Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not: Difference between revisions

:::::Kww: I will AGF that you actually believe that statement. however, as I have said ''many, many, many'' times, this is not about religion for me (any more than the ''same'' argument on Pregnancy or Goatse.cx was about nudity). For me, this is about NPOV and ethics: about not using images that offend out readers without some good encyclopedic reason to do so. Frankly, I am baffled by the fact that you don't instantly accept this. It wouldn't surprise me more if we went out ballroom dancing and you start flailing around like you're in a [[mosh pit]]. I've got nothing against moshing, mind you, but trying to carry that 'if you get hurt you shouldn't have come here' attitude into wikipedia's editing practices is ''bizarre''. or so it seems to me.

:::::I don't see that we lose anything ''that matters to the encyclopedia'' by showing a little common courtesy where we can. you seem to see common courtesy as some infectious form of radical censorship. that position is just such a complete non-sequitor to me that I cannot even fathom why you would hold. maybe if you could explain ''that'' to me we could get somewhere. --[[User_talk:Ludwigs2|<span style="color:darkblue;font-weight:bold">Ludwigs</span><span style="color:green;font-weight:bold">2</span>]] 23:27, 6 November 2011 (UTC)