User talk:Ezarate: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
Line 258: Line 258:
::I think that it's usefull, I will translate it later, thanks for the advise [[User:Ezarate|Ezarate]]<small>[[User Talk:Ezarate|esteban]]</small> 18:05, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
::I think that it's usefull, I will translate it later, thanks for the advise [[User:Ezarate|Ezarate]]<small>[[User Talk:Ezarate|esteban]]</small> 18:05, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
:::Thanks, &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<strong>Jim</strong> . . . . <small><small>[[User:Jameslwoodward|Jameslwoodward]]</small> ([[User talk:Jameslwoodward|talk to me]])</small> 22:33, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
:::Thanks, &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<strong>Jim</strong> . . . . <small><small>[[User:Jameslwoodward|Jameslwoodward]]</small> ([[User talk:Jameslwoodward|talk to me]])</small> 22:33, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

== Could you please explain... ==

You deleted [[:Category:Murghab River]]. I think this was premature. Did you notice that no one went on record in the discussion that the category should be deleted?

I think I raised a key question, which was unaddressed.

[[:Category:Murghab River]] was created first. Later [[:Category:Morghab River]] was created. The elements in the old category were manually moved to the new category, without any prior discussion. This was probably a newbie mistake. The individual who created the new category started the steps to initiate a discussion over deleting the old category, by placing a {{tl|Delete}} template on it. But they didn't complete that initiation. In particular, they left the {{tl|Delete}} template unpopulated. This too was probably a newbie mistake.

I think that an article existed on the English language wikipedia that used the newer transliteration is a bad reason to replace one category with another. As I suggested in the discussion, given that there is no standard for transliterating Afghan names, I think the only good reason for deleting the old category in favor of the new one would be if the Afghan government had officially adopted one transliteration over another.

Further, I requested that if we found one transliteration was the official transliteration used by the Afghan government, other transliterations should not be deleted, but should be be to redirections.

So, could you please explain the actions you took?

I didn't say this in the deletion discussion, but I will point out now, that if we find the Afghan government has an official transliteration it may turn out to be a '''''third''''' transliteration. In that case I think both [[:Category:Murghab River]] and [[:Category:Morghab River]] should redirect to a new category using the Afghan government's official name. [[User:Geo Swan|Geo Swan]] ([[User talk:Geo Swan|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 02:41, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:41, 22 April 2011

English: Welcome to the Commons, Ezarate!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文(台灣)‎ | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−
First steps tutorial

Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy.

Getting help

More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.

Goodies, tips and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities.
  • All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~
  • Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!)
  • To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], which produces: Image:Foo.jpg
  • If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper
Made a mistake?
  • Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}}
  • For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

--SieBot 16:50, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

La Burxa

Hola Ezarate,

me parece que has cometido un error al borrar la imagen en La Burxa, esta revista se edita en licencia Creative Commons y es de libre difusión. Al subir la imagen creo que lo puse. Si no es así siento el error, pero por favor, vuelve a subir la imagen.

--Vacomva (talk) 19:50, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright Image:CapillaSantaGemma.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. For images, you may find Commons:Image casebook useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.


Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

-Alpertron (talk) 16:23, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Telescopio

La foto de "telescopio", ¿no es en realidad un microscopio?. Saludos. Barcex (talk) 22:55, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Si querés subilas de nuevo y yo borro las malas. Barcex (talk) 22:59, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hola: es "rodocrosita", el nombre de la piedra. [[1]]
--Roberto Fiadone (talk) 23:00, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Ezarate!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:49, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Que gusto...

Hombre, ¿quién sino? :-) Sí, aprovechando unos minutos para subir algunas imágenes que tengo por ahí preparadas desde hace tiempo a la vez que recopilo mucho material nuevo, saludos desde Jaipur, --Poco a poco (talk) 19:07, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Marking images for deletion

Thanks for your recent efforts to mark images with copyright violations. When you do this, though, don't forget to follow the steps mentioned in the deletion template, such as notifying the original uploader.

Gracias por sus recientes esfuerzos para marcar imágenes con violaciones de derechos de autor. Al hacer esto, sin embargo, no se olvide de seguir los pasos mencionados en la plantilla de supresión, por ejemplo la notificación al cargador original. - Jmabel ! talk 05:38, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]


العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Abel Santa Cruz.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Abel Santa Cruz.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Noddy93 (talk) 21:24, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]


العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Maria Claudia Falcone.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Maria Claudia Falcone.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Noddy93 (talk) 21:52, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bot

Usas un "bot" en tu cuento? Tienes muchos resúmenes de ediciones donde dice "bot:" o "robot:". Por favor, no use un bot en este cuento sin permiso de este proyecto. Killiondude (talk) 06:40, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]


العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:RicardoTrigo.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:RicardoTrigo.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

High Contrast (talk) 11:20, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]


File source is not properly indicated: File:RicardoTrigo.jpg

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:RicardoTrigo.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:RicardoTrigo.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

High Contrast (talk) 11:20, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

When you mark an image for deletion...

... as you did at File:AficheBAQ.jpg, do remember to notify the uploader (I've followed through for you in this case). - Jmabel ! talk 20:06, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:PIC 4243.JPG. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.

čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  ไทย  日本語  Tiếng Việt  中文  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

--TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 09:24, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

NB: You may upload a cropped version of it showing the autograph only. Also, please don't upload pictures with names such as "PIC 4243" or "IMG" or something like that. Try to find a better title for your uploads. Thanks for your comprehension. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 09:24, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:TwoSaintsZinacan.JPG

File:TwoSaintsZinacan.JPG is in public domain because of its age.. .it was painted either in teh 16th or 17th century as the description states.Thelmadatter (talk) 16:51, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Er... was there a reason for you reverting my new version of this? I'm trying to move this set of images towards Featured picture set status. I don't really want to revert until I know if there's an issue I need to be aware of. I mean, I own the newspaper. It's pretty white. Adam Cuerden (talk) 01:11, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tapa de la Revista Hijitus ¿!?

Hola,

¿Qué es eso de poner en las descripciones de las fotos del bicentenario: "Tapa de la Revista Hijitus de Argentina del 25 de noviembre de 1970"? --Roberto Fiadone (talk) 02:41, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Je, eso venía a decir. Todas las fotos del bicentenario dicen "Tapa de la Revista Hijitus....". Barcex (talk) 07:24, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bot

Por favor paralo y revisa sus subidas de archivos. Está metiendo trozos de regex entre las cabeceras, etc como aquí. Gracias, --Dferg (talk · meta) 12:35, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hola Ezarate. Che vos sabés que esta imagen File:Basilica de Santo Domingo-Cordoba (Argentina)0.jpg no es la basilica sino la catedral. ¿Tenés idea si puede haber otros errores? Y otra cosa: se podrá cambiar la licencia con la que estás subiendo tus fotos? porque tendría que ser la recomendada que es cc-by-sa 3.0 + gfdl. Alakasam (talk) 00:30, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WikiLoader

Hey Esteban, cambié la plantilla que colocaste aquí ya que sí tiene licencia, lo que no hay es permiso claro de que el autor lo ha liberado bajo esa licencia. Saludos, --Màñü飆¹5 talk 23:04, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Photo

Hello, Ezarate! File:Kindzmarauli_Wine.jpg - this is my photography.--Gruszecki (talk) 09:53, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Missing evidence of permission?

Me puedes explicar por que has marcado dos de mis fotos como missing evidence of permission? Las he puesto como release to public domain. No tienen copyright y yo soy el autor. Cual es el problema? Miguel Andrade (talk) 22:22, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think objects holding a label (but not the label alone) are fine. There are tons of photos of those. See related discussion here [2]. The shape of a bottle can be patented but I think they cannot be copyrighted because bottles are a utilitarian article, see here [3]. Miguel Andrade (talk) 14:23, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're now a filemover

Hi Ezarate, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

  • Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one.
  • Please do not tag redirects as {{Speedy}}. Other projects, like InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references.
  • For guideline when to rename a file, please see Commons:File renaming and Commons:File naming.

Geagea (talk) 02:24, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lukeford photo's

Hi Ezarate,

Can you please inform me what you mean with "This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: http://es.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Especial:Registro&page=Estaci%C3%B3n+de+Girona" as reason on a couple of Lukeford photo uploads ?

Best regards,

Gohe007 (talk) 19:51, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ezarate. You have new messages at Gohe007's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  català  čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  suomi  français  galego  हिन्दी  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  ქართული  македонски  മലയാളം  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Türkçe  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−

Gohe007 (talk) 20:06, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No tengo idea

No tengo idea de quién sea vos pero me bloqueaste injustamente fue algo absurdo y burdo al igual que tu justificación de borrar mi archivo por que **no es una imagen real** eso que tiene que ver =S obviamente es un gran retrato algo que seguramente vos nunca harás ;) y por otra parte sólo espero encontrar a otro user como aquí en wikipedia en español a que em apoye t veo el abuso de poder que tenes vos.

Buen día Neo ender (talk) 00:16, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:FannyNavarro.jpg

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:FannyNavarro.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:FannyNavarro.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Kam Solusar (talk) 05:30, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ya está en dominio público según la ley argentina y el autor a saber quien es, pon "unknown" y quita el cartel de aviso. Un saludo. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 00:50, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
To verify the copyright status we need more information about the original source, where and when the photo was taken and published. The photo could have been taken and published in any country, so there's no proof that Argentinan copyright laws apply here. Regards, --Kam Solusar (talk) 04:06, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Taylor Swift

The same photo was usd on en.wiki so there isn't copyright.--2811Butterfly (talk) 01:49, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your RfA

Hi, just wanted to let you know I've deemed your RfA successful and promoted you to the position of adminship on Commons. Congrats! Let me know if you have any questions, and best of luck. –Juliancolton | Talk 00:25, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Varg Vikernes

You marked two photos of Vikernes to speedy deletion. According to source, the photos have been licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. Karppinen (talk) 17:57, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't find the creative commons license tag there, sorry Ezarateesteban 18:48, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding File:Petit_logo.jpg

Hi thanks for your guidance regarding File:Petit_logo.jpg. I have sent a mail as instructed. Where can I know the current status of the review process? How much time will it take for the administrator to review it? (because if it is longer than seven days, the file might get deleted as per wiki policy)

Thanks in advance.

--Jayarathina (talk) 07:08, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Falklands coins

At Commons:Deletion requests/File:Moneda Islas Malvinas Reverso.png, I added another image of the same coin and the category Category:Coins of the Falkland Islands as well. Can you delete those? (See en:Coins of the Falkland Islands for info on the territory's coins, which show that they'll all be copyright until 2025.) —innotata 14:56, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done --Ezarateesteban 15:33, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. Your assumption was incorrect. --Leyo 15:33, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Afd had been moved also, ✓ Done Ezarateesteban 15:39, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Prince

Hi,

you are one of the few moderators active at this hour. Could you please take away the protection of File:Nl-Prince-article.ogg? I have made a new version of the file and need to upload it.

Regards, VR-Land (talk) 00:05, 28 March 2011 (UTC) OK go ahead Ezarateesteban 00:11, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! :-) Regards, VR-Land (talk) 00:12, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It's been done. As I said, you have my thanks. Regards, VR-Land (talk) 00:21, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome Ezarateesteban 00:23, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

He visto que ese usuario ha subido aquí varios logos corporativos de Telecinco-Mediaset. La verdad es que no estoy muy al tanto de en qué medida están afectados por derechos de autor y de sus condiciones de uso, pero dado que se los ha atribuido como de su autoría, imagino que no será lo más correcto. En fin, te lo apunto por si crees que deben ser modificados o eliminados. Saludos. --DJ Nietzsche (talk) 14:09, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Luke Ford permission

There is an established OTRS ticket for the Luke Ford images - see here. Tabercil (talk) 03:29, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Were you able to resolve your issues on this? It's just that I want to try and head off anything that could lead to a repeat of the fiasco that's mentioned at Commons:Village pump/Archive/2008/07#Luke ford permission. Tabercil (talk) 17:36, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Do you have the headers of these email? I'll ask to another OTRS member --Ezarateesteban 17:48, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ugh... that's a looong time ago. I *might* still have them, but I do remember doing the "forward to OTRS with full headers" bit once before so I'm betting they're already in the system there. Maybe not under that ticket though... can you search for any other OTRS tickets referencing Luke Ford? Tabercil (talk) 19:31, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Nope... no longer have them that far back. I do have a follow-up exchange I made with Luke back in March 2007 where he says the exchange is proper... send me an email and I'll forward it to you to look at it. Tabercil (talk) 21:47, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Imagen Logo Universitat Politècnica de València.jpg

Hola Ezarate, has borrado por estar sometido a copyright el fichero con el logo oficial de la Universitat Politècnica de València subido (por su autor) con intención de utilizarlo en la página de la UPV . La inclusión de logos de entidades académicas para usarlos en representación de la institución es una práctica habitual en wikipedia que puedes ver en páginas como ésta (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:JHU_seal.png) o ésta (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:CardSeal-1.gif). Si hace falta añadir algún dato o referencia más para que el logo pueda estar en el Commons te ruego que me digas qué es y le pediré al autor que lo incluya.

Muchas gracias

Ndespujol (talk) 18:37, 1 April 2011 (UTC)Ndespujol[reply]

En Commons no se permite el fair use, en la wiki inglesa si --Ezarateesteban 18:40, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please take care about second file mentioned in request. Thank you. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done thanks!!! Ezarateesteban 18:20, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Imagen SanCor suprimida

Acabo de enterarme (de casualidad) que el 25/03/1 borraste la fotografía "Sancor_products.jpg" que yo había subido a commons para ser utilizada en la página "SanCor" de wikipedia en inglés.

Estuve leyendo sobre la aplicación de los trabajos derivados, y ahí no veo que se haga referencia alguna sobre esta clase de productos (packaging), así como en wikipedia (en) hay varias páginas donde figuran fotos de los productos con licencia "public domain" de commons (por ejemplo, imágenes de zapatillas nike como ésta: Nike Air Jordan

Por lo tanto, no me queda claro tu criterio de aplicación de copyright: ¿una zapatilla Nike puede ser subida a commons pero un envase Sancor no? ¿Las fotos de automóviles no deberían ser prohibidas en su totalidad, entonces? (aunque hayan sido sacadas de manera casual en la calle).

Te pido por favor que me expliques qué criterio se utiliza en estos casos, porque guiándome por los ejemplos que te comenté, debería pensar que la foto que subí, fue borrada apresurada y erróneamente. Y digo "apresuradamente", porque un administrador (como me ha pasado en otros casos) habitualmente notifica al uploader sobre si su imagen borra ciertas políticas y corre peligro de ser suprimida, y en este caso nada de eso sucedió. La función de administrador debe ser manejada con responsabilidad porque puede incurrirse fácilmente en abusos de poder.

Aguardo tu respuesta, Fma12 (talk) 14:49, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New Admin Help

Is this useful?. I ask because it took me a couple of weeks to learn about the first and I just learned about the second today. If it is helpful, would you like to translate it?      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:45, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think that it's usefull, I will translate it later, thanks for the advise Ezarateesteban 18:05, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks,      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:33, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please explain...

You deleted Category:Murghab River. I think this was premature. Did you notice that no one went on record in the discussion that the category should be deleted?

I think I raised a key question, which was unaddressed.

Category:Murghab River was created first. Later Category:Morghab River was created. The elements in the old category were manually moved to the new category, without any prior discussion. This was probably a newbie mistake. The individual who created the new category started the steps to initiate a discussion over deleting the old category, by placing a {{Delete}} template on it. But they didn't complete that initiation. In particular, they left the {{Delete}} template unpopulated. This too was probably a newbie mistake.

I think that an article existed on the English language wikipedia that used the newer transliteration is a bad reason to replace one category with another. As I suggested in the discussion, given that there is no standard for transliterating Afghan names, I think the only good reason for deleting the old category in favor of the new one would be if the Afghan government had officially adopted one transliteration over another.

Further, I requested that if we found one transliteration was the official transliteration used by the Afghan government, other transliterations should not be deleted, but should be be to redirections.

So, could you please explain the actions you took?

I didn't say this in the deletion discussion, but I will point out now, that if we find the Afghan government has an official transliteration it may turn out to be a third transliteration. In that case I think both Category:Murghab River and Category:Morghab River should redirect to a new category using the Afghan government's official name. Geo Swan (talk) 02:41, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]