User talk:BelloWello: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
MiszaBot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 3 thread(s) (older than 1d) to User talk:BelloWello/Archive 3, User talk:BelloWello/Archive 2. |
MiszaBot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 1 thread(s) (older than 1d) to User talk:BelloWello/Archive 3. |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
}} |
}} |
||
{{Archives |search=yes |bot=MiszaBot III |age=one |units=day }} |
{{Archives |search=yes |bot=MiszaBot III |age=one |units=day }} |
||
== Edit warring at [[Southern Adventist University]] == |
|||
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> [[Image:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=|link=]] You have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''1 week''' for [[WP:Edit warring|edit warring]]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|make useful contributions]]. If you would like to be unblocked, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|appeal this block]] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}, but you should read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] first. <p>During a dispute, you should first try to [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|discuss controversial changes]] and seek [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request [[Wikipedia:Page protection|page protection]].</p></div><!-- Template:uw-ewblock --> The complete report of this case is at [[WP:AN3#User:BelloWello reported by User:Lionelt (Result: 1 week)]]. [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 05:33, 30 May 2011 (UTC) |
|||
:Hi BelloWello, this (from EdJohnston) in the AN/I is the part I was trying to explain on the article's talk page: ''"The BLP exemption from 3RR is very narrowly worded and in my judgment this is not covered by that exemption."'' |
|||
:Mistakes and not understanding the policies happen. I'm hoping when you return, you can take this to heart and we can actively, properly address any issues that still remain with the article in question. A few tips that my former mentor (and some of the experienced editors who's talk pages I stalk) gave me: "before assuming policy covers some action, review one's intent first. If taking such action supports one's own agenda, it's not a good idea to hide such actions behind policy. And if one is not sure of policy, find an experienced editor to ask first, before jumping in and making a mistake". It's served me well - even with me jumping in and out of vandal fighting and working to end edit wars. I hope those tips serve you equally as well. If you have any questions, let me know. While you are blocked, you can still edit this page. I'll watchlist it, and respond to any policy or guideline questions you may have - though I would suggest not discussing the article in question until after your block has expired (and then, do so on the article's talk page). Best, <span style="border:1px solid #100;padding:1px;"><small>[[User:RobertMfromLI|R<small>OBERT</small>M<small>FROM</small>LI]] </small>|<small> <sup>[[User talk:RobertMfromLI|TK]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/RobertMfromLI|CN]]</sub></small></span> 06:01, 30 May 2011 (UTC) |
|||
I'm not sure why you didn't just listen to Kuru's advice and just self revert. Plenty of time to make changes later if warranted. You don't need to be the Yang to Fountainviewkid's Yin and you would both be better served by being less confrontational. [[User:Mojoworker|Mojoworker]] ([[User talk:Mojoworker|talk]]) 07:26, 31 May 2011 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 13:20, 1 June 2011
|
|||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 1 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
