People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎On animal testing: i am removing this part, as there seems to be no consensus for it
SlimVirgin (talk | contribs)
added some refs, checked others to update access dates, removed some contested or poorly sourced (will post on talk), other MoS fixes
Line 15: Line 15:
| focus = [[Animal rights]]
| focus = [[Animal rights]]
| method =
| method =
| revenue = $34 million for the year ending July 31, 2009<ref>[http://www.peta.org/about/numbers.asp 2009 financial statement], PETA, accessed June 4, 2010.</ref>
| revenue = $34 million for the year ending July 31, 2009<ref>[http://www.peta.org/about/numbers.asp 2009 financial statement], PETA, accessed June 26, 2010.</ref>
| endowment =
| endowment =
| num_volunteers =
| num_volunteers =
Line 28: Line 28:
}}
}}


'''People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals''' ('''PETA''') is an American [[animal rights]] organization based in [[Norfolk, Virginia|Norfolk]], [[Virginia]], led by [[Ingrid Newkirk]], its international president. With two million members and supporters, it says it is the largest animal rights group in the world. Its slogan is "animals are not ours to eat, wear, experiment on, or use for entertainment."<ref>[http://www.peta.org/MC/NewsItem.asp?id=11462 PETA letter to the Sarasota County Commission], accessed May 23, 2008; [http://www.peta.org/about/ "About Peta"], accessed July 10, 2006.</ref>
'''People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals''' ('''PETA''') is an American [[animal rights]] organization based in [[Norfolk, Virginia|Norfolk]], [[Virginia]], led by [[Ingrid Newkirk]], its international president. With two million members and supporters, it says it is the largest animal rights group in the world. Its slogan is "animals are not ours to eat, wear, experiment on, or use for entertainment."<ref>[http://www.peta.org/MC/NewsItem.asp?id=11462 PETA letter to the Sarasota County Commission], accessed June 26, 2010; [http://www.peta.org/about/ "About Peta"], accessed July 10, 2006.</ref>


Founded in 1980, the organization is a [[501(c)#501(c)(3)|non-profit]], tax-exempt corporation with 187 employees, funded almost entirely by its members. In its campaigns and investigations, it focuses on four core issues&mdash;[[factory farming]], [[fur farming]], [[animal testing]], and animals in entertainment&mdash;though it also campaigns against fishing, the killing of animals regarded as pests, the keeping of chained backyard dogs, [[cock fighting]], [[dog fighting]], and [[bullfighting]]. It aims to inform the public through advertisements, undercover investigations, animal rescue, and lobbying.<ref name=about>[http://www.peta.org/about About PETA]</ref>
Founded in 1980, the organization is a [[501(c)#501(c)(3)|non-profit]], tax-exempt corporation with 187 employees, funded almost entirely by its members. In its campaigns and investigations, it focuses on four core issues&mdash;[[factory farming]], [[fur farming]], [[animal testing]], and animals in entertainment&mdash;though it also campaigns against fishing, the killing of animals regarded as pests, the keeping of chained backyard dogs, [[cock fighting]], [[dog fighting]], and [[bullfighting]]. It aims to inform the public through advertisements, undercover investigations, animal rescue, and lobbying.<ref name=about>[http://www.peta.org/about About PETA], accessed June 26, 2010.</ref>


The organization has been criticized for the confrontational style and content of its campaigns, and for the number of animals it [[Animal euthanasia|euthanizes]].<ref>[http://www.newsweek.com/id/134549/ "PETA and Euthanasia"], ''Newsweek'', April 28, 2008</ref> It was further criticized in 2005 by U.S. Senate Environment Committee chairman [[Jim Inhofe]] for having given grants several years earlier to [[Animal Liberation Front]] (ALF) and [[Earth Liberation Front]] (ELF) activists charged with offenses including arson. PETA responded that it has no involvement in ALF or ELF actions, and that it does not support arson or violence.<ref>For Inhofe's allegations, see [http://epw.senate.gov/hearing_statements.cfm?id=247266 Statement of Senator James M. Inhofe], U.S. Senate Committee on Environment & Public Works, May 18, 2005; also see the [http://epw.senate.gov/109th/Exhibit_5.pdf 2001 PETA tax return] referenced by Inhofe. For PETA's response, see Frieden, Terry. [http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/05/19/domestic.terrorism/index.html FBI, ATF address domestic terrorism], CNN, May 19, 2005.</ref> The group has also been criticized from within the animal rights movement for not being radical enough. Animal rights advocate [[Gary Francione]], professor of law at Rutgers School of Law-Newark, calls PETA the "new welfarists," arguing that they have become an animal welfare group because they work with industries to achieve incremental reform.<ref name=Francione67>Francione, Gary. ''Rain without Thunder: The Ideology of the Animal Rights Movement''. Temple University Press, 1996, pp. 67-77.</ref> Newkirk explained PETA's position in 2002: "If anybody wonders 'what's this with all these reforms?' you can hear us clearly. Our goal is total animal liberation, and the day when everyone believes that animals are not ours to eat, not ours to wear, not ours to experiment [on], and not ours for entertainment or any other exploitive purpose."<ref name=Newkirkspeech>Newkirk, Ingrid. [http://vimeo.com/7246561 PETA president speaks up for animals], at 25:44 mins, Animal Rights 2002 Convention, June 30, 2002, accessed May 4, 2010.</ref>
The organization has been criticized for the confrontational style and content of its campaigns, and for the number of animals it [[Animal euthanasia|euthanizes]].<ref>[http://www.newsweek.com/id/134549/ "PETA and Euthanasia"], ''Newsweek'', April 28, 2008.</ref> It was further criticized in 2005 by U.S. Senate Environment Committee chairman [[Jim Inhofe]] for having given grants several years earlier to [[Animal Liberation Front]] (ALF) and [[Earth Liberation Front]] (ELF) activists charged with offenses including arson. PETA responded that it has no involvement in ALF or ELF actions, and that it does not support arson or violence.<ref>For Inhofe's allegations, see [http://epw.senate.gov/hearing_statements.cfm?id=247266 Statement of Senator James M. Inhofe], U.S. Senate Committee on Environment & Public Works, May 18, 2005, accessed June 26, 2010; also see the [http://epw.senate.gov/109th/Exhibit_5.pdf 2001 PETA tax return] referenced by Inhofe. For PETA's response, see Frieden, Terry. [http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/05/19/domestic.terrorism/index.html FBI, ATF address domestic terrorism], CNN, May 19, 2005.</ref> The group has also been criticized from within the animal rights movement for not being radical enough. Animal rights advocate [[Gary Francione]], professor of law at Rutgers School of Law-Newark, calls PETA the "new welfarists," arguing that they have become an animal welfare group because they work with industries to achieve incremental reform.<ref name=Francione67>Francione, Gary. ''Rain without Thunder: The Ideology of the Animal Rights Movement''. Temple University Press, 1996, pp. 67&ndash;77.</ref> Newkirk explained PETA's position in 2002: "If anybody wonders 'what's this with all these reforms?' you can hear us clearly. Our goal is total animal liberation, and the day when everyone believes that animals are not ours to eat, not ours to wear, not ours to experiment [on], and not ours for entertainment or any other exploitive purpose."<ref name=Newkirkspeech>Newkirk, Ingrid. [http://vimeo.com/7246561 PETA president speaks up for animals], at 25:44 mins, Animal Rights 2002 Convention, June 30, 2002, accessed June 26, 2010.</ref>


==History==
==History==
[[Image:Silver-Spring-monkey.jpg|thumb|150px|left|PETA distributed images of the Silver Spring monkeys with the caption, "This is [[vivisection]]. Don't let anyone tell you different."<ref>Carbone, Larry (2004). '"What Animal Want: Expertise and Advocacy in Laboratory Animal Welfare Policy''. Oxford University Press, p. 149, see figure 4.2.</ref>]]
[[Image:Silver-Spring-monkey.jpg|thumb|150px|left|PETA distributed images of the Silver Spring monkeys with the caption, "This is [[vivisection]]. Don't let anyone tell you different."<ref>Carbone, Larry (2004). '"What Animal Want: Expertise and Advocacy in Laboratory Animal Welfare Policy''. Oxford University Press, p. 149, see figure 4.2.</ref>]]
{{See|Silver Spring monkeys}}
{{See|Silver Spring monkeys}}
PETA was founded in the spring of 1980 by Newkirk and [[Alex Pacheco (activist)|Alex Pacheco]], initially as what Newkirk called "five people in a basement." The group first came to public attention in the summer of 1981, during what became known as the [[Silver Spring monkeys]] case, a widely publicized dispute about experiments conducted on 17 macaque monkeys at the Institute of Behavioral Research in [[Silver Spring, Maryland]].<ref>Schwartz, Jeffrey M. and Begley, Sharon. ''The Mind and the Brain: Neuroplasticity and the Power of Mental Force'', Regan Books, 2002.
PETA was founded in the spring of 1980 by Newkirk and [[Alex Pacheco (activist)|Alex Pacheco]], initially as what Newkirk called "five people in a basement." The group first came to public attention in the summer of 1981, during what became known as the [[Silver Spring monkeys]] case, a widely publicized dispute about experiments conducted on 17 macaque monkeys at the Institute of Behavioral Research in Silver Spring, Maryland.<ref>Schwartz, Jeffrey M. and Begley, Sharon. ''The Mind and the Brain: Neuroplasticity and the Power of Mental Force'', Regan Books, 2002.
*Pacheco, Alex and Francione, Anna. [http://www.animal-rights-library.com/texts-m/pacheco01.htm The Silver Spring Monkeys], in Peter Singer (ed.) ''In Defense of Animals'', Basil Blackwell 1985, pp. 135&ndash;147.</ref> The case lasted ten years, involved the first police raid in the U.S. on an animal laboratory, triggered an amendment in 1985 to the Animal Welfare Act, and became the first animal-testing case to be argued before the [[United States Supreme Court]].<ref name=Schwartz>Schwartz, Jeffrey M. and Begley, Sharon. ''The Mind and the Brain: Neuroplasticity and the Power of Mental Force'', Regan Books, 2002, p. 161; [http://www.nal.usda.gov/awic/legislat/pl99198.htm Food Security Act of 1985 subtitle F]</ref>
*Pacheco, Alex and Francione, Anna. [http://www.animal-rights-library.com/texts-m/pacheco01.htm The Silver Spring Monkeys], in Peter Singer (ed.) ''In Defense of Animals'', Basil Blackwell 1985, pp. 135&ndash;147.</ref> The case lasted ten years, involved the first police raid in the U.S. on an animal laboratory, triggered an amendment in 1985 to the Animal Welfare Act, and became the first animal-testing case to be argued before the [[United States Supreme Court]].<ref name=Schwartz>Schwartz, Jeffrey M. and Begley, Sharon. ''The Mind and the Brain: Neuroplasticity and the Power of Mental Force'', Regan Books, 2002, p. 161.</ref>


Pacheco had taken a job in May 1981 inside a primate research laboratory at the Institute, intending to gain firsthand experience of working inside an animal laboratory.<ref>Pacheco, Alex. [http://www.petatv.com/tvpopup/video.asp?video=silver-spring-monkeys&Player=wm "Testimony on the Silver Spring monkeys case], U.S. House Subcommittee on Science, Research, and Technology, PETA, accessed June 25, 2009.</ref> The researcher in charge of the lab, psychologist Dr. Edward Taub, had cut [[Dorsal root ganglion|sensory ganglia]] that supplied nerves to the monkeys' fingers, hands, arms, and legs&mdash;a process called "deafferentation"&mdash;so that the monkeys could not feel them; some of the monkeys had had their entire spinal columns deafferented.<ref name=Doidge141>Doidge, Norman (2007). ''The Brain That Changes Itself''. Viking Penguin , p. 141.</ref> He then used restraint, electric shock, and withholding of food and water to force the monkeys to use the deafferented parts of their bodies.<ref name=Johnson>Johnson, David (2003). [http://www.curledup.com/mindbrai.htm Review of ''The Mind and the Brain: Neuroplasticity and the Power of Mental Force''], ''curledup.com''.</ref> The research led in part to the discovery of [[neuroplasticity]] and a new therapy for stroke victims called [[constraint-induced movement therapy]].<ref>[http://www.strokeassociation.org/presenter.jhtml?identifier=3029931#2006 "Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy"], excerpted from "A Rehab Revolution," ''Stroke Connection Magazine'', September/October 2004.</ref>
Pacheco had taken a job in May 1981 inside a primate research laboratory at the Institute, intending to gain firsthand experience of working inside an animal laboratory.<ref>Pacheco, Alex. [http://www.petatv.com/tvpopup/video.asp?video=silver-spring-monkeys&Player=wm "Testimony on the Silver Spring monkeys case], U.S. House Subcommittee on Science, Research, and Technology, PETA, accessed June 26, 2010.</ref> Edward Taub, the researcher in charge of the lab, had cut [[Dorsal root ganglion|sensory ganglia]] that supplied nerves to the monkeys' fingers, hands, arms, and legs&mdash;a process called "deafferentation"&mdash;so that the monkeys could not feel them; some of the monkeys had had their entire spinal columns deafferented.<ref name=Doidge141>Doidge, Norman (2007). ''The Brain That Changes Itself''. Viking Penguin , p. 141.</ref> He then used restraint, electric shock, and withholding of food and water to force the monkeys to use the deafferented parts of their bodies.<ref name=Johnson>Johnson, David (2003). [http://www.curledup.com/mindbrai.htm Review of ''The Mind and the Brain: Neuroplasticity and the Power of Mental Force''], ''curledup.com''.</ref> The research led in part to the discovery of [[neuroplasticity]] and a new therapy for stroke victims called [[constraint-induced movement therapy]].<ref>[http://www.strokeassociation.org/presenter.jhtml?identifier=3029931#2006 "Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy"], excerpted from "A Rehab Revolution," ''Stroke Connection Magazine'', September/October 2004, accessed June 26, 2010.</ref>


Pacheco visited the laboratory at night, and took photographs that showed the monkeys were living in what the Institute for Laboratory Animal Research's ''ILAR Journal'' called filthy conditions.<ref name=Sideris>Sideris, Lisa et al (1999). [http://dels.nas.edu/ilar_n/ilarjournal/40_1/40_1Roots.shtml "Roots of Concern with Nonhuman Animals in Biomedical Ethics"], Institute for Laboratory Animal Research, ILAR Journal V40(1) 1999.</ref> He turned his evidence over to the police, who raided the lab and arrested Taub. Taub was convicted of six counts of animal cruelty, the first such conviction in the U.S. of an animal researcher, later overturned on appeal.<ref name=Schwartz>Schwartz and Begley 2000, p. 161.</ref> The subsequent dispute, and the ten-year battle for custody of the monkeys&mdash;described by ''The Washington Post'' as a vicious mud fight, during which both sides accused the other of lies and distortion&mdash;transformed PETA into a national, then international, movement. By February 1991, it claimed over 350,000 members, a paid staff of over 100, and an annual budget of over $7 million.<ref>Carlson, Peter. [http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/washingtonpost/access/72090854.html?dids=72090854:72090854&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&type=current&date=Feb+24%2C+1991&author=Peter+Carlson&pub=The+Washington+Post+%28pre-1997+Fulltext%29&desc=THE+GREAT+SILVER+SPRING+MONKEY+DEBATE&pqatl=google The Great Silver Spring Monkey Debate], ''The Washington Post'', February 24, 1991.</ref>
Pacheco visited the laboratory at night, and took photographs that showed the monkeys were living in what the Institute for Laboratory Animal Research's ''ILAR Journal'' called filthy conditions.<ref name=Sideris>Sideris, Lisa et al (1999). [http://dels.nas.edu/ilar_n/ilarjournal/40_1/40_1Roots.shtml "Roots of Concern with Nonhuman Animals in Biomedical Ethics"], Institute for Laboratory Animal Research, ILAR Journal V40(1) 1999.</ref> He turned his evidence over to the police, who raided the lab and arrested Taub. Taub was convicted of six counts of animal cruelty, the first such conviction in the U.S. of an animal researcher, later overturned on appeal.<ref name=Schwartz>Schwartz and Begley 2000, p. 161.</ref> The subsequent dispute, and the ten-year battle for custody of the monkeys&mdash;described by ''The Washington Post'' as a vicious mud fight, during which both sides accused the other of lies and distortion&mdash;transformed PETA into a national, then international, movement. By February 1991, it claimed over 350,000 members, a paid staff of over 100, and an annual budget of over $7 million.<ref>Carlson, Peter. [http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/washingtonpost/access/72090854.html?dids=72090854:72090854&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&type=current&date=Feb+24%2C+1991&author=Peter+Carlson&pub=The+Washington+Post+%28pre-1997+Fulltext%29&desc=THE+GREAT+SILVER+SPRING+MONKEY+DEBATE&pqatl=google The Great Silver Spring Monkey Debate], ''The Washington Post'', February 24, 1991.</ref>
Line 48: Line 48:
[[Image:Alec Baldwin and Ingrid NewKirk by David Shankbone.jpg|right|thumb|200px|[[Alec Baldwin]] with president and co-founder [[Ingrid Newkirk]], at a PETA event for filmmaker Donny Moss in New York City]]
[[Image:Alec Baldwin and Ingrid NewKirk by David Shankbone.jpg|right|thumb|200px|[[Alec Baldwin]] with president and co-founder [[Ingrid Newkirk]], at a PETA event for filmmaker Donny Moss in New York City]]
{{Wikinews|Ingrid Newkirk, co-founder of PETA, on animal rights and the film about her life}}
{{Wikinews|Ingrid Newkirk, co-founder of PETA, on animal rights and the film about her life}}
PETA is an animal rights organization, and as such it rejects [[speciesism]] and the idea of animals as property. It therefore opposes the use of animals in any form: as food, entertainment, clothing, and in animal testing, and would like to see an end to animals being dependent on human beings for their survival.<ref>"Animal rights", ''Encyclopedia Britannica'', accessed July 10, 2006; ''Companion Animals: Pets or Prisoners?'', PETA pamphlet</ref> The group has been criticized by other animal rights advocates for its willingness to work with industries that use animals&mdash;a position many animal rights advocates find problematic (see [[#Conflicts with other animal rights advocates|below]]). Newkirk rejects the criticism, and has said of PETA that it is here to hold the radical line.<ref>Pesce, Carolyn. "Holding the 'radical line'"], ''USA Today'', September 3, 1991.</ref>
PETA is an animal rights organization, and as such it rejects [[speciesism]] and the idea of animals as property. It therefore opposes the use of animals in any form: as food, entertainment, clothing, and in animal testing, and would like to see an end to animals being dependent on human beings for their survival.<ref>"Animal rights", ''Encyclopedia Britannica'', first accessed July 10, 2006, and again June 26, 2010; ''Companion Animals: Pets or Prisoners?'', PETA pamphlet.</ref> The group has been criticized by other animal rights advocates for its willingness to work with industries that use animals&mdash;a position many animal rights advocates find problematic (see [[#Conflicts with other animal rights advocates|below]]). Newkirk rejects the criticism, and has said of PETA that it is here to hold the radical line.<ref>Pesce, Carolyn. "Holding the 'radical line'"], ''USA Today'', September 3, 1991.</ref>


PETA addresses animal advocacy at a macro and micro level, from lobbying governments to advising on how to prevent flooding without destroying beavers' homes. It promotes a vegan diet, tries to reform the practices in factory farms and slaughterhouses, initiates media campaigns against particular companies or practices, helps to find sanctuaries for former circus and zoo animals, initiates lawsuits against companies, and lobbies government to impose fines where animal welfare legislation has been violated. It also introduces children to animal rights through its teacher network and education programs.<ref name=annual2004>[http://www.peta.org/feat/annual_review04/ "PETA annual review 2004"], PETA, accessed April 21, 2010.</ref>
PETA addresses animal advocacy at a macro and micro level, from lobbying governments to advising on how to prevent flooding without destroying beavers' homes. It promotes a vegan diet, tries to reform the practices in factory farms and slaughterhouses, initiates media campaigns against particular companies or practices, helps to find sanctuaries for former circus and zoo animals, initiates lawsuits against companies, and lobbies government to impose fines where animal welfare legislation has been violated. It also introduces children to animal rights through its teacher network and education programs.<ref name=annual2004>[http://www.peta.org/feat/annual_review04/ "PETA annual review 2004"], PETA, accessed June 26, 2010.</ref>


===Campaigning===
===Campaigning===
Line 66: Line 66:
*Sideris, Lisa; McCarthy, Charles & Smith, David H. [http://dels.nas.edu/ilar_n/ilarjournal/40_1/40_1Roots.shtml "Roots of Concern with Nonhuman Animals in Biomedical Ethics"], ''Bioethics of Laboratory Animal Research'', Institute for Laboratory Animal Research (ILAR) Journal V40 (1) 1999.</ref>
*Sideris, Lisa; McCarthy, Charles & Smith, David H. [http://dels.nas.edu/ilar_n/ilarjournal/40_1/40_1Roots.shtml "Roots of Concern with Nonhuman Animals in Biomedical Ethics"], ''Bioethics of Laboratory Animal Research'', Institute for Laboratory Animal Research (ILAR) Journal V40 (1) 1999.</ref>


[[File:It'sADog'sLife.gif|left|thumb|180px|PETA filmed [[Huntingdon Life Sciences|HLS]] staff in the UK beating dogs, broadcast by Channel 4 in the UK as ''It's a dog's life''.]]
[[File:It'sADog'sLife.gif|left|thumb|180px|PETA filmed [[Huntingdon Life Sciences|HLS]] staff in the UK beating dogs, broadcast in 1997 by Channel 4 in the UK as ''It's a dog's life''.<ref>[http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/1123837.stm "A controversial laboratory"], BBC News, January 18, 2001.</ref>]]
In 1990, [[Bobby Berosini]], a Las Vegas entertainer, lost his wildlife license, as well as a later lawsuit against PETA, after PETA broadcast an undercover film of him slapping and punching orangutans.<ref>Hearne, Vicki. ''Can an ape tell a joke?'', ''Harpers'', November 1, 1993; [http://www1.law.umkc.edu/Faculty/levit/DefamationPrivacy/Winter2005/PETAvBobby.pdf PETA v. Bobby Berosini] from the Supreme Court of Nevada; [http://www.rcfp.org/news/1994/0222f.html High court throws out $4.2 million judgment animal trainer won in libel, privacy suit], The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, accessed June 28, 2009; Geer, Carri. [http://www.reviewjournal.com/lvrj_home/1998/Apr-30-Thu-1998/news/7409815.html Animal rights group's requests on Berosini assets rejected], ''Las Vegas Review-Journal'', April 20, 1998; Geer, Carri. [http://www.reviewjournal.com/lvrj_home/2000/Feb-15-Tue-2000/news/12963917.html Berosini ordered to return $2 million to United States], ''Las Vegas Review-Journal'', February 15, 2000; Greer, Carri. [http://www.reviewjournal.com/lvrj_home/2002/Mar-11-Mon-2002/news/18269503.html Former showman and his wife ordered to pay three law firms], ''Las Vegas Review-Journal'', March 11, 2002.</ref> A PETA investigation inside [[Huntingdon Life Sciences]] (HLS), a contract animal-testing company, in 1997 produced film of staff in the UK beating dogs,<ref name=PETAHLS>[http://web.archive.org/web/20051103222642/http://www.huntingdonsucks.com/gallery/InsideHLS.mpg Undercover video footage of HLS employees beating a puppy], filmed at the Huntingdon Research Centre, England (video), accessed June 20, 2009; also see [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=88kMJXphN0k YouTube], accessed April 22, 2010.</ref> and what appears to be abuse of monkeys in the company's New Jersey facility.<ref name=scaredmonkey>[http://web.archive.org/web/20051031040108/http://www.huntingdonsucks.com/gallery/scared_monkey.mov Undercover video footage of HLS employees apparently dissecting a live monkey], filmed at the HLS Princeton Research Center, New Jersey, U.S. (video), accessed June 20, 2009.</ref> After the video footage aired on British television in 1999, a group of activists set up [[Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty]] with a view to closing HLS down, a campaign that is ongoing.
In 1990, [[Bobby Berosini]], a Las Vegas entertainer, lost his wildlife license, as well as a later lawsuit against PETA, after PETA broadcast an undercover film of him slapping and punching orangutans.<ref>Hearne, Vicki. ''Can an ape tell a joke?'', ''Harpers'', November 1, 1993; [http://www1.law.umkc.edu/Faculty/levit/DefamationPrivacy/Winter2005/PETAvBobby.pdf PETA v. Bobby Berosini] from the Supreme Court of Nevada; [http://www.rcfp.org/news/1994/0222f.html High court throws out $4.2 million judgment animal trainer won in libel, privacy suit], The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, accessed June 28, 2009; Geer, Carri. [http://www.reviewjournal.com/lvrj_home/1998/Apr-30-Thu-1998/news/7409815.html Animal rights group's requests on Berosini assets rejected], ''Las Vegas Review-Journal'', April 20, 1998; Geer, Carri. [http://www.reviewjournal.com/lvrj_home/2000/Feb-15-Tue-2000/news/12963917.html Berosini ordered to return $2 million to United States], ''Las Vegas Review-Journal'', February 15, 2000; Greer, Carri. [http://www.reviewjournal.com/lvrj_home/2002/Mar-11-Mon-2002/news/18269503.html Former showman and his wife ordered to pay three law firms], ''Las Vegas Review-Journal'', March 11, 2002.</ref> A PETA investigation inside [[Huntingdon Life Sciences]] (HLS), a contract animal-testing company, in 1997 produced film of staff in the UK beating dogs,<ref name=PETAHLS>[http://web.archive.org/web/20051103222642/http://www.huntingdonsucks.com/gallery/InsideHLS.mpg Undercover video footage of HLS employees beating a puppy], filmed at the Huntingdon Research Centre, England (video), accessed June 20, 2009; also see [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=88kMJXphN0k YouTube], accessed April 22, 2010.</ref> and what appears to be abuse of monkeys in the company's New Jersey facility.<ref name=scaredmonkey>[http://web.archive.org/web/20051031040108/http://www.huntingdonsucks.com/gallery/scared_monkey.mov Undercover video footage of HLS employees apparently dissecting a live monkey], filmed at the HLS Princeton Research Center, New Jersey, U.S. (video), accessed June 20, 2009.</ref> After the video footage aired on British television in 1999, a group of activists set up [[Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty]] with a view to closing HLS down, a campaign that is ongoing.


In 1999, a North Carolina grand jury handed down indictments against pig-farm workers on Belcross Farm in Camden County, the first indictments for animal cruelty on a factory farm in the U.S., after a three-month PETA investigation produced film of the workers beating the animals, and skinning a sow that was allegedly still conscious.<ref>[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OJZZOe2K15k PETA: Belcross Farms investigation], PETA video narrated by James Cromwell, ''YouTube'', accessed April 27, 2010; [http://www.peta.org/feat/invest/index.html "Pig Farm Cruelty Revealed"], PETA, accessed April 21, 2010; [http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1298&dat=19990708&id=FewyAAAAIBAJ&sjid=fQgGAAAAIBAJ&pg=6661,1729672 PETA probe spurs indictment of three for cruelty to pigs], Associated Press, July 9, 1999.</ref>
In 1999, a North Carolina grand jury handed down indictments against pig-farm workers on Belcross Farm in Camden County, the first indictments for animal cruelty on a factory farm in the U.S., after a three-month PETA investigation produced film of the workers beating the animals, and skinning a sow that was allegedly still conscious.<ref>[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OJZZOe2K15k PETA: Belcross Farms investigation], PETA video narrated by James Cromwell, ''YouTube'', accessed April 27, 2010; [http://www.peta.org/feat/invest/index.html "Pig Farm Cruelty Revealed"], PETA, accessed April 21, 2010; [http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1298&dat=19990708&id=FewyAAAAIBAJ&sjid=fQgGAAAAIBAJ&pg=6661,1729672 PETA probe spurs indictment of three for cruelty to pigs], Associated Press, July 9, 1999.</ref>


[[Image:600-restraint-tube4.jpg|right|thumb|180px|A monkey in a restraint tube, as filmed by PETA in [[Covance]] laboratory in [[Vienna, Virginia]], 2004&ndash;2005.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.covancecruelty.com/photos.asp |title=>> Photo Gallery |publisher=Covance Cruelty |date= |accessdate=2010-03-26}}</ref> Covance disputed many of PETA's charges, but not this photograph.<ref name=Covance-conclude /><ref name=Covance-cleared />]]
[[Image:600-restraint-tube4.jpg|right|thumb|180px|A monkey in a restraint tube filmed by PETA inside [[Covance]], Vienna, Virginia, 2004&ndash;2005.<ref>[http://www.covancecruelty.com/photos.asp Covance photo gallery], PETA, accessed June 26, 2010.</ref>]]
In 2003 and 2004, a PETA investigation inside [[Covance]], an animal-testing company in the U.S. and Europe, obtained footage that appeared to show monkeys being mistreated. A PETA employee filmed primates in Covance's Vienna, Virginia, lab being choked, hit, and denied medical attention when badly injured, according to PETA.<ref name=Buske>Buske, Jennifer. [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/08/01/AR2008080103886.html "PETA Urges Withdrawal Of Support for Drug-Test Lab"], ''The Washington Post'', August 3, 2008.</ref> PETA submitted a formal complaint to the U.S. Department of Agriculture.<ref>[http://www.covancecruelty.com/videos.asp Video footage from inside Covance]; [http://www.covancecruelty.com/feat-fined.asp "Covance fined for violations of the Animal Welfare Act"], PETA; Benz, Kathy and McManus, Michael. [http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/05/17/peta.lab/index.html PETA accuses lab of animal cruelty], CNN, May 17, 2005.</ref> Covance received 16 sanctions and agreed to a fine of $8,720, but said the citations were for minor administrative matters unrelated to animal cruelty, and that over 700 of the charges made by PETA had been rejected by the government.<ref>[http://www.covancechandler.com/docs/pr060331.pdf Covance Announces Conclusion Of U.S. Food and Drug Administration and Department of Agriculture Inspections of Its Vienna, VA Facility], Covance press release, March 31, 2008, accessed June 26, 2010.</ref> In 2005 Covance initiated a lawsuit charging PETA with fraud, violation of employee contract, and conspiracy to harm the company's business, but later dropped it.<ref name=Buske/>


In 2004, PETA published the results of an eight-month undercover investigation in a West Virginia [[Pilgrim's Pride]] slaughterhouse that supplies chickens to KFC. ''The New York Times'' reported the investigation as showing workers stomping on live chickens, throwing dozens against a wall, tearing the head off a chicken to write graffiti, strangling one with a latex glove, and squeezing birds until they exploded. [[Yum Brands]], owner of KFC, called the video appalling, and threatened to stop purchasing from Pilgrim's Pride if no changes were made; Pilgrim's Pride fired 11 employees, and introduced an anti-cruelty pledge for workers to sign.<ref>McNeil, Donald G. [http://www.nytimes.com/2004/07/25/weekinreview/the-nation-gaining-ground-at-last-a-company-takes-peta-seriously.html "The Nation: Gaining Ground; At Last, a Company Takes PETA Seriously"], ''The New York Times'', July 25, 2004.</ref>
In 1999 PETA obtained undercover footage from inside the [[Carolina Biological Supply Company]], which appeared to show wriggling cats being embalmed alive. An anatomist argued that the wriggling was the effect formalin has on freshly dead muscle tissue, and showed a video of the same writhing in a cat known to be dead; the case against the company was dismissed.<ref>Morrison, Adrian R. [http://www.naiaonline.org/body/articles/archives/labanimalarticle.htm "Pogo Revisited: Caring about animals and creativity"], National Animal Interest Alliance.</ref>

In 2003 and 2004, a PETA investigation inside [[Covance]], an animal-testing company in the U.S. and Europe, obtained footage that appeared to show monkeys being hit and mistreated; PETA submitted a formal complaint to the U.S. Department of Agriculture.<ref>[http://www.covancecruelty.com/videos.asp Video footage from inside Covance]; [http://www.covancecruelty.com/feat-fined.asp "Covance fined for violations of the Animal Welfare Act"], PETA; Benz, Kathy and McManus, Michael. [http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/05/17/peta.lab/index.html PETA accuses lab of animal cruelty], CNN, May 17, 2005.</ref> Covance received 16 sanctions and agreed to a fine of $8,720, but stated that all of the citations were for minor administrative matters unrelated to animal cruelty, and that over 700 of the specific charges made by PETA had been rejected by the government.<ref name=Covance-conclude>{{cite web
|url= http://www.covancechandler.com/docs/pr060331.pdf
|title= Covance Announces Conclusion Of U.S. Food and Drug Administration and Department of Agriculture Inspections of Its Vienna, VA Facility
|accessdate= 2008-08-10
|date= 2008-03-31
|format= PDF
|publisher= Covance}}</ref> Covance also claimed that PETA had edited film together in order to exaggerate the evidence;<ref name=Covance-cleared /> PETA denied this allegation. A German state prosecutor determined that Covance's European laboratories had broken no laws.<ref name=Covance-cleared>[http://www.ebra.org/ebrabulletin-covance-cleared-of-primate-charges_136.htm Covance cleared of primate charges], European Biomedical Research Association, 2004. Retrieved June 20, 2009.</ref> Legal action has also been brought against PETA for invasion of privacy following undercover work, but a federal judge in the U.S. ruled in PETA's favor in April 2007 that undercover investigations often reveal misconduct.<ref name=RoodApril13/>

In 2004, PETA published the results of an eight-month undercover investigation in a West Virginia [[Pilgrim's Pride]] slaughterhouse that supplies chickens to KFC. ''The New York Times'' reported the investigation as showing workers stomping on live chickens, throwing dozens against a wall, tearing the head off a chicken to write graffiti, strangling one with a latex glove, and squeezing birds until they exploded. [[Yum Brands]], owner of KFC, called the video appalling, and threatened to stop purchasing from Pilgrim's Pride if no changes were made; Pilgrim's Pride fired 11 employees, and introduced an anti-cruelty pledge for workers to sign.<ref>McNeil, Donald G. [http://www.nytimes.com/2004/07/25/weekinreview/the-nation-gaining-ground-at-last-a-company-takes-peta-seriously.html The Nation: Gaining Ground; At Last, a Company Takes PETA Seriously], ''The New York Times'', July 25, 2004.</ref>


===Positions===
===Positions===
Line 97: Line 88:
*Hsu, Spencer S. [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/19/AR2005121901777.html "FBI Papers Show Terror Inquiries Into PETA; Other Groups Tracked"], ''The Washington Post'', December 20, 2005.</ref>
*Hsu, Spencer S. [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/19/AR2005121901777.html "FBI Papers Show Terror Inquiries Into PETA; Other Groups Tracked"], ''The Washington Post'', December 20, 2005.</ref>


According to the ''New York Post'', PETA gave $1,500 to the [[Earth Liberation Front]] in 2001; Newkirk said the donation was a mistake, and that the money had been intended for public education about destruction of habitat.<ref>Friedman, Stefan C. [http://web.archive.org/web/20030622034250/http://espn.go.com/outdoors/general/columns/guest_columnist/1349596.html "The PETA-ELF connection"], ''New York Post'', undated, accessed April 23, 2010.</ref> In 1995, [[Rod Coronado]], a former ALF activist, received $64,000 from PETA and two months later $38,240, as a loan to fund his legal defense, after being convicted of setting fire to a Michigan State University research lab in 1992. During Coronado's trial, U.S. Attorney Michael Dettmer claimed Newkirk had arranged before the fact to have Coronado send her documents from the lab and a videotape of the raid;<ref>Government sentencing memorandum of U.S. Attorney Michael Dettmer in USA v. Rodney Coronado, July 31, 1995, pp. 8–10. Exhibit in U.S. Senate testimony: [http://epw.senate.gov/109th/MARTOSKO_TESTIMONY.pdf].</ref> Newkirk denied this allegation, describing it and related charges as inane.<ref>{{Cite journal|url=http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=578jAAAAIBAJ&sjid=0dAFAAAAIBAJ&pg=6761,29288&dq=newkirk+coronado+peta&hl=en|title=Rejected plea bargain called Coronado "positive role model".|first=Ken|last=Olsen|journal=Moscow-Pullman Daily News|date=February 1, 1995|accessdate=June 23, 2010|page=6A}}</ref> PETA claimed a tax refund from the Internal Revenue Service for the donation after the arson took place.<ref name=RodCoronado$>[http://epw.senate.gov/109th/Exhibit_11.pdf Exhibit #11. PETA Gives Over $70,000 to ALF Member After Burning Down Michigan State Research Lab], Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works, accessed June 20, 2006.</ref>
According to the ''New York Post'', PETA gave $1,500 to the [[Earth Liberation Front]] in 2001; Newkirk said the donation was a mistake, and that the money had been intended for public education about destruction of habitat.<ref>Friedman, Stefan C. [http://web.archive.org/web/20030622034250/http://espn.go.com/outdoors/general/columns/guest_columnist/1349596.html "The PETA-ELF connection"], ''New York Post'', undated, accessed April 23, 2010.</ref> In 1995, [[Rod Coronado]], a former ALF activist, received $64,000 from PETA and two months later $38,240, as a loan to fund his legal defense, after being convicted of setting fire to a Michigan State University research lab in 1992. During Coronado's trial, U.S. Attorney Michael Dettmer said Newkirk had arranged before the fact to have Coronado send her documents from the lab and a videotape of the raid.<ref>Government sentencing memorandum of U.S. Attorney Michael Dettmer in USA v. Rodney Coronado, July 31, 1995, pp. 8–10; [http://epw.senate.gov/109th/Exhibit_11.pdf Exhibit #11. PETA Gives Over $70,000 to ALF Member After Burning Down Michigan State Research Lab], Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works, accessed June 26, 2010.</ref>


====On animal testing====
====On neutering, backyard dogs, and pets====
PETA believes that [[animal testing]]&mdash;whether toxicity testing, basic or applied research, or for education and training&mdash;is wasteful, unreliable, and irrelevant to human health, because artificially induced diseases in animals are not identical to human diseases, and because humans and animals differ in biologically significant ways. They say that animal experiments are frequently redundant and lack accountability, oversight, and regulation. Newkirk told ''Vogue'' magazine in 1989 that even if animal research resulted in a cure for AIDS, PETA would be against it.<ref>''Vogue magazine'', September 1989.</ref> PETA promotes alternatives, including [[embryonic stem cell]] research and [[in vitro]] cell research.<ref>[http://www.peta.org/mc/factsheet_display.asp?ID=126 Animal Experiments: Overview], PETA, accessed June 20, 2009.</ref> PETA employees have volunteered for human testing of vaccines; Scott Van Valkenburg, PETA’s Director of Major Gifts, said in 1999 that he had been a volunteer in human testing of HIV vaccines.<ref>Van Valkenburg, Scott. [http://www.seattleweekly.com/1999-07-07/news/letters Letters: White-coat welfare], ''Seattle Weekly'', July 7, 1999; see [http://www.petavanguardsociety.com/Svalkenburg.asp Scott Van Valkenburg], PETA, accessed June 20, 2009.</ref>

In October 2007, PETA asked the United States Army to reconsider its use of live animals to simulate battlefield injuries during medical education and training, and in February 2008 sent a letter to Assessment and Training Solutions, a contractor which offers the training to the military, asking the company to change its methods. In late 2008, the United States Department of Defense (DoD) formed an analysis team to reevaluate the use of live animals for training; it said that the review was unrelated to external activities or organizations. PETA spokesman Shalin Gala said of the development, "They wouldn't be reviewing this unless pressure was brought to bear on the situation."<ref>Jones, Matthew, "[http://hamptonroads.com/2009/03/peta-sees-win-militarys-probe-use-animals PETA Sees Win In Military's Probe Of Use Of Animals]", ''[[Norfolk Virginian-Pilot]]'', March 20, 2009.</ref>

====On pet welfare and ownership====
[[File:PETAandbackyarddogs.jpg|thumb|180px|PETA provides dog houses for chained backyard dogs.]]
[[File:PETAandbackyarddogs.jpg|thumb|180px|PETA provides dog houses for chained backyard dogs.]]
PETA runs several programs though its Community Animal Project that helps cats and dogs in poorer areas of Virginia, near PETA's headquarters.<ref>[http://www.peta.org/feat/cap/ Join PETA's Community Animal Project], PETA, accessed April 23, 2010.</ref> In 2008 they [[neutering|neutered]] 7,485 cats, dogs, and rabbits in that area, including pit bulls and feral cats, at a discounted rate or free of charge. The group helps neglected dogs and cats who are ill and injured, and pursues cruelty cases. Each year they set up hundreds of dog houses with straw bedding for dogs chained outside all winter.<ref>They supplied over 300 dog houses and 1,200 bales of straw in 2008; see [http://www.peta.org/feat/annualreview/numbers.asp The Year in Numbers], PETA Annual Review 2008, accessed June 20, 2009.</ref> PETA also produces advertisements urging people to control the pet population through neutering and adoption from shelters,<ref>[http://www.helpinganimals.com/about_cap.asp "Helping Animals in Our Region"], PETA's Community Animal Project; [http://www.peta.org/about/faq-comp.asp Companion Animals FAQs], PETA's position on pets or 'companion animals'.</ref> and campaigns against organizations such as the [[American Kennel Club]] that promote the breeding of purebred strains.<ref>Farris, Gene. [http://www.usatoday.com/sports/2009-02-09-peta-westminster-kkk-protest_N.htm PETA dresses in KKK garb outside Westminster Dog Show], ''USA Today'', February 10, 2009.</ref>
PETA runs several programs though its Community Animal Project that helps cats and dogs in poorer areas of Virginia, near PETA's headquarters.<ref>[http://www.peta.org/feat/cap/ Join PETA's Community Animal Project], PETA, accessed April 23, 2010.</ref> In 2008 they [[neutering|neutered]] 7,485 cats, dogs, and rabbits in that area, including pit bulls and feral cats, at a discounted rate or free of charge. The group helps neglected dogs and cats who are ill and injured, and pursues cruelty cases. Each year they set up hundreds of dog houses with straw bedding for dogs chained outside all winter.<ref>They supplied over 300 dog houses and 1,200 bales of straw in 2008; see [http://www.peta.org/feat/annualreview/numbers.asp The Year in Numbers], PETA Annual Review 2008, accessed June 20, 2009.</ref> PETA also produces advertisements urging people to control the pet population through neutering and adoption from shelters,<ref>[http://www.helpinganimals.com/about_cap.asp "Helping Animals in Our Region"], PETA's Community Animal Project; [http://www.peta.org/about/faq-comp.asp Companion Animals FAQs], PETA's position on pets or 'companion animals'.</ref> and campaigns against organizations such as the [[American Kennel Club]] that promote the breeding of purebred strains.<ref>Farris, Gene. [http://www.usatoday.com/sports/2009-02-09-peta-westminster-kkk-protest_N.htm PETA dresses in KKK garb outside Westminster Dog Show], ''USA Today'', February 10, 2009.</ref>


PETA argues that it would have been better for animals had the institution of breeding them as "pets" never emerged. The group argues that the desire to own and receive love from animals is selfish, and that their breeding, sale, and purchase can cause immeasurable suffering. They write that millions of dogs spend their lives chained outside in all weather conditions or locked up in chain-link pens and wire cages in puppy mills, and that even in what they call good homes animals are often not well cared for. They would like to see the population of dogs and cats reduced through spaying and neutering, and for people never to purchase animals from pet shops or breeders, but to adopt them from shelters instead. The group makes clear that they have no desire to confiscate or set free animals who are well cared for, and deplores what they call the "myth" that they would want to do so.<ref name=pets>[http://www.peta.org/campaigns/ar-petaonpets.asp Animal Rights Uncompromised: PETA on 'Pets'], PETA, accessed June 15, 2010.</ref>
PETA argues that it would have been better for animals had the institution of breeding them as "pets" never emerged. The group argues that the desire to own and receive love from animals is selfish, and that their breeding, sale, and purchase can cause immeasurable suffering. They write that millions of dogs spend their lives chained outside in all weather conditions or locked up in chain-link pens and wire cages in puppy mills, and that even in what they call good homes animals are often not well cared for. They would like to see the population of dogs and cats reduced through spaying and neutering, and for people never to purchase animals from pet shops or breeders, but to adopt them from shelters instead. The group makes clear that they have no desire to confiscate or set free animals who are well cared for, and deplores what they call the "myth" that they would want to do so.<ref name=pets>[http://www.peta.org/campaigns/ar-petaonpets.asp Animal Rights Uncompromised: PETA on 'Pets'], PETA, accessed June 15, 2010.</ref>
Line 122: Line 108:
[[File:Steve irwin at Australia zoo.jpg|right|thumb|200px|PETA criticizes conservation personalities such as [[Steve Irwin]] for placing animals under stress.]]
[[File:Steve irwin at Australia zoo.jpg|right|thumb|200px|PETA criticizes conservation personalities such as [[Steve Irwin]] for placing animals under stress.]]
PETA is critical of television personalities they call self-professed wildlife warriors, arguing that while a conservationist message is getting across, some of the actions are harmful to animals, such as invading animals' homes, netting them, subjecting them to stressful environments, and wrestling with them. Those actions often involve juvenile animals which the group says should be with their mothers.<ref>[http://www.helpinganimals.com/f-wildlifewarriors.asp Steve Irwin: Not a True 'Wildlife Warrior'], PETA, accessed September 15, 2006.</ref> In 2006 when [[Steve Irwin]] died, PETA's vice-president [[Dan Mathews]] said that Irwin had made a career out of antagonizing frightened wild animals, a dangerous message to send to children.<ref>Walls, Jeannette (2006). [http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14626178/PETA sheds no crocodile tears for Steve Irwin], MSNBC, Sept 11, 2006.</ref> Australian Member of Parliament [[Bruce Scott]] said PETA should apologize to Irwin's family and the rest of Australia.<ref>[http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,20416291-5008780,00.html PETA renews attack on Irwin], accessed September 15, 2006.</ref>
PETA is critical of television personalities they call self-professed wildlife warriors, arguing that while a conservationist message is getting across, some of the actions are harmful to animals, such as invading animals' homes, netting them, subjecting them to stressful environments, and wrestling with them. Those actions often involve juvenile animals which the group says should be with their mothers.<ref>[http://www.helpinganimals.com/f-wildlifewarriors.asp Steve Irwin: Not a True 'Wildlife Warrior'], PETA, accessed September 15, 2006.</ref> In 2006 when [[Steve Irwin]] died, PETA's vice-president [[Dan Mathews]] said that Irwin had made a career out of antagonizing frightened wild animals, a dangerous message to send to children.<ref>Walls, Jeannette (2006). [http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14626178/PETA sheds no crocodile tears for Steve Irwin], MSNBC, Sept 11, 2006.</ref> Australian Member of Parliament [[Bruce Scott]] said PETA should apologize to Irwin's family and the rest of Australia.<ref>[http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,20416291-5008780,00.html PETA renews attack on Irwin], accessed September 15, 2006.</ref>

{{clear}}
====On animal testing====
PETA believes that [[animal testing]]&mdash;whether toxicity testing, basic or applied research, or for education and training&mdash;is wasteful, unreliable, and irrelevant to human health, because artificially induced diseases in animals are not identical to human diseases, and because humans and animals differ in biologically significant ways. They say that animal experiments are frequently redundant and lack accountability, oversight, and regulation. Newkirk told ''Vogue'' magazine in 1989 that even if animal research resulted in a cure for AIDS, PETA would be against it.<ref>''Vogue magazine'', September 1989.</ref> PETA promotes alternatives, including [[embryonic stem cell]] research and [[in vitro]] cell research.<ref>[http://www.peta.org/mc/factsheet_display.asp?ID=126 Animal Experiments: Overview], PETA, accessed June 20, 2009.</ref> PETA employees have volunteered for human testing of vaccines; Scott Van Valkenburg, PETA’s Director of Major Gifts, said in 1999 that he had been a volunteer in human testing of HIV vaccines.<ref>Van Valkenburg, Scott. [http://www.seattleweekly.com/1999-07-07/news/letters Letters: White-coat welfare], ''Seattle Weekly'', July 7, 1999; see [http://www.petavanguardsociety.com/Svalkenburg.asp Scott Van Valkenburg], PETA, accessed June 20, 2009.</ref>


==Conflicts with other animal rights advocates==
==Conflicts with other animal rights advocates==
Line 136: Line 124:


==Finance==
==Finance==
PETA received donations of over $32 million for the year ending July 31, 2009. Over 80 percent of its operating budget was spent on its programs; 15 percent on fundraising efforts; and four percent on management and general operations. Thirty-two percent of its staff earned under $30,000, and 24 percent earned over $40,000. Newkirk earned just under $37,000. <ref>[http://www.peta.org/about/numbers.asp 2009 Financial Statement], PETA, accessed April 23, 2010; [http://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm/bay/search.summary/orgid/4314.htm Charity Rating], charitynavigator.org.</ref>
PETA received donations of over $32 million for the year ending July 31, 2009. Over 80 percent of its operating budget was spent on its programs; 15 percent on fundraising efforts; and four percent on management and general operations. Thirty-two percent of its staff earned under $30,000, and 24 percent earned over $40,000. Newkirk earned just under $37,000. <ref>[http://www.peta.org/about/numbers.asp 2009 Financial Statement], PETA, accessed June 26, 2010; [http://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm/bay/search.summary/orgid/4314.htm "People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals"], charitynavigator.org, accessed June 26, 2010.</ref>


The U.S. [[United States Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works|Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works]] has criticized PETA's finances, pointing to tax-return claims for funding organizations such as the ALF.<ref>[http://epw.senate.gov/109th/Exhibit_5.pdf Exhibit5] "PETA Tax Return Claiming Grant to Terrorist Organization", [http://epw.senate.gov/109th/Exhibit_11.pdf Exhibit 11] "PETA gives over $70,000 to ALF member after burning down Michigan State Research Lab"</ref> The [[BBB Wise Giving Alliance]] said in 2008 that PETA does not meet three of its 17 accountability standards: the board chair serves as the treasurer of the board; it has only three voting members of the board, instead of the recommended five; and its website does not provide electronic access to its most recent IRS Form 990.<ref>[http://www.bbb.org/charity-reviews/national/animal-protection/people-for-the-ethical-treatment-of-animals-in-norfolk-va-1160 People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals], Better Business Bureau, accessed April 24, 2010.</ref>
The U.S. [[United States Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works|Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works]] has criticized PETA's finances, pointing to tax-return claims for funding organizations such as the ALF.<ref>[http://epw.senate.gov/109th/Exhibit_5.pdf Exhibit5] "PETA Tax Return Claiming Grant to Terrorist Organization", [http://epw.senate.gov/109th/Exhibit_11.pdf Exhibit 11] "PETA gives over $70,000 to ALF member after burning down Michigan State Research Lab"</ref> The [[BBB Wise Giving Alliance]] said in 2008 that PETA does not meet three of its 17 accountability standards: the board chair serves as the treasurer of the board; it has only three voting members of the board, instead of the recommended five; and its website does not provide electronic access to its most recent IRS Form 990.<ref>[http://www.bbb.org/charity-reviews/national/animal-protection/people-for-the-ethical-treatment-of-animals-in-norfolk-va-1160 People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals], Better Business Bureau, accessed June 26, 2010.</ref>


==Media campaigns==
==Media campaigns==
===Animals as food===
===Animals as food===
[[File:PETA Lettuce Ladies.JPG|right|thumb|130px|Two of PETA's Lettuce Ladies in [[Columbus, Ohio]]]]
[[File:PETA Lettuce Ladies.JPG|right|thumb|120px|Two of PETA's Lettuce Ladies in [[Columbus, Ohio]]]]
{{See also|Kentucky Fried Cruelty#KentuckyFriedCruelty.com}}
{{See also|Kentucky_Fried_Cruelty#KentuckyFriedCruelty.com}}
PETA promotes vegetarian and vegan diets through celebrity ads, a vegetarian-specific website, a vegetarian cooking blog and website, by offering free Vegetarian Starter Kits, and by publishing explicit videos of meat production.<ref>[http://www.petatv.com/tvpopup/video.asp?video=MYM_update_500&Player=wm Meat Your Meat narrated by Alec Baldwin]</ref> PETA has also criticized [[kosher]] and [[halal]] methods of animal slaughter as inhumane.<ref>[http://blog.peta.org/archives/kosher_meat Investigator Discusses PETA Sting on Kosher Slaughterhouse], PETA, accessed April 22, 2010.</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.islamicconcerns.com/halalvegetarianism.asp |title=Halal Vegetarianism | author= IslamicConcerns.com a PETA web site|accessdate= 23 June 2010}}</ref>
PETA promotes vegetarian and vegan diets through celebrity ads, a vegetarian-specific website, a vegetarian cooking blog and website, by offering free Vegetarian Starter Kits, and by publishing explicit videos of meat production.<ref>[http://www.petatv.com/tvpopup/video.asp?video=MYM_update_500&Player=wm Meat Your Meat narrated by Alec Baldwin]</ref> PETA has also criticized [[kosher]] and [[halal]] methods of animal slaughter as inhumane.<ref>[http://blog.peta.org/archives/kosher_meat Investigator Discusses PETA Sting on Kosher Slaughterhouse], PETA, accessed April 22, 2010; [http://www.islamicconcerns.com/halalvegetarianism.asp "Halal Vegetarianism"], Islamicconcerns.com, a PETA website, accessed June 26, 2010.</ref>


;Holocaust on your Plate
;Holocaust on your Plate
{{see|Animal rights and the Holocaust}}
{{see|Animal rights and the Holocaust}}
The 2003 Holocaust on your Plate exhibition consisted of eight {{convert|60|sqft|m2|adj=on}} panels, each juxtaposing images of the [[The Holocaust|Holocaust]] with images of factory farming. The campaign was inspired by the Nobel Prize-winning Jewish author [[Isaac Bashevis Singer]], a vegetarian and animal rights supporter, who wrote: "In relation to [animals], all people are Nazis; for them it is an eternal [[Treblinka extermination camp|Treblinka]]."<ref>[http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/Northeast/02/28/peta.holocaust Group blasts PETA 'Holocaust' project], CNN, February 28, 2003.</ref> The exhibit's creator, Matt Prescott, who is Jewish and lost several relatives in the Holocaust, said it was the mindset that made the Holocaust possible&mdash;that we may do what we want to those we decide are inferior&mdash;that allows atrocities to be committed against animals.<ref name=Teather>Teather, David. [http://www.guardian.co.uk/animalrights/story/0,11917,906289,00.html "'Holocaust on a plate' angers US Jews"], ''The Guardian'', March 3, 2003.</ref>
The 2003 Holocaust on your Plate exhibition consisted of eight {{convert|60|sqft|m2|adj=on}} panels, each juxtaposing images of the [[The Holocaust|Holocaust]] with images of factory farming. The campaign was inspired by the Nobel Prize-winning Jewish author [[Isaac Bashevis Singer]], an animal rights advocate, who wrote: "In relation to [animals], all people are Nazis; for them it is an eternal [[Treblinka extermination camp|Treblinka]]."<ref>[http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/Northeast/02/28/peta.holocaust Group blasts PETA 'Holocaust' project], CNN, February 28, 2003.</ref> The exhibit's creator, Matt Prescott, who himself lost relatives in the Holocaust, said it was the same mindset that made the Holocaust possible&mdash;that we may do what we want to those we decide are inferior&mdash;that allows atrocities to be committed against animals.<ref name=Teather>Teather, David. [http://www.guardian.co.uk/animalrights/story/0,11917,906289,00.html "'Holocaust on a plate' angers US Jews"], ''The Guardian'', March 3, 2003.</ref>


Photographs of concentration camp inmates were shown next to those of caged chickens, and piled bodies of Holocaust victims next to a pile of pig carcasses. Captions included: "like the Jews murdered in concentration camps, animals are terrorized when they are housed in huge filthy warehouses and rounded up for shipment to slaughter. The leather sofa and handbag are the moral equivalent of the lampshades made from the skins of people killed in the Nazi death camps."<ref name=SmithHolocaust>Smith, Wesley J. [http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2003/12/21/INGH63PBJ81.DTL "PETA to cannibals: Don't let them eat steak"], ''San Francisco Chronicle'', December 21, 2003.</ref> [[Abraham Foxman]] of the [[Anti-Defamation League]] said comparing the systematic murder of millions of Jews with animal rights was abhorrent.<ref name=Teather>Teather, David. [http://www.guardian.co.uk/animalrights/story/0,11917,906289,00.html "'Holocaust on a plate' angers US Jews"], ''The Guardian'', March 3, 2003.</ref> In May 2005 Newkirk apologized for the pain the campaign had caused, while defending its goals. She explained that "the PETA staff who proposed that we do it were Jewish, and the patronage for the entire endeavor was Jewish. We were careful to use Jewish authors and scholars and quotes from Holocaust victims and survivors. And since Judaism has some of the strongest teachings regarding compassion for animals among the monotheistic faiths, I truly believed, as did the Jewish staff members who proposed the exhibit, that a large segment of the Jewish community would support it."<ref>Newkirk, Ingrid. [http://web.israelinsider.com/Views/5475.htm "Apology for a tasteless comparison"], ''Israelinsider'', May 5, 2005.</ref>
Photographs of concentration camp inmates were shown next to those of caged chickens, and piled bodies of Holocaust victims next to a pile of pig carcasses. Captions included: "like the Jews murdered in concentration camps, animals are terrorized when they are housed in huge filthy warehouses and rounded up for shipment to slaughter. The leather sofa and handbag are the moral equivalent of the lampshades made from the skins of people killed in the Nazi death camps."<ref name=SmithHolocaust>Smith, Wesley J. [http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2003/12/21/INGH63PBJ81.DTL "PETA to cannibals: Don't let them eat steak"], ''San Francisco Chronicle'', December 21, 2003.</ref> [[Abraham Foxman]] of the [[Anti-Defamation League]] said comparing the systematic murder of millions of Jews with animal rights was abhorrent.<ref name=Teather>Teather, David. [http://www.guardian.co.uk/animalrights/story/0,11917,906289,00.html "'Holocaust on a plate' angers US Jews"], ''The Guardian'', March 3, 2003.</ref> In May 2005 Newkirk apologized for the pain the campaign had caused, while defending its goals.<ref>Newkirk, Ingrid. [http://web.israelinsider.com/Views/5475.htm "Apology for a tasteless comparison"], ''Israelinsider'', May 5, 2005, accessed June 26, 2010</ref>


;Dairy
;Dairy
Line 156: Line 144:


;"Your Daddy Kills Animals!"
;"Your Daddy Kills Animals!"
[[File:Peta Comic Book.gif|thumb|right|130px|Front cover of ''Your Mommy Kills Animals'']]
[[File:Peta Comic Book.gif|thumb|right|120px|Front cover of ''Your Mommy Kills Animals'']]
The organization has been criticized for distributing graphic pamphlets to children. PETA says the pamphlets are geared toward making parents aware that their actions affect their children. "Your Daddy Kills Animals!", showing a cartoon father gutting a fish, says: "Until your daddy learns it's not fun to kill, keep your doggies and kitties away from him. He's so hooked on killing defenseless animals, they could be next."<ref>[http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,176739,00.html PETA Tells Kids to Run From Daddy], Fox News, November 25, 2005.</ref> "Your Mommy Kills Animals" features a cartoon of a mother slicing a knife into a rabbit's stomach; the title was adopted by a [[Your Mommy Kills Animals (film)|2007 documentary about PETA]]. In February 2010, the British Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) ruled against a PETA poster featuring one of the people jailed in the UK for the [[death of Baby P]]: "Steven Barker: Animal Abuser, Baby Abuser, Rapist. People who are violent towards animals rarely stop there." The ASA said the poster constituted unnecessary shock tactics.<ref>Sweney, Mark. [http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2010/feb/03/peta-ad-asa Watchdog bans animal rights ad for 'unnecessary shock tactics'], ''The Guardian'', February 3, 2010.</ref>
The organization has been criticized for distributing graphic pamphlets to children. PETA says the pamphlets are geared toward making parents aware that their actions affect their children. "Your Daddy Kills Animals!", showing a cartoon father gutting a fish, says: "Until your daddy learns it's not fun to kill, keep your doggies and kitties away from him. He's so hooked on killing defenseless animals, they could be next."<ref>[http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,176739,00.html PETA Tells Kids to Run From Daddy], Fox News, November 25, 2005.</ref> "Your Mommy Kills Animals" features a cartoon of a mother slicing a knife into a rabbit's stomach; the title was adopted by a [[Your Mommy Kills Animals (film)|2007 documentary about PETA]]. In February 2010, the British Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) ruled against a PETA poster featuring one of the people jailed in the UK for the [[death of Baby P]]: "Steven Barker: Animal Abuser, Baby Abuser, Rapist. People who are violent towards animals rarely stop there." The ASA said the poster constituted unnecessary shock tactics.<ref>Sweney, Mark. [http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2010/feb/03/peta-ad-asa Watchdog bans animal rights ad for 'unnecessary shock tactics'], ''The Guardian'', February 3, 2010.</ref>


Line 166: Line 154:


===As entertainment===
===As entertainment===
[[Image:ShilpaShettyPETA.jpg||right|thumb|200px|[[Shilpa Shetty]] in a ''Boycott the circus'' advertisement]]
[[Image:ShilpaShettyPETA.jpg|right|thumb|170px|[[Shilpa Shetty]] in a ''Boycott the circus'' advertisement]]
The group regularly protests circuses that use animals. The [[Ringling Bros. and Barnum & Bailey Circus]] is a frequent target of PETA's allegations of abuse. PETA asked a number of mayors to pass legislation banning items used to train elephants from cities the circus was due to visit. In one specific case, PETA asked that "[[Ankus|bullhooks]], [[Electroshock gun|electric prods]] and other devices that inflict pain on, or cause injury to, [[elephants]]" be banned, after the animal care director of the Carson & Barnes Circus, Tim Frisco, was filmed allegedly attacking elephants with bullhooks and electric prods. PETA's videotape of one of Frisco's training sessions allegedly shows him attacking elephants with steel-tipped bullhooks and shocking them with electric prods.<ref>[http://www.peta.org/mc/NewsItem.asp?id=8573 "Carson & Barnes Trainer Videotaped Beating, Shocking Elephants"], PETA, July 6, 2006.</ref> The elephants are shown screaming and recoiling in pain, according to PETA.<ref>[http://www.petatv.com/tvpopup/Prefs.asp?video=carson_barnes PETA undercover video of Tim Frisco, animal care director of the Carson & Barnes Circus, training elephants], PETAtv.com (video).</ref>
The group regularly protests circuses that use animals. The [[Ringling Bros. and Barnum & Bailey Circus]] is a frequent target of PETA's allegations of abuse. PETA asked a number of mayors to pass legislation banning items used to train elephants from cities the circus was due to visit. In one specific case, PETA asked that "[[Ankus|bullhooks]], [[Electroshock gun|electric prods]] and other devices that inflict pain on, or cause injury to, [[elephants]]" be banned, after the animal care director of the Carson & Barnes Circus, Tim Frisco, was filmed allegedly attacking elephants with bullhooks and electric prods. PETA's videotape of one of Frisco's training sessions allegedly shows him attacking elephants with steel-tipped bullhooks and shocking them with electric prods.<ref>[http://www.peta.org/mc/NewsItem.asp?id=8573 "Carson & Barnes Trainer Videotaped Beating, Shocking Elephants"], PETA, July 6, 2006.</ref> The elephants are shown screaming and recoiling in pain, according to PETA.<ref>[http://www.petatv.com/tvpopup/Prefs.asp?video=carson_barnes PETA undercover video of Tim Frisco, animal care director of the Carson & Barnes Circus, training elephants], PETAtv.com (video).</ref>

===In animal testing===
In October 2007, PETA asked the United States Army to reconsider its use of live animals to simulate battlefield injuries during medical education and training, and in February 2008 sent a letter to Assessment and Training Solutions, a contractor which offers the training to the military, asking the company to change its methods. In late 2008, the United States Department of Defense (DoD) formed an analysis team to reevaluate the use of live animals for training; it said that the review was unrelated to external activities or organizations. PETA spokesman Shalin Gala said of the development, "They wouldn't be reviewing this unless pressure was brought to bear on the situation."<ref>Jones, Matthew, "[http://hamptonroads.com/2009/03/peta-sees-win-militarys-probe-use-animals PETA Sees Win In Military's Probe Of Use Of Animals]", ''[[Norfolk Virginian-Pilot]]'', March 20, 2009.</ref>


===General===
===General===

Revision as of 17:39, 26 June 2010

Founded1980
FounderIngrid Newkirk and Alex Pacheco
Type501(c)(3)
FocusAnimal rights
Location
Members
2,000,000
Key people
Ingrid Newkirk, President
Revenue
$34 million for the year ending July 31, 2009[1]
Employees
187
Websitewww.peta.org

People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) is an American animal rights organization based in Norfolk, Virginia, led by Ingrid Newkirk, its international president. With two million members and supporters, it says it is the largest animal rights group in the world. Its slogan is "animals are not ours to eat, wear, experiment on, or use for entertainment."[2]

Founded in 1980, the organization is a non-profit, tax-exempt corporation with 187 employees, funded almost entirely by its members. In its campaigns and investigations, it focuses on four core issues—factory farming, fur farming, animal testing, and animals in entertainment—though it also campaigns against fishing, the killing of animals regarded as pests, the keeping of chained backyard dogs, cock fighting, dog fighting, and bullfighting. It aims to inform the public through advertisements, undercover investigations, animal rescue, and lobbying.[3]

The organization has been criticized for the confrontational style and content of its campaigns, and for the number of animals it euthanizes.[4] It was further criticized in 2005 by U.S. Senate Environment Committee chairman Jim Inhofe for having given grants several years earlier to Animal Liberation Front (ALF) and Earth Liberation Front (ELF) activists charged with offenses including arson. PETA responded that it has no involvement in ALF or ELF actions, and that it does not support arson or violence.[5] The group has also been criticized from within the animal rights movement for not being radical enough. Animal rights advocate Gary Francione, professor of law at Rutgers School of Law-Newark, calls PETA the "new welfarists," arguing that they have become an animal welfare group because they work with industries to achieve incremental reform.[6] Newkirk explained PETA's position in 2002: "If anybody wonders 'what's this with all these reforms?' you can hear us clearly. Our goal is total animal liberation, and the day when everyone believes that animals are not ours to eat, not ours to wear, not ours to experiment [on], and not ours for entertainment or any other exploitive purpose."[7]

History

PETA distributed images of the Silver Spring monkeys with the caption, "This is vivisection. Don't let anyone tell you different."[8]

PETA was founded in the spring of 1980 by Newkirk and Alex Pacheco, initially as what Newkirk called "five people in a basement." The group first came to public attention in the summer of 1981, during what became known as the Silver Spring monkeys case, a widely publicized dispute about experiments conducted on 17 macaque monkeys at the Institute of Behavioral Research in Silver Spring, Maryland.[9] The case lasted ten years, involved the first police raid in the U.S. on an animal laboratory, triggered an amendment in 1985 to the Animal Welfare Act, and became the first animal-testing case to be argued before the United States Supreme Court.[10]

Pacheco had taken a job in May 1981 inside a primate research laboratory at the Institute, intending to gain firsthand experience of working inside an animal laboratory.[11] Edward Taub, the researcher in charge of the lab, had cut sensory ganglia that supplied nerves to the monkeys' fingers, hands, arms, and legs—a process called "deafferentation"—so that the monkeys could not feel them; some of the monkeys had had their entire spinal columns deafferented.[12] He then used restraint, electric shock, and withholding of food and water to force the monkeys to use the deafferented parts of their bodies.[13] The research led in part to the discovery of neuroplasticity and a new therapy for stroke victims called constraint-induced movement therapy.[14]

Pacheco visited the laboratory at night, and took photographs that showed the monkeys were living in what the Institute for Laboratory Animal Research's ILAR Journal called filthy conditions.[15] He turned his evidence over to the police, who raided the lab and arrested Taub. Taub was convicted of six counts of animal cruelty, the first such conviction in the U.S. of an animal researcher, later overturned on appeal.[10] The subsequent dispute, and the ten-year battle for custody of the monkeys—described by The Washington Post as a vicious mud fight, during which both sides accused the other of lies and distortion—transformed PETA into a national, then international, movement. By February 1991, it claimed over 350,000 members, a paid staff of over 100, and an annual budget of over $7 million.[16]

Philosophy and activism

Profile

Alec Baldwin with president and co-founder Ingrid Newkirk, at a PETA event for filmmaker Donny Moss in New York City

PETA is an animal rights organization, and as such it rejects speciesism and the idea of animals as property. It therefore opposes the use of animals in any form: as food, entertainment, clothing, and in animal testing, and would like to see an end to animals being dependent on human beings for their survival.[17] The group has been criticized by other animal rights advocates for its willingness to work with industries that use animals—a position many animal rights advocates find problematic (see below). Newkirk rejects the criticism, and has said of PETA that it is here to hold the radical line.[18]

PETA addresses animal advocacy at a macro and micro level, from lobbying governments to advising on how to prevent flooding without destroying beavers' homes. It promotes a vegan diet, tries to reform the practices in factory farms and slaughterhouses, initiates media campaigns against particular companies or practices, helps to find sanctuaries for former circus and zoo animals, initiates lawsuits against companies, and lobbies government to impose fines where animal welfare legislation has been violated. It also introduces children to animal rights through its teacher network and education programs.[19]

Campaigning

File:Christy Turlington I'd rather go naked than wear fur.cleanup.jpg
Christy Turlington during PETA's "I'd rather go naked than wear fur" campaign[20]

The organization is known for its aggressive media campaigns, combined with a solid base of celebrity support—Paul McCartney, Pamela Anderson, and Sarah Jessica Parker are supporters, and several supermodels have posted naked with PETA's slogan "I'd Rather Go Naked than Wear Fur."[21] Many of its campaigns have focused on large corporations, such as KFC, McDonald's, Wendy's, Burger King, PETCO, Procter & Gamble, Covance, and Huntingdon Life Sciences. The campaigns have including buying shares in the target companies; for example, as shareholders of YUM! Brands, which owns KFC, PETA submitted a shareholders' resolution asking for more humane treatment of the animals KFC processes.[22] Newkirk has said that the outrageous campaigns are the ones that grab attention, so PETA won't shirk from engaging in them, though she adds that the group has many quieter projects that are rarely heard about.[23]

The campaigns have produced some successes for PETA. Burger King, McDonald's, and Wendy's have introduced vegetarian options in their menus after PETA targeted them; Petco dropped the sale of many exotic live pets; and Polo Ralph Lauren said it would no longer use fur.[24] Some of the campaigns have been controversial. Newkirk was criticized in 2003 when she sent a letter to PLO-leader Yasser Arafat asking him to keep animals out of the conflict, after a donkey was laden with explosives during an attack in Jerusalem,[25]and for the group's "Holocaust on your Plate" exhibition, where eight 60-square-foot (5.6 m2) panels juxtaposed images of the Holocaust and factory farming; see below.

Undercover investigations

PETA sends its employees undercover into facilities such as research laboratories to document the treatment of animals, sometimes requiring them to spend months recording their experiences.[26] It also produces videos based on material collected by other groups who go undercover, including the Animal Liberation Front (ALF). Some investigations have led to lawsuits or government action against the companies or universities. PETA itself faced legal action in April 2007 after the owners of a chinchilla ranch in Michigan complained about a PETA undercover inquiry there; the judge ruled in PETA's favor that undercover investigations are one of the main ways the criminal justice system in the U.S. operates.[26]

In 1984, PETA produced a 26-minute film called Unnecessary Fuss,[27] based on 60 hours of researchers' footage obtained by the ALF during a raid on the University of Pennsylvania's head injury clinic. The footage showed researchers laughing at baboons as they inflicted brain damage on them with a hydraulic device intended to simulate whiplash. The ensuing publicity led to the suspension of funds from the university, the firing of its chief veterinarian, the closure of the lab, and a period of probation for the university.[28]

File:It'sADog'sLife.gif
PETA filmed HLS staff in the UK beating dogs, broadcast in 1997 by Channel 4 in the UK as It's a dog's life.[29]

In 1990, Bobby Berosini, a Las Vegas entertainer, lost his wildlife license, as well as a later lawsuit against PETA, after PETA broadcast an undercover film of him slapping and punching orangutans.[30] A PETA investigation inside Huntingdon Life Sciences (HLS), a contract animal-testing company, in 1997 produced film of staff in the UK beating dogs,[31] and what appears to be abuse of monkeys in the company's New Jersey facility.[32] After the video footage aired on British television in 1999, a group of activists set up Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty with a view to closing HLS down, a campaign that is ongoing.

In 1999, a North Carolina grand jury handed down indictments against pig-farm workers on Belcross Farm in Camden County, the first indictments for animal cruelty on a factory farm in the U.S., after a three-month PETA investigation produced film of the workers beating the animals, and skinning a sow that was allegedly still conscious.[33]

File:600-restraint-tube4.jpg
A monkey in a restraint tube filmed by PETA inside Covance, Vienna, Virginia, 2004–2005.[34]

In 2003 and 2004, a PETA investigation inside Covance, an animal-testing company in the U.S. and Europe, obtained footage that appeared to show monkeys being mistreated. A PETA employee filmed primates in Covance's Vienna, Virginia, lab being choked, hit, and denied medical attention when badly injured, according to PETA.[35] PETA submitted a formal complaint to the U.S. Department of Agriculture.[36] Covance received 16 sanctions and agreed to a fine of $8,720, but said the citations were for minor administrative matters unrelated to animal cruelty, and that over 700 of the charges made by PETA had been rejected by the government.[37] In 2005 Covance initiated a lawsuit charging PETA with fraud, violation of employee contract, and conspiracy to harm the company's business, but later dropped it.[35]

In 2004, PETA published the results of an eight-month undercover investigation in a West Virginia Pilgrim's Pride slaughterhouse that supplies chickens to KFC. The New York Times reported the investigation as showing workers stomping on live chickens, throwing dozens against a wall, tearing the head off a chicken to write graffiti, strangling one with a latex glove, and squeezing birds until they exploded. Yum Brands, owner of KFC, called the video appalling, and threatened to stop purchasing from Pilgrim's Pride if no changes were made; Pilgrim's Pride fired 11 employees, and introduced an anti-cruelty pledge for workers to sign.[38]

Positions

On direct action and the ALF

Ingrid Newkirk on clashes with other animal rights organizations and her feelings about the Animal Liberation Front.

Newkirk is outspoken in her support of direct action. PETA members have been criticized for taking activism too far, particularly in their long-standing efforts to halt the fur industry, which have involved disrupting fashion shows and throwing red paint on the runway.[39] In 1996, PETA activists (acting independently of PETA) famously threw a dead raccoon onto the restaurant table of Anna Wintour, editor-in-chief of Vogue, who promotes the use of fur, and left bloody paw prints and the words "Fur Hag" on the steps of her home.[40] In January 2010, Gerry Byrne, a Canadian MP, compared PETA to terrorists for throwing a tofu cream pie at Canada's fishery minister Gail Shea in protest at the Canadian seal hunt.[41]

Not until black demonstrators resorted to violence did the national government work seriously for civil rights legislation ... In 1850 white abolitionists, having given up on peaceful means, began to encourage and engage in actions that disrupted plantation operations and liberated slaves. Was that all wrong?—Ingrid Newkirk[42]

The group has also been criticized for providing financial support to ALF activists faced with legal action. Newkirk makes no apology for this, writing that no movement for social change has ever succeeded without the "militarism component": "Thinkers may prepare revolutions," she wrote of the ALF, "but bandits must carry them out."[42]

In 2004 The Observer described what it called a network of relationships between apparently unconnected animal rights groups on both sides of the Atlantic, writing that, with assets of $6.5 million, and with the PETA Foundation holding further assets of $15 million, PETA funds a number of activists and groups—some with links to militant groups, including the ALF, which the FBI has named as a domestic terrorist threat.[43]

According to the New York Post, PETA gave $1,500 to the Earth Liberation Front in 2001; Newkirk said the donation was a mistake, and that the money had been intended for public education about destruction of habitat.[44] In 1995, Rod Coronado, a former ALF activist, received $64,000 from PETA and two months later $38,240, as a loan to fund his legal defense, after being convicted of setting fire to a Michigan State University research lab in 1992. During Coronado's trial, U.S. Attorney Michael Dettmer said Newkirk had arranged before the fact to have Coronado send her documents from the lab and a videotape of the raid.[45]

On neutering, backyard dogs, and pets

File:PETAandbackyarddogs.jpg
PETA provides dog houses for chained backyard dogs.

PETA runs several programs though its Community Animal Project that helps cats and dogs in poorer areas of Virginia, near PETA's headquarters.[46] In 2008 they neutered 7,485 cats, dogs, and rabbits in that area, including pit bulls and feral cats, at a discounted rate or free of charge. The group helps neglected dogs and cats who are ill and injured, and pursues cruelty cases. Each year they set up hundreds of dog houses with straw bedding for dogs chained outside all winter.[47] PETA also produces advertisements urging people to control the pet population through neutering and adoption from shelters,[48] and campaigns against organizations such as the American Kennel Club that promote the breeding of purebred strains.[49]

PETA argues that it would have been better for animals had the institution of breeding them as "pets" never emerged. The group argues that the desire to own and receive love from animals is selfish, and that their breeding, sale, and purchase can cause immeasurable suffering. They write that millions of dogs spend their lives chained outside in all weather conditions or locked up in chain-link pens and wire cages in puppy mills, and that even in what they call good homes animals are often not well cared for. They would like to see the population of dogs and cats reduced through spaying and neutering, and for people never to purchase animals from pet shops or breeders, but to adopt them from shelters instead. The group makes clear that they have no desire to confiscate or set free animals who are well cared for, and deplores what they call the "myth" that they would want to do so.[50]

On euthanasia

Before founding PETA, Newkirk was chief of animal-disease control and director of the animal shelter in the District of Columbia.[51] She has said that she was shocked by the way the animals were treated in the shelter, and by the methods used to euthanize them. She told Michael Specter of The New Yorker:

I went to the front office all the time, and I would say, "John is kicking the dogs and putting them into freezers." Or I would say, "They are stepping on the animals, crushing them like grapes, and they don't care." In the end, I would go to work early, before anyone got there, and I would just kill the animals myself. Because I couldn't stand to let them go through that. I must have killed a thousand of them, sometimes dozens every day. Some of those people would take pleasure in making them suffer. Driving home every night, I would cry just thinking about it. And I just felt, to my bones, this cannot be right.[52]

PETA opposes the no kill movement.[53] The group takes in feral cat colonies with diseases such as feline AIDS and leukemia, stray dogs, litters of parvo-infected puppies, and backyard dogs, and as such it would be unrealistic to operate a no-kill policy.[54] They offer free euthanasia services to counties that kill unwanted animals via gassing or shooting—they recommend the use of an intravenous injection of sodium pentobarbital if administered by a trained professional[55]—and for severely ill or dying pets when euthanasia at a veterinarian is unaffordable. They recommend euthanasia for certain breeds, such as pit bull terriers, and in certain situations for animals in shelters: for example, for those living for long periods in cramped cages.[56]

Two PETA employees were charged with 31 felony counts of animal cruelty and eight misdemeanor counts of illegal disposal of dead animals in 2005, when at least 80 euthanized animals were left in area dumpsters over the course of a month; the two employees, who were later acquitted, were seen leaving behind 18 dead animals, and 13 more were found inside their van. The animals had been euthanized after being removed from shelters in Northampton and Bertie counties.[57] The group said it began euthanizing animals in some rural North Carolina shelters after it found the shelters were killing animals in ways PETA considered inhumane.[58]

On wildlife conservation personalities

PETA criticizes conservation personalities such as Steve Irwin for placing animals under stress.

PETA is critical of television personalities they call self-professed wildlife warriors, arguing that while a conservationist message is getting across, some of the actions are harmful to animals, such as invading animals' homes, netting them, subjecting them to stressful environments, and wrestling with them. Those actions often involve juvenile animals which the group says should be with their mothers.[59] In 2006 when Steve Irwin died, PETA's vice-president Dan Mathews said that Irwin had made a career out of antagonizing frightened wild animals, a dangerous message to send to children.[60] Australian Member of Parliament Bruce Scott said PETA should apologize to Irwin's family and the rest of Australia.[61]

On animal testing

PETA believes that animal testing—whether toxicity testing, basic or applied research, or for education and training—is wasteful, unreliable, and irrelevant to human health, because artificially induced diseases in animals are not identical to human diseases, and because humans and animals differ in biologically significant ways. They say that animal experiments are frequently redundant and lack accountability, oversight, and regulation. Newkirk told Vogue magazine in 1989 that even if animal research resulted in a cure for AIDS, PETA would be against it.[62] PETA promotes alternatives, including embryonic stem cell research and in vitro cell research.[63] PETA employees have volunteered for human testing of vaccines; Scott Van Valkenburg, PETA’s Director of Major Gifts, said in 1999 that he had been a volunteer in human testing of HIV vaccines.[64]

Conflicts with other animal rights advocates

PETA has been the target of criticism from animal rights advocates who believe the group is too soft on animal rights; that PETA should not target women in its ads; or that it should stop the pie-throwing and other stunts.[65] PETA's "I'd rather go naked than wear fur" campaign generated criticism from feminists, as did their poster—showing a woman's legs with black stockings, high heels, and a fur coat dripping with blood—with the caption: "It takes up to 40 dumb animals to make a fur coat. But only one to wear it."[66] Feminist writer Carol J. Adams writes that the anti-fur campaign spoke the male language of exchange, as do the coats themselves: women wear them, but it is mostly men who buy them.[67] Feminists for Animal Rights also criticized an ad in which Patti Davis posed naked with Hugh Hefner's dog.[68][69]

Gary Francione argues that PETA are "new welfarists," not animal rights advocates.

Gary Francione, professor of law at Rutgers School of Law-Newark, has said PETA has become an animal welfare group, and calls them the "new welfarists," because they work with industries that use animals to effect incremental change. A proponent of abolitionism, Francione argues that PETA's approach—that of traditional animal welfare groups—makes the public think progress is underway when the changes are only cosmetic.[6]

Newkirk has responded to the criticism with the argument that PETA pursues reform while retaining the goal of total animal liberation. She told an animal rights conference: "Reforms move a society very importantly from A to B, from B to C, from C to D. It's very hard to take a nation or a world that is built on seeing animals as nothing more than hamburgers, handbags, cheap burglar alarms, tools for research, and move them from A to Z ... If anybody wonders 'what's this with all these reforms?', you can hear us clearly. Our goal is total animal liberation and the day when everyone believes that animals are not ours to eat, not ours to wear, not ours to experiment, and not ours for entertainment or any other exploitive purpose."[7]

Francione has also criticized PETA for having caused grassroots animal rights group to close, groups that he argues were essential for the survival of the animal rights movement, which rejects the centrality of corporate animal charities. Francione writes that PETA initially set up independent chapters around the U.S., but closed them in favor of a top-down, centralized organization, which not only consolidated decision-making power, but centralized donations too. Now, local animal rights donations go to PETA, rather than to a local group.[6]

Finance

PETA received donations of over $32 million for the year ending July 31, 2009. Over 80 percent of its operating budget was spent on its programs; 15 percent on fundraising efforts; and four percent on management and general operations. Thirty-two percent of its staff earned under $30,000, and 24 percent earned over $40,000. Newkirk earned just under $37,000. [70]

The U.S. Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works has criticized PETA's finances, pointing to tax-return claims for funding organizations such as the ALF.[71] The BBB Wise Giving Alliance said in 2008 that PETA does not meet three of its 17 accountability standards: the board chair serves as the treasurer of the board; it has only three voting members of the board, instead of the recommended five; and its website does not provide electronic access to its most recent IRS Form 990.[72]

Media campaigns

Animals as food

Two of PETA's Lettuce Ladies in Columbus, Ohio

PETA promotes vegetarian and vegan diets through celebrity ads, a vegetarian-specific website, a vegetarian cooking blog and website, by offering free Vegetarian Starter Kits, and by publishing explicit videos of meat production.[73] PETA has also criticized kosher and halal methods of animal slaughter as inhumane.[74]

Holocaust on your Plate

The 2003 Holocaust on your Plate exhibition consisted of eight 60-square-foot (5.6 m2) panels, each juxtaposing images of the Holocaust with images of factory farming. The campaign was inspired by the Nobel Prize-winning Jewish author Isaac Bashevis Singer, an animal rights advocate, who wrote: "In relation to [animals], all people are Nazis; for them it is an eternal Treblinka."[75] The exhibit's creator, Matt Prescott, who himself lost relatives in the Holocaust, said it was the same mindset that made the Holocaust possible—that we may do what we want to those we decide are inferior—that allows atrocities to be committed against animals.[76]

Photographs of concentration camp inmates were shown next to those of caged chickens, and piled bodies of Holocaust victims next to a pile of pig carcasses. Captions included: "like the Jews murdered in concentration camps, animals are terrorized when they are housed in huge filthy warehouses and rounded up for shipment to slaughter. The leather sofa and handbag are the moral equivalent of the lampshades made from the skins of people killed in the Nazi death camps."[77] Abraham Foxman of the Anti-Defamation League said comparing the systematic murder of millions of Jews with animal rights was abhorrent.[76] In May 2005 Newkirk apologized for the pain the campaign had caused, while defending its goals.[78]

Dairy

To reduce milk consumption, PETA created the "Got Beer?" campaign, a parody of Got Milk?. Advertisements urged students to "wipe off those milk moustaches and replace them with. . . foam." Mothers Against Drunk Driving and college officials complained that the campaign encouraged underage drinking. A new campaign placed ads in high school newspapers and printed trading cards saying that dairy products caused acne, obesity, heart disease, cancer, and strokes.[79] The British Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) asked PETA to discontinue it after a complaint from The National Farmers' Unions, the Dairy Council, the Royal Agricultural Society of England, and one member of the public; the ASA said it played on children's fears and that the health-risk claims were not directly supported by the cited articles. PETA changed some of its material and continued the campaign.[80] PETA suggested in 2008 that Ben & Jerry's create an ice-cream product from human milk, after a Swiss restaurant began using human milk in some of its menu items.[81]

"Your Daddy Kills Animals!"
File:Peta Comic Book.gif
Front cover of Your Mommy Kills Animals

The organization has been criticized for distributing graphic pamphlets to children. PETA says the pamphlets are geared toward making parents aware that their actions affect their children. "Your Daddy Kills Animals!", showing a cartoon father gutting a fish, says: "Until your daddy learns it's not fun to kill, keep your doggies and kitties away from him. He's so hooked on killing defenseless animals, they could be next."[82] "Your Mommy Kills Animals" features a cartoon of a mother slicing a knife into a rabbit's stomach; the title was adopted by a 2007 documentary about PETA. In February 2010, the British Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) ruled against a PETA poster featuring one of the people jailed in the UK for the death of Baby P: "Steven Barker: Animal Abuser, Baby Abuser, Rapist. People who are violent towards animals rarely stop there." The ASA said the poster constituted unnecessary shock tactics.[83]

Prize for in-vitro meat creation

In April 2008, PETA announced a US$1m prize for the creation of a method to produce commercially viable quantities of in vitro meat at competitive prices by 2012. The announcement caused what Newkirk called a near civil war in their office, since many of PETA's members are repulsed by the thought of eating animal tissue even if no animals are killed in its creation.[84]

As clothing

Two long-running campaigns are "Here's the rest of your fur coat,"[85] and "I'd Rather Go Naked Than Wear Fur," in which supermodels appeared nude to express their opposition to wearing fur.[21] In May 2006, PETA held a naked protest near St Paul's Cathedral in London to highlight the use of real bear fur in the Bearskins used by the Foot Guards. In 2009, they called for a boycott of Canadian maple syrup and the 2010 Olympics in Vancouver to protest the Canadian fur seal hunt.[86]

As entertainment

File:ShilpaShettyPETA.jpg
Shilpa Shetty in a Boycott the circus advertisement

The group regularly protests circuses that use animals. The Ringling Bros. and Barnum & Bailey Circus is a frequent target of PETA's allegations of abuse. PETA asked a number of mayors to pass legislation banning items used to train elephants from cities the circus was due to visit. In one specific case, PETA asked that "bullhooks, electric prods and other devices that inflict pain on, or cause injury to, elephants" be banned, after the animal care director of the Carson & Barnes Circus, Tim Frisco, was filmed allegedly attacking elephants with bullhooks and electric prods. PETA's videotape of one of Frisco's training sessions allegedly shows him attacking elephants with steel-tipped bullhooks and shocking them with electric prods.[87] The elephants are shown screaming and recoiling in pain, according to PETA.[88]

In animal testing

In October 2007, PETA asked the United States Army to reconsider its use of live animals to simulate battlefield injuries during medical education and training, and in February 2008 sent a letter to Assessment and Training Solutions, a contractor which offers the training to the military, asking the company to change its methods. In late 2008, the United States Department of Defense (DoD) formed an analysis team to reevaluate the use of live animals for training; it said that the review was unrelated to external activities or organizations. PETA spokesman Shalin Gala said of the development, "They wouldn't be reviewing this unless pressure was brought to bear on the situation."[89]

General

"Are Animals the New Slaves?"

The 2005 "Are Animals the New Slaves?" campaign featured a display in which images of oppressed groups, including African-American slaves, Native Americans, child laborers, and women, were juxtaposed with those of chained elephants and slaughtered cows.[90] One panel in the exhibit juxtaposed a picture of an African-American being lynched with a photo of a cow hanging from its feet. Others juxtaposed a picture of a burning corpse with that of a burning chicken, and of a fettered slave next to a circus elephant. An 11-part display set up next to a memorial to the Amistad mutineers on the New Haven Green was taken down after a protest from the NAACP.[91]

Requests for name changes

PETA regularly asks towns and groups to change their names to highlight specific issues. It campaigned in 1996 for a new name for Fishkill, New York, and in April 2003 offered free veggie burgers to Hamburg, New York if it would call itself Veggieburg.[92] In October 2003, it offered $20,000 worth of veggie burgers to local schools if Rodeo, California would call itself Unity, an acknowledgment of Union Oil's role in the area's economy.[93] In 2007, it asked Commerce City, Colorado to change its name to KentuckyFriedCruelty.com; in 2008, it launched the "Save the Sea Kittens" campaign, calling fish "sea kittens" in an attempt to give them a positive image; and in 2009 asked the Pet Shop Boys to change their name to Rescue Shelter Boys.[94]

See also

References

  1. ^ 2009 financial statement, PETA, accessed June 26, 2010.
  2. ^ PETA letter to the Sarasota County Commission, accessed June 26, 2010; "About Peta", accessed July 10, 2006.
  3. ^ About PETA, accessed June 26, 2010.
  4. ^ "PETA and Euthanasia", Newsweek, April 28, 2008.
  5. ^ For Inhofe's allegations, see Statement of Senator James M. Inhofe, U.S. Senate Committee on Environment & Public Works, May 18, 2005, accessed June 26, 2010; also see the 2001 PETA tax return referenced by Inhofe. For PETA's response, see Frieden, Terry. FBI, ATF address domestic terrorism, CNN, May 19, 2005.
  6. ^ a b c Francione, Gary. Rain without Thunder: The Ideology of the Animal Rights Movement. Temple University Press, 1996, pp. 67–77. Cite error: The named reference "Francione67" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
  7. ^ a b Newkirk, Ingrid. PETA president speaks up for animals, at 25:44 mins, Animal Rights 2002 Convention, June 30, 2002, accessed June 26, 2010. Cite error: The named reference "Newkirkspeech" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
  8. ^ Carbone, Larry (2004). '"What Animal Want: Expertise and Advocacy in Laboratory Animal Welfare Policy. Oxford University Press, p. 149, see figure 4.2.
  9. ^ Schwartz, Jeffrey M. and Begley, Sharon. The Mind and the Brain: Neuroplasticity and the Power of Mental Force, Regan Books, 2002.
    • Pacheco, Alex and Francione, Anna. The Silver Spring Monkeys, in Peter Singer (ed.) In Defense of Animals, Basil Blackwell 1985, pp. 135–147.
  10. ^ a b Schwartz, Jeffrey M. and Begley, Sharon. The Mind and the Brain: Neuroplasticity and the Power of Mental Force, Regan Books, 2002, p. 161. Cite error: The named reference "Schwartz" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
  11. ^ Pacheco, Alex. "Testimony on the Silver Spring monkeys case, U.S. House Subcommittee on Science, Research, and Technology, PETA, accessed June 26, 2010.
  12. ^ Doidge, Norman (2007). The Brain That Changes Itself. Viking Penguin , p. 141.
  13. ^ Johnson, David (2003). Review of The Mind and the Brain: Neuroplasticity and the Power of Mental Force, curledup.com.
  14. ^ "Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy", excerpted from "A Rehab Revolution," Stroke Connection Magazine, September/October 2004, accessed June 26, 2010.
  15. ^ Sideris, Lisa et al (1999). "Roots of Concern with Nonhuman Animals in Biomedical Ethics", Institute for Laboratory Animal Research, ILAR Journal V40(1) 1999.
  16. ^ Carlson, Peter. The Great Silver Spring Monkey Debate, The Washington Post, February 24, 1991.
  17. ^ "Animal rights", Encyclopedia Britannica, first accessed July 10, 2006, and again June 26, 2010; Companion Animals: Pets or Prisoners?, PETA pamphlet.
  18. ^ Pesce, Carolyn. "Holding the 'radical line'"], USA Today, September 3, 1991.
  19. ^ "PETA annual review 2004", PETA, accessed June 26, 2010.
  20. ^ I'd Rather Go Naked Than Wear Fur, accessed May 28, 2007.
  21. ^ a b "Fashion and Dress", Encyclopaedia Britannica, 2006.
  22. ^ PETA resolution among five for Yum shareholders, Business First, May 18, 2005.
  23. ^ Satya, January, 2001
  24. ^ "Vegetarians Have It Our Way at Burger King", November 1, 2002; "McDonald's eyes PETA-friendly option", December 29, 2004; "Wendy's steps up animal welfare standards", September 5, 2001; "Petco Agreement with PETA", April 15, 2005; "Peta claims victory as fashion house drops fur", Associated Press, June 10, 2006.
  25. ^ PETA's letter to Yasser Arafat, February 3, 2003; Dougherty, Kerry "Arafat gets ass-inine plea from PETA on intifada", Jewish World Review, February 10, 2003.
  26. ^ a b Rood, Justin. "Undercover Cameras OK, Judge Rules", ABC News, April 13, 2007.
  27. ^ Unnecessary Fuss, Peta.org. The film can be downloaded from *Unnecessary Fuss Part 1 *Part 2 *Part 3 *Part 4 *Part 5 (video)
  28. ^ Blum, Deborah. Monkey Wars, Oxford University Press, paperback edition 1995, p. 118.
    • Carbone, Larry. What Animals Want: Expertise and Advocacy in Laboratory Animal Welfare Policy. Oxford University Press, 2004, p. 90.
    • Rudacille, Deborah. The Scalpel and the Butterfly: The Conflict between Animal Research and Animal Protection. University of California Press 2000, pp 145–147.
    • Sideris, Lisa; McCarthy, Charles & Smith, David H. "Roots of Concern with Nonhuman Animals in Biomedical Ethics", Bioethics of Laboratory Animal Research, Institute for Laboratory Animal Research (ILAR) Journal V40 (1) 1999.
  29. ^ "A controversial laboratory", BBC News, January 18, 2001.
  30. ^ Hearne, Vicki. Can an ape tell a joke?, Harpers, November 1, 1993; PETA v. Bobby Berosini from the Supreme Court of Nevada; High court throws out $4.2 million judgment animal trainer won in libel, privacy suit, The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, accessed June 28, 2009; Geer, Carri. Animal rights group's requests on Berosini assets rejected, Las Vegas Review-Journal, April 20, 1998; Geer, Carri. Berosini ordered to return $2 million to United States, Las Vegas Review-Journal, February 15, 2000; Greer, Carri. Former showman and his wife ordered to pay three law firms, Las Vegas Review-Journal, March 11, 2002.
  31. ^ Undercover video footage of HLS employees beating a puppy, filmed at the Huntingdon Research Centre, England (video), accessed June 20, 2009; also see YouTube, accessed April 22, 2010.
  32. ^ Undercover video footage of HLS employees apparently dissecting a live monkey, filmed at the HLS Princeton Research Center, New Jersey, U.S. (video), accessed June 20, 2009.
  33. ^ PETA: Belcross Farms investigation, PETA video narrated by James Cromwell, YouTube, accessed April 27, 2010; "Pig Farm Cruelty Revealed", PETA, accessed April 21, 2010; PETA probe spurs indictment of three for cruelty to pigs, Associated Press, July 9, 1999.
  34. ^ Covance photo gallery, PETA, accessed June 26, 2010.
  35. ^ a b Buske, Jennifer. "PETA Urges Withdrawal Of Support for Drug-Test Lab", The Washington Post, August 3, 2008.
  36. ^ Video footage from inside Covance; "Covance fined for violations of the Animal Welfare Act", PETA; Benz, Kathy and McManus, Michael. PETA accuses lab of animal cruelty, CNN, May 17, 2005.
  37. ^ Covance Announces Conclusion Of U.S. Food and Drug Administration and Department of Agriculture Inspections of Its Vienna, VA Facility, Covance press release, March 31, 2008, accessed June 26, 2010.
  38. ^ McNeil, Donald G. "The Nation: Gaining Ground; At Last, a Company Takes PETA Seriously", The New York Times, July 25, 2004.
  39. ^ "Fur", Encyclopaedia Britannica, 2006; History of PETA's fur campaign, Furisdead.com.
  40. ^ Zappia, Corina. "Bloody Brilliant Pie, Anna Wintour, and the history of fur protest", Village Voice, October 20, 2005.
  41. ^ "Pie hit should earn PETA 'terrorist' label: MP", CBC News, January 26, 2010; Pie tossing is terrorism, MP says", The Toronto Star, January 26, 2010.
  42. ^ a b Newkirk, Ingrid. "The ALF: Who, Why, and What?", Terrorists or Freedom Fighters? Reflections on the Liberation of Animals. Best, Steven & Nocella, Anthony J (eds). Lantern 2004, p. 341./
  43. ^ Doward, Jamie. "Beauty and the beasts", The Observer, August 1, 2004.
  44. ^ Friedman, Stefan C. "The PETA-ELF connection", New York Post, undated, accessed April 23, 2010.
  45. ^ Government sentencing memorandum of U.S. Attorney Michael Dettmer in USA v. Rodney Coronado, July 31, 1995, pp. 8–10; Exhibit #11. PETA Gives Over $70,000 to ALF Member After Burning Down Michigan State Research Lab, Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works, accessed June 26, 2010.
  46. ^ Join PETA's Community Animal Project, PETA, accessed April 23, 2010.
  47. ^ They supplied over 300 dog houses and 1,200 bales of straw in 2008; see The Year in Numbers, PETA Annual Review 2008, accessed June 20, 2009.
  48. ^ "Helping Animals in Our Region", PETA's Community Animal Project; Companion Animals FAQs, PETA's position on pets or 'companion animals'.
  49. ^ Farris, Gene. PETA dresses in KKK garb outside Westminster Dog Show, USA Today, February 10, 2009.
  50. ^ Animal Rights Uncompromised: PETA on 'Pets', PETA, accessed June 15, 2010.
  51. ^ Newkirk, Ingrid. "Controlling an animal as deadly as a weapon", San Francisco Chronicle, June 8, 2005.
  52. ^ Specter, Michael. "The woman behind the most successful radical group in America", The New Yorker, April 14, 2003.
  53. ^ [http://www.peta.org/campaigns/ar-nokillshelters.asp Animal Rights Uncompromised:'No-Kill' Shelters, PETA, accessed April 27, 2010.
  54. ^ "A reply from PETA to a letter inquiring about its euthanization decisions", Petrescueonline.net.
  55. ^ Euthanasia: The Compassionate Option, PETA, accessed April 27, 2010.
  56. ^ Newkirk, Ingrid. Controlling an animal as deadly as a weapon, San Francisco Chronicle, June 8, 2005.
  57. ^ PETA Employees Face 31 Felony Animal-Cruelty Charges for Killing, Dumping Dogs, Lincoln Tribune; PETA workers cleared of animal cruelty convictions
  58. ^ Saunders, Debra J. Better dead than fed, PETA says, San Francisco Chronicle, June 23, 2005; “The Dilemma of the Unwanted”, San Francisco Chronicle, June 30, 2005.
  59. ^ Steve Irwin: Not a True 'Wildlife Warrior', PETA, accessed September 15, 2006.
  60. ^ Walls, Jeannette (2006). sheds no crocodile tears for Steve Irwin, MSNBC, Sept 11, 2006.
  61. ^ PETA renews attack on Irwin, accessed September 15, 2006.
  62. ^ Vogue magazine, September 1989.
  63. ^ Animal Experiments: Overview, PETA, accessed June 20, 2009.
  64. ^ Van Valkenburg, Scott. Letters: White-coat welfare, Seattle Weekly, July 7, 1999; see Scott Van Valkenburg, PETA, accessed June 20, 2009.
  65. ^ Sizemore, Bill. "PETA's zeal pushes the envelope too far for some", The Virginian-Pilot, December 3, 2000.
  66. ^ Francione, Gary. Rain without Thunder: The Ideology of the Animal Rights Movement. Temple University Press, p. 74.
  67. ^ Adams, Carole. Neither Man nor Beast: Feminism and the Defense of Animals. Continuum International Publishing Group, 1995, p. 135.
  68. ^ "PETA and a Pornographic Culture", Feminists for Animal Rights newsletter, vol 8, no 3–4, 1994.
  69. ^ Francione, Gary. Rain without Thunder: The Ideology of the Animal Rights Movement. Temple University Press, p. 76.
  70. ^ 2009 Financial Statement, PETA, accessed June 26, 2010; "People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals", charitynavigator.org, accessed June 26, 2010.
  71. ^ Exhibit5 "PETA Tax Return Claiming Grant to Terrorist Organization", Exhibit 11 "PETA gives over $70,000 to ALF member after burning down Michigan State Research Lab"
  72. ^ People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Better Business Bureau, accessed June 26, 2010.
  73. ^ Meat Your Meat narrated by Alec Baldwin
  74. ^ Investigator Discusses PETA Sting on Kosher Slaughterhouse, PETA, accessed April 22, 2010; "Halal Vegetarianism", Islamicconcerns.com, a PETA website, accessed June 26, 2010.
  75. ^ Group blasts PETA 'Holocaust' project, CNN, February 28, 2003.
  76. ^ a b Teather, David. "'Holocaust on a plate' angers US Jews", The Guardian, March 3, 2003.
  77. ^ Smith, Wesley J. "PETA to cannibals: Don't let them eat steak", San Francisco Chronicle, December 21, 2003.
  78. ^ Newkirk, Ingrid. "Apology for a tasteless comparison", Israelinsider, May 5, 2005, accessed June 26, 2010
  79. ^ Johnson, Mike and Spice, Linda. "Saving face?; PETA's new anti-milk ad campaign, aimed at teens, angers ag department," Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, May 20, 2000.
  80. ^ ASA Adjudication, Advertising Standards Authority, September 5, 2001; Anti-milk ad campaign 'will continue', BBC News, September 4, 2001; www.milksucks.com, PETA.
  81. ^ Shields, Rachel. New threat to dairy farmers – ice cream with mother's milk, The Independent, September 28, 2008.
  82. ^ PETA Tells Kids to Run From Daddy, Fox News, November 25, 2005.
  83. ^ Sweney, Mark. Watchdog bans animal rights ad for 'unnecessary shock tactics', The Guardian, February 3, 2010.
  84. ^ Schwartz, John. "PETA’s Latest Tactic: $1 Million for Fake Meat", The New York Times, April 21, 2008.
  85. ^ "Here's the rest of your fur coat", accessed April 27, 2010. See [1]
  86. ^ Naked demo against bearskin hats, BBC News, May 21, 2006, accessed June 20, 2009; PETA in Madison to promote syrup boycott, The Daily Page, August 5, 2009; [http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/posted/archive/2009/06/09/peta-portrays-2010-olympic-mascots-as-bloodthirsty-seal-hunters.aspx PETA portrays 2010 Olympic mascots as bloodthirsty seal hunters', The National Post, June 9, 2009.
  87. ^ "Carson & Barnes Trainer Videotaped Beating, Shocking Elephants", PETA, July 6, 2006.
  88. ^ PETA undercover video of Tim Frisco, animal care director of the Carson & Barnes Circus, training elephants, PETAtv.com (video).
  89. ^ Jones, Matthew, "PETA Sees Win In Military's Probe Of Use Of Animals", Norfolk Virginian-Pilot, March 20, 2009.
  90. ^ "Are Animals the New Slaves?", PETA's Animal Liberation Project; PETA Rethinks 'Slavery' Exhibit, Southern Poverty Law Center, August 15, 2005.
  91. ^ Brune, Adrian. PETA exhibit provokes anger from blacks, Orlando Sentinel, October 5, 2005.
  92. ^ Re: Fishkill, the root "kill" is found in many New York town names, and is Dutch for "creek.""PETA Woos Hamburgers With Rare Offer", CBS News, April 22, 2003
  93. ^ Citizens like calling it Rodeo -- veggie burgers won't change that
  94. ^ Pluck You - Hmm. Would you rather live in Commerce City or KentuckyFriedCruelty.com?, Westword, March 22, 2007; Save the Sea Kittens, PETA, accessed January 26, 2009; PETA to Pet Shop Boys: Rescue Shelter Boys, perhaps?, CNN, April 10, 2009.

Further reading