Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Ceradonbot

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was Approved.

Ceradonbot

• (BRFA
• Approved BRFAs
• talk
• contribs
• count
• SUL
• logs
• page moves
• block log
• rights log
• flag)

Operator: Ceradon (talk · contribs)

Time filed: 00:20, Saturday January 21, 2012 (UTC)

Automatic or Manual: automatic, I will shut the bot down after a batch of edits an review

Programming language(s): Pywikipediabot

Source code available: interwiki.py

Function overview: Maintains interwiki links on articles on the English Wikipedia

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate):

Edit period(s): continuous

Estimated number of pages affected: 100-300 pages a day

Exclusion compliant (Y/N): Y

Already has a bot flag (Y/N): N

Function details: Idem, options are -confirm -array:300 -namespace:0 -autonomous -continue -force -pt:48

Discussion

NOTE: The bot was renamed from Cerabot, because of CERabot, to User:Ceradonbot. Ceradon ^talk_contribs 00:38, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

•  Note: This bot appears to have edited since this BRFA was filed. Bots may not edit outside their own or their operator's userspace unless approved or approved for trial. AnomieBOT⚡ 00:44, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

• This is easily explained, I forgot to put -confirmed on, but I have it on as an option now. I have read and understood the bot policy. Ceradon ^talk_contribs 01:49, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Approved for trial (1 days). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. Looks good, but let's do a short trial to make sure everything works. — The Earwig ^(talk) 04:12, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

NOTE: -confirm was expected to be put as an option temporarily during the trial however The Earwig asked me to keep it off in IRC. --Ceradon ^talk_contribs 23:53, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Trial complete. – I'll look at the contribs in the morning if someone else hasn't gotten to it. — madman 04:07, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks, Madman. --Ceradon ^talk_contribs 04:09, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

This bot can not be approved with both the -auto and -force parameters. I've suggested to Ceradon that he remove the force parameter. - Kingpin¹³ (talk) 16:39, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Rolled back 25 of the bot's edits in which it erroneously removed interwiki links (presumably due to the -force parameter per above). — madman 16:42, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

• Agreed. The -force parameter will not be used. --Ceradon ^talk_contribs 21:13, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

 Approved. Parameters now check out, just another standard interwiki.py bot. - Kingpin¹³ (talk) 22:31, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.