Commons talk:Abuse filter/Archive 2011: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Browse history interactively
← Older editNewer edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
No edit summary
Line 654: Line 654:
:You tried to write <code><nowiki>[[File:Example.jpg]]=={{int:filedesc}}==</nowiki></code>
:You tried to write <code><nowiki>[[File:Example.jpg]]=={{int:filedesc}}==</nowiki></code>
:I assume you mistakenly clicked on the "insert image" button. -- [[User:Rillke#Welcome|<b><i><span style="color:#0C9;background-color:#FFF">RE</span></i></b>&nbsp;rillke]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Rillke|questions?]] 22:56, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
:I assume you mistakenly clicked on the "insert image" button. -- [[User:Rillke#Welcome|<b><i><span style="color:#0C9;background-color:#FFF">RE</span></i></b>&nbsp;rillke]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Rillke|questions?]] 22:56, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

==Report by 188.100.60.19==
*'''Report by:''' {{User8|188.100.60.19}}
*'''Page name:''' ''Unknown''
*'''Edit kind:'''
*'''Comments:''' [[Special:Contributions/188.100.60.19|188.100.60.19]] 14:25, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:25, 16 December 2011

Click here to add a new subject

/Archive 2009
/Archive 2010

Report by Gaeser

Fixed by Rocket. Nothing really to be done about the filter imho, it's a pretty rare situation--DieBuche (talk) 00:59, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

Report by Nightscream

Next time, redirect it instead of blanking it. Rocket000 (talk) 07:30, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

Report by Andreas Plank

You should tag pages like that with {{sdelete|reason}} or fix it like you did. Rocket000 (talk) 07:32, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

Report by Liangent

Thanks, I'm having a look how to improve that behaviour--DieBuche (talk) 01:00, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

Report by 92.100.198.176

Please let the user know on his user talk page. Editing of other peoples profiles is blocked. –Krinkletalk 00:31, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

Report by JALR52

Please write the article at Wikipedia. This is Commons, a free media repository, not an encyclopedia. --The Evil IP address (talk) 16:23, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

Report by Skeezix1000

The problem is you're adding {{flickrreview|File Upload Bot (Magnus Manske)|August 11, 2010}} but you're not File Upload Bot (Magnus Manske). I added it for you since the bot did in fact review it previously. I won't change the filter as this shouldn't happen that often. Rocket000 (talk) 12:27, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
I see. That makes sense. Thanks for your help. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 13:04, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
No problem. Upon further review, we may change this filter, there's a couple other situations like yours. Rocket000 (talk) 14:16, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
Btw, I changed it, edits are now allowed after warnings. They are still logged so any abuse can quickly be rollbacked--DieBuche (talk) 08:50, 18 August 2010 (UTC)


Report by Siga

The page you would have left behind is useless and thus, the system prevents an empty gallery. Please instead of removing the one image from a gallery and leaving <gallery> in tact, remove that as well and place {{speedydelete|Empty gallery}} on the page so that an administrator will delete it. The filter will not warn for empty gallery if a speedy-nomination is put in it's place. –Krinkletalk 00:31, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

Report by 186.66.254.210

Please let the user know on his user talk page. Editing of other peoples profiles is blocked. –Krinkletalk 00:31, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

Report by 69.171.163.49

  • Report by: 69.171.163.49 (talk • contribs • block log • filter log)
  • Page name: Unknown
  • Edit kind: to categorize the image " Martine Valcourt Coulombe " so it could be posted on the NBPC Partie Conservateur du Nouveau Brunswick dans la page de Martine Coulombe
  • Reason abuse filter: not too sure if the category was filled properly
  • Comments: please help in posting the picture of Martine Valcourt Coulombe MLA in it's place 69.171.163.49 13:23, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
Your categorizing action was good. However, as you can see here, you also played around with the Image-insert buttons. You can re-do your edit by simply adding the category as you intended without the addition of the [[File:Example stuff. –Krinkletalk 00:33, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

Report by WingatebyWyndham

Don't remove the information table from File-pages. Removing that doesn't delete the image, it only means extra work. Please use the "Nominate file for deletion" button in the left sidebar.
–Krinkletalk 00:35, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

Report by 184.59.1.204

Posting your email like that doesn't help either. Anyway, I deleted the file for you for privacy reasons. Rocket000 (talk) 17:24, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
And I removed the e-mail address from this page. Not much point in leaving it here, even munged. —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 22:41, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Report by Uleli

In cases like this where you want to remove all the images from a page because they don't belong there, please add a {{Speedy}} request so it can be deleted. The edit filter is to prevent empty galleries. Rocket000 (talk) 17:20, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Report by Talia Gatta

The abuse filter was triggered because the page contained sample code like '''Bold text''' which should never occur on a real page. Also, Commons is not the place for articles. Please go to Wikipedia to read, edit and create articles. Commons is a free media repository, not an encyclopedia. –Krinkletalk 00:38, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

Report by Matthew.hartington

There is no reason to substitute the Information-template. Please let us know where this was notified so it can be corrected. –Krinkletalk 00:48, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

Report by 188.28.36.164

This has been fixed in the mean time. Removing the {{Information}} template is allowed if, for example, an {{Artwork}}-template is added. Thanks for letting us know. –Krinkletalk 00:50, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

Report by Goodtimes254

Blanking pages is not a solution for anything and is not connected to the picture. The file is about the file, it is not the file. Please read [MediaWiki:Abusefilter-blanking|here: How to delete instead of blank]] for further instructions. –Krinkletalk 00:52, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

Report by 79.253.189.159

Please let the user know on his user talk page. Editing of other peoples profiles is prevented. –Krinkletalk 00:54, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

Report by 203.187.237.168

Commons talk

Report by 69.236.162.142

Report by Muscrats

Removing the description of the File in the Commons storage does not delete it from a Wikipedia article. Please edit the Wikipedia article and replace Christine_Tobin.jpg with the filename of another image stored on Wikipedia or Commons. –Krinkletalk 08:39, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

Report by G-u-t

Report by Lipedia

Than: "...identified as potential unconstructive" or so

Report by Blue tail damselfly

The warning was triggered here. This was a valid warning since you inserted several 'sample' snippets that should never be on a real page. To undo something you typed or inserted use your browser/system options: press CTRL-Z or under your "Edit" menu on top choose something like "Undo".
May I ask what you attempted to achieve with this edit ? Perhaps I can help. –Krinkletalk 14:44, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

Report by Vitepi

Non-free media is not allowed on Wikimedia Commons. Therefore adding such notice is inappropiate. If non-free media is allowed on the wiki you need the media on, upload locally. File:PUCP_university_logo.jpg has been deleted. –Krinkletalk 17:59, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

Report by Liné1

But everytime they had to be suppressed: In biology we have articles (some thousands) that contain only species/genus lists and no medias. For that reason this 'Abuse filter' must be disabled.

Liné1 (talk) 08:57, 4 February 2011 (UTC) Liné1 (talk) 08:57, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

Guys, there is a big problem with this Filter. Can we see that together ? Cheers Liné1 (talk) 12:39, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
Hello guys, what is the purpose of this page if it is not watched?. Nobody answers? Liné1 (talk) 06:47, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
The filter no longer triggers for users with more than 150 edits. Thanks for the report, –Krinkletalk 17:56, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

Report by 68.35.246.225

It's gone now, but for the next time: Make sure you're logged in with your account (assuming you are User:Dsyn22), these warnings won' appear when you're logged into your account. –Krinkletalk 17:51, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

Report by Wouterhagens

Report by JoeJohnson2

Report by Wouterhagens

Report by 92.17.27.14

"May I thank all those who take an interest in what, I repeat, are, for myself at least, complicated matters for so far (26 February 2011) having left intact the 'Description' edit by myself (which relates to the correct title in accordance with a public document in the form of Council minutes)? For better or for worse these matters are now being even more fully discussed (in the sense of discussion in relation to further evidential documents of one sort and another, including a postcard) on http://www.britishlistedbuildings.co.uk/en-432718-war-memorial-in-redheugh-gardens-hartlep/comments; all of these historical matters will be, or at least should be, eventually brought into some sort of concordence here on the Internet, surely? We shall see.

Whoever happens to be the person responsible for this particular rather misleading title in terms of public documents and which is therefore the ultimate responsibility of the relevant local authoritty (which goes together with other misleading titles relating to architecture described as 'listed' under the legislation, with the resulting consequences so far as British history, and in fact European history relating to the First World War, is concerned) will hopefully now, after several months from the time when this issue was first raised, carry out the evidently necessary correction." (End of quote)

  • Comments: This unfortunately is a matter which relates directly to the freedom of speech and related admittedly rather complicated issues of law with particular reference to the 'listed buildings' in England, as orginally laid out and intended, the immediate 'building' in question being that dealt with in the site mentioned in the above attempt to edit, but involving numerous others, in particular the one originally entitled in a public document (Council minutes recording a gift accepted in 'the public interest' under the legislation, that is not for statutorty purpose) the 'West Hartlepool War Memorial', and now at least for the time being currently dealt with under that title in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/West_Hartlepool_War_Memorial. This and related matters are also being dealt with now in other sites by myself, and may ultimate result in published material which will expose errors elsewhere, including your own.

I suggest your own title should be corrected as soon as possible, if only in order to make it in accordance with the original title from which you yourselves have derived it, and which makes clear that the only connection with the Heugh Battery is that it happens to be near it. The refusal of your site to accept this suggestion is not understood at all I am afraid, ladies and gentlemen. Can you perhaps contact me with your explanation if there is one at all (peter.judge@laposte.net)? If you do not, and if a further attempt to make a comment on the Discussion page is refused in one week's time and the title remains the same, I shall have to arrive at the conclusion that you are not interested in any further contacts whatsoever. (This is taking up a lot of my time but I am obliged to admit that the ultimate responsibility is, believe it or not, clearly that of the government itself, in particular local authorites.)

In conclusion I thank you anyway for the option to make this response on this longrunning and complicated matter which relates to both domestic law and treaty obligations (1985 Granada Convention). The technical competence which is evidently your own on this and other websites solves many problems and makes available unprecedented possibilities ... it seems that it does not however deal with the concept of truth and law in any traditionally recognizable way. Peter Judge 92.17.27.14 11:40, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

Report by Pfeifferfranz

To request deletion don't blank the page, but request deletion. Place {{Speedy| reason here}} somewhere on a page and an administrator will look at it as soon as possible and delete the page as needed. –Krinkletalk 17:20, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

Report by 71.108.69.71

wank

Report by 71.108.69.71

Report by Mussen4me

Report by 92.238.250.202

POO

Report by TruthSeeker1911

Report by Int21h

that is not him

Report by 2.121.170.91

Report by Hellomisser

reporting mistake on this diagram.

Report by 122.110.178.42

Error

Report by 194.250.183.69

I would be pleased to have a feedback from you soon. Regards, 194.250.183.69 14:45, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

Report by Hans Adler

I just spent ages trying to figure out by experiments why my comment to a deletion discussion was rejected. Turns out the abuse filter doesn't like the German company name A.S.S. (Altenburg-Stralsunder Spielkartenfabriken) when spelled without the dots! This is fucking ridiculous. Surely nobody must be protected against seeing the word ass in capital letters? Hans Adler (talk) 08:41, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

PS: In English, "ASS" is also an abbreviation for w:argininosuccinate synthase, a human gene. In German there is a large number of alternative meanings, see w:de:Ass, and there are also a few in French, see the corresponding French disambiguation page to which I cannot link because of the stupid abuse filter.
Also: Is anyone watching this page at all? If this is not the place where problems with the abuse filter can be reported and will be acted on, where is it? Hans Adler (talk) 10:08, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for pointing this out, Hans Adler. This is the correct place and I have just adapted the filter in question to permit "ASS". This rule was originally taken from en-wp and we should adapt it at Commons to a more international environment. --AFBorchert (talk) 08:16, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
Thanks! Hans Adler (talk) 15:59, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

Report by EmiratiCulture

Report by 220.237.150.112

John Quinlan (wrestler)

Report by Dogpoundzman

  • Report by: Dogpoundzman (talk • contribs • block log • filter log)
  • Page name: John Quinlan (wrestler) (hist • logs • abuse log)
  • Edit kind: I was in the process of removing the category: John Quinlan (wrestler) from some, not all, of the photos in this commons gallery. I want to removed just this category, not the image itself which will stay in commons. The gallery of this subject has far too many images and just keeping a few of the professional ones in there will enhance it as well as keeping it updated and neat. I would like to go ahead and remove the categort on some of them for a more professional, clean looking updated gallery for the subject.
  • Comments: I look forward to hearing back from you soon as doing this would free up space for future professional and updated images for the subject. Thank you Dogpoundzman (talk) 19:09, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

Report by 99.71.140.7

misstace

The photo of the Centaur on Wiki Commons attributed to Skulls Unlimited is infringement of copyright. The author of the image is William Willers, NOT Skulls Unlimited or Sklmsta

Report by Sufiji

  • Report by: Sufiji (talk • contribs • block log • filter log)
  • Page name: Unknown
  • Edit kind: Give proper credit for the Centaur skeleton. It is not copyright free, it is not public domain, the author of this image is not Sklmsta or Skulls Unilimited. This is an artistic creation by artist William Willers, who hired Skulls Unlimited to make his design according to his specifications. Skulls Unlimited and "Sklmsta" are taking credit for work that is not theirs and claiming it is copyright free.
  • Comments: Sufiji (talk) 01:13, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

Report by 110.13.74.24

Report by Tony Wills

Someone Defaced our page - tring to remove it - If you can help Please do so - Carl Johnson - Automobile CLub of Southern California 715-885-2293

Report by 69.224.107.100

fuck you asshole you deleted my file }}

My error, I thought I am invited to give an answer to Ian and Wiki

Report by 41.145.133.73

  • Report by: 41.145.133.73 (talk • contribs • block log • filter log)
  • Page name: Commons:Sandbox (hist • logs • abuse log)
  • Edit kind: I thought I should use this page for my reply, where I explained that I do have the right to donate this picture
  • Comments: Anne Labuschagne, who is a niece of the late Dorothy Dodds, owns the copyright to the rediscovered sketchbooks and all illustrations of this wonderful artist.

She asked me to donate the picture 2-7a Orothamnus zeyheri.jpg

This is my last try to do something about it - I am too busy to spend more time on this topic Kind regards Rosemarie Breuer 41.145.133.73 17:35, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

Report by ณว

Report by Lokita92

Report by 71.118.203.194

Report by Tree Falling In The Forest

ähm, ich habe diese seite geändert, weil sie angeblich meine wikimedia-commons-seite ist.

Report by 78.53.85.231

Report by 79.53.82.114

Report by Reykholt

Þýrill - category and text i wrote this wrongly. Could you pls. delete it?]] ([{{fullurl:Þýrill

Þýrill - category and text i wrote this wrongly. Could you pls. delete it?|action=history}} hist] • logs • abuse log)

  • Edit kind: explication and category

It is existing written correctly as (Icelandic mountain). Tks. Reykholt (talk) 19:28, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

Report: cannot remove wrong category

Report by 109.66.215.45

yuma.daily.sun

Report by 174.254.2.38

Report by Christian von Holst

Du hast eine Gallerie angelegt. Kategorien haben den Category: - prefix. -- RE rillke questions? 17:16, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

Report by MegaLady

Report by 187.13.8.228


Report by 89.242.94.214

Report by 65.175.207.114

Report by 88.69.217.109

Report by 69.166.72.109

Report by 182.72.180.202

Report by 109.150.200.193

Report by 71.84.49.173


Report by Abhikdhar2009

The filter is not letting me edit my own user page. Please help !! --117.194.98.159 08:23, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

I suggest you log-in. -- RE rillke questions? 17:13, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

Report by Bosslike123

Report by 217.87.158.140

Report by 88.22.194.106

IPO SHARE MUTUAL FUND UID PAN POPSP TIN PRAN

Report by Alankitworld

fuera

Report by 87.221.116.186

Report by Mundouniversal

cannot remove

Report by Kaluzman

You have to insert a new category instead. -- RE rillke questions? 23:15, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

Report by 97.77.230.126

Report by Larryadixon

We are not an encyclopedia. You are on Commons. If you want to write an article, go en:. If you like to create a gallery, then make sure you replaced all text added by clicking a toolbar-button with actual content. -- RE rillke questions? 18:12, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

Deleting a page of my own work

Report by 188.100.60.19

      I agree with the deleting, because It's my own work. 
      Please delete the photo and the comments/exif data imediatly !!!
You clicked on "donnate an image" oder "bild spenden" while uploading. Das heißt, dass es nicht gelöscht wird. Die meisten Creative-Commons-Lizenzen sind darüber hinaus nicht widerrufbar. Hast Du bedenken wegen des Klarnamens? Dann kann ich ihn gern aus den Exif-Daten entfernen. -- RE rillke questions? 10:52, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

es muss heissen Musiker und nicht Musikern

Report by 80.218.0.230

Benutzerkonto erstellen und 4 Tage warten oder auf die Diskussionsseite des Nutzers schreiben. Er wäre sicher dankbar. -- RE rillke questions? 19:39, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

Error

Report by 166.147.76.75

No error. You are not logged-in and vandalism of other user's talk-pages isn't appreciated. -- RE rillke questions? 14:59, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

Report by 89.241.224.122

You tried to write [[File:Example.jpg]]=={{int:filedesc}}==
I assume you mistakenly clicked on the "insert image" button. -- RE rillke questions? 22:56, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

Report by 188.100.60.19

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons_talk:Abuse_filter/Archive_2011&oldid=63940130"