Wikipedia:WikiProject Conservatism/About us: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Jjrj24 (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 35: Line 35:
# [[User:SeanNovack|Rapier]] ([[User talk:SeanNovack|talk]]) 04:14, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
# [[User:SeanNovack|Rapier]] ([[User talk:SeanNovack|talk]]) 04:14, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
# [[User:PokeHomsar|PokeHomsar]] ([[User talk:PokeHomsar|talk]]) 13:12, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
# [[User:PokeHomsar|PokeHomsar]] ([[User talk:PokeHomsar|talk]]) 13:12, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
# [[User:jjrj24|jjrj24]] ([[User talk:jjrj24|talk]]) 12:28, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
# [[User:jjrj24|jjrj24]] ([[User talk:jjrj24|talk]]): Enlightening conservative people & topics in a world darkening with liberalism.
# {{User|Christian1985}} 17:14, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
# {{User|Christian1985}} 17:14, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
# {{User|Redstate1995}} 21:44, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
# {{User|Redstate1995}} 21:44, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:33, 7 October 2011


Vision and goals

WikiProject Conservatism documents the conservative movement, and the people, groups and events that have shaped that movement. We accomplish this by:

  • Identifying conservative articles
  • Improving every conservative article to Featured Article status
  • Striving for a neutral point of view and balance in articles that fall under our purview

The Right Stuff

The Right Stuff
July 2018
DISCUSSION REPORT
WikiProject Conservatism Comes Under Fire

By Lionelt

WikiProject Conservatism was a topic of discussion at the Administrators' Noticeboard/Incident (AN/I). Objective3000 started a thread where he expressed concern regarding the number of RFC notices posted on the Discussion page suggesting that such notices "could result in swaying consensus by selective notification." Several editors participated in the relatively abbreviated six hour discussion. The assertion that the project is a "club for conservatives" was countered by editors listing examples of users who "profess no political persuasion." It was also noted that notification of WikiProjects regarding ongoing discussions is explicitly permitted by the WP:Canvassing guideline.

At one point the discussion segued to feedback about The Right Stuff. Member SPECIFICO wrote: "One thing I enjoy about the Conservatism Project is the handy newsletter that members receive on our talk pages." Atsme praised the newsletter as "first-class entertainment...BIGLY...first-class...nothing even comes close...it's amazing." Some good-natured sarcasm was offered with Objective3000 observing, "Well, they got the color right" and MrX's followup, "Wow. Yellow is the new red."

Admin Oshwah closed the thread with the result "definitely not an issue for ANI" and directing editors to the project Discussion page for any further discussion. Editor's note: originally the design and color of The Right Stuff was chosen to mimic an old, paper newspaper.

Add the Project Discussion page to your watchlist for the "latest RFCs" at WikiProject Conservatism Watch (Discuss this story)

ARTICLES REPORT
Margaret Thatcher Makes History Again

By Lionelt

Margaret Thatcher is the first article promoted at the new WikiProject Conservatism A-Class review. Congratulations to Neveselbert. A-Class is a quality rating which is ranked higher than GA (Good article) but the criteria are not as rigorous as FA (Featued article). WikiProject Conservatism is one of only two WikiProjects offering A-Class review, the other being WikiProject Military History. Nominate your article here. (Discuss this story)
RECENT RESEARCH
Research About AN/I

By Lionelt

Reprinted in part from the April 26, 2018 issue of The Signpost; written by Zarasophos

Out of over one hundred questioned editors, only twenty-seven (27%) are happy with the way reports of conflicts between editors are handled on the Administrators' Incident Noticeboard (AN/I), according to a recent survey . The survey also found that dissatisfaction has varied reasons including "defensive cliques" and biased administrators as well as fear of a "boomerang effect" due to a lacking rule for scope on AN/I reports. The survey also included an analysis of available quantitative data about AN/I. Some notable takeaways:

  • 53% avoided making a report due to fearing it would not be handled appropriately
  • "Otherwise 'popular' users often avoid heavy sanctions for issues that would get new editors banned."
  • "Discussions need to be clerked to keep them from raising more problems than they solve."

In the wake of Zarasophos' article editors discussed the AN/I survey at The Signpost and also at AN/I. Ironically a portion of the AN/I thread was hatted due to "off-topic sniping." To follow-up the problems identified by the research project the Wikimedia Foundation Anti-Harassment Tools team and Support and Safety team initiated a discussion. You can express your thoughts and ideas here.

(Discuss this story)

Delivered: ~~~~~

Members

Please feel free to add yourself here.

  1. Lionelt (talk) 01:28, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Drrll 06:27, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  3. CWenger (talk) 21:35, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Dezidor (talk) 21:46, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  5. ThinkEnemies (talk · contribs) I am interested in working on... not really sure how to answer this. 01:49, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  6. User:NYyankees51 03:11, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  7. RightCowLeftCoast (talk · contribs) 07:46, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Eisfbnore (talk · contribs) – Conservatism in Norway 21:25, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  9. FitzColinGerald (talk · contribs) - Neoconservatism in the United States.
  10. Geofferybard (talk · contribs) - Critique of Enlightenment rationalism from perspective rooted in spiritual traditions such as Christianity and Buddhism; Japanese anti-Communism; American Conservative critique of fascism; libertarian and conservative libertarian critiques of statism 21:39, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Rapier (talk) 04:14, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  12. PokeHomsar (talk) 13:12, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  13. jjrj24 (talk): Enlightening conservative people & topics in a world darkening with liberalism.
  14. Christian1985 (talk · contribs) 17:14, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Redstate1995 (talk · contribs) 21:44, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Carrite (talk) 01:08, 30 March 2011 (UTC) The McCarthy Period and Cold War era anti-communism.[reply]
  17. Avazina (Avazina's Talk) 10:30, 2 April 2011
  18. Binksternet (talk · contribs) Interested in the interplay between conservative, libertarian, centrist and liberal issues. 20:43, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Mark Shaw (talk · contribs) Fiscal/defense conservative, social liberal/libertarian. 03:12, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Jarrodaus11 Conservatism in Australia
  21. Warfieldian (talk)
  22. DGG ( talk ) 01:37, 19 April 2011 (UTC) not as a statement of my own politics, but as an advocate of NPOV, to keep all political articles unbiased. DGG ( talk ) 01:37, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Willwal (talk · contribs) 15:21, 19 April 2011 (UTC). Member of the UK Conservative Party; eurosceptic, Thatcherite, economic libertarian, social conservative/liberal.[reply]
  24. patsw (talk · contribs) 02:46, 22 April 2011 (UTC) The Wikipedia is full of Fabian gradualists and Alinskyite confrontationalists, so when they push left, it is good to be among editors who push right back. Remember - WP:NOTTRUTH.[reply]
  25. JohnAlbertRigali (talk) 14:04, 22 April 2011 (UTC) Focused on revealing leftists in the American and international sociopolitical scenes.[reply]
  26. jprw (talk) 14:04, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  27. KevinOKeeffe (Talk)
  28. Boromir123 (Talk)
  29. Ddiaz841 (talk)
  30. Jessemckay (talk · contribs) I'm interested in a roster of prominent conservatives/liberals. 03:20, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Elsterputzer (talk · contribs) Member of the UK Conservative Party and interested in updating online shared knowledge (Talk)
  32. ΙΧΘΥΣ (talk · contribs)
  33. Saruman-the-white (talk · contribs) Australian traditionalist and classical liberal conservative interested in improving Australian conservatism-related articles and clearing up policially correct and leftist-dominated claims and analyses. (Talk)
  34. Cognate247 (talk · contribs) -- interested in helping any way I can! 14:17, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Chris Chittleborough (talk · contribs) AKA CWC -- interested in New Media, especially conservative/libertarian. 07:51, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Spalds (talk · contribs) 03:50, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  37. darkstar1st (talk · contribs) in fiscal conservative constitutionalism Darkstar1st (talk) 11:54, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Toa Nidhiki05 (talk · contribs) Never joined one of these WikiProjects before, but I'll be glad to help out. Toa Nidhiki05 18:16, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  39. PoliceChief (talk · contribs) - interested in pages related to the British Conservative Party especially former Prime Minister Lady Thatcher PoliceChief (talk) 00:11, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Newfoundlander&Labradorian (talk · contribs)
  41. Gamingexpert (talk · contribs) (I'm a libertarian. I am the primary editor of Political positions of Sarah Palin and frequently edit pages related to her.) 00:19, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  42. OpenInfoForAll (talk · contribs) (I am interested in working on all things conservative) 21:25, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  43. NapoleonX (talk · contribs) (I am a conservative interested in conservative heroes such as Ronald Reagan and Andrew Breitbart a conservative pioneer in citizen journalism on the Internet) 14:43, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  44. mzk1 (talk · contribs) While I did it for other reasons, I've managed (I think) to get the Reliable Sources page to differentiate more between fact and opinion in newspapers.Mzk1 (talk) 20:19, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Phoenician Patriot (talk · contribs) I am a Republican Precinct Committeeman in Maricopa County, AZ and webmaster for the Maricopa County Republican Committee (MCRC).Phoenician Patriot (talk) 13:57, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  46. rjensen (talk · contribs) I'm a professional historian working on political topics00:41, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  47. soonersfan168 (talk · contribs) I'm a young conservative who desires to improve Wikipedia!
  48. Conservative Philosopher (talk · contribs) I am a conservative, and want to improve coverage of conservative topics on Wikipedia. 00:36, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Screwball23 (talk · contribs) thank you for the invite! --Screwball23 talk 18:31, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Regushee (talk · contribs) I am most certainly Conservative, and I'm willing to help with whatever I can do
  51. TFD (talk) 02:27, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]


  • Keep up to date on all issues affecting Conservatism. Click here to add the Noticeboard to your watchlist.
  • And don't forget to add the project userbox to your user page:

{{User Conservatism}}


  • Do you know someone who may be interested in the project? Put this on their talk page:

{{WikiProject Conservatism invite|Signature=~~~~}}

Please accept this invite to join the Conservatism WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to conservatism.
Simply click here to accept! {{{Signature}}}


  • You can use this template to welcome new users to Wikipedia and invite them to join Conservatism:

{{subst:RightWelcome}}

  • More templates regarding membership can be found at WP:WikiProject Conservatism/Templates
  • Interested in populating your userpage with political party userboxes? Find them here.
  • Socially conservative user boxes along with those of other tendencies in society can be found here.

Template:Handy-dandy