User talk:FayssalF

Notes, Babel and Archives It's not an ®. It's a joke! By the way, vandalism creates spiritual turbulence, resulting in misfortune. DON'T BE OFFENSIVE! Older discussions are found here: 1st Floor, 2nd F, 3rd F, 4th F, 5th F, 6th F, 7th F, 8th F, 9th F, 10th F, 11th F, 12th F, 13th F, 14th F, 15th F, 16th F, 17th F, 18th F, 19th F, 20th F, 21st F, 22nd F, 23rd F, 24th F, 25th F, 26th F, 27th F, 28th F, 29th F, 30th F, 31th F, 32th F If I have started a conversation on your talk page, feel free to respond here. If you leave a message for me here, I will respond there and here as well. BABEL This user contributes to Wikimedia Commons. 40,000 This user has over 40,000 edits on the English Wikipedia. This user participates in Pages needing translation into English. This user maintains a strict policy advising against all personal attacks. This user is a member of WikiProject Countering systemic bias. This user is a participant in WikiProject Morocco. This user is a member of WikiProject Military history. This user is a participant in WikiProject Spain. This user is able to contribute with an advanced level of English. اللغة الام لهذا المستخدم هي العربية. Cet utilisateur parle français à un niveau comparable à la langue maternelle. Este usario puede contribuir con un nivel avanzado en Español. Ĉi tiu uzanto povas komuniki per baza nivelo de Esperanto. Questo utente può contribuire con un italiano di livello semplice. This user is Moroccan. ind This user is politically independent. This user is a Citizen of the World (Terra, ⊕). C#This user can program in C#. 33This user is 33 years old. This user BOINCs. This user supports moral equality amongst great apes and humans. This user is car-free.‡ This user owns one or more Siamese cats.

Ongoing discussions

3rd viscount monckton of brenchley This subject has suffered from Graves' Disease, which causes ocular proptosis. Various people who may be part of a paid network of wreckers who tamper with the biogs of people who disagree with global warming have repeatedly inserted an obviously offensive photo of the subject that exploits his physical disability by making a feature of the proptosis in a ludicrous way. Please refer these people - one of them is ChrisO, who has been warned before - to the arbitration committee. Population history of Egypt - the language issue Hi there. I have a slight concern stemming from your comment on your edit, to the effect of work being needed on the language section. This section is only relevant to the extent that it sheds light on the population history of the people, it is not a detailed article about the languages themselves. Please discuss on the talk page. Thanks Wdford (talk) 12:16, 11 August 2009 (UTC) Hi Wdford, Probably more details should be given to the Ancient Egyptian language itself; or at least the scripts (as I am doing now). I didn't say they weren't relevant but that would be like having a section dedicated to the Spanish language full of details about Romance and Latin languages with nothing about the Spanish itself. -- FayssalF - Wiki me up® 12:29, 11 August 2009 (UTC) Also, I agree with you and that's why I am working on it trying to reduce it and keep the main points. -- FayssalF - Wiki me up® 12:36, 11 August 2009 (UTC) OK - that makes sense. Thanks for the response. Wdford (talk) 12:44, 11 August 2009 (UTC) Omar Sharif and Youssef Chahine Fayssal: Thanks for protecting the article. Please do the same with Youssef Chahine. Omar Sharif had been mediated till the cows went home on its Talk page by Admin Sancho. The problem can be summarized in Admin. Sancho's statement: "Even the leap from "Sharif's parents were Lebanese", to "Sharif is of Lebanese descent" is going too far in an article about a living person." Omar Sharif and Youssef Chahine are both Egyptian citizens whose parents may have had Lebanese origins of some sort or may have been immigrants to Egypt. Sancho had laboriously and very methodically mediated Omar Sharif's article and he found no support for any Lebanese reference to be made about Omar Sharif... He made the statement above, that his parents origins could NOT be extended to him. This is the version that Sancho had ended with. We do not want to go this whole process again. --Arab Cowboy (talk) 00:19, 12 August 2009 (UTC) Arab cowboy you are a disrespectful person first saying that I was nonsense, then saying Im a tribal Middle Easterner and now calling me a cow? Do you know how to have a discussion in a civil manor. I am sure the administrator will judge fairly so please do not sit here and make problems. Youssef Chahine does have Lebanese origins, this is verifiable, his father was Lebanese, his real name is Gibran Sawaya. His father was an immigrant to Egypt. And Omar Sharif real name Michael Demitri is also Lebanese by origin. His parents were Lebanese immigrants to Egypt. The only thing Egyptian about Youssef and Omar is the fact they were born in another country that is not their country of origin. His parent's origins are his origins as well. So we do not need to say his father was Lebanese but instead Youssef Chahine is of Lebanese origin. Or instead of saying Omar Sharif's father is Lebanese that Omar Sharif is of Lebanese origin. This is the truth. No Lebanese reference to be made about Omar Sharif LOL...Michael Shalhoub is clearly a Lebanese name. And Sancho did say that you should make a reference to his origins as being Lebanese. I can also point that out. Lebanese bebe (talk) 14:46, 13 August 2009 (UTC) Harrassed bebe, please provide evidence with quotations from me where I said that you were nonsense and a tribal Middle Easterner. You distort my words as you distort everything about the articles you wish to discuss. The proof is up here on this page. You falsely claim that I called you a cow when there was no mention of you at all in the whole paragraph. You seem to enjoy being insulted that you are doing it to yourself! Please do not waste my time. --Arab Cowboy (talk) 06:41, 14 August 2009 (UTC) direct I love Lebanese and I love Egyptians. In fact, I love everyone :) Incidentally, I've always thought that Omar Sharif's parents (not him, he's an Egyptian) were either Lebanese or Syrian but that has been my personal belief which has no basis since I had no sources (just hearsay). Now, what's the deal, guys? My advice (well, all admins would tell you the same story) is to look for reliable sources to back up your claims. I am directing this specifically to Lebanese bebe because the burden of proof lies with the editor who adds or restores material. You need to bring a solid reliable source. Otherwise, you better drop it. To help you both, guys. http://omarsharif.netfirms.com/articles.htm is not a reliable source at all. According to Wikipedia:RS we only publish the opinions of reliable authors. Now, Lebanese bebe, could you please start basing your edits on real reliable sources and avoid using websites hosted for free (netfirms.com!!!) as reliable sources? You could easily back up your edits with stuff like the ones I've just found... Come on guys, don't be lazy! <ref>{{cite book |last=Cooper-Chen |first=Anne |title=Global entertainment media: content, audiences, issues |series=LEA's communication series |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=gb8Bkmq5254C&pg=PA93&dq=Michel+Dimitri+Shalhoub&ei=ZFKESsHFPKXCywTI9sXaDQ#v=onepage&q=Michel%20Dimitri%20Shalhoub&f=false |year=2005 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=0-8058-5169-0 |pages=93 |quote=Hamama starred with an unknown Syrian-Lebanese Christian, Michel Dimitri Shalhoub }}</ref> <ref>{{cite book |last=Darwish |first=Mustafa |title= Dream makers on the Nile: a portrait of Egyptian cinema |year=1998 |publisher=American University in Cairo Press |isbn=9-7742-4429-X |URL=http://books.google.com/books?id=GwBlAAAAMAAJ&q=Michel+Dimitri+Shalhoub&dq=Michel+Dimitri+Shalhoub&ei=ZFKESsHFPKXCywTI9sXaDQ |pages=31 |quote=Omar al-Sharif (1931- ) Omar al-Sharif was born Michel Dimitri Shalhoub, to an Alexandrian family of Lebanese descent. }}</ref> Now, you can just copy and paste the above reliable sources and put the issue to rest. Can I unprotect the article now that you can see clearly what reliable sources say? Ok guys, matter resolved? -- FayssalF - Wiki me up® 18:06, 13 August 2009 (UTC) Thank you, Fayssal... all that you say makes sense. I have the most reliable source, Omar Sharif's own autobiography, The Eternal Male. I have a hard copy of it. The issue here is that I have been through this whole process on Omar Sharif's Discussion page before. Each and every word related to his origins was subjected to very close scrutiny by Admin Sancho. Sancho's decision was what I stated above, that there's no reliable evidence that Omar Sharif was anything but Egyptian. Sancho's concluding statement was: "Even the leap from "Sharif's parents were Lebanese", to "Sharif is of Lebanese descent" is going too far in an article about a living person." It is still on the article Discussion page. Obviously Lebanese bebe is new at this; she's making hilarious claims, including the claim that she lives in the USA, because if she really did, she would know that "till the cows go home" is an American expression that means that the matter was discussed to its conclusion. It had nothing to with her being a cow or otherwise, and she obviously insults herself and attributes the insults to others. --Arab Cowboy (talk) 22:47, 13 August 2009 (UTC) Fayssal, please see this interview with Omar Sharif: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gYD0LTKaFc4&feature=related. At Time 11:30, he says, "I've never changed my passport. My passport was always Egyptian." Period! --Arab Cowboy (talk) 17:07, 14 August 2009 (UTC) Arab Cowboy, "I've never changed my passport. My passport was always Egyptian" is something which relates to him as an individual. That has nothing to do with his ancestral origins which is the subject of your editorial dispute. -- FayssalF - Wiki me up® 14:09, 19 August 2009 (UTC) Fayssal, the article is about Omar Sharif as an individual, not his ancestors. This was the conclusion of the previous mediation by another admin on the same article. In addition, we have already stated that he belongs to a Lebanese-Egyptian family, so, what is the subject of the dispute now? --Arab Cowboy (talk) 11:11, 23 August 2009 (UTC) Omar Sharif was born Michael Shalhoub in Alexandria, Egypt to Lebanese-Egyptian Catholic parents.[2][3] I hadn't seen that sentence! -- FayssalF - Wiki me up® 14:19, 23 August 2009 (UTC) Mythdon proposal at ANI This message is being sent to inform the Arbitration Committee of a sanction proposal forbidding me from editing Arbitration Committee pages and talk pages. Discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Mythdon and Arbitration Mythdon (talk • contribs) 05:41, 19 August 2009 (UTC) Reply on my talk page I have responded to your "explicit final warning". Upon reading this notification, please revert this notification. Mythdon (talk • contribs) 19:50, 19 August 2009 (UTC) AfD nomination of Rachid Sbihi An editor has nominated the article Rachid Sbihi, which you created, for deletion. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rachid Sbihi. Regards, Qwfp (talk) 15:04, 1 September 2009 (UTC) Second Lebanon War You reverted my edits to the Second Lebanon War. Apparently, you thought that they weren't "neutral." I should have you know that my edits were thoroughly researched, cross-referenced, sourced and on some occasions, double sourced. I'm puzzled as to what you find biased in my edits. I added 6 paragraphs (2 in the "Background" section and four in the "Post War events" section), each dealing with a factual event that ocurred. Please review each paragraph and tell me what you find objectionable and why you found the sources to be unreliable. In addition, since everything I edited was sourced, the reader can take the information at face value and disregard or accept the information based upon the reader's assessment of the source. However, by deleting my edits, you have substituted the reader's judgnment with your own and have acted as an abusive censor and I believe that you have abused your position as site administrator. I fully intend on re-posting the reverted edits and adding more edits to this and other articles dealing with the Arab/Israeli conflict to restore some balance and unbiased reporting. --Jiujitsuguy (talk) 15:55, 1 September 2009 (UTC)jiujitsuguy--Jiujitsuguy (talk) 15:55, 1 September 2009 (UTC) Hi there Faysself. I see that you were quick to revert my edits but not so quick to explain why you thought the sourced material violated neutrality. I would like an explanation please. --Jiujitsuguy (talk) 00:09, 2 September 2009 (UTC)jiujitsuguy--Jiujitsuguy (talk) 00:09, 2 September 2009 (UTC) Hi Jiujitsuguy. Nobody can be connected onwiki for 24h :) Well, the following are your edits... In late June of 2005 an IDF paratroop unit operating near Shaba Farms detected and engaged a three-man Hezbollah squad that had infiltrated the area. In the day long chase that followed, the IDF force succeeded in killing the squad’s commander while his two comrades fled back across the border. A videotape captured by the paratroopers contained evidence that left little doubt of Hezbollah’s intention to abduct soldiers. <ref>Amos Harel, “Chronicle of Disaster,” 07/18/08, www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1003170.html</ref> reason: This sounds as like press release made by an army. succeeded, evidence, little doubt, intention are all terms used by a biased source. The use of such heavy words makes your tone so biased unless the newspaper is using the same words and in such a case it would be deemed a biased source. The following 12 months witnessed three more attempts by Hezbollah to abduct soldiers. All of these were thwarted by the IDF. The most audacious attempt occurred on November 21, 2005 when dozens of heavily armed Hezbollah special forces, under cover of mortar and rocket fire, crossed the border on foot, motorcycles and ATVs and stormed an Israeli outpost at Kafr Rajar. The outpost however was empty and the Hezbollah force fell victim to an Israeli ambush. A lone Israeli marksman, Cpl. David Markowitz succeeded in killing four guerillas. The remaining force retreated back to their positions in Lebanon, leaving much of their equipment behind. <ref>Dudkevitch, Paratrooper Sniper Becomes Hero, Jerusalem Post Online Edition, 11/22/05.</ref> reason: Sounds too heroic for an encyclopedia tone. Look at the source again. Imagine a Hizbollah's partisan media talking about this same event if it ever took place. On February 12, 2008 a car bomb in Damascus killed Imad Mugniyah, the head of Hezbollah’s military wing. As its chief military strategist, Mugniyah’s assassination dealt the organization a severe blow. <ref>Zisser, Nasrallah’s Defeat in the 2006 War, 01/23/09, http://netwmd.com/blog/2009/01/3167</ref> According to Israeli intelligence sources, someone had replaced the headrest of the driver’s seat with another containing a small high explosive charge. <ref>http://yalibnan.com/site/archives/2008/02/israel_killed_h.php </ref> Israel considered Mugniyah a “significant force behind actions against Israel” and connected him to the kidnapping of the two reservist soldiers. <ref>Greenberg, Militay Intelligence: Hizbullah lost its number one figure, ynetnews.com, 2/13/08</ref> reason: Note the blog in the website address. Blogs are not used as reliable sources. We are also talking about the 2006 Lebanon War so the this whole edits about Imad Mughniya which happened on 2008 is considered undue weight. See WP:UNDUE. On July 14, 2009 an underground Hezbollah ammunition depot set off a massive series of explosions in the South Lebanese village of Khirbat Silim, just ten miles north of the Israeli-Lebanese border. Hezbollah, embarrassed by the incident and its apparent violation of UN Security Counsel Resolution 1701, blamed the explosion on, “leftover shells that had been collected during and after Israel’s withdrawal from Lebanon,” in 2000.<ref>Associated Press, Hezbollah: Lebanon blast set off by old shells, 7/22/09</ref> However, United Nations Under-Secretary-General for Peacekeeping Operations, Alain LeRoy, placed the blame squarely on Hezbollah and blamed the organization for heightened tensions in Southern Lebanon.<ref>Benhorin, UN official: Arms Cache that exploded in Lebanon was Hezbollah’s, ynetnews.com, 7/23/09</ref> reason: Embarassed, apparent? That aside, is this article about the 2006 events or 2009? Please do review WP:NPOV and WP:UNDUE. On July 15, 2009 an Iranian Tupolev commercial airliner crashed in northwest Iran. The Italian newspaper, Corriere della Sera, reported that the crash-which left 168 people dead-was caused by the explosion of sophisticated fuses slated to be delivered to Hezbollah. The aircraft was carrying a large number of modern fuses composed of two kilograms of explosives and electrical instrumentation. Members of the Iranian Revolutionary Guards, who accompanied the contraband, were also killed in the crash. <ref>Magal, Iran Plane was carrying arms for Hezbollah, ynetnews.com (citing Corriere della Sera), 08/02/09.</ref> On August 23, 2009 villagers of the South Lebanese village of Marwakhin forcefully repelled efforts by Hezbollah gunmen to store weapons in their village. The incident was filmed by the IDF’s field intelligence Corps. <ref>http://www.youtube.com/user/idfdesk?blend=4&ob=4</ref> <ref>Lebanese villagers recorded driving away Hezbollah men, Ynetnews.com, 8/25/09</ref> reason: Undue weight again. And Youtube is not a reliable source. -- FayssalF - Wiki me up® 00:58, 2 September 2009 (UTC) Hello Faissalf. Thank you for responding and thanks for the constructive criticisms. Perhaps we can come to agreement and consensus on my recent edits. I think you were a bit trigger happy on the revert button. That said, I am willing to play ball and make some changes in the spirit of conciliation and journalistic integrity. Re paragraph 1: You claim that the edit reads like an army press release. I served four years in the JAG so that’s just my writing style but I am willing to remove the offending words that gave rise to the reversion. Re paragraph 2: You claim that the edit sounds “too heroic” and suggested that the source itself was biased. The source was Haaretz, a well respected, left of center Israeli daily, equivalent in style and substance to the New York Times. As far as the incident itself is concerned, it truly was a remarkable feat considering that a lone, relatively inexperienced soldier killed four heavily armed operatives and foiled their plans. By your logic, the Wiki article dealing with the Entebbe rescue mission, where IDF soldiers flew into the heart of Africa to rescue hostages should be reverted because the episode “sounds too heroic.” Nevertheless, in the interest of consensus, I will make changes so that it will sound “less heroic.” Re Paragraph 3: You cite two objections. First you claim “undue weight” and you expressed similar objections to the remaining three paragraphs. Second, you claimed that blogs are not reliable. I will first address the former objection as it pertains to the remaining three paragraphs. There is a specific section in the Wiki article that deals with “Post Ceasefire Events.” The last entry prior to mine relates to an event that occurred June 30, 2007 nearly a full year after the cessation of hostilities. Moreover, the following paragraph relates to an event that occurred on July 16, 2008 two year after the war. Yet you did not delete these entries, presumably because they were issues that were very germane to the war. It is therefore entirely appropriate for me to include paragraphs 3 trough 6 as edits in the “post ceasefire events” section. As I pointed out, Israel connected Mugniyah to the abduction which sparked the war. Deletion of my edit as “undue weight” without doing the same in connection with the aforementioned edits is hypocritical. You also objected to citing the blog as a source. The article that I cited from was written by Prof Eyal Zisser, head of the Department of Middle Eastern and African History and a senior research fellow at the Moshe Dayan Center for Middle Eastern and African Studies at Tel Aviv University. He is the author of several books including Syria: Domestic Political Stress and Globalization (2002), Assad's Legacy: Syria in Transition (2000), and Lebanon: The Challenge of Independence (2000). In short, he’s no light weight and I suggest that you let the Wiki readers determine for themselves the reliability of the source. Moreover, that was 1 of 3 sources that I cited for that particular edit and deletion of the entire edit was harsh. Re Paragraph 4: You objected to the usage of the words “embarrassed” and “apparent.” I will substitute the offending words. Re paragraph 5: You argued “undue weight.” Please refer to my counter argument above. In addition, the issue is germane as it relates to a violation of UN Security Counsel Resolution 1701, the Resolution that brought an end to the war. Re paragraph 6: You objected to YouTube as a source. First, that was not the only source that I relied upon. You were so quick to delete the edit that you failed to take note that Ynet was also cited as a source. Second, the incident was videotaped and uploaded to YouTube. I just wanted to give Wiki readers the opportunity to view the video and judge for themselves. Thank you for your time and consideration and I eagerly await your response. --Jiujitsuguy (talk) 17:22, 2 September 2009 (UTC)jiujitsuguy--Jiujitsuguy (talk) 17:22, 2 September 2009 (UTC) Hello Faysself. I made revisions to my edits that incorporated some of your helpful suggestions. As a matter of professional courtesy, please do not revert these edits prior to consulting me. If they are not to your liking we can revise them further until we reach consensus. Thanks, jiujitsuguy--Jiujitsuguy (talk) 20:05, 3 September 2009 (UTC) Conduct probationary period Did you do this to clarify my question here? Mythdon (talk • contribs) 04:54, 7 September 2009 (UTC) I am afraid that doesn't matter. You've been answered tons of questions and nothing stopped you from excessively wasting the time of the time and patience of the Community and ArbCom. I doubt any further response or clarification is required now. -- FayssalF - Wiki me up® 05:08, 7 September 2009 (UTC) Okay. I assume that's why you're supporting my 6 month site ban, with a 6 month probation. Mythdon (talk • contribs) 05:09, 7 September 2009 (UTC) Also, I have asked more questions regarding the motion at the amendment request. Mythdon (talk • contribs) 19:46, 7 September 2009 (UTC) There's nothing left ambiguous. They have been answered in depth unless you believe there are tons of types of conduct probations (there's only one type). Next time, in case you plan to come back, you need to contribute more and ask little (most of your contributions now are excessive and boring questions which is ironic since you have declared lately at your talk page that you do not need any one to advice or help you at all). -- FayssalF - Wiki me up® 20:09, 7 September 2009 (UTC) "Advice or help you at all" refers to behavior rather than the terms of the sanctions I am under, and the new sanction I am about to get. "Most of your contributions now are excessive and boring questions. " - What I've been doing lately is vandalism fighting, etc. Also, does this ban have anything to do with my requests to the Arbitration Committee, what is being looked at as poor behavior, or is it both? Right now, I'm wondering if I should come back in March, or come back later. I'm also debating with myself whether or not to make any more requests for clarifications. Mythdon (talk • contribs) 20:14, 7 September 2009 (UTC) I have asked more questions at the amendment page. Please answer them, and ones I asked earlier. Mythdon (talk • contribs) 05:47, 8 September 2009 (UTC) Stop it ;) -- FayssalF - Wiki me up® 18:31, 8 September 2009 (UTC) Fine. Mythdon (talk • contribs) 19:01, 8 September 2009 (UTC) Nominations open for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 12 September! Many thanks,  Roger Davies talk 04:24, 7 September 2009 (UTC) A message to the Arbitration Committee This message is being sent to all non-recused arbitrators. I have sent a message to the Arbitration Committee at the amendment page, that mentions what I feel that I need to say to ArbCom before the ban takes effect. The message is here. Thank you. Mythdon (talk • contribs) 22:11, 8 September 2009 (UTC) The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLII (August 2009) The August 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:48, 13 September 2009 (UTC) Academia Mexicana de Derechos Humanos you created the article and i want to help with the article but cant find any info on it have any clues on where i can find info on this thanksOo7565 (talk) 17:40, 14 September 2009 (UTC) Not much except links found by Google. -- FayssalF - Wiki me up® 19:30, 14 September 2009 (UTC) hey thanks for the helpOo7565 (talk) 17:58, 15 September 2009 (UTC) Military history coordinator elections: voting has started! Voting in the Military history WikiProject coordinator election has now started. The aim is to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of sixteen candidates. Please vote here by 23:59 (UTC) on 26 September! For the coordinators,  Roger Davies talk 22:09, 16 September 2009 (UTC) Morocco 16:24, 7 March 2007 FayssalF protected Morocco ‎ (IP vandalism [edit=autoconfirmed:move=autoconfirmed] (expires 16:24, March 14, 2007 (UTC))) 23:38, 14 July 2007 FayssalF protected Morocco ‎ (Vandalism by User:Mariam83 socks [edit=autoconfirmed:move=autoconfirmed] (expires 23:38, 28 July 2007 (UTC))) 09:49, 3 September 2007 FayssalF protected Morocco ‎ (Too much disruption by IPs [edit=autoconfirmed:move=autoconfirmed]) That was over two years ago. I'd like to review this to see if semiprotection is still considered necessary. Please see talk:Morocco. --TS 20:48, 23 September 2009 (UTC) Hello, I saw that you already had a little dispute with Bokpasa about the History of Morocco. This user is acting again by editing the article [1]. Can you please do something? I reported him to the admins, but I don't think that will have any effect. (I asked on the discussion page of the article to protect it, but I got no answer) Thanks in advance Omar-Toons (talk) 20:10, 24 April 2010 (UTC) Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_Dictators You commented in the last Article for deletion discussion. This article is up for deletion again. You are welcome to comment about the discussion for deletion. Ikip (talk) 09:20, 25 September 2009 (UTC) Thanks. -- FayssalF - Wiki me up® 22:35, 26 September 2009 (UTC) MILHIST admins Hi. Since you're an admin and a member of the Military History WikiProject, feel free to list yourself here. Cheers, –Juliancolton | Talk 17:03, 26 September 2009 (UTC) Thanks. -- FayssalF - Wiki me up® 22:35, 26 September 2009 (UTC) No longer in use Sorry for posting in pieces. [2] Jehochman Talk 16:35, 1 October 2009 (UTC) Suggested text of motion on administrator professionalism The following standards of professionalism are what ArbCom expects of administrators: {enumerate list of ideas}. The parties to this case are asked to confirm that they will abide by these standards. Any administrator who acts, or intends to act, against these principals may have sysop access removed by the Arbitration Committee. List what is expected and ask all of us, myself included, to confirm agreement. Make sure to include an anti-nepotism provision. Jehochman Talk 03:07, 2 October 2009 (UTC) Thanks. I'll have a look at this tomorrow. -- FayssalF - Wiki me up® 03:44, 2 October 2009 (UTC) Regarding the current RfARb Case on Sockpuppets.. Was this [3] the kind of thing you were looking for, with regards to a motion and/or updating the ADMIN policy? SirFozzie (talk) 05:58, 2 October 2009 (UTC) Proposed deletion of Blood and Religion The article Blood and Religion has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: Nothing notable about this book While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. brewcrewer (yada, yada) 18:05, 2 October 2009 (UTC) The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIII (September 2009) The September 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:50, 2 October 2009 (UTC) Confused Hi, I was pleased that you asked for motions to be entertained in the present RFAR. However, while there seems to be excellent discussion, as a result, it appears that discussion is not being used to inform the process. I note that you have not yet placed a vote on the most contentious items, so I believe you are proceeding in a way that respects our efforts. I know you can't speak to your colleagues' actions, but do you know whether they have read the motions, or the concerns expressed relating to them? It appears that they are proceeding with their votes in ignorance of our discussion, and that concerns me. Very interested in your thoughts. Or if you see fit to encourage your colleagues to read up on the community motions and their discussions, I'd very much appreciate that too. -Pete (talk) 02:12, 6 October 2009 (UTC) Hi Pete, Thanks. I am personally still open to entertain discussions and has asked for that. I am still open to review my votes. However, I believe that motions 5.1 and 6 addresses well "Pete Forsyth's edits to Sir Fozzie's motion". I made sure to discuss the community proposals with ArbCom focusing mainly on the guidance aspect of motion(s). Some arbitrators have had concerns about writing policy and I tried my best to argue that they are guidances as the community needs to be encouraged to adopt guidelines or tweak policies in that direction. The thing that all ArbCom members seem to be agreeing with is that what happened is 'bad'. What do you think? -- FayssalF - Wiki me up® 02:37, 6 October 2009 (UTC) I think ArbCom is condoning corruption. By only issuing warnings, you invite people to test limits, because the worst that happens is that they get a warning. If they only get caught 10% of the time, they can get away with a lot before they get a warning. When you are dealing with surreptitious misbehavior, you need to apply stronger deterrence than if you are dealing with overt bad behavior that everyone can see and monitor. Jehochman Talk 03:20, 6 October 2009 (UTC) I don't believe that is accurate. As I've said a couple of times, I can't sanction someone without a precedent unless it is a very serious violation. It is a serious violation for me but it is not something clear to many people in the community. I am bound by the "don't write policy mr arbitrator". What I am doing is to guide the community to fix that hole in the policy. Bear in mind that if any sanction called for would also apply to you if found guilty after verifying the FT2 allegations "Observation out of disgust by uninvolved FT2". Would it be fair to treat the same thing differently? So, instead of sanctioning a dozen of people I prefer fixing holes. And, no I am not condoning any bad actions and I am sure that any new occurrence by anyone would result in a natural desysop. -- FayssalF - Wiki me up® 04:03, 6 October 2009 (UTC) FT2's allegations are pure vindictive nonsense against Bishonen, who he perceives to be his arch enemy. He discredits himself by posting such comments. What a shame. I understand your point about precident. It's a shame the community can't agree how to deal with bad admins. Well, you are doing these people no service by letting them off. They will be held in low regard by many people within the community. The troublemakers and facilitators are quick to post at RFAR, but there are many, many silent editors watching who favor the position I advocate. Thank you for listening to my rants. Good evening, Jehochman Talk 04:30, 6 October 2009 (UTC) Vindictive or not; they are serious. What I am trying to do here is to push the community to develop an explicit policy or guideline. Now, you got a basis; ArbCom does not support the friendship concept within Wikipedia. Please go work for it. This has been my stance since the comment I made at the request. -- FayssalF - Wiki me up® 04:43, 6 October 2009 (UTC) Okay, judicial restraint is an approach. Hopefully you can wrap this case up quickly and take advantage of the momentum for improvement. Jehochman Talk 04:58, 6 October 2009 (UTC) It may be a judicial restraint although I am not sure it is but you must be aware of the obiter dictum which concerns your own actions. And yes, the whole community must take advantage of the momentum improvement. The RfA, and adminship in general, is broken and needs a real and serious debate. We have arrived to a very critical crossroad; you whether fix adminship yourselves or give ArbCom more powers to fix it. -- FayssalF - Wiki me up® 05:26, 6 October 2009 (UTC) Law Hi, just a small note of correction concerning your recent comment about Law on the Motions page, where you said Law (talk · contribs) had been blocked for nine months, but socked after six months.[4] According to what I can see, he socked after about 2.5 months, not six. He was blocked on June 16,[5] but then began editing on a new account on September 4.[6] so that was 2.5 months into his 9 month block. Or did I make an error of my own? --Elonka 02:23, 6 October 2009 (UTC) Thanks Elonka. You are totally correct. I'll vote accordingly. -- FayssalF - Wiki me up® 02:25, 6 October 2009 (UTC) To elaborate There is a portion of the community that is so put off by ArbCom's attempts to "shove" that official motions which profess to advise upon guidelines and policy provoke the opposite reaction. Silent boycott results where encouragement is intended. Most of the people who have contacted me on that point today have simultaneously cheered the point raised and expressed fears of retaliation if they posted openly. This probably won't boost your morale as an arbitrator, but recall the "editors encouraged" finding of the Scientology arbitration. Review the relevant article histories and ask yourself whether any portion of the community was actually encouraged by that finding. Long after resignation from formal mentorship I still get petitions from multiple people because no other uninvolved edtitor has remotely come close to filling the gap. "Encouragement" findings do not actually encourage the community. At best those motions are ineffectual; experienced editors interpret them as the Committee's collective plea for backup in situations so hairy that no arbitrator is willing to assume actual risk. Experience has shown that the Committee does not support the community members who respond to such pleas; if they make the slightest error (real or perceived) they get hung out to dry. Durova321 03:05, 7 October 2009 (UTC) Yes, encouragements to the community, along the lines of "Behave better and improve the Scientology articles", are often not effective, and those who try to solve hard problems are often punished, or threatened with punishment, for any perceived flaw in their work. I've experienced this myself quite recently. On the other hand, Durova, how do you feel about Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration/Requests/Motions#Administrators_reminded_and_encouraged? My understanding is that the reminder to administrators is just pointing to Wikipedia:Administrators and saying in effect, "We are going to enforce this policy more strictly. Please pay careful attention." I think that sort of motion can be useful. Jehochman Talk 12:37, 7 October 2009 (UTC) Thanks for your thoughts guys. Let's see... the problem with Wikipedia dispute resolution process is not its application; it is that -as a community- we don't have a system set on stones. As an arbitrator with an experience as an editor and administrator, I try my best to craft resolutions taking into consideration multiple factors; never one factor. It is very easy for arbitrators to go beyond encouraging and focus on sanctions. But experience has shown that that is not the magical formula. In my co-presentation at the Buenos Aires' Wikimania, I explained to the audience the difference between earlier disputes and 2008/2009 ones is that most of the disputes now are disputes involving groups of people against other groups. Sanctions fit for disputes where individual behavior is in question. When you have a group wiki-fighting against another you'd never arrive to a consensus in terms of a dispute resolution approach. When I encourage a group today to do something I make sure I send a message that next time I'll sanction. Managing group disputes is not like managing individual disputes and you know that. I wish the community comes up with a very optimal approach. To arrive to that approach we need to discourage the groups' culture and to do that I am supporting the friendship concept vs Wikipedia motion. We need to see each other as equal contributors with no cabals, no secret mailing lists, no conspiracies, etc... This is not a social club. -- FayssalF - Wiki me up® 17:59, 7 October 2009 (UTC) In fairness As discussed here, do you think it would be helpful to include a general admonishment of any unnamed parties who knowingly supported a sock puppet at RfA? There have been some questions of fairness like why are we picking on these administrators when there are others? It is possible to place a remedy against unnamed parties. Should they be disclosed later, then the remedy is there to help them. Jehochman Talk 13:01, 8 October 2009 (UTC) an opinion, please. There is a dispute happening at Battle of Cieneguilla about the use of the lead image. Do you mind going there, taking a look and offering an opinion? Start at the article, you can't miss the image, then head for the discussion page. Thanks, Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 21:34, 8 October 2009 (UTC) Motion votes I note that your support of Jennavecia's desysop references my voting rationale. Please note that while I have not changed my vote, I have altered my voting statement. Please review the changes I have made, in case it alters your opinion about the matter. Cheers! Vassyana (talk) 03:21, 9 October 2009 (UTC) Walking the walk Per this and [7] this, do you intend to register in the WikiCup? If so, I will do another Moroccan featured picture drive as soon as your next good article gets promoted. Durova322 21:08, 9 October 2009 (UTC) Asmahan arbitration Dont know if you saw it, but Arab Cowboy posted his evidence, so no need for further delay.--Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 08:07, 10 October 2009 (UTC) Articles for deletion nomination of BOINC Account Manager I have nominated BOINC Account Manager, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BOINC Account Manager. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Joe Chill (talk) 22:21, 27 October 2009 (UTC) Aissawa Hello, I had just noticed that you worked on some earlier versions of Aissawa. I had made note of some article issues at Talk:Aissawa and in the process I may or may not have spotted a copyvio. I asked at WP:ISLAM's talk page, as well. Just wondering if you'd care to throw in your $0.02. Thanks, and take care, -- Gyrofrog (talk) 22:27, 31 October 2009 (UTC) for your knowledge [8] Regards Mr Unsigned Anon (talk) 01:15, 4 November 2009 (UTC) Vanguard rocket Hi, I notice you tagged the Vanguard (rocket) article for Military History, back in 2007. I wonder if you knew that the Vanguard was explicitly developed as a non-military, civilian satellite launcher? There actually was an oblique connection, in that in 1955 (when the project started), the US was developing a spy satellite system based on the ballistic missile, and was concerned that overflying Russian territory with a military rocket might create problems. So it was thought best to develop a separate scientific satellite launcher to establish the overflight precedent, rather than use a military launch vehicle. This may have been the deciding factor in the choice of the NRL Vanguard over the Army Jupiter as the IGY satellite launch vehicle. Of course this was all made moot when the USSR launched Sputnik 1 on an R-7 rocket, their ICBM, which was about 30 times larger than Vanguard. Anyhow, I thought you might want to reconsider the tag. I will not remove it myself. Cheers, Wwheaton (talk) 18:04, 4 November 2009 (UTC) Test your World War I knowledge with the Henry Allingham International Contest! As a member of the Military history WikiProject or World War I task force, you may be interested in competing in the Henry Allingham International Contest! The contest aims to improve article quality and member participation within the World War I task force. It will also be a step in preparing for Operation Great War Centennial, the project's commemorative effort for the World War I centenary. If you would like to participate, please sign up by 11 November 2009, 00:00, when the first round is scheduled to begin! You can sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here! This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 18:47, 8 November 2009 (UTC) The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIV (October 2009) The October 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 18:47, 8 November 2009 (UTC) Happy Thanksgiving! Happy Thanksgiving! Happy Thanksgiving! I just wanted to wish those Wikipedians who have been nice enough to give me a barnstar or smile at me, supportive enough to agree with me, etc., a Happy Thanksgiving! Sincerely, --A NobodyMy talk 07:07, 27 November 2009 (UTC) Thanks. Enjoy it :) -- FayssalF - Wiki me up® 01:38, 16 December 2009 (UTC) Seanmercy He has requested unblock, states that he has edited from a school IP and that may be the reason for it. Who is he supposed to be a sock of, and what's the evidence? Daniel Case (talk) 18:48, 15 December 2009 (UTC) Thanks, Daniel. Here is the case. -- FayssalF - Wiki me up® 01:37, 16 December 2009 (UTC) The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XIV (November 2009) The November 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 08:57, 21 December 2009 (UTC) Clarification request Greetings, Fayssal, from a recent convict. I'd like to ask for a bit of clarification (at least informal) on the "articles about Eastern Europe" wording. The way it's phrased seems pretty ironclad, but in this discussion you seem to leave open room for a little leeway, speaking of the "spirit of the restriction". The reason I'm asking for more of an explanation is that I both wish to abide by the decision, and wish to avoid being taken before WP:AE by individuals who may be watching my edits. My last edit before the case closed was this. Would that now be unacceptable? What about this recent edit? Moldova has 32 districts, each divided into communes. I have created very short stubs (like this one) about communes in 27 of them, but I still have 5 districts to go. Would it be acceptable to continue? I'm not looking to game the system. I realise my actions have displeased the Committee, and not without reason. But I would like a better sense of where things stand. - Biruitorul Talk 04:41, 23 December 2009 (UTC) Again I ask: what about, at the very least, reverting simple vandalism? For instance this guy with four contributions just vandalized four articles. Vandalism has only been reverted on one of them, but I, with 60,510 edits (who even wrote one of the articles in question), apparently can do nothing about it. Please clarify. - Biruitorul Talk 16:27, 28 December 2009 (UTC) Season's greetings Thank you for being one of the people who has made 2009 such an interesting and enlightening year for me. It has certainly had its challenges, but also many highlights. I wish you peace and contentment in 2010, and a joyous holiday season to you and yours. In honour of the season, I hope you will enjoy a little musical token. Your choice: traditional or cheeky. Best, Risker (talk) 00:46, 25 December 2009 (UTC) Happy New Year Best Wishes for 2010, FloNight♥♥♥♥ 12:21, 1 January 2010 (UTC) The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVI (December 2009) The December 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:11, 3 January 2010 (UTC) Thanks I never thanked for your condolence note last year, but I appreciate it more than I can possibly express. All the best, in friendship. Guettarda (talk) 16:22, 10 January 2010 (UTC) Unreferenced BLPs Hello FayssalF! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 7 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 939 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list: Hakim Noury - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL Mbarek Bekkaï - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL Ahmed Balafrej - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL Ahmed Laraki - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL Azzeddine Laraki - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL Joan Gaspart - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL Michel Abitbol - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 06:33, 15 January 2010 (UTC) Ja/Jou I draw your attention to serial editing of pages still, as far as I know under your mediation. Several violations NPOV and violations of BLP issues presenting see edits by anon Ip 64.128.245.110 from Florida, USA see [[9]]Links to several mainstream secondary sources also removed on BJ presents page Catapla (talk) 03:53, 30 January 2010 (UTC) Discussion on Admin Noticebaoard Hi You are mentioned in the discussion see [10] report re possible topic ban violation etc Catapla (talk) 12:45, 1 February 2010 (UTC) Oh. My. Gosh. I just want to say that if ever I have had cause to want to emulate another admin, that would now after viewing User:FayssalF/JK! You are one amazing contributor, FayssalF. If we could all be like you! - Tbsdy (formerly Ta bu shi da yu) talk 06:44, 2 February 2010 (UTC) We learn from you, Ta bu! -- FayssalF - Wiki me up® 02:01, 8 March 2010 (UTC) The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVII (January 2010) The January 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:32, 5 February 2010 (UTC) Copyright issues with pictures you uploaded Hi FayssalF. I have noticed there are copyright issues with many pictures you uploaded here and on Commons. First I stumbled on File:Elmandjra.jpg : who is the author? What made you assert this photo has been put in public domain by its author? Can you point me to the text that say so please? Then I noticed you also uploaded some pictures of you which you claim to be the author ("I, the copyright holder..."). This is obviously not the case. Can you please mention the actual author and send his/her permission to the OTRS team? Among those pictures are: File:Faybens.jpg, File:Braveheart fay.JPG, File:Bus manchester airport.JPG, File:Bus edinburgh.JPG (please check the other pictures of yourself if any) Finally, there are a number of images you imported on Commons (and maybe here) from http://www.sajed.ir/, a site whose editor states that its content is under GFDL. The problem here is that there is little chance that this editor is the author of the pictures he is using (like File:Taleghani-big.jpg or File:Mersad.jpg) and therefore, being not the copyright holder, (s)he has no right to release them under a GFDL license. Can you please check the pictures you uploaded from sajed.ir and delete them? Thanks. I know this work can be tedious but as an admin, I guess you know that abiding with copyrights is a primary issue. Thank you for fixing this quickly, else I will have to ask for the deletion of those pictures. — Xavier, 19:20, 21 February 2010 (UTC) Hi Xavier: File:Elmandjra.jpg: I got an e-mail from the subject of the picture. I have no problem providing it. These are all my own pictures. In other words, that is me. How can I prove that? I am wondering how sure you are when you say "This is obviously not the case". The Iranian files were uploaded when the copyright policy and debates were still at their start. You can just delete them. Note that most of the above were uploaded almost four years ago. If I had uploaded them yesterday I could be accused of not abiding by the rules! -- FayssalF - Wiki me up® 23:18, 9 March 2010 (UTC) Nominations for the March 2010 Military history Project Coordinator elections now open! The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 8 March 2010! More information on coordinatorship may be found on the coordinator academy course and in the responsibilities section on the coordinator page. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:30, 1 March 2010 (UTC) The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVIII (February 2010) The February 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:23, 4 March 2010 (UTC) CfD nomination of Category:Joujouka I have nominated Category:Joujouka (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for merging into Category:Jajouka (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:55, 9 March 2010 (UTC) Block of User:Mythdon Mythdon (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Mythdon is not banned. He was banned for six months on 00:44, 9 September 2009 (UTC), as linked in your edit summary. It has been six months time since that. He is unbanned.— Dædαlus Contribs 06:11, 15 March 2010 (UTC) Mythdon is now indefinitely blocked per Arbitration Enforcement. I am refactoring my edit summary block for the sake of wp:BURO. -- FayssalF - Wiki me up® 06:14, 15 March 2010 (UTC) But that original ban was passed by a motion. Shouldn't this one too?— Dædαlus Contribs 06:31, 15 March 2010 (UTC) This is not a motion; this is an indefinite block related to Arbitration Enforcement. Motions are suitable for complex issues. Cases involving accounts who have shown no sign of an improvement after a an ArbCom case (admonishment) and a 6 month ban need no motion when blocking indefinitely. It's deserved and please, let's not waste time here. If you want to appeal, please do so. -- FayssalF - Wiki me up® 06:36, 15 March 2010 (UTC) Your tone appears rather uncivil when I have being civil with you. Please be so with me. You do not need to stress words in your posts as if you are talking down to me. I do not know completely how Arbcom operates, but 12 hours to indef seems a bit of a stretch for something of enforcement. Further, this case was about his interaction with Ryulong. Did he breach his parole by mentioning Ryulong?— Dædαlus Contribs 06:43, 15 March 2010 (UTC) I am sorry for the tone although I really see no incivility anywhere. It could be firm but not uncivil. I find myself obliged to ask you a simple question: have you ever read these 49 questions? -- FayssalF - Wiki me up® 06:51, 15 March 2010 (UTC) On the subject of appealing, how do I do so?— Dædαlus Contribs 06:43, 15 March 2010 (UTC) Wikipedia:Appealing_a_block. I hope my shot answer is not deemed uncivil. -- FayssalF - Wiki me up® 06:51, 15 March 2010 (UTC) It isn't, thank you for your time.— Dædαlus Contribs 07:42, 15 March 2010 (UTC) Explanation of Mythdon block requested Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding To explain your block of Mythdon in more detail. The thread is Block explanation requested. Thank you. DES (talk) 14:00, 15 March 2010 (UTC) Hello, FayssalF. You have new messages at Mythdon's talk page. Message added 04:43, 17 March 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Powergate92Talk 04:43, 17 March 2010 (UTC) Thanks for the notification, Powergate92. -- FayssalF - Wiki me up® 05:29, 17 March 2010 (UTC) Coordinator elections have opened! Voting for the Military history WikiProject coordinator elections has opened; all users are encouraged to participate in the elections. Voting will conclude 23:59 (UTC) on 28 March 2010. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:48, 18 March 2010 (UTC) mail you have mail. --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 21:34, 24 March 2010 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:Communications in Morocco table Template:Communications in Morocco table has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:37, 6 April 2010 (UTC) The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIX (March 2010) The March 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:44, 7 April 2010 (UTC) Asmahan Hello Faysal, do you remember this post that you left, [11] that we should discuss sources, arguments and let other experienced contributors help. Well I presented the corrections at the talkpage and got a neutral editor to take a look, look at nr 4 in corrections: [12] I presented my suggestion and linked to the source in the book and Nishidani came with a suggestion following the source and added it to the article, now the Newer Tweety account has changed that sentence to "stopped in" against what we talked about, and against what the source say, [13] Nefer Tweety has done this without participating at the talkpage, he just changed what me and Nishhdiani talked about typing "corrections" in the edit summary. This is the same old behavior that Arab Cowboy and NT did repeatedly which led to arbitration, anything that was talked about at the talkpage they just changed against what had been said on the talkpage. And NT is still continuing with this now. Peter Cohen has also made a post at the talkpage asking Nefer Tweety if Peter can be accepted as an honest broker without being called a meatpuppet and NT did not reply [14] the article is on probation, can you please take a look at this? --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 00:43, 12 April 2010 (UTC) Photos from Morocco Hey Fayssal, I understand you are still located in Morocco? I am requiring a couple of photos from Morocco as outlined at User:Russavia/Required_photos#.C2.A0Morocco. Would you be in any position to be able to help with these, or perhaps you can point me towards someone who may be able to assist with getting these? Any help appreciated. Cheers, --Russavia I'm chanting as we speak 12:31, 23 April 2010 (UTC) Hi Russavia. Yes, I am located in Morocco but not in Rabat. I'll ask a friend of mine to get a few pictures or else I'd have to wait until I visit the capital. As for Casablanca, I'll try to visit the Russian consulate and ask them for their permission to take a few pictures. -- FayssalF - Wiki me up® 17:28, 23 April 2010 (UTC) Thanks for that Fayssal - all help is appreciated. With the Casablanca consulate, do you know if it is housed in its own building? Or is it in some sort of office building? I couldn't find anything from the address, and (unusually) they don't have a website. Cheers, --Russavia I'm chanting as we speak 07:31, 25 April 2010 (UTC) Wikipedia:WikiProject Paintball Hello FayssalF, you have received this notice because you have placed your name on the list of members of WikiProject Paintball. We are currently looking to make the wikiproject more active, and in doing so, we need to have a list of active members on the wikiproject. If you wish to stay an active part of wikiproject Paintball, please add your username to Active users. Conversely, if you wish to leave the wikiproject, please remove your name from the list of members at Wikipedia:WikiProject Paintball. Thank you. Gibraltar Case Comments I just wanted to bring to your attention a few things on the Gibraltar case. 1. When I was having problems I said some regrettable things, which I have apologised for, if you still feel a topic ban is appropriate then I'm not going to argue about it. I just make the point that bans and blocks are supposedly preventative not punitive. I made those remarks whilst in a bad place, they haven't been repeated and they're out of character. Now that I am a lot better is it still appropriate? 2. The assertion that the self-governing status of Gibraltar is an "opinion" not a fact. Sorry but I cannot accept that remaining in the case. Gibraltar is self-governing, it is a fact that the Spanish editors could not dispute. Instead they have tried to use a combination of synthesis and original research to try and minimise the status in the article. Their motivation in doing so is based on Spanish nationalism toward Gibraltar, where it is portrayed as a British colony on stolen Spanish soil. Those comments are only serving to buttress Spanish nationalism to skew the POV of the article not to achieve NPOV. I think you're being incredibly naive if you feel those remarks are helpful in steering the dispute, I can see those remarks coming back to haunt you in various nationalist disputes. 3. When this case was started, I couldn't participate fully as my father was ill and another editor was hospitalised. The evidence produced by a number of editors who've effectively held the article hostage was directed toward removing editors they disagreed with by topic bans; you'll note that I didn't propose of suggest any blocks/bans/sanctions against individuals. Effectively what you're proposing is to remove one side but leave the other intact. You're rewarding editors for baiting others into uncivil remarks. 4. In reading your comments I can only conclude you have apparently disregarded the workshop. In the workshop there was case of RHoPF hounding editors, walls of text being put up to derail discussion by Ecemaml, non-apologies such as "I'm sorry you were offended by my joke" not to mention examples of bad faith and uncivil remarks: [15] activity, obstinacy, discourtesy, incompetence at communication, and nationalism form a demonic combination [16] "Gibnews' rottweiler" repeated [17] [18] I get a sense of "if I'm going down I'm taking you with me" here. [19] So that is three untruths in the same section from you, Why are you telling untruths here, Justin? 5. In the workshop, the editors were lobbying to have my conduct examined more fully. I would still welcome that. 6. This was never an arbcom case, there had been no previous attempt at long term solutions. I can only note my bitter disappointment that arbcom would punish one group of violators while allowing another group of violators to go free without even a token slap or even have their conduct examined at all. Particularly an editor who apparently delights in teasing and tormenting those with temporary mental problems. I've seen this editor hounding people for years and I can't believe he is going to get away with it again. The solution you're proposing might reduce conflict, well if you ban only one side then what's left can violently agree on skewing the POV of the article. What it isn't is a long term solution, I did propose something like this some time ago [20], it would be more workable. Justin talk 09:49, 30 April 2010 (UTC) The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : L (April 2010) The April 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:22, 5 May 2010 (UTC) 139.181.0.34 You made a comment to 139.181.0.34 regarding inappropriate links. Sorry, but it wasn't me. I never post anon. I always use my user ID. Mediasponge (talk) 21:29, 17 May 2010 (UTC) Bachir Attar Hello, FYI I have reverted a series of edits to Bachir Attar that were made by a new user, [[::User:Bachir Attar|Bachir Attar]] (talk · contribs). Thanks, -- Gyrofrog (talk) 15:59, 21 May 2010 (UTC) "Jewish Internet Defense Force" Hi Fayssal - just thought you might want to see this - 1. You've got some Jewish internet organisation after you Mar4d (talk) 12:07, 31 May 2010 (UTC) The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LI (May 2010) The May 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:06, 5 June 2010 (UTC) Fair use rationale for File:Cantonporcelain.jpg Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Cantonporcelain.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:09, 8 June 2010 (UTC) The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LII (June 2010) The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LII (June 2010) Front page Project news Articles Members Editorial Project news Catch up with our project's activities over the last month, including the new Recruitment working group and Strategy think tank Articles Milhist's newest featured and A-Class content Members June's contest results plus the latest awards to our members Editorial LeonidasSpartan shares his thoughts on how, as individual editors, we can deal with frustration and disappointment in our group endeavour To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:00, 6 July 2010 (UTC) Tenmei's violation of ArbCom conditions By ArbCom's ruling, I believe User:Tenmei is instructed not to interact with me, but he has done so here 1 and 2. I hope this issue can be remedied soon. In case you forgot what case this is about, link is here: 3.Teeninvestor (talk) 20:50, 21 July 2010 (UTC) Moroccan Spoken Arabic Hey Fayssal. It's been a while since we met in Buenos Aires. I still have many happy thoughts about us meeting. I would like to ask you to contribute your thoughts to a discussion at translatewiki.net. Much appreciated. Siebrand (talk) 19:47, 6 August 2010 (UTC) Renaming Allaroundamazingbarnstar3.png to Allaroundamazingbarnstar.png My apologizes for the disruption of editing your user space. The Allaroundamazingbarnstar3.png is being deleted in favor for its Commons equivalent. I had to edit your user pages to ensure that you weren't affected. --AllyUnion (talk) 22:47, 11 August 2010 (UTC) The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LIII (July 2010) The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LIII (July 2010) Front page Project news Articles Members Editorial Project news New parameter for military conflict infobox introduced; Preliminary information on the September coordinator elections Articles Milhist's newest featured and A-Class content Members July's contest results, the latest awards to our members, plus an interview with Parsecboy Editorial Opportunities for new military history articles To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:25, 18 August 2010 (UTC) The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LIV (August 2010) The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LIV (August 2010) Front page Project news Articles Members Editorial Project news The return of reviewer awards, task force discussions, and more information on the upcoming coordinator election Articles A recap of the month's new Featured and A-Class articles, including a new featured sound Members Our newest A-class medal recipients and this August's top contestants Editorial In the first of a two-part series, Moonriddengirl discusses the problems caused by copyright violations To change your delivery options for this newsletter please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:14, 7 September 2010 (UTC) The Milhist election has started! The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. You are cordially invited to help pick fourteen new coordinators from a pool of twenty candidates. This time round, the term has increased from six to twelve months so it is doubly important that you have your say! Please cast your vote here no later than 23:59 (UTC) on Tuesday, 28 September 2010. With many thanks in advance for your participation from the coordinator team,  Roger Davies talk 21:38, 16 September 2010 (UTC) Notification Please see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Amendment#Request_to_amend_prior_case:_Koavf. This request was initiated by Koavf, but as far as his contributions show, he didn't notify any user...so I'm notifying you because you participated in the discussion that led to the community sanction. Cheers, Ncmvocalist (talk) 21:29, 15 October 2010 (UTC) Thanks for the notification. -- FayssalF - Wiki me up® 01:40, 18 October 2010 (UTC) The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LV (September 2010) The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LV (September 2010) Front page Project news Articles Members Editorial Project news The results of September's coordinator elections, plus ongoing project discussions and proposals Articles A recap of the month's new Featured and A-Class articles Members Our newest A-class medal recipients, this September's top contestants, plus the reviewers' Roll of Honour (Apr-Sep 2010) Editorial In the final part of our series on copyright, Moonriddengirl describes how to deal with copyright infringements on Wikipedia To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 21:23, 21 October 2010 (UTC) Rogue administrators I am writing because one or more admins are blocking accounts from users who happen not to agree with them. My crime was to post these comments. I will leave it to you to decide whether or not the charges are valid. My attempts to complain have also been blocked. Attempts to contact you by email and phone also failed. I had to change my IP address in order to be able to contact you. I suspect a very large number of users have similarly been falsely accused and have been unable to contact you because they did not know how to alter their IP address. Alternate user name (talk) 00:05, 28 October 2010 (UTC) Abd al-Haqq I Hello. A group of us are trying to clear the backlog at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Articles_lacking_sources_from_October_2006. The page of the above name is one of the several thousand articles lacking Sources that were tagged in October 2006. Can you help in finding good Sources for the facts in the article? Unless there is a good source offered, the article will be proposed for deletion. Sincerely, GeorgeLouis (talk) 08:13, 8 November 2010 (UTC) Abu l-Aish Ahmad Hello. A group of us are trying to clear the backlog at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Articles_lacking_sources_from_October_2006. The page of the above name is one of the several thousand articles lacking Sources that were tagged in October 2006. Can you help in finding good Sources for the facts in the article? Unless there is a good source offered, the article will be proposed for deletion. Sincerely, GeorgeLouis (talk) 06:09, 9 November 2010 (UTC) WP:CHECK request User:Kaverijha16 seems to be the same person as the blocked editor User:6feetheight, along with anons User:61.2.209.68 and User:61.2.209.94. Similar edit pattern and edit summary, as well as overlapping interests, are somewhat suspicious. Aditya(talk • contribs) 12:33, 10 November 2010 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue LVI, October 2010 Your Military history Newsletter Project News: Editors for the newsletter, GAN backlog reduction drive Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: EyeSerene sums up our "Five years of military history" To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:36, 21 November 2010 (UTC) Because you commented at AN/I You wrote here So please see here. I would really like to get this resolved. Thanks. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:19, 30 November 2010 (UTC)