User talk:Cculber007: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Cculber007 (talk | contribs)
removed, not notice that Dayewalker solved it
Line 167: Line 167:
Sorry, I didn't mean to offend you, is this where you want comments and questions? I don't understand where you're going with all of this, but personal attacks on editors are still not permitted. [[User:Dayewalker|Dayewalker]] ([[User talk:Dayewalker|talk]]) 22:28, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
Sorry, I didn't mean to offend you, is this where you want comments and questions? I don't understand where you're going with all of this, but personal attacks on editors are still not permitted. [[User:Dayewalker|Dayewalker]] ([[User talk:Dayewalker|talk]]) 22:28, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
: Yes, I think this is much better! Easier to see where you'd like things. Thanks! [[User:Dayewalker|Dayewalker]] ([[User talk:Dayewalker|talk]]) 23:26, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
: Yes, I think this is much better! Easier to see where you'd like things. Thanks! [[User:Dayewalker|Dayewalker]] ([[User talk:Dayewalker|talk]]) 23:26, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

== Blocked ==

I have blocked your account indefinitely because you don't seem to be able to work with other people on this website. For reference, see the hypocrisy at [https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Courcelles&diff=prev&oldid=441110038], [https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Cculber007&diff=prev&oldid=441110261]; the nonsense at [https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w/index.php?title=File:MarthaBerry.jpg&diff=prev&oldid=441110583], [https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dayewalker&diff=prev&oldid=441777839]; the attacks at [https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Cculber007&diff=prev&oldid=441772026], [https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w/index.php?title=User_talk:EdwardZhao&diff=prev&oldid=441773288]. Unfortunately, you are the only dolt here. If you are in a "rage moody" then you need to get off Wikipedia instead of calling someone a Fascist. And we don't play with [[WP:NLT|legal threats]] like the one you implied on Edward's talk page. Frankly, I don't think you understand how Wikipedia even works. Because Edward doesn't have any special "position" or "authorization" like you claimed. [[WP:CIR|A lack of competence]] seems to be the actual underlying issue behind your misperceptions, so consider that another reason for your block.

So you will be blocked until a) you agree not to pursue legal action, as it is Wikipedia's policy to block involved whilst legal action is pending; and b) you agree not to call people dolts or Fascists, or attack anyone on Wikipedia. To be unblocked, post this below: <code><nowiki>{{unblock | reason=your reason here ~~~~}}</nowiki></code>, obviously inserting your actual reason.

Sincerely,

Yet another disrespectful Fascist dolt who does not deserve his position. <span style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:80%;">'''/[[User:Fetchcomms|<span style="color:#000;">ƒETCH</span>]][[User talk:Fetchcomms|<span style="color:#000;">COMMS</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Fetchcomms|<span style="color:#000;">/</span>]]'''</span> 03:46, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:31, 29 July 2011

Welcome to the Talk of Cculber007

Wikipedians and guests, please fill your opinions, discussion, and others about me as Cculber007 only, placing here. If it is about pictures, articles, and other issues including Wikipedian policy in legal way (illegal ways will give you suspendion in the policy of Wikipedia that protects the rights of Wikipedians) must be in Cculber007's Talk archive, not User talk:Cculber007 otherwise they will be deleted. if I get disrespectful threat or senseless messages like incorrect warnings. I also delete messages without reading them if they are not in comment space. I will not read messages if they are under photographes space, userboxes space, or Cculber007 profile. I read them if they are in the area of the comments about Cculber007.


"You cannot force anyone to respect you and you cannot tell anyone what to do, you must stick with work ethics and make yourself better in a service with fellow wikipedians." -- 13 January 2008 Cculber007 to Wikipedians of Wikipedia World.

"Deaf people are no different from hearing people, they are normal human beings without hearing." -- 06 January 2008 Cculber007 to Wikipedians of Wikipedia World.

"Education always is powerful knowledge gives you learning and understanding." -- December 1998 Cculber007

"History always repeat our past that we cannot change but we can change future." -- November 1992 Cculber007 to one of Gallaudet University professors.

Created Userboxes:

{{User:Cculber007/Userboxes/Gally}}
This user graduated from Gallaudet University.
{{User:Cculber007/Userboxes/ASL}}
This user is deaf who signs in ASL
{{User:Cculber007/Userboxes/HisCha}}
H This user is a member of the History Channel.
{{User:Cculber007/Userboxes/Smithson}}
This user is a member of the Smithsonian Institution.
{{User:Cculber007/Userboxes/Titanic}}
This user loves RMS Titanic.
{{User:Cculber007/Userboxes/PearlH}}
Pearl Harbor
May we never forget…
{{User:Cculber007/Userboxes/Indy}}
This user is an Indiana Jones fan.
{{User:Cculber007/Userboxes/Women}}
This user loves Women.



Created Photographes:

Comments about Cculber007

Hello

Hello, Cculber007. This is llywrch (talk), & I am posting here based on a thread about you on Wikipedia:Administrators' Noticeboard/Incidents. I have been on Wikipedia for a long time. I also have been an Administrator for almost as long, & I am one of the most senior Admins on Wikipedia who is still active.

Now that I have identified myself, I want to address a few misconceptions I have found on this talk page. First, it established policy for other Wikipedians to leave messages on a user's talk page, & not some other talk page. There are many reasons why this is so, but one of the important ones that the Wikipedia software is configured to alert you when someone wants to talk to you. Telling people to post on another page defeats this, & if people follow your unusual wishes you may miss learning about important information. Getting angry at people who post here & leaving comments on their talk pages telling them not do that is not the proper response; this implies that you do not trust them, & makes it hard for them to trust you or want to work with you.

On the other hand, once you have read these messages on your talk page, you are free to respond however you wish to them -- write a message back, delete them, move them to another page -- or ignore them. This has been Wikipedia policy or custom as long as I can remember; just remember that if someone leaves you a message & you delete it, everyone will assume that you have read it & act accordingly.

Second, you have flagged a number of messages other Wikipedians have left for you as "disrespectful and immature" or "unrespectful treat". I looked over those messages, & it is my experienced opinion that they are not hostile, direspectful or immature -- although your response to them could be seen as so.

This leads me to the main point of posting here. I strongly urge you to rethink how you respond to messages from other Wikipedians. A good reason is that people respond more positively to kind or soft language than they do to suspicious or hostile words. Another good reason, which may be more important, is that you can be blocked from editting Wikipedia if you continue to respond in this way. Although this warning can be made by any Wikipedian in good standing, I am saying that here as a senior Admin; you should consider this a very serious message. The next Admin who looks at your behavior might not be as friendly as have tried to be & she or he may decide to block you without any further communication.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to either leave them on my talk page, or to email me. I would like to help you be a more constructive editor -- which I hope is your goal, since it is my goal on Wikipedia. -- llywrch (talk) 20:52, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP AH

This user wants you to join
WikiProject
Alternate History
.

Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 13:30, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

re: history of Oophorectomy

By all means, feel free to add any factual historical information to the articles. This is a user-written encyclopedia and you shouldn't feel afraid to add something if it improves the article.

As for why I did not add any historical originally, it wasn't anything I had researched. The original "article," so to speak, was a redirect to "castration" and therefore wouldn't have consisted of any actual research. Another user decided that it warranted its own article and various users have expanded the article subsequently. As I said, this is a community project and if you think that something is left out, please feel free to add it. -- EmperorBMA|話す 19:47, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Call out

WikiProject Alternate History is currently holding a roll call, which we hope to have annually. Your username is listed on the members list, but we are unsure as to which editors are still active within the project. If you still consider yourself an active editor, please add your name back to the Active members list. You can also list yourself as a Supporter if you feel you cannot dedicate the time necessary to be an active member.

Please also see the Project talk page for more information concerning this Call Out. Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 13:55, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yoyoma1111

I'll leave a notice on his page, and if he decides to vandalize again, I'll report him. Mokoniki | talk 16:17, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that you were just trying to be helpful, but I don't think it was a good idea for you to edit his page. Even if he is close to being labeled as a troll, you should have just left his page alone. It might make him troll you even more. :( Mokoniki | talk 00:13, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I understand. Let's give him until tomorrow , and if he vandalizes another page again, I'll report him. Mokoniki | talk 00:28, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]


RE: Gallaudet University

Alright, but we're going to have to start warning him if he vandalizes again, or Wikipedia isn't going to do anything. I watched the page and shall keep an eye out. Mokoniki | talk 20:19, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not a mistake

The presence of your username on Wikipedia:Huggle/Whitelist is not a mistake, nor is it labeling you as a vandal. It is identifying you as someone who is probably not a vandal, and thus your edits are ignored by users of Huggle. Being automatically updated every time someone exits Huggle, you were re-added a minute after you removed yourself. I don't know if it's even possible for someone to permanently remove themselves from whitelist, but no one should need to have themselves removed either unless for some reason they want Huggle patrollers watching them. Reach Out to the Truth 01:13, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Sorry, I didn't mean to offend you, is this where you want comments and questions? I don't understand where you're going with all of this, but personal attacks on editors are still not permitted. Dayewalker (talk) 22:28, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I think this is much better! Easier to see where you'd like things. Thanks! Dayewalker (talk) 23:26, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]