Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎8mm caliber: 7.92mm calibre designation: closing as declined (also per the RTV)
Line 3: Line 3:
<br clear="all"/>
<br clear="all"/>
{{Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Header}}
{{Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Header}}

== 8mm caliber: 7.92mm calibre designation ==
'''Initiated by ''' [[User:Dingo|Dingo]] ([[User talk:Dingo|talk]]) '''at''' 19:43, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

=== Involved parties ===
<!-- use {{admin|username}} if the party is an administrator -->
*{{userlinks|Dingo}}, ''filing party''
*{{userlinks|MFIreland}}
<!-- The editor filing the case should be included as a party for purposes of notifications. -->

;Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request
<!-- All parties must be notified that the request has been filed, immediately after it is posted, and confirmation posted here. -->
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:MFIreland&diff=404863770&oldid=404860546]


;Confirmation that other steps in [[Wikipedia:dispute resolution|dispute resolution]] have been tried
<!-- Identify prior attempts at dispute resolution here, with links/diffs to the page where the resolution took place. If prior dispute resolution has not been attempted, the reasons for this should be explained in the request for arbitration -->
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:MFIreland&diff=404819665&oldid=404743705 Try to initiate dialogue with references to previous discussion on [[8x57 IS]].]
*[[Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:MFIreland_reported_by_Dingo_.28talk.29_.28Result:_.29]]
=== Statement by [[User:Dingo|Dingo]] ([[User talk:Dingo|talk]]) ===
In [[Talk:8x57_IS#German_military_designation.3F]] and before in the Request to Move, I discovered that there seem to be NO references in German literature about the 8mil-calibres as 7.92mm. No sources could be cited otherwise until now. The calibre designation is either 8mm (civil) or 7.9mm (Wehrmacht, Reichswehr and users before). Sources have been cited that it's either "cartridge 7.9mm" or "8x57 IS".

Therefore, after the movement of [[8x57 IS]], I began to correct other articles in [[:category:7.92 mm firearms]], as well as the category itself. [[User:MFIreland]] began reverting. With references on above talk, I reverted again (2nd revert) and wrote to User:MFIreland. He reverted again (3rd revert), and reverted without comment my comments on his talk page. So, I don't think this is going to be resolved communicatively. --[[User:Dingo|Dingo]] ([[User talk:Dingo|talk]]) 19:40, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

=== Statement by MFIreland ===
Any edits I reverted made by user:Dingo was because they where unsourced and/or original research.--'''''[[User:MFIreland|<font color="008000">MFIreland</font>]]''''' • [[User talk:MFIreland|<font color="FFA500"><sup>Talk</sup></font>]] 20:39, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

=== Clerk notes ===
:''This area is used for notes by non-recused Clerks.''
:Noting that according to the deletion log of the filing party's userpage, this user has exercised the right to vanish. [[User:AlexandrDmitri|Alexandr Dmitri]] ([[User talk:AlexandrDmitri|talk]]) 09:39, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

=== Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter (0/6/0/0) ===
*'''Decline''' as premature and suggest other methods of DR first, such as Dispute Resolution and/or a RfC [[User:SirFozzie|SirFozzie]] ([[User talk:SirFozzie|talk]]) 22:37, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
*'''Decline'''. Arbitration is the last step in resolving disputes. Please try to discuss the matter with other editors (if you can't work it out amongst yourselves) perhaps by asking for a third opinion or creating a request for comment. This and other ideas to resolve issues are described at [[WP:Dispute Resolution]]. [[User:Shell_Kinney|Shell]] <sup>[[User_talk:Shell_Kinney|babelfish]]</sup> 14:22, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
*'''Decline''' and suggest you try other [[WP:DR|dispute resolution]] methods. For example, you could obtain a [[WP:3O|third opinion]] or [[WP:MEDCAB|informal mediation]]. [[User:PhilKnight|PhilKnight]] ([[User talk:PhilKnight|talk]]) 13:18, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
*'''Decline''' per all preceding. [[User:Casliber|Casliber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 14:09, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
*'''Decline''' per my colleagues. [[User:Risker|Risker]] ([[User talk:Risker|talk]]) 02:10, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
* '''Decline'''. In the light of the solid wall of declines, and the opening party's RTV, this can probably now be closed. &nbsp;[[User:Roger Davies|<span style="color:maroon; font-variant:small-caps">'''Roger'''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Roger Davies|'''talk''']]</sup> 10:12, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:40, 2 January 2011

Requests for arbitration