Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Ceradonbot 2: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 19:50, 28 January 2012

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was

Approved.

Ceradonbot 2

Operator: Ceradon (talk · contribs)

Time filed: 23:01, Wednesday January 25, 2012 (UTC)

Automatic or Manual: Automatic unsupervised

Programming language(s): pywikipedia

Source code available: yes, redirect.py

Function overview: fix redirects which point to other redirects

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate):

Edit period(s): daily

Estimated number of pages affected: 100/month

Exclusion compliant (Y/N): Y

Already has a bot flag (Y/N): Y

Function details: Idem, options used are -double -namespace:0

Discussion

Looks good. redirect.py normally works. Good sticking to the mainspace; I'd say ready for a trial or approval. Have you tested it with yet? Rcsprinter (gossip) 17:11, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No, not yet anyway, I am waiting for trial approval to test.--Ceradon ^talk_contribs 20:57, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

{{BAGAssistanceNeeded}} Please approve for trial, no problems found. Rcsprinter (whisper) 15:33, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

After a test, which I am still performing as we speak, I have figured out the parameters. redirect.py double -namespace:0 -pt:30 -api -always. I am not using -always in this test as this parameter lets the bot edit unsupervised. --Ceradon ^talk_contribs 19:26, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Approved. Standard pywikipedia code, already been tried and tested, but Ceradon apparently misunderstood Rcsprinter123's comment as an approval for trial. In any case, the edits which have been done look fine, so no harm done (probably best to keep in in mainspace though, as you appear to be planning). Keep pywikipedia up-to-date. - Kingpin¹³ (talk) 19:50, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-<noinclude>[[Category:Open Wikipedia bot requests for approval|Ceradonbot 2]]</noinclude>
+<noinclude>[[Category:Approved Wikipedia bot requests for approval|Ceradonbot]]</noinclude><div class="boilerplate metadata" style="background-color:
+#A0FFA0; margin:2em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #AAAAAA;">
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at [[WT:BRFA]].'' The result of the discussion was [[File:Symbol keep vote.svg|20px|alt=|link=]] '''Approved'''{{#ifeq:yes|yes|.}}<!-- from Template:Bot Top-->
 ==[[User:Ceradonbot|Ceradonbot]] 2==
 {{Newbot|Ceradonbot|2}}
@@ Line 43: / Line 45: @@
 *Looks good. redirect.py normally works. Good sticking to the mainspace; I'd say ready for a trial or approval. Have you tested it with yet? <font color="#00ACF4">'''[[User:Rcsprinter123|<span style="font-family:cambria; font-size:10pt; color:gray">Rcsprinter</span>]]''' [[User talk:Rcsprinter123|<span style="font-family:calibri; font-size:8pt; color:black">(gossip)</span>]]</font> 17:11, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
 :*No, not yet anyway, I am waiting for trial approval to test.--<font face="Kristen ITC">'''[[User:Ceradon|<font color="0000FF">Ce</font><font color="318CE7">ra</font><font color="BCD4E6">don</font>]]'''  <sup>[[User talk:Ceradon|<font color="00FF00">talk</font>]]</sup><sub style="margin-left:-3.5ex">[[Special:Contributions/Ceradon|<font color="#036">contribs</font>]]</sub></font> 20:57, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
-::*{{BAGAssistanceNeeded}} Please approve for trial, no problems found. <font color="#A20846">'''[[User:Rcsprinter123|<span style="font-family:cambria; font-size:10pt; color:gray">Rcsprinter</span>]]''' [[User talk:Rcsprinter123|<span style="font-family:calibri; font-size:8pt; color:black">(whisper)</span>]]</font> 15:33, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
+::*{{tl|BAGAssistanceNeeded}} Please approve for trial, no problems found. <font color="#A20846">'''[[User:Rcsprinter123|<span style="font-family:cambria; font-size:10pt; color:gray">Rcsprinter</span>]]''' [[User talk:Rcsprinter123|<span style="font-family:calibri; font-size:8pt; color:black">(whisper)</span>]]</font> 15:33, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
 *After a test, which I am still performing as we speak, I have figured out the parameters. ''redirect.py double -namespace:0 -pt:30 -api -always''. I am not using -always in this test as this parameter lets the bot edit unsupervised. --<font face="Kristen ITC">'''[[User:Ceradon|<font color="0000FF">Ce</font><font color="318CE7">ra</font><font color="BCD4E6">don</font>]]'''  <sup>[[User talk:Ceradon|<font color="00FF00">talk</font>]]</sup><sub style="margin-left:-3.5ex">[[Special:Contributions/Ceradon|<font color="#036">contribs</font>]]</sub></font> 19:26, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
+{{BotApproved}} Standard pywikipedia code, already been tried and tested, but Ceradon apparently misunderstood Rcsprinter123's comment as an approval for trial. In any case, the edits which have been done look fine, so no harm done (probably best to keep in in mainspace though, as you appear to be planning). Keep pywikipedia up-to-date. - [[User:Kingpin13|Kingpin]]<sup>[[Special:Contributions/Kingpin13|13]]</sup> ([[User talk:Kingpin13|talk]]) 19:50, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at [[WT:BRFA]].''<!-- from Template:Bot Bottom --></div>