User talk:HaeB: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
CategorizationBot (talk | contribs)
Notifying user of 4 uncategorized image(s)
EdwardsBot (talk | contribs)
Line 111: Line 111:
*[[:Image:En-wikipedia-externallinks-edu (inkdroid, August 2010).png]] was uncategorized on 31 August 2010 [[User:CategorizationBot|CategorizationBot]] ([[User talk:CategorizationBot|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 11:00, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
*[[:Image:En-wikipedia-externallinks-edu (inkdroid, August 2010).png]] was uncategorized on 31 August 2010 [[User:CategorizationBot|CategorizationBot]] ([[User talk:CategorizationBot|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 11:00, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
<!-- Uncategorized notification -->
<!-- Uncategorized notification -->

== <!--Insert section heading of your message here (start)
-->''The Signpost'': 30 August 2010<!--
Insert section heading of your message here (end)--> ==

<!--Insert body of message here (start)
--><div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;">
* News and notes: [[:en:Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2010-08-30/News and notes|Most linked websites on Wikipedia, New York Wiki-Conference, and more]]

* In the news: [[:en:Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2010-08-30/In the news|Agatha Christie spoiled, Wales on Wikileaks, University students improve Wikipedia, and more]]

* WikiProject report: [[:en:Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2010-08-30/WikiProject report|Studying WikiProject Universities]]

* Features and admins: [[:en:Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2010-08-30/Features and admins|Featured article milestone: 3,000]]

* Arbitration report: [[:en:Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2010-08-30/Arbitration report|What does the Race and intelligence case tell us?]]

* Technology report: [[:en:Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2010-08-30/Technology report|Reusability of MediaWiki code, Google Summer of Code: Interwiki transclusion, and more]]
</div>
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">'''[[:en:Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost|Read this Signpost in full]]''' &middot; [[:en:Wikipedia:Signpost/Single|Single-page]] &middot; [[:en:Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Subscribe|Unsubscribe]] &middot; </div><!--
Insert body of message here (end)-->--[[m:User:EdwardsBot|EdwardsBot]] ([[m:User talk:EdwardsBot|talk]]) 05:55, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
<!-- EdwardsBot 0005 -->

Revision as of 05:55, 5 September 2010

Einstieg

Hallo Hoch :-)
willkommen hier in commons. Für den Einstieg schau mal bitte: Commons:Gemeinschaftsportal und besonders Commons:Babel, damit andere Nutzer wissen, in welchen Sprachen sie ggf. Fragen an Dich stellen können ... da gibt es diese blauen Kästchen, wie u.a. ich sie auch habe ... Gute Grüße von :Bdk: 20:29, 1 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Commons:Village pump ist auch ab und zu lustig ;-) --Paddy 04:47, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Kat und Artikel. Bilder kommen in Artikel und werden in Kats einsortiert richtig Praha Category:Praha oder Hradec Králové Category:Hradec Králové noch nicht ganz richtig Dithmarschen sollte in Category:Dithmarschen und die kat sollte dann in Schleswig-Holstein oder ähnlich... --Paddy 05:29, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Hi, regarding Image:Nokia 7650 (stock.xchng).jpg. Images from stock.xnch are not public domain. For details, see Commons:Bad sources. Thuresson 08:53, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Stock.xchng

Hello ! You may know my interest in the current stock.xchg policy since I launched the poll about it based on my legal analysis. I'd just like to point out that maybe, in the future, you avoid mentioning the source into the file name, like you did for Image:Nokia 7650 (stock.xchng).jpg. The new policy insists on not building any galleries or categories for those pictures, I guess it's better not to make them too easily searchable too. By the way, most of the time, the {{CopyrightedFreeUse}} and {{CopyrightedFreeUseProvidedThat|Insert-Conditions-Here}} copyright tags are appropriate or even better than PD (see Commons:Copyright tags). That's all. Hope don't mind this note and have a good day ! :) villy 09:14, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)

I see what you mean and I agree. As mentioned in my reply to Thuresson I wasn't aware of this whole discussion when I uploaded the image. Feel free to move it to another filename if you prefer. regards, High on a tree 11:29, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Hu Jintao

Hi, saw your comment about the Hu Jintao picture on Shizhao's talk. Unfortunately it was deleted before image restoring was installed. Please reupload the image (your source was http://img.radiobras.gov.br/Aberto/index.php/Imagens.Principal.00.0.2004-11-13). The template:Agencia Brasil is completely accepted at the moment, because they put their content under a CC license ([1] at bottom of page). At the moment of deletion it was under suspicion. Grüsse. NielsF 01:18, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I was aware of that discussion, but I thought that deletion of those images had been held until they got word from the copyright holder. And out of many Agencia Brasil photos which I've uploaded this was the only one which got deleted. Anyway, Shizhao has restored the description page and uploaded the original photo from the source, I put the cropped version over it and everything is fine now, I'm just left wondering how often this kind of thing happens here. In any case, nice of you to have noticed this and tell me about the past ABr problem, dank u wel ;) regards, High on a tree 06:49, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Ignacio Corsini.jpg

Aunque no dispongamos de los datos necesarios para comprobar que la imagen es de dominio público por el Artículo 34 de la Ley 11.723, por el Artículo 31 de la misma Ley queda claro que la publicación es libre.

"Art. 31. - El retrato fotográfico de una persona no puede ser puesto en el comercio sin el consentimiento expreso de la persona misma, y muerta ésta, de su cónyuge e hijos o descendientes directos de éstos, o en su defecto del padre o de la madre. Faltando el cónyuge, los hijos, el padre o la madre, o los descendientes directos de los hijos, la publicación es libre.

La persona que haya dado su consentimiento puede revocarlo resarciendo daños y perjuicios.

Es libre la publicación del retrato cuando se relacione con fines científicos, didácticos y en general culturales, o con hechos o acontecimientos de interés público o que se hubieren desarrollado en público."

Image:Ignacio Corsini.jpg

http://www.secyt.gov.ar/11723.htm

Boru318 12:25, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, good catch I fixed the preloaded debate to subst: the image title. This means that it will give it correctly :) As for adding the reason automatically, I can't think of an easy way to do that at the moment but I will work on it when I get a free moment.--Nilfanion 22:44, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please delete this picture I had uploaded. I cannot provide the source and cannot remember if I originally imported it from :en or an officiel US page. Dake 20:55, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Hi! I made a summary in English for this image, in order to make clear (I hope so) that I am its author. --Praxides 17:15, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • I think I didn't make myself clear. The photo was restored and digited by request of the copyright holder, in order to put it into public domain. This file and others were unavailable before the project take place. I can send the project terms (doc in Portuguese). A site in the web will be created soon, if we get financial support for it --Praxides 10:08, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Image deletion warning Image:Photo_P_Lamy-2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

Dantadd 00:27, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The release under the GNU FDL is very clearly noted on the talk page (OTRS ticket #2006031310003349, confirmed by the current Chair of the Wikimedia Foundation). Feel free to add an appropriate OTRS template if you desire. Regards, High on a tree 01:32, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sadequain

hi, thanks for your message, i know the heir of Sadequain, and i got the images from the heir's website, how can i get it free liscensed. Please advise --Taimoors 18:53, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reply at User talk:Taimoors. Regards, High on a tree 00:29, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright

What is a copyright pitchure?--Vatrena ptica 18:23, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Have you read Commons:Licensing? You might also find en:Copyright (or the equivalent in your language Wikipedia) helpful. Regards, High on a tree 22:26, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Admin?

Want to give it a try? --Boricuæddie 02:08, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"a web page"?

[2] Hi, it would really help if you gave a link to the website in question when marking copyvios. How else can we verify it's a violation? And being from a website doesn't necessarily make it a copyvio. We have tons of stuff that's freely licensed taken from "Una Pagina Web". Thank you for helping us with copyright violations, but please be more specific. Thanks! Rocket000 (talk) 07:58, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, ok. I see these were the words of the uploader. Nevermind then. :) Rocket000 (talk) 08:01, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image deletion warning Image:Frankfurt_intl_airport_(nasa).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

abf /talk to me/ 13:30, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have notified the original uploader. Regards, High on a tree (talk) 17:48, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, why do you ask? I have responded to your question. Raphael Saulus (talk) 09:43, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Citizendium

Re citizendium article length, is Wikipedia's median value not showing the same trend?

Also, wouldn't a better graph be a composite of (total articles * median length), which is basically total words over time. 69.142.154.10 00:39, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copied your comment to File talk:Lessons from Citizendium.pdf and replied there. Regards, High on a tree (talk) 17:18, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, HaeB!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 11:00, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 30 August 2010

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe ·

--EdwardsBot (talk) 05:55, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]