User talk:Wsiegmund: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
→‎Where is the deletion discussion of Secular Fascism ?: Added link to enwiki talk page discussion.
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 102: Line 102:


== Where is the deletion discussion of Secular Fascism ? ==
== Where is the deletion discussion of Secular Fascism ? ==
[[User:Doug youvan|Doug youvan]] ([[User talk:Doug youvan|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 06:54, 6 January 2012 (UTC)


:Please follow the link in the notice posted on your talk page. Alternatively, it is [[Commons:Deletion requests/File:Secular Fascism.png]]. Please do not attempt to move disputes from elsewhere to Commons.[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk%3ADouglas_Youvan/Archive1#Hostility_Directed_at_a_Biophysicist_Who_Happens_to_be_Christian] Also, you would be well-advised to heed [[:en:WP:SOAP]] and [[:en:WP:COI]]. I've removed the list of your self-published works, above. --[[User:Wsiegmund|Walter Siegmund]] [[User_talk:Wsiegmund|(talk)]] 15:24, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
Pseudocolor in Pure and Applied Mathematics, ISBN 978-0-615-43573-2
Questions from a Christian Biophysicist, ISBN 978-0-615-43125-3
As Velocity Approaches Light Speed, P and NP Become Equivalent for Computations Using Zero-Mass Particles, ISBN 978-0-9849696-0-9

[[User:Doug youvan|Doug youvan]] ([[User talk:Doug youvan|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 06:54, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:42, 6 January 2012

- Welcome to my talk page -
So that it is easier to follow a discussion, I will reply to messages left here on this page. If I have posted on your talk page,
I will be watching so you can reply there if you wish.


This talk page is automatically archived by MiszaBot. Any sections older than 7 days are automatically archived. Please see the links listed below.

Also see my enwiki talk page.

Archives

Mar2007 Apr2007 May2007 Jun2007 Jul2007 Aug2007 Sep2007 Oct2007 Nov2007 Dec2007 Jan2008 Mar2008 Apr2008 May2008 Jun2008 Jul2008 Aug2008 Oct2008 2008/9 2008/10 2008/11 2008/12 2009/2 2009/3 2009/4 2009/5 2009/6 2009/7 2009/8 2009/9 2009/10 2009/11 2009/12 2010/1 2010/2 2010/3 2010/4 2010/5 2010/6 2010/7 2010/8 2010/9 2010/10 2010/11 2010/12 2010/1 2010/2 2010/3 2010/4 2010/5 2010/6 2010/7


Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paradise River 8217.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Matricaria discoidea 2630.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me -- Holleday 17:21, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Upload mistake

Hello,

I've uploaded a picture from flickr this morning (File:GoreText_Experience_Tour_-_Chris_Sharma.jpg). But I've seen that I did a mistake regarding to the license. Can you help me to correct this and delete the file that, if I'm correct, doesn't fit Wiki license? Cordially. --Helgismidh (talk) 10:47, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It was deleted yesterday by Lymantria.[1] The CC NonCommercial-NoDerivs license is not permitted on Commons. Please see COM:L for more. Thank you. --Walter Siegmund (talk) 21:32, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
North_Santiam_River has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jsayre64 (talk) 01:33, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please see my talk page here for my response to your post. Jsayre64 (talk) 03:24, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello my friend,
Could you copy the content of Taxonavigation/sandbox into Taxonavigation?
I have added a bad usage detector ;-)
Thanks in advance Liné1 (talk) 19:34, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Liné1; Avec plaisir. Joyeuses fêtes et la nouvelle année. --Walter Siegmund (talk) 00:31, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Where is the deletion discussion of Secular Fascism ?

Doug youvan (talk) 06:54, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please follow the link in the notice posted on your talk page. Alternatively, it is Commons:Deletion requests/File:Secular Fascism.png. Please do not attempt to move disputes from elsewhere to Commons.[2] Also, you would be well-advised to heed en:WP:SOAP and en:WP:COI. I've removed the list of your self-published works, above. --Walter Siegmund (talk) 15:24, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]