User talk:89.164.16.105

Do not remove references from articles merely because you think they make the article look unaesthetically pleasing.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 20:35, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

this isn't anything about unaesthetically, but a lie and un-truth, only because Wikipedia is CIA part control sistem, all reviews are from USA, there is truth? WRONG. If I am constant moving the prof. review is because of un-proff. review and it's rate and text has nothing to do about this person article. Either way, leave the Stay the Ride Alive article how it is, but I done, it is better, believe me, no one click on the references. Why others edition what does need it, NEED that reference?! Where is you mind for God sake, are you robot of USA-party? Then if, find lyics of GACKT GHOST song, maybe you will understand more.--89.164.16.105 (talk) 22:25, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

The references are there to support the statements in the article. We have references to show that there is a normal version, a version with a DVD, and a version called the "special memorial single". Removing references is vandalism and if you continue to do so you will be blocked. Also your random accusations of "CIA control" are nonsense.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 22:31, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

Ryulong, you think you are doing something, but you are just doing wrong, that is today life. Yes, Wikipedia is under CIA control, like Flickr and Facebook, what you think, why other langauges article 'like Japan or Italian' aren't having that much work on? Understand what I am doing, article is much better without that no-use references. This isn't violation, but your reason your thoughts about what is good and wrong. Here is none vandalism.--89.164.16.105 (talk) 22:37, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

This is your last warning. Stop reformatting the Stay the Ride Alive article by removing references and turning them into external links. And stop referring to Wikipedia as being under "CIA control". Wikipedia is an international website that is not connected to any governmental entity. This website is edited by Americans, British, Irish, Indian, Russian, Japanese, Croatian (like yourself), and many other nationalities. Stop mentioning your ridiculous conspiracy theory otherwise you will be blocked.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 22:41, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

What if I were in your place, one who thinks his reason, his ego is bigger and better only because is working here more than someone else like me, who was costant removing your external links with my references what aren't helping the article like someone thinks. Is hard to think what is real, but truth hurts, and I have total freedom to edit edits what are better from others, but blocking me will mark you and anyone else as a person who thinks they are egoist.--89.164.16.105 (talk) 22:50, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

The references support statements in the article. Your constant removals are vandalism. Stop making non sequiturs.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 22:52, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

Talk with me, tell me, why, where is your power to do so? Where? Support, how? Is that really a support, that just you imagine, that isn't a support. This is far from the end. You need to go away from the computer, this will block your brain, what USA highers want..--89.164.16.105 (talk) 22:56, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

It doesn't matter whether this website is secretly controlled by the CIA, the KGB, the Lollipop Guild, or the ghost of Walt Disney and an international cabal of sausage-makers. Removing legitimate references is not permissible. Any other random accusations are beside the point. Besides, if that's really true, is scuffing up an article's references going to change it? I'm not strictly saying the references do or don't need to be removed. But stop trying to drag it into red herring territory. - Vianello (Talk) 23:11, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

This has to stop

Please stop vandalizing articles. What you are doing is not OK. Discuss issues on article talk pages and find consensus first.

If you keep vandalizing articles and making unreasonable claims such as CIA control of articles, you will be blocked from editing. If you reset your IP address again and edit past a block we will protect articles from being edited by IP editors.

If you want to discuss and work with editors, that's fine. If not, you are contributing to the wrong project. Wikipedia is an online collaborative encyclopedia. Your input is welcome - but you have to respect Ryulong and others' inputs as well. If you won't respect other contributors, you need to go.

Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 23:23, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

You have been blocked

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Do not ever come onto this site again and insult my country with your hatred and ignorance. Do I make myself clear? So help me, the next block of your IP will be of one year at minimum. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 23:28, 16 December 2009 (UTC)