Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Warpath (Transformers): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 08:12, 17 September 2010

Warpath (Transformers)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Original research, go-bots spamcruft, non notable, fails GNG, fails pretty much all civilised standards. Donald Schroeder JWH018 (talk) 21:07, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - This page isn't about a Gobot, and the nominator seems to be going around nominating articles based on some Gobot-hate spree. Mathewignash (talk) 21:27, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - So anyone has the temerity to nominate an article to delete is must because of pure hatred of fiction. Nothing to with the fact the article, has a severe lack of reliable third person sources. The only source is WP:FANSITE, and questionable notability. Notability isn't inherent. Dwanyewest (talk) 21:38, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No, in this ONE particular case, he is going on some gobot hate spree. He's nominating a bunch of articles and calling them "gobots". Mathewignash (talk) 22:07, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep another primary character from the first 2-3 seasons of the TV show. Sources [1], [2]. - Burpelson AFB ✈ 22:59, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The only reliable source that I have found is a book consisting entirely of Wikipedia articles. [3] This is not quite what usually goes by that term. Hans Adler 23:55, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Standard fictional biography, just like any character from Lost or CSI. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 01:38, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete- the nominator is a sockpuppet of Torkmann, but this should not detract from the fact that the nomination is accurate. As Hans points out, the sourcing is hopelessly inadequate. Reyk _YO! 03:34, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment BANNAD SOCK PUPPET NOMINATION - This whole deletion nomination was created by a banned sock puppet, and should be ended based on that, a REAL nomination could then be made if someone legitmate wants to make one. Mathewignash (talk) 08:08, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I disagree. Nobody knew Donald was a sockpuppet when this AFD was started, and several people have made good-faith comments based on the merits of the article so a procedural close is now out of the question. Reyk _YO! 08:12, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 *'''Delete'''- the nominator is a sockpuppet of Torkmann, but this should not detract from the fact that the nomination is accurate. As Hans points out, the sourcing is hopelessly inadequate. [[User:Reyk|<font color="Maroon">'''Reyk'''</font>]] <sub>[[User talk:Reyk|'''<font color="Blue">YO!</font>''']]</sub> 03:34, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
 *'''Comment BANNAD SOCK PUPPET NOMINATION''' - This whole deletion nomination was created by a banned sock puppet, and should be ended based on that, a REAL nomination could then be made if someone legitmate wants to make one. [[User:Mathewignash|Mathewignash]] ([[User talk:Mathewignash|talk]]) 08:08, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
+**I disagree. Nobody knew Donald was a sockpuppet when this AFD was started, and several people have made good-faith comments based on the merits of the article so a procedural close is now out of the question. [[User:Reyk|<font color="Maroon">'''Reyk'''</font>]] <sub>[[User talk:Reyk|'''<font color="Blue">YO!</font>''']]</sub> 08:12, 17 September 2010 (UTC)