User talk:Ruslik0

Nudge...

...to keep this typo out of the Pluto discussion: I think you wanted to write "routine calculations", as per Wikipedia:OR#Routine_calculations. --Stephan Schulz (talk)

Aurora (astronomy)

I have started a thread about your unthinking vandalism to this article. [1]

Hurray for your TFA

Mmmm, magnetosphere..

Kudos on the fine article appearing today on the front page! Have a donut. Scartol • Tok 16:29, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

Template:Campaignbox Colorado War

Over at this TfD, you decided to delete Template:Campaignbox Colorado War even though there was essentially no debate. Shouldn't it have been close as a 'no consensus' due to the fact that there was extremely limited discussion? Bsimmons666 (talk) 01:25, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

Item 8 of the administrator instructions says: There is no such thing as quorum. If after the normal time period, there are no objections to deletion of a template, it can simply be deleted. I deleted it because as a navbox it was useless with just one link. Ruslik_Zero 11:31, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

disappointed: supporting you was really the only reason I voted.

I voted regarding a small number of other folks, but my votes were very much in line with conventional wisdom, and were thus almost certainly irrelevant. Supporting you was really the only reason I bothered to vote at all. And I am very disappointed. • Ling.Nut 06:52, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

At least I am in the black. Ruslik_Zero 09:55, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

...and, relatively speaking, very close to the cutoff line. But what's done is done. Hope all is well! • Ling.Nut 11:00, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Drac and the Oort cloud

Thanks for the addition, but there now appears to be a slight contradiction in the wording of the section that I hope we can clear up. I think the implicit assumption is that Drac and its presumed cousins originated in the Oort cloud, yes? If so then we should make that clear, because the article now reads as if there are two possible sources for Halley-type comets. Thanks again. Serendi^podous 04:52, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Notification: Proposed 'Motion to Close' at Wikipedia:Community de-adminship/Draft RfC

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Community de-adminship/Draft RfC re: a 'Motion to close', which would dissolve Cda as a proposal. The motion includes an !vote. You have previously commented at Wikipedia:WikiProject Administrator/Admin Recall. Best Wishes for the Holidays, Jusdafax 05:46, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

FA-Team revival

I've made a proposal to bring the FA-Team out of inactivity—with a mission a bit different than we're used to. This is just a generic note I'm sending to members asking for their input. Cheers, Mm40 (talk) 01:34, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

Xavier bowl games

Hello there. I wasn't aware that "not very useful" is a reason to delete, especially when bowl game navboxes are a standard part of Wikipedia articles on college football programs. The template was originally nominated because it was orphaned, which was rectified well before the discussion closed. I wonder if you might reconsider your close. Best, Mackensen (talk) 22:15, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

The purpose of navigation templates is to facilitate navigation between multiple related existing articles. This template contained just one redlink. There were neither multiple nor even existing articles [that needed navigation between them]. See more detailed analysis in WP:NAVBOX. Ruslik_Zero 09:36, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

See you at deletion review then. Mackensen (talk) 15:38, 30 December 2009 (UTC)