User talk:NuclearWarfare: Difference between revisions
MiszaBot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 2 thread(s) (older than 3d) to User talk:NuclearWarfare/Archive 35. |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
Replied, at [[Talk:Time, Inc. v. Hill]]. — '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 15:37, 8 November 2011 (UTC) |
Replied, at [[Talk:Time, Inc. v. Hill]]. — '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 15:37, 8 November 2011 (UTC) |
||
I have been discussing it! You leveled this false accusation at Anythingyouwant also after he made a change that he had given reasons for on the talk page. Do you not read the talk page? Given the number of edits you make many without summary on this article you need to just simmer down. Not to mention protecting pages that you are heavily and one-sidely involved in editing! You are well out of order to say I didn't discuss on the talk page. I was re-factoring the edit when you reverted due to a minor mix up in the wording. Give people a freaking chance to fix their own mistake![[User:DMSBel|DMSBel]] ([[User talk:DMSBel|talk]]) 04:39, 9 November 2011 (UTC) |
|||
I will fix the typo I made and its not violation of 1RR OK![[User:DMSBel|DMSBel]] ([[User talk:DMSBel|talk]]) 04:41, 9 November 2011 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 04:41, 9 November 2011
| |||||||||||||||||
| This is NuclearWarfare's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
|
Wait! Are you here because your article was speedy deleted? Click here before leaving a message to find out why. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 3 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
As a participant at Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion#G4 and subsequent XfDs, would you take a look at Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion#G4: Moving forward? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:05, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
Reply
Replied, at Talk:Time, Inc. v. Hill. — Cirt (talk) 15:37, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
I have been discussing it! You leveled this false accusation at Anythingyouwant also after he made a change that he had given reasons for on the talk page. Do you not read the talk page? Given the number of edits you make many without summary on this article you need to just simmer down. Not to mention protecting pages that you are heavily and one-sidely involved in editing! You are well out of order to say I didn't discuss on the talk page. I was re-factoring the edit when you reverted due to a minor mix up in the wording. Give people a freaking chance to fix their own mistake!DMSBel (talk) 04:39, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
I will fix the typo I made and its not violation of 1RR OK!DMSBel (talk) 04:41, 9 November 2011 (UTC)