion: I think that a preview of the descriptions could be useful, especially for the preview of wiki-links, to know if they work well. sNappyml 20:23, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

languages

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10_6_7; fr-fr) AppleWebKit/533.21.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.5 Safari/533.21.1

did not find a keyboard for other characters (cyrillic, greek etc...) Jebulon (talk) 23:03, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0.1 

Omaof3 (talk) 23:13, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Donate media file" button still not entirely clickable

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10_5_8; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.20.25 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.4 Safari/533.20.27

Just a reminder that the button is still not entirely clickable for me (Safari and OmniWeb). As a comparison, the "Submit Feedback" and "Cancel" buttons on the "leave feedback" pop-up work normally. Maybe this isn't top priority, but I didn't see it listed in the Known Issues section, so here's another reminder. – Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies 03:34, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Upload more files

Should ideally remember the last entered values. Shyamal (talk) 08:24, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fully agree. In fact, this is one of the reasons I'm not using the Wizard, as the normal upload form can remember the last entered values, as well as be reused over and over again just hitting the back button, making uploads via the normal form immensely faster and less annoying than via the wizard, even done one by one.--- Darwin Ahoy! 18:39, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Very good point. This is one of the reasons I am still using the old upload form. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 17:55, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Einstellung in Benutzergalerien

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0.1

Ich vermisse, dass die Bilder nicht - wie beim Communist - automatisch in die Benutzergalerie geladen werden. Könnte man das zumindest als Option einbauen? --Rainer Halama (talk) 11:25, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Where has the link to the Commons derivative tool gone?

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 Firefox/3.5.19 ( .NET CLR 3.5.30729)

As far as I am concerned this new interface has just succeeded in making uploades 10 times harder. SpinningSpark 12:51, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Couldn't agree more. Orderinchaos (talk) 06:32, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Error message

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; de; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 Firefox/3.5.19

I tried uploading my images and now it says in red "This looks like a file you obtained from another imagehost. Please make the title more meaningful. Also, double check that you have the rights to publish it on Wikimedia Commons." That is complete non-sense and a real nuisance for the uploading process. Gryffindor (talk) 14:35, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Easy

User agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; Trident/4.0; GTB6.6; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0; .NET4.0C; BRI/2; AskTB5.6)

I consider the new program a huge improvement! Koosg (talk) 15:04, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Some bugs and suggestions

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0.1

  • 1- The wizard allowed me to "upload" one repeated file i chose by mistake (I ended up with 6 originals and 1 copy).
  • 2 - There is no way to remove a file after the first step. If I've done the mistake reported in 1), I'll have to abort everything
  • 3 - If you go back (back button), everything is lost
  • 4 - Wizard does not remember values entered in former sessions, as does the normal upload form
  • 5 - Wizard can't be reused as the normal upload form (using back button after each upload). Instead, everything has to be redone from the first step
  • 6 - Wizard allows choosing repeated names as destination filenames. I don't know what happens when you try to upload such things, as my FF crashed before I could complete the process. - Darwin Ahoy! 18:48, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ridiculous error message, cannot upload.

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0.1

I got: "This looks like a file you obtained from another imagehost. Please make the title more meaningful. Also, double check that you have the rights to publish it on Wikimedia Commons." File name was very meaningful, photo was made by myself, and to add to the aggavation, this is a SOLVED bug, see: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29029 I tried changing the titel, to no avail. Just wasted half an hour, and still cannot upload my pictures. This is quite ridiculous. Wammes Waggel (talk) 20:48, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just use Commons:Upload, this thing is still sort of a test, it seems.--- Darwin Ahoy! 22:15, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nouvel assistant de versement Wikimedia Commons

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/534.24 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/11.0.696.71 Safari/534.24

Super pratique et efficace cet assistant qui permet de verser des "rafales" de documents ! Le nombre de fichiers importés devrait faire un bon spectaculaire dans les prochaines semaines ...Peut-être encore un petit effort du côté de la catégorisation des médias, par exemple en accédant directement à l'arborescence des catégories ? Du bon travail qui va dans le bon sens. BluesyPete (talk) 07:28, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

How do I choose a custom license?

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Gentoo Firefox/3.6.

There are lots of custom licenses for different websites (like Comunismul în România). I want to be able to use those for uploading Strainu (talk) 09:01, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See [[Commons:Prototype upload wizard faq#Where are the other licenses? and Commons:Licensing.--Trixt (talk) 07:32, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Translation

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0.1

The smallprint under the header 'Upload wizard' suggests that I could help to translate this page. Clicking on the link brings me to a page that shows no way to do so. MarcoSwart (talk) 13:24, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think that you're referring to this page: as shows, no messages for translation at the moment in your favorite language.--Trixt (talk) 07:32, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

My picture has an unknown warning: badfilename...

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10_5_8; de-de) AppleWebKit/533.21.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.4 Safari/533.20.27

.... but the other ones worked from my Kamera (Its a Coolpix S8100 from Nikon Kivifreak (talk) 14:49, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Limited Release rights

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101203 Firefox/3.6.13

How can I tag an image PD-India from the wizard? The wizard gives only limited options for the copyright. I have to manually edit the page after upload to add PD-India. Redtigerxyz (talk) 18:23, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See Commons:Prototype upload wizard faq#Where are the other licenses?--Trixt (talk) 07:32, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wizard does not provide all options as provided in old form

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101203 Firefox/3.6.13

Why is the flickr, derivative work, direct upload options missing??? Redtigerxyz (talk) 18:26, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See Commons:Prototype upload wizard faq#Why did you remove all the choices such as "uploading someone else's work from Flickr" or "free software screenshot"?--Trixt (talk) 07:32, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Why are not giving the links to alternate methods of flickr AND the derivative work derivativeFX! as in earlier form ??? --Redtigerxyz (talk) 05:52, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bravo

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; rv:5.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/5.0

On est passé de la préhistoire au XXIe siècle Berichard (talk) 19:24, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Approssimative translation in English: We are passed from Prehistory to 21st century.--Trixt (talk) 07:32, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

upload of own photos failed

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0.1

I've been trying to upload a batch of photos. One of them, the wizard states that it looks like an image from an image host. Rubbish - it's my own photo. I can live with those accusations, but that the whole process then seizes up is most annoying. It won't let me do anything else, but I have to start from scratch (minus the photo that is apparently not mine, of course). Schwede66 07:34, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Plantages

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0) AppleWebKit/534.24 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/11.0.696.71 Safari/534.24

Bonjour. Je voulais vous signaler que j'ai des difficultés à rajouter une image. En effet, depuis la mise en place de ce système, mon navigateur plante pendant un certain temps avant de reprendre ! Pehaha (talk) 09:04, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0.1

My first upload with the new wizard... I don't miss the Flickr upload, it is much better all included. Anneyh (talk) 16:18, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Help with translations

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0.1

Clicking on this link is frustrating. Mostly lead to "you are not allowed" even after registering etc. Anneyh (talk) 16:48, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is more of a TranslateWiki issue. If you experienced problems with Special:FirstSteps, maybe you could provide some feedback to them? In the meantime, you can post your translation suggestions here or on Commons:Bistro or on TranslateWiki. Jean-Fred (talk) 18:43, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Super!

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de; rv:1.9.0.19) Gecko/2010031422 Firefox/3.0.19 GTB7.0 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729)

This is very good, to have a multiple upload, but it would be better, if the files could get uploaded, while you choose the next ones... Pauli94 19:56, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

Très bien

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/534.24 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/11.0.696.71 Safari/534.24

Bravo, outil beaucoup mieux à utiliser, je parviens à catégorier mes images alors que je n'y parvenais pas avant. A conserver véritablement, très utile et agréable. Bravo pour l'amélioration! Polnico62240 (talk) 20:03, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0.1

Merci d'avoir réalisé cet assistant de versement ManiacParisien 05:21, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

Too hard to use!

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0.1

Not user friendly at all - too many stages and too much subtlety. The old form was actually easier to use!

Uploaded File:Aubigny Qld.png using the wizard last night, could not figure out how to attribute another user on Commons for the source image. Either it tried to prevent me uploading at all, or allowed me to do so only by not indicating (I had to edit it in afterwards). Having an explicit option referencing another Commons image and providing a space to enter a username to attribute it to would be an improvement. Orderinchaos (talk) 06:30, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Alvaro Kasillas

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0) AppleWebKit/534.24 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/11.0.696.71 Safari/534.24

the last image imposibol upload, Alvaro Kasillas (talk) 08:30, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Traduction incomplète

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; fr; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110420 Firefox/3.6.17

L'option "Retour à l'ancien formulaire" renvoie vers la version en anglais. Il serait plus judicieux de rediriger directement vers la version francophone. Merci Yelkrokoyade (talk) 10:14, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

En effet. Déjà signalé, impossible pour le moment. On attend le patch... <soupir> Jean-Fred (talk) 18:44, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blocage chargement

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; fr; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110420 Firefox/3.6.17

L'assistant affiche le message suivant : "Cela ressemble à un fichier que vous avez obtenus d'une autre hébergeur d'images. Veuillez rendre le titre plus significatif. Aussi, vérifiez que vous disposez des droits pour publier ce fichier sur Wikimedia Commons." Ce n'est pas le cas et le chargement reste bloqué après modification du titre de l'image. Velvet (talk) 13:40, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Insertion fichier

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; fr; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110420 Firefox/3.6.17 ( .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET4.0C)

Proposer la syntaxe pour l'insertion des fichiers est une bonne idée mais serait d'utiliser des mots français fichier plutôt que file ou vignette plutôt que thumb. Cela me semble marcher aussi bien.

Bravo pour le nouvel assistant plus simple. Bildoj (talk) 17:11, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Upload Wizard: License selection, resuming on error, cats

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0.1

  1. I'd like to have a possibility to license my work under GFDL and all CC-By-SA without having to edit all uploaded files afterwards.
  2. There are sometimes errors: Browser, Server, Connection. It would be nice to have a "resume incomplete upload" option.
  3. Some users are confused because they forget to press the "Add category" button. When cursor leaves this field, category should be added automatically.
  4. It would be nice to have the possibility for multi-selection in the file-selection dialog.
  5. Good work. Continue improving it. -- RE rillke questions? 00:22, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Categorization

From Commons:Village_pump#Upload_Wizard_keeping_files_from_being_marked_as_uncategorised, it appears that at least 25% of the files uploaded with the Wizard are w/o categories.

Further, if categorization-bot can't determine any categories for the files, that means the files aren't used either. --  Docu  at 04:52, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Great!

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1) AppleWebKit/534.24 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/11.0.696.71 Safari/534.24

Very simple and intuitive, no problems at all, works very nice to me Zamba (hmaglione10) Su inquietud no molesta 07:15, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Assistant versement

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0.1

un progrès par rapport à la version précédente. Merci Patrick89 (talk) 08:42, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple upload

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/534.24 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/11.0.696.71 Safari/534.24

I tried to upload 10 jpg files, but after the description of the images files are not uploaded correctly. I have a Google Chrome browser and Windows 7 software. Tr6637 (talk) 16:55, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0.1

Catégorisation

Devant la croissance exponentielle des fichiers-images à catégorise depuis 2 jours (plus de 8000 pour le 5 juin 2011), on peut s'interroger sur le lien de cause à effet de la mise à disposition de ce nouvel assistant de téléversement, assurément plus convivial pour les novices, mais à mon goût moins rationnel (défaut d'une saisie sur un seul masque imposant plus de clics) dès lors que l'on a une pratique plus ancienne du serveur précédent. GO69 (talk) 18:53, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Voir Commons:Village_pump#Upload_Wizard_keeping_files_from_being_marked_as_uncategorised. Jean-Fred (talk) 19:01, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Uploading from Flicker?

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0.1

Whenever I choose a tag in the new upload wizard that says "US Federal Government Source", the wizard tags the image as "Uploaded from Flicker." The Flicker-checker-bot then tries to determine where on Flicker the image was from, and everything goes kaflonky from there.

Sorry, silly wizard: It was not uploaded from Flicker! I don't know why the wizard does that.

Thanks for fixing the flaw. Tim1965 (talk) 00:50, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Problemi riscontrati (Italian)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0.1

- Impossibilità di tornare indietro e mancanza di un pulsante "back" - Manca l'anteprima della licenza scelta 

Awd (talk) 17:49, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Gets hungup - what to do?

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_6_7) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/12.0.742.91 Safari/534.30

While uploading 8 files, the second file said "file uploaded successfully, but sever unable to get thumbnail." When I had completed describing all the files, it would not complete the upload on the 2nd file after about 10 minutes. All my effort wasted. could you fix this? Smallbones (talk) 03:02, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. The occasional hang on the final step is the single biggest remaining problem with UploadWizard. We're digging into it.--Eloquence (talk) 02:16, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

self template loop

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_6_7) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/12.0.742.91 Safari/534.30

if you hit the upload more files at the end of an upload, the next batch will have a self loop template showing, i.e. it comes out {{self|self| Smallbones (talk) 03:14, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

and slow as s--t

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_6_7) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/12.0.742.91 Safari/534.30

slow as s--t Smallbones (talk) 03:16, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blocage à la page "Décrire"

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X 10.5; fr; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110420 Firefox/3.6.17

Après avoir téléversé une photo, j'ai l'erreur suivante "Cela ressemble à un fichier que vous avez obtenus d'une autre hébergeur d'images. Veuillez rendre le titre plus significatif. Aussi, vérifiez que vous disposez des droits pour publier ce fichier sur Wikimedia Commons.", mais surtout, l'impossibilité de revenir en arrière. La seule possibilité est de fermer la fenêtre. Jmh2o (talk) 11:06, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Flickr template added, while there is no link to Flickr

I am getting pretty bored of doing edits like this one. Already on May 19th I reported here that it seems that Upload Wizard adds {{FlickrReview}} to images tagged with {{PD-USGov}}. Of course the FlickreviewR bot does not find a link to a flickr file and the image ends up in Category:Unsourced Flickr images reviewed by FlickreviewR. That category I check almost daily. Since UploadWizard is the default uploader, most of the maintaining job in that Category is removing unjustified FlickreviewR tags. Please, can someone really look into this? Kind regards, Lymantria (talk) 17:18, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bug reported bugzilla:29346 but devs seem not able to write (a simple) patch themselves form information provided by me. I marked the lines that are responsible and commented what's happening there. I'm busy, but when I have time, I'll try to find a solution. -- RE rillke questions? 16:57, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If only this wizard were used more...

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:5.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/5.0

This wizard is great! The only thing is, I wish other wikis running on MediaWiki used it. Please try to get it deployed on as many MediaWiki wikis as you can as soon as possible. Thanks. Cooljeanius (talk) 01:08, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Error message "This looks like a file you obtained from another imagehost. Please make the title more meaningful."

For another occurrence, please see Commons:Help_desk#Uploading_cropped_photo. --  Docu  at 06:37, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Commentaire nouvelle interface d'assistant d versement de fi

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0.1

Bravo ! Très pédagogique cette nouvelle interface. Tout est très clair. Vieil habitué du téléversement de photos, cela me simplifie beaucoup la tâche. En particulier la catégorisation. Seul le temps de téléchargement pêche encore par sa lenteur. Salut et Fraternité. Piero d'Houin Inocybe (talk) 17:40, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Prévisualisation

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en; rv:1.9.0.11) Gecko/20080528 Epiphany/2.22

Avec l'assistant, il n'y a pas de prévisualisation du chargement. Cjp24 (talk) 13:56, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Super für Doofe!

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0.1

Hallo,

ich bin von dem Assistenden sehr begeistert.

Lustige Pfingsten wünscht

Kai, der Marschmensch Marschmensch (talk) 15:07, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

invidia

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.0; Trident/5.0; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; Media Center PC 5.0; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; OfficeLiveConnector.1.5; OfficeLivePatch.1.3; .NET4.0C) 

Portobird (talk) 11:06, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

refuses to upload

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_6_7) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/12.0.742.91 Safari/534.30

Message was (5 times) "This looks like a file you obtained from another imagehost. Please make the title more meaningful. Also, double check that you have the rights to publish it on Wikimedia Commons." The files were definitely my own, entitled "Marven Gardens NJ 1" - "Marven Gardens NJ 5". Please let us know what titles you allow and please DO NOT imply in any way that I'm passing off others' photos as my own! Smallbones (talk) 15:38, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Retour en arrière

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; fr; rv:1.9.1.3) Gecko/20091020 Ubuntu/9.10 (karmic) Firefox/3.5.3

On ne peut pas revenir en arrière en cliquant sur le fil d'ariane. Embêtant lorsqu'on se rend compte qu'on a uploadé une image en double Xfigpower (pssst) 16:11, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Catégorie en cascade

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; fr; rv:1.9.1.3) Gecko/20091020 Ubuntu/9.10 (karmic) Firefox/3.5.3

on ne peut pas appliqué une catégorie à l'ensemble des images Xfigpower (pssst) 16:12, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

BEST UPLOAD TOOL

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.1; Trident/5.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0; InfoPath.2; .NET4.0C; .NET4.0E)

Hi, WikiMedia. You have done the best upload tool for uploading images or other media to the WikiMedia Commons. I like it. Nileshbandhiya (talk) 10:00, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Looks like a file you obtained from another imagehost"

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_6_7) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/12.0.742.91 Safari/534.30

This works very poorly and gets hungup. It appears to run off the titles and likes to mess with titles I like. When I cahnge the title nothing happens. Please consider revamping this whole thing. Also I need feedback. I complained about this yesterday and have heard nothing. Smallbones (talk) 17:56, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The current blacklist situation is horrible.
Commons has two different blacklists that are used to check filenames. MediaWiki:Filename-prefix-blacklist and MediaWiki:Titleblacklist. MediaWiki:Titleblacklist appears to be broken since the 1.17 deployment, per bugzilla:28466. So, files that should be rejected by the old upload form because their files match the Commons blacklist are not currently blocked, and a lot of standard camera filenames etc. go through.
At the same time, UploadWizard is implementing its own mini-JavaScript version of the title blacklist to catch the most common issues. This implementation is 1) prone to error in case a regular expression in the implementation is matched differently in different browsers, 2) redundant, 3) largely working. So, filenames that should be blocked are blocked by UploadWizard, but there may be issues of false positives. I can't tell you at a glance whether your match is a false positive, or actually a prohibited title rule per the blacklist developed and maintained by the community.
So, it's a mess, and UW is actually behaving more correctly right now than the old upload form. We need to fix the blacklist code, and the community probably needs to do some pruning to ensure that the rules on it still make sense. It's one of the big issues on our to-do list to sort out after 1) improved thumbnail generation (see Neil's comment here), 2) improved upload completion (see my note on files hanging in UW).--Eloquence (talk) 20:52, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
How can you say with a straight face that the "UW is actually behaving more correctly right now than the old upload form"? It behaves so correctly that nobody but unaware newbies that still aren't tired of serving as guinea pigs is using it.--- Darwin Ahoy! 21:39, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A house of Mahammedpur

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0.1

I want to insert it in article " Mahammedpur" Md. Rahim Ullah (talk) 18:49, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; fr-FR) AppleWebKit/530.17 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Safari/530.17

Very usefull, works perfect, thanks for the job. Patrick.charpiat (talk) 22:29, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Broken thumbnails

User agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; chromeframe/12.0.742.100; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET4.0C; .NET CLR 1.1.4322)

Every time I've attempted to upload files with the wizard over the past few days, I've received error messages that the server is unable to display thumbnails of the uploaded images. Problem happens regardless of the time of day and quantity of uploaded images in the batch. This does not prevent me from continuing with the wizard.

In other news, I'd like to praise the minds behind the upload wizard for its features and ease of use. Because of this, I've found myself trawling my photo collection for old photos that may be of use and uploading them (in the past I would only upload individual images if I knew I could then add them to a Wikipedia article). Bravo! -- saberwyn 08:51, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Crash-prone!

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/5.0

I like this wizard and have uploaded dozens of pictures with it, but the thing is very finicky. If you do anything wrong, you lose a great deal of work. JonRichfield (talk) 18:09, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

So where is a person supposed to click????

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0.1

The only working button I find on the old form is the link to the Help Desk. Fortunately "back to the old form" is present in text above it, and is what I've used, but notably the Upload button does NOT work either, nor does clicking on the green OK, or the graphics for work I made myself.

Furthermore, the case I have at the moment is one of uploading very low resolution text in block letters because I am astounded at how easy it is to read at low zoom and how difficult it is to read at high zoom and wanted to ask a question about it at the wikipedia refdesk. Now as I understand simple text is not copyrightable (it's also not a trademark, but just one small piece of a logo). But it isn't my work either. The page should have a case for works too simple to copyright. Wnt (talk) 23:06, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure I understand your "where is a person supposed to click" question. Anyway, as for "works too simple to copyright", I went and checked out most of those images and it's like 95%+ incorrectly licensed. So I decided not to bother with it, as it just seems to confuse people. NeilK (talk) 18:12, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

beta upload

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:5.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/5.0

twice when uploading the procedure seem to stop before the last several images. there was no place to cancel or retry. It continues to this moment I suppose as I only left the page now. Otherwise I appreciate the streamlined approach very much. Mlane78212 firefox5 and windows7 Mlane 14:19, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

adding items

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:5.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/5.0

Really prefer this to other system. However, it would be good for the page to scroll as one adds images. As it is now it stays on the last level that was used. mlane78212 firefox 5, windows 7 Mlane 16:27, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

Wizard allowed me to upload same file twice in a batch of 8

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0.1

I tried to upload 8 image files, but accidentally selected one of the files twice. The wizard allowed me to enter data for all 8 files, then it hung when publishing the last one, which was the duplicate file. Nonenmac (talk) 16:30, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

first step, register, missing, and no german ...

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0.1

i tried to use this new wizard, and ....

1. clicked while i was not logged in --> it did not open! 2. logged in, goto: http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Hochladen&uselang=de clicked for beginners ... and an english page shows up! 

ThurnerRupert (talk) 21:25, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hallo ThurnerRupert,
1: unangemeldet kann man hier keine Dateien hochladen - das ist beachsichtigt und auch mit dem normalen/alten Formular so.
2: Bitte versuche es nun nochmal - ich habe es verbessert. Nun sollte es klappen. Zur Erkärung: Du hattest den Hochladeassistent auf Englisch gesehen, weil du die Sprache der Bedienoberfläche hier noch nicht auf Deutsch umgestellt hast. Ich empfehle dir, dies zu tun: im ersten Kapitel des Bildertutorials der Wikipedia ist die Spracheinstellung beschrieben. Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 03:17, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
also wenn man anfänger ist, dann weiss man das nicht mit dem anmelden. also wärs noch nett wenn die hilfe bzw so ein toller assistent trotzdem funktioniert :) vielen dank auf jeden fall für deine reaktion! --ThurnerRupert (talk) 03:47, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

there is a "process" on top ... but no link to click

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0.1

there is a "process" on top ... but no link to click. cannot go form upload to release rights, or back to learn. 

ThurnerRupert (talk) 21:27, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

assistant de versement

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; fr; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091102 Firefox/3.5.5 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729)

génial Pramzan (talk) 03:54, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Button not being a button

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10_5_8; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.20.25 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.4 Safari/533.20.27

"Select a media file to donate" button is still not a button. However, I've found a nice comparison that may help you guys out. On the upload screen, "Add another file" does not appear to be a button, but "Upload" is!

On the Release rights screen, "Next" is a full button. So how come some of these are buttons, others are not? (I still have to move my cursor around (up) to find the link.) – Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies 06:28, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think you will notice that they actually are buttons, but what you mean to say is that your mouse doesn't turn into a pointing hand and the button doesn't have a depress effect. The reason why is that there is some HTML trickery going on to make the form work the way it does. Browsers render the file upload control in many different ways, but in UploadWizard they all look the same, and furthermore, it can be styled in any way. If the lack of button-ness really disturbs you I can work harder on fixing that. I actually have code that does the right thing in many browsers and does the cursor and depress effect, but I disabled it a while back because it was interfering with something else and never got back to this. NeilK (talk) 18:08, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

good

User agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1)

good Lifedics (talk) 14:49, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Commons maintanance problem

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; Trident/5.0; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; SLCC2; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0; HPDTDF; Tablet PC 2.0; .NET4.0C)

The upload wizard does not put texte in the file history case comment. This makes commons maintainance by checking user-galleries problematic. See exemple: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:ListFiles/Eve Havang(nl) (talk) 15:27, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Translation for upload wizard in "local" deutsch

Hi, is it possible to make that for people who have set 'de-ch' , 'Schweizer Hochdeutsch' as prefered language, that the language used in case of absence of translation was deutsch rather than english? thanks --Chandres (talk) 15:29, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Select multiple files at once

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/12.0.742.100 Safari/534.30

I've taken like 60 pictures i want to upload, now i have to select them 1 by 1, why cant is select 60 at once with ctrl or shift? Mvg, Basvb (talk) 18:02, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You may try Commonist, it is bet fit for such tasks, and allows you to upload all the 60 at once very easily.--- Darwin Ahoy! 03:28, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I hope to have this feature in a future iteration. The UploadWizard model was designed to allow everything from Internet Explorer 6 to Chrome whatever-it-is-this-week to do multiple files, one at a time OR multiple files at a time. Unfortunately this has delayed getting multiple files in the easiest way. NeilK (talk) 18:00, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

uploading the same image twice

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0.1

by mistake I uploaded the same image twice. As thumbnails do not show up until upload was done, I did not recognize it until it was too late. After the initial upload is done, there is no way to skip single selected images (Would be an improvement, if this could be possible).

Uploading the same image twice with identical names (the intention was to skip the second upload), lets the second upload hang forever. The first one was ok. --Herzi Pinki (talk) 19:30, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

even when doing a full description of the duplicate image under another name, the upload wizard hangs when uploading the same image a second time. All work on other images later in the list is lost. cheers. --Herzi Pinki (talk) 23:05, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

updating existing files

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110422 Ubuntu/10.10 (maverick) Firefox/3.6.17

upload wizard does not seem to allow for uploading a new version of a file already existing in wikicommons. Bcharles (talk) 05:38, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is correct. I am afraid this is a usability decision on our part. The concept of using the upload tool to upload a new version of a file makes no sense to most people. They assume that to make a new version, one goes to the page for the file. The vast majority of the time, people are not trying to upload over an old file, they have chosen a similar name by accident. NeilK (talk) 17:58, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

existing file cc license

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110422 Ubuntu/10.10 (maverick) Firefox/3.6.17

The upload wizard does not allow for using some licenses for modifications to existing wikimedia files (ie cc 2.0). Bcharles (talk) 05:57, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Encore planté !

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0.1

Encore planté à la dernière étape ... (Still stuck at the last step ...) Daniel Villafruela (talk) 06:22, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is much easier. Please make this standard. Thank you.

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0.1 

Reise-Line (talk) 19:55, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I prefered the old one

User agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.0; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; Media Center PC 5.0; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; .NET4.0C)

I use to write the whole description of the image with an editor. And to make a copy/paste of this whole description. As far as I know, it is not possible to do that with the new upload wizard. Tangopaso (talk) 20:32, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Assistant de versement

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/12.0.742.100 Safari/534.30

(Je suppose que le type qui a décidé d’appeler ça un «assitant de versement» travaille dans une banque, mais là n’est pas l’objet de ce message).

Le «nouveau» formulaire «amélioré» devrait permettre de retourner en arrière.

Sinon, où se trouve l’amélioration??? Emdx (talk) 00:33, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wizard seems to have crashed again

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/5.0

Is there some way to get in and save what you have done when it seems to die without having saved everything? JonRichfield (talk) 09:27, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

merci

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0.1

c'est pratique Sosdoc (talk) 14:15, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

From another imaghost?

Twice I uploaded File:Picnic House brick wall jeh.jpg which I snapped two months ago. Twice I got the message: "This looks like a file you obtained from another imagehost. Please make the title more meaningful. Also, double check that you have the rights to publish it on Wikimedia Commons."

Yes, it's all mine and I never sent it anywhere except my own computers. There was no problem on the third attempt, using the old upload page. Did a bug cause this false alarm? Incidentally, on the first attempt, I also uploaded another file and had no way to proceed out of the alarm page to publish that one, which to me suggests a second problem in the wizard. On the whole I'm delighted with the new method but please don't discontinue the old page. Jim.henderson (talk) 20:14, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I could bet taht it's because your file starts with "pic". The message "This looks like a file you obtained from another imagehost", actually, is very impolite, even offensive, and completely pointless. I don't know why they have placed it there.--- Darwin Ahoy! 21:04, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Same with names starting with German Bild for Image, e.g. in composita like Bildstock. --Herzi Pinki (talk) 23:16, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ah. Yes, if the wizard is forbidding filenames starting with words like "Picatinny" or "Pickle" then it should say so, rather than make baseless and irrelevant accusations. Jim.henderson (talk) 23:56, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This was a bug but it should be fixed now. NeilK (talk) 17:55, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thought it was dead

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1) AppleWebKit/535.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/14.0.794.0 Safari/535.1

Took so long to upload 1.7mb file, I gave up and went back to the old form. Turned out it wasn't dead, but with no progress bar, it's hard to know. Stevage (talk) 08:31, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Working on it. Unfortunately due to open source polices at the WMF I can't use Flash, so progress bars are more or less impossible on most platforms. However, modern Chrome, Firefox and maybe even IE 10 will have an API I can use for a better progress bar. NeilK (talk) 17:55, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Process leaves me unable to immediately view file uploaded

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0.1

When the current upload process terminates, I am given a choice to copy and pasted the code necessary to publish the image, upload another file, or go to the commons home page. I prefer to copy the image description into the caption for immediate editing and publication. The available options force me to make several clicks before I can view the file i just uploaded. I would like to see an option added that allows users to view the last file uploaded. -- btphelps (talk) (contribs) 19:47, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I just click on the thumbnail or filename. This is with MSIE 8 or Chrome 12. Doesn't it work for you? Jim.henderson (talk) 18:40, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sort order in Categories

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.1; Trident/5.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0; Tablet PC 2.0; InfoPath.2; Media Center PC 5.0; SLCC1; OfficeLiveConnector.1.5; OfficeLivePatch.1.3; .NET4.0C)

I noticed the wizard does not understand the | sign to separate the category name from the sort-order text. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 13:05, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure I understand you. Can you explain where you tried to use this? The Category widget doesn't actually accept wikitext. NeilK (talk) 17:53, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Upload wizard

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/12.0.742.100 Safari/534.30

Very useful tool! Thank you. Teñsor Jambou (talk) 09:25, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User agent: Opera/9.80 (Windows NT 5.1; U; pl) Presto/2.8.131 Version/11.11 

Wafx (talk) 11:28, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is brilliant!

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110614 Firefox/3.6.18

This is a vast improvement over the old system. The whole thing is just very well thought out and very well designed. the inclusion of the 'use' step is very helpful, the automatic invitation to write descriptions in more than one language, the auto-default of the license so that people don't get stressed over choices...

Truly excellent work. A Wonderful Wizard, if ever a wizard was. The men and women behind the curtain who made this Wizard should feel very proud of themselves. Alecmconroy (talk) 12:53, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Author

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110420 Firefox/3.6.17

Very poor. Why do categories & descriptions have to be copied individually to each file? It's just crashed on me, not for the first time.

The information still fails to make sufficiently clear the copyright position - people will still claim to be the "author" of photos of objects in copyright. Johnbod (talk) 14:55, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The meaning of "author" is not made at all clear. What I suggest is is explaining it clearly in simple English. Does that clarify? Johnbod (talk) 23:55, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
What short, clear phrase do you suggest? Jim.henderson (talk) 00:29, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
How about ‘Original creator/author’?
And they will still write "own work", "cuz I got to", "I want it here and I want it now". Human nature. NVO (talk) 18:06, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Help bubbles don't go away

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 SeaMonkey/2.0.14

When I click on a help button ("?"), I see no way to close the blue text bubble containing the help text. Gestumblindi (talk) 20:10, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The way to close it is to click the '?' again, or click another '?'. But I agree that an [x], or having the balloon fade away when the mouse leaves, would be more intuitive. NeilK (talk) 17:44, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Remarques

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; fr; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110614 Firefox/3.6.18 ( .NET CLR 3.5.30729)

Bel outil, merci beaucoup !

Il est dommage qu'on ne puisse décider de ne pas importer une photo parmi plusieurs après téléversement. De plus, les catégories qui n'existent pas ne sont pas affichés en rouge. kvardek du (la plej bela nombro) 20:47, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merci ! Nous essayons de le rendre plus fiable. Aussi, après avoir parlé avec des bénévoles, j'ai décidé de supprimer la possibilité d'ajouter des catégories dans l'UploadWizard. Donc on n'aura pas besoin des liens rouges. NeilK (talk) 17:50, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, non ! Moi, je fais attention aux catégories que j'ajoute ! Je prépare un minimum le versement. Et quand je mets n photos d'une même catégorie, c'est plus facile de procéder par copier-coller. --Jmh2o (talk) 19:42, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Stepwise fallback e.g. Bad filename in step "describe" not p

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; Trident/5.0; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; SLCC2; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0; .NET4.0C)

go backl funktion missing in upload tool. I got the message bad filename in the second last step, but I don#t know how to correct it. Please fix it. Thanks a lot. Smarty-HH (talk) 21:13, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Uploadwizard category in many tongues

Is the wizard responsible for these categories added to files, or is this just a user addition:

and others ?? --Tony Wills (talk) 11:26, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
wizard. Look at each file's history: these categories are there from the start. NVO (talk) 17:43, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Author field is too short

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X 10_4_11; en) AppleWebKit/533.19.4 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.1.3 Safari/533.19.4 

Ian Spackman (talk) 22:20, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Source field is much too short

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X 10_4_11; en) AppleWebKit/533.19.4 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.1.3 Safari/533.19.4

This seemed to me to be a reasonable account of the source of a file:

Internet Archive’s copy of Eugen Holländer,

Die Karikatur und Satire in der Medizin: Medico-Kunsthistorische Studie von Professor Dr. Eugen Holländer, 2nd edn (Stuttgart:Ferdinand Enke, 1921), fig. 79 (p. 171).

Specifically the filediekarikaturunds00holl_0207.jp2 extracted from diekarikaturunds00holl_jp2.zip [174,178,046 bytes] in the folder http://ia600307.us.archive.org/33/items/diekarikaturunds00holl/

Ian Spackman (talk) 22:23, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Internal error: file was not found in temporary storage

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20110608 Firefox/4.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.1

I uploaded three .jpg files at once, not extremely large (each around 2 MB). For the first one, I got the error message "Internal error: file was not found in temporary storage." The second and the third one (La_Suisse_Juli_2011-2.jpg and La_Suisse_engine_Juli_2011.jpg) got uploaded without problem. Gestumblindi (talk) 01:29, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The next attempt for this particular file worked, it's now at File:La Suisse Juli 2011-1.jpg. Gestumblindi (talk) 01:34, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

self|self|self

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0.1

At every upload, the "wizard" adds another "self" to the CC0 template Pieter Kuiper (talk) 08:01, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Select a media file to donate"

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:5.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/5.0

This button (the first you see when you click the "upload file" link to the left) is a bit odd - shouldn't it read "Select a media file to upload"? It's not obvious what uploading a file has to do with donating (which is typically used to refer to money or physical objects, not a copy of a file). Mike Peel (talk) 10:10, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I assume that this wording was chosen to indicate already at the first step of the uploading process that it's about donating images to the public. Gestumblindi (talk) 11:18, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
But it's not! The uploader is releasing images to the public, with the expectation of being attributed (or, if they are uploading a low resolution version of their image, then potentially financial recompense for their higher resolution version). They're not donating the image at all! Mike Peel (talk) 19:21, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Big improvement

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:2.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0

I really like the new upload pages! It is a huge improvement.

Suggestion: When I accidentally entered two identical titles, the upload on the second one failed, as it should. But I could not see how to back up and change the title without going through the whole process again. Maybe you could check for identical titles on the form, and have a button to back up if there are failed uploads for any reason. Edibobb (talk) 15:52, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

wenn mehrere Bilder hochgeladen und Dopplung

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/12.0.742.112 Safari/534.30

Scheint man nicht weiter zu kommen, da er möchte, dass ich die Aktualisierung eines Bildes auf der jeweiligen Bildseite klären soll. Conny (talk) 16:29, 4 July 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Hallo Conny, wenn du es noch nicht geschafft hast, dann verwende das alte Formular hier: Commons:Hochladen. Dass der Hochladeasisstent/Upload wizard Probleme macht, wenn eine Datei schonmal hochgeladen wurde, ist bekannt und leider noch nicht gelöst. Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 00:41, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

feedback

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/12.0.742.112 Safari/534.30

On the first step (Learn), the next button needs to be larger or more noticeable.

Is the wording - select which file to donate - understandable. Donate seems like an odd word? Usability studies? Mahanga (Talk) 18:14, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Organisation Logos

User agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; Trident/4.0; GTB7.1; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0; .NET4.0C)

I try to upload the logo of the Theodora Foundation. How can I put the {{Bild-LogoSH}} so that it will be uploaded/accepted? Thanks for help. Othmar Othmar Bamert (talk) 13:59, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Othmar, wenn du bei Commons:Hochladen "Es stammt von woanders." auswählst, kannst du diese Lizenz-Vorlage einfügen. Aber bitte hier auf Commons so: {{subst:Bild-LogoSH}} . Und beachte, dass die Regeln für Logo hier in Commons eine ganze Ecke strenger, als beim Upload in de.wikipedia sind. Hier sind nur reine Textlogos mit einfachen geometrischen Elementen erlaubt.
Wenn du die Benutzeroberfläche hier auf Deutsch gestellt hast, kommst du auch mit dem Hochladelink direkt auf die von mir verlinkte Seite Commons:Hochladen.
Alternativ gehe auf de:Wikipedia:Hochladen und wähle dort "Logo" aus. Mehr auf deiner Diskussionsseite (nicht wirklich hier passend). Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 00:27, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nice upgrade; could use a few other features

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_6_8) AppleWebKit/535.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/13.0.782.32 Safari/535.1

The batch upload ability is great. It could be better if you could choose multiple files at the same time, rather than being forced to continuously press the "add another file" button.

Also, once uploaded, it would be great if you could add the same description or extra text (e.g., coordinates or user-created templates) to the batch like you do with the batch license application.

Otherwise, great upgrade.

Best, Matt Wade (User:UpstateNYer) upstateNYer 03:13, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your feedback! Yes, multi-file selection is high on our list of coming attractions, and some kind of batch description editing or copying has also been frequently requested -- we'll find a way to do it. So stay tuned. :-) --Eloquence (talk) 05:23, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unable to correct errors, lot of work lost

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; es-ES; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101203 BTRS87711 Firefox/3.6.13

I was uploading a pack of files, and I wrongly entered the same destination name for some of them. System showed me a warning, for the duplicated ones, but it does not allow me to edit the names. Therefore I lost all work (descriptions, categories etc), and I had to start the upload again from zero, Jordiferrer (talk) 11:26, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Problem with categorization

Hello! All the 22 files uploaded through the new wizard lack categorization, even if I've inserted it in the field. This bug seems to be still here. Roberto Segnali all'Indiano 11:48, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Entering is not enough, you have to click to activate the category. This feature makes it possible to enter multiple categories one after the other. --Wuselig (talk) 13:29, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, thank you! :-) --Roberto Segnali all'Indiano 17:30, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I discovered that too. It is a bit counterintuitive. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 18:18, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It was "learning by doing", or should I say "...not doing" in my case, too. Even within one batch-upload I sometimes still miss the essential klick. --Wuselig (talk) 10:43, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I'm confused. So I copypasted the text string into the window, waited until the window inflated to swallow it, then click what? NVO (talk) 20:18, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The radio-button to the right of the window telling you what to do in your chosen language. Mine says "hinzufügen" at the moment. --Wuselig (talk) 22:13, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Assistant de téléVersement

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; rv:5.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/5.0

Tellement mieux que la version anglaise totalement hermétique et incompréhensible. Un seul mot : merci Sibanak (talk) 07:38, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

error message at "release rights" stage

User agent: Opera/9.80 (Windows NT 5.1; U; en) Presto/2.9.168 Version/11.50

The message was that there were 3 errors on the form. Since there were at least 9 red stars, and no other way of identifying the errors, I didn't know what to do to correct them Andrew Dalby (talk) 10:32, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bad interface: endless loop

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110613 SUSE/3.6.18-0.2.1 Firefox/3.6.18

Unable to upload file; upload link is never exposed in an obvious way. Lovibond (talk) 03:56, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New wizard

User agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.2; WOW64; Trident/4.0; InfoPath.2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729)

The new wizard is excellent! Very easy to use and clear - no chance for confusion on the release rights now! Tayregoodwin (talk) 10:45, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It allowed you to categorise your file in a non existing category, still.--- Darwin Ahoy! 11:22, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This is correct behavior, in my opinion (although I never managed to have it save any categories). Upload first, create category later. Nothing wrong with it (I do it regularly, so it can't be wrong). NVO (talk) 20:25, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It can't be right as well. The category added by this user is possibly acceptable, even if non existent, the problem is that newbies like this one never create the categories after adding them, and the file remains uncategorised while not appearing in the uncategorised media categories, making it very hard to find. Worst case are non-English speakers adding categories in their native language. I've found yesterday at least two French users which categorised every file they uploaded in UW (and they were a lot of them) with French named categories, like Ecrivains and the sort. It would be better if they couldn't add no categories at all than be allowed to add such things without even realizing the mistake they are doing, and without any system to warn them afterwards, as it is now.--- Darwin Ahoy! 08:03, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Doesn't that just mean that the non-English categories should be created as (bot-aware) redirects to the corresponding English categories? Mike Peel (talk) 19:33, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps, but those kind of redirects are deleted on sight here, usually. Even alternative ways of spelling the category in English such as "Austrian painters" and "Painters from Austria" are generally against consensus and deleted when caught. At least these last are something that should be discussed: It's already such a burden to remember all the English names for everything when you are not a native English speaker, let alone the precise variation Commons use. I completely fail to understand why there is such a bloody war on redirects, really.--- Darwin Ahoy! 21:36, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If this is the case, then I would completely agree with you - given that such a redirect costs Commons nothing, and provides benefits both in mono- and multi-lingual senses, that seems to be a very odd consensus to me. If you can point me towards the location where that consensus was reached, then I would very much appreciate it. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 22:26, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It is something that is being done for long, long time. Category:Austrian painters, for instance, ws deleted in 2007. When I joined the project in 2009, I seem to recall a large purge on those redirects as well, including some I created. Unfortunately I cannot point you to the precise origins of this habit, though Foroa certainly can, so you may talk to him. If I well recall from past conversations, part of the argument has to do with keeping users from adding wiki-en style categories, and educating them by not leaving that option available. This never worked, IMO, since it was always possible to add those cats, the only difference is that they would show as red links and would not categorise anything. As it is now with the new UW, even the red link are not shown, so it's all trouble and no gain. And from the moment we had bots automatically moving files from redirected categories into the proper category, I really can't see what is the problem with those redirects.--- Darwin Ahoy! 23:15, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
IIRC cat redirs show up in HotCat's suggestion list which always confuses me. Since I wonder: why the heck are there two cats describing the same. And so I always have to check if both are the same when categorizing images. That is the only annoying thing with redirs. Maybe hotcat could be changed to exclude a redir in the list if the target cat or another redir with the same target is there. Or at least mark redirs in the list. However, catredirs are probably a bad solution for internationalizing the cat system. Just imagine a category rename with dozens of redirs to it... Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 01:44, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, they show up at HotCat (as do non-existant cats, which is even worst), so a big prolixity of redirects is indeed an issue. However, in cases like "Austrian painters" or "Municipalities of/in Brazil" it is not problematic, and is actually helpful. Anyway, if you chose the redirect instead of the real cat, Hotcat will change it automatically to the proper cat, so it is not a problem.--- Darwin Ahoy! 04:09, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, selecting the redir cat works - but if we have "Cat. A" and "Cat A2" (a redir to cat A) and I see both entries in the list an first select "Cat. A" then I do not know if Cat A2 is something slightly different which may also apply. And so I have to check it. Like "Standing men" and "Men standing" (fictive example). Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 07:34, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Licensing

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:5.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/5.0

I can't upload MPL GPL or BSD-licensed screenshots. why? Smile4ever (talk) 13:35, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Because the upload wizard has a limited functionality. You need to use the free screenshot option at Commons:Upload. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 19:35, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
... so the upload wizard should have its functionality expanded? Is such an expansion planned? Mike Peel (talk) 19:30, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It is lacking several other options the old forms have. Some were intentionally (by WMF) removed to make it simpler because they are used seldom and newbies do not need them (like {{PD-textlogo}} → leads to (wrong) logo uploads as own work... ;-) ) some were probably removed simply because of complexity and because the wizard is still a first (test) version (clearly mentioned at Commons:Hochladen and Commons:Upload/nl). Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 01:56, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Name

User agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; SIMBAR={F1B6B385-FA66-4205-B8AE-0DD46473294B}; GTB7.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; OfficeLiveConnector.1.3; OfficeLivePatch.0.0; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; BRI/2)

Upload Wizard doesn't accept DSCF...JPG file name but it accepts the HP version (HPIM...JPG). Thx. Chris.urs-o (talk) 18:15, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Catégories

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; Trident/5.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0; eSobiSubscriber 2.0.4.16; .NET4.0C)

Pas mal dans l'ensemble. Assez rapide. J'aurais aimé que l'affichage des catégories permettent de descendre ou de remonter dans l'arborescence des mêmes catégories. Pourrait-on envisager que l'arborescence en détail s'incrive dans la partie droite de l'écran non utilisée ? (catégories remontées-catégorie demandée-catégories descendues) Rh-67 (talk) 03:39, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

illustrated by thom7gashima

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10_6_8; ja-jp) AppleWebKit/533.21.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.5 Safari/533.21.1

This is thom7gashima maked illustration. 

 長嶋敏明 (talk) 10:09, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Derivative works?!

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/535.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/13.0.782.41 Safari/535.1

There used to be an awesome wizard for uploading derivative works. Now I'm faced with answering the question "This work is entirely my own" or "this is someone else's work", when obviously it's a combination. Mcstrother (talk) 18:41, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's still there, at Commons:Upload. You can also deactivate the Wizard in your preferences/gadgets/Improved navigation.--- Darwin Ahoy! 19:01, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Works slow

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; ro; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110614 Firefox/3.6.18

The tool works very, very slow. Cezarika1 (talk) 04:58, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you upload up to 10 files á 1 MB it will of course take some time. Not the tool is slow, especially your internet connection (upload rate) is slow. --Martin H. (talk) 13:43, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Error

User agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; .NET CLR 1.1.4322)

Got a "still checking if filename is unique" dialogue box that wouldnt go away, and so I cant actually use this upload wizard. Not nice. Andrew Jameson (talk) 12:46, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Peut-on ravoir l'ancienne interface?

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Ubuntu/10.04 Chromium/12.0.742.112 Chrome/12.0.742.112 Safari/534.30

Français : Quelle perte de temps pour l'usager régulier. Peut-on ravoir l'ancienne interface?
English: What a waste of time for the regular user. Can we get back the old interface?

Bouchecl (talk) 15:39, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The old interface is still available at Commons:Upload (it's linked as "Back to the old form" on the Wizard page). Gestumblindi (talk) 01:10, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Manually inserting licensing templates (Follow-up)

Just following up on the discussion above about being able to manually insert licenses, as the list of options in Upload Wizard is limited. Uploading with an incorrect license and then going back and fixing it is inefficient, frustrating and will lead to errors. I just wanted to follow up about the status of this issue. Thanks. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 20:33, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's high in the wishlist, but not as high as multi-file selection, which we'll probably focus on first.--Eloquence (talk) 07:54, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
That's fantastic. I had no expectation that it was at the top of any list - I just want to know that it is on the to-do list. Thanks, --Skeezix1000 (talk) 16:34, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Upload Wizard

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; rv:5.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/5.0

Wizard is great and easy to use, how about putting same type into edit function in Wikipedia Michael1952 (talk) 13:48, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Better integration into the editing process is definitely something we'd like to get to, once the core functionality is solid.--Eloquence (talk) 07:56, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

{{OTRS Pending}} support

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0) AppleWebKit/535.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/14.0.812.0 Safari/535.1

Seconded. "Is there a reason why the new upload wizard doesn't offer an option to add an OTRS template? Are there plans to add this feature? When I was first starting, the only reason I learned about OTRS was because it was part of the original upload form. Now I have to come to this page to obtain the template. I'm worried that people are going to be skipping this step. – VisionHolder « talk » 13:15, 28 June 2011 (UTC)" Tommyang (talk) 01:05, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Museum Photography

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:5.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/5.0

There should be a convenient way to allow for the licensing of the photo itself and of the object beeing photographed. The object is usually PD-old, but if it is a 3-D object the photograph of the object needs also to be licensed. Of course you can add a {{PD-old]] manually, but the text in the description should somehow explain which of the conflicting licences applies to what. Wuselig (talk) 09:19, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

More forgiving please!!!

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:6.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/6.0

Your uploader is very valuable. I have by now uploaded some hundreds of photos, whereas, using earlier tools I had very nearly given up on uploading! But... If I forget to title a pic correctly in such a way that it slips through, but before the last phase of the upload, then I have to do it all again!!! I have wasted hours on that. If I take too long between entering some pictures and the final update (at least I think that is the problem) then I also have to start over. More hours! I think that sometimes it has accepted ten pics in a batch, but then loops on the last upload... I still use it (with circumspection, but if anyone has ideas on improvements...!

Cheers, and thanks so far,

Jon Richfield JonRichfield (talk) 18:21, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is probably related to known issues with the title blacklist implementation. We're working on that this week.--Eloquence (talk) 07:53, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Flaw in the feedback mechanism

I provided feedback on this page via the feedback form on the upload wizard - but it didn't (as far as I could spot) tell me that it was leaving the feedback on this page, nor recommend that I watch this page for responses to my feedback, nor suggest that I look on this page for feedback on a similar topic to my question. I applaud the introduction of a method of feedback that doesn't require someone to hit the 'edit' button or come to grips with the edit interface - but if that mechanism doesn't also lead to a way to learn the feedback to that mechanism then it's not particularly useful to those providing the feedback... Mike Peel (talk) 19:23, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mike, a direct link to this page should be in the feedback popup.--Eloquence (talk) 07:46, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, yes, I see it now. I think the reason I didn't spot it initially was because it's linked to on the form where you leave the comment, but once you submit then the box goes away - I would have expected a message saying something along the lines of "Thanks for your feedback; it's been left on this page; follow that page if you're interested in discussing this further." A heads-up about where the feedback will be left is good, but a reminder afterwards of where it's gone would also be useful. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 08:17, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm probably talking to myself but...

When I insert a flickr url on a multi-upload, it adds a CC license automatically and adds an additional licence for each additional multi-upload I make. For example: upload 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. Simple fix: Stop automatically adding CC licences if the image is PD US Military. Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 23:27, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't work

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/12.0.742.122 Safari/534.30

Nothing displayed when I go to http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:UploadWizard

Tried with Firefox and Chrome. Give up. I'll upload at Picasa and let someone else upload it to Commons. Bennylin (yes?) 12:06, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Huh? (I'm on Firefox 5.0/XP) The "go" button is there, - just scroll three screens down, it's under the doodles and on the right. They call it usability. NVO (talk) 16:44, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Call it doodles or call it tutorials... You can shut off the tutorial on your next visit and your straight in the programm. With respect to uasability it should be considered, that the "Go-button" should be incorporated into the page more prominently. I could image a lot of users will also try to hit the rider "upload" at the top of the page, which is used here as a status -report only --Wuselig (talk) 17:39, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Look no further: it took yours truly around a year to get to the magic button. I guess it will take another year to understand how to paste {{Information}} and list of categories ;) NVO (talk) 02:12, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In 6 iterative recent user tests with a total of 19 unique testers, not a single user actually had any problem finding the "Next" button (which is deliberately below the tutorial), nor is it clear from the original comment that this is the issue here.

Bennylin, could you clarify what you mean with "nothing displayed"? Do you get a spinner and nothing else, a blank page, ..?--Eloquence (talk) 07:52, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Drag and drop

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/12.0.742.122 Safari/534.30

You can only drag and drop 1 file at a time. Also if you don't drag the picture exactly onto the 'select' button, it shows the picture by itself and when you press back all the other pictures that are ready to be uploaded are gone. I also uploaded 10 files and spent ages renaming them and then they got stuck on the publishing stage. There was no option to try again or go back a stage. Refreshing the page meant starting the whole wizard from the beginning. Sweetie candykim (talk) 19:08, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ライセンスについて

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:5.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/5.0

ライセンスについて理解しました。再度UPロードします。 osaka_hoshizora 21:41, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

New upload tool

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; Trident/5.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0; .NET4.0C; InfoPath.1; MATM)

A much simpler process and an improvement on the older system of uploading. Martin york (talk) 10:31, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why is it so slow today

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110614 Firefox/3.6.18 GTB7.1 ( .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET4.0C)

Why is it so slow today Clariosophic (talk) 18:24, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rights release

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:2.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0

I have uploaded a number of files and tried to release them into public domain, using the Creative Commons Zero license radio-button. This produces a bug: instead of {{self|cc-zero}}, I get many repetitions of "self" within the template, e.g. {{self|self|self|self|self|self|self|self|cc-zero}}.

Can this be fixed? Better still, can I set public domain as the default preference for my uploads? Thanks. --Ammodramus (talk) 21:20, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not able to reproduce this in FF or Chrome either with single or multiple file uploads. Are you able to repeat this, and if so, do you have time to provide exact steps to reproduce?--Eloquence (talk) 05:15, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I'm using Firefox. The problem doesn't occur on the first batch of files that I upload; nor does it occur on a second batch if I click the "Upload file" link in the left-margin menu of Commons. It has occurred when I've uploaded additional batches of files using the "Upload more files" button at the bottom of the final page of the upload wizard sequence (the page with "Thanks for uploading!" at the top).
For what it's worth, I've checked the "Skip this step in the future" checkbox on the bottom of the first page of the upload wizard. I'm not sure if that makes a difference. I will experiment later; right now, I have a slow connection, and the library's about to close and kick me out anyhow.
--Ammodramus (talk) 01:51, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Have experimented further. The problem seems to be associated with the use of the "Upload more files" button on the bottom of the last page of the upload wizard sequence. Each time I click it and upload a new batch, it adds another "self|" to the license; thus the first batch of files came through OK, with "{{self|cc-zero}}"; the second batch had an error, with "{{self|self|cc-zero}}"; the third had "{{self|self|self|cc-zero}}", etc.
After several iterations of this, I clicked the "Upload file" link in the left-margin menu, checked "Skip this step in the future" on the bottom of the first page, and uploaded another batch. The license came through fine; when I again clicked "Upload file" in the left margin, and uploaded yet another batch, there were no problems with the license.
--Ammodramus (talk) 19:11, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

indefinite hang

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.19) Gecko/20110707 Firefox/3.6.19

In general I like the upload wizard very much. But several times it's hung indefinitely at the publish step, and I've had to start over. I also got the already noted problem of route to fix uploading a duplicate filename. Dcrjsr (talk) 22:59, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Uploading data on this Special page.

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10_5_8; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.21.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.5 Safari/533.21.1

I uploaded all information required to 10 photographs today, however they stayed in the submitting limbo for an hour. Is there any record of my input? Could there have possibly been a problem with this system today? Joyce lowry (talk) 23:06, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

its goog

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:5.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/5.0

its goog Sujoy (talk) 05:38, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Broken link on secure server

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Ubuntu/11.04 Chromium/12.0.742.112 Chrome/12.0.742.112 Safari/534.30

The link to the home wiki (in the last step, I think) wasn't working on the secure server. Helder 16:08, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Can't go back to the learn tab

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/535.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/14.0.827.10 Safari/535.1

Once dismissed, the learn section of the upload wizard is inaccessible on future uploads. Dami (talk) 11:32, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Name of this plant

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; rv:5.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/5.0.1

I want to know the name of this plant that seems to be very invasive. 

Mkhouma (talk) 16:02, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Upload Wizard

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/12.0.742.122 Safari/534.30

I like the idea and it works pretty well. However, it wasn't intuitive to click [Add] button after typing the category into the category field. This resulted in images being uploaded without categorisation and I had to go back. ACCassidy (talk) 17:19, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I did that too and it took me ages to then go into all the files I uploaded and add the categories. I would have thought it would tell me that I need to click add. I didn't realise at the time and I just typed in the category and didn't see the add button until afterwards. It shouldn't publish if there is text in the box which hasn't been 'added'. Sweetie candykim (talk) 22:59, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Essingang

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/12.0.742.122 Safari/534.30

Mbiama Assogo Roger Mbiama (talk) 18:54, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Media selection

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:5.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/5.0.1

It would be a lot easier if you were able to select multiple files at the same time to upload. Currently you have to select each one individually which is both fustrating and time consuming. Jonodavies12 (talk) 00:18, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed this too. I am sure last time I uploaded them I could shift and select upto 10, but this isn't working now. Neither is dragging the image onto the donate icon. Neither is the actual uploading for me however. It is just hanging. Sweetie candykim (talk) 23:02, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Upload

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; Trident/5.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0; eSobiSubscriber 2.0.4.16; .NET4.0C)

Chargement trop long ! plus long qu'auparavant ! Rh-67 (talk) 09:05, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Boxschat

User agent: Nokia2730c-1/2.0 (10.45) Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1

chatingan Leyoor (talk) 10:43, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hochladen eines Bildes nicht möglich.

User agent: Opera/9.80 (Windows NT 5.1; U; de) Presto/2.6.30 Version/10.63 

Andreas Schwarzkopf (talk) 16:21, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Don't upload an 200MB .ogg video

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110614 Firefox/3.6.18

I try to upload an .ogg video with a resolution of 720p for 2.5 hours. My Task-Manager (Windows 7) says that nothing has been transmitted since the opload process has started.

.ogg files with smaller file sizes can be uploaded without any problems. Medvedev (talk) 20:54, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There is a general 100 MB limit per file for uploads (see the text in the old upload form). I guess it also applies for the upload wizard. Compress it more or split it. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 01:23, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thank You! I also thought that the filesize is to big, but I was'n able to find this information in any Help article. --Medvedev (talk) 16:48, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

multiple uploads, same license page for all

User agent: Opera/9.80 (Windows NT 6.1; U; de) Presto/2.9.168 Version/11.50

It would be great tu upload multiple image and "copy 'n paste" the full description page of another file which is already uploaded (so a classic "bare" uploader with multiple files) Mabdul (talk) 21:43, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I got help in the IRC channel and got the tool The Communist. thanks. Mabdul (talk) 22:12, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Upload Wizard

User agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.0; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; Media Center PC 5.0; .NET CLR 3.0.04506)

This is thoroughly useless. Ditch it. Kelisi (talk) 23:35, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Adding categories with colons in them

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/5.0

The category autocomplete doesn't work properly for categories with colons in them. The part of the category name after the colon doesn't show up in the list of options.

For example, I found this problem when trying to add the category: Photographs by User:99of9 99of9 (talk) 05:18, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Upload_Wizard_feedback&oldid=57457080"