Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Pending changes reviewer/Historical: Difference between revisions

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
No edit summary
Line 135: Line 135:
*<span class="plainlinks">[[User:Heymid|{{ucfirst:Heymid}}]] · ([[User talk:Heymid|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Heymid|contribs]] · [[Special:DeletedContributions/Heymid|deleted]] · [[:luxo:Heymid|cross-wiki]] · {{ plainlink | url=http://en.wikichecker.com/user/?t={{urlencode:Heymid}}| name=wikichecker}}· [http://toolserver.org/~soxred93/count/index.php?name={{urlencode:{{ucfirst:Heymid}}}}&lang=en&wiki=wikipedia count] · {{ plainlink | url=http://toolserver.org/~soxred93/pages/index.php?name={{urlencode:Heymid}}&namespace=0&redirects=noredirects | name=pages created}} · [{{fullurl:Special:Log|user={{anchorencode:{{ucfirst:Heymid}}}}}} logs] · [{{fullurl:Special:Log/block|page=User:{{anchorencode:{{ucfirst:Heymid}}}}}} block&nbsp;log] · [{{fullurl:Special:Listusers|limit=1&username={{urlencode:{{ucfirst:Heymid}}}}}} lu] · [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/{{ucfirst:Heymid}}|rfar]] · [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment/{{ucfirst:Heymid}}|rfc]] · [[Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/{{ucfirst:Heymid}}|rfcu]] · [[Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/{{ucfirst:Heymid}}|ssp]] · [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/{{ucfirst:Heymid}}|spi]] · [http://toolserver.org/~eagle/archivesearch.php?search=%28%5C%7B%5C%7B%5B%5E%5B%5D*%5C%7C%7C%5B%5E%7C%3A%2FA-Za-z0-9%5D%7C%5E%29{{urlencode:Heymid}}%5B%5EA-Za-z0-9%5D&useregex=1&where%5B%5D=enpedia_3rr&where%5B%5D=enpedia_an&where%5B%5D=enpedia_ani&where%5B%5D=enpedia_cn search an, ani, cn, an3]</span>) ([[Special:Userrights/Heymid|<span style="color:#002bb8">'''assign permissions'''</span>]])
*<span class="plainlinks">[[User:Heymid|{{ucfirst:Heymid}}]] · ([[User talk:Heymid|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Heymid|contribs]] · [[Special:DeletedContributions/Heymid|deleted]] · [[:luxo:Heymid|cross-wiki]] · {{ plainlink | url=http://en.wikichecker.com/user/?t={{urlencode:Heymid}}| name=wikichecker}}· [http://toolserver.org/~soxred93/count/index.php?name={{urlencode:{{ucfirst:Heymid}}}}&lang=en&wiki=wikipedia count] · {{ plainlink | url=http://toolserver.org/~soxred93/pages/index.php?name={{urlencode:Heymid}}&namespace=0&redirects=noredirects | name=pages created}} · [{{fullurl:Special:Log|user={{anchorencode:{{ucfirst:Heymid}}}}}} logs] · [{{fullurl:Special:Log/block|page=User:{{anchorencode:{{ucfirst:Heymid}}}}}} block&nbsp;log] · [{{fullurl:Special:Listusers|limit=1&username={{urlencode:{{ucfirst:Heymid}}}}}} lu] · [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/{{ucfirst:Heymid}}|rfar]] · [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment/{{ucfirst:Heymid}}|rfc]] · [[Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/{{ucfirst:Heymid}}|rfcu]] · [[Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/{{ucfirst:Heymid}}|ssp]] · [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/{{ucfirst:Heymid}}|spi]] · [http://toolserver.org/~eagle/archivesearch.php?search=%28%5C%7B%5C%7B%5B%5E%5B%5D*%5C%7C%7C%5B%5E%7C%3A%2FA-Za-z0-9%5D%7C%5E%29{{urlencode:Heymid}}%5B%5EA-Za-z0-9%5D&useregex=1&where%5B%5D=enpedia_3rr&where%5B%5D=enpedia_an&where%5B%5D=enpedia_ani&where%5B%5D=enpedia_cn search an, ani, cn, an3]</span>) ([[Special:Userrights/Heymid|<span style="color:#002bb8">'''assign permissions'''</span>]])
:Definitely something for me! /[[User:Heymid|<span style="color:green;">Hey</span>]][[User_talk:Heymid|<span style="color:red;">''Mid''</span>]] ([[Special:Contributions/Heymid|contributions]]) 18:01, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
:Definitely something for me! /[[User:Heymid|<span style="color:green;">Hey</span>]][[User_talk:Heymid|<span style="color:red;">''Mid''</span>]] ([[Special:Contributions/Heymid|contributions]]) 18:01, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

::I believe it would be a grave error to give access to any tools to Heymid, who has been permbanned at Swedish Wikipedia. - [[User:Tournesol|Tournesol]] ([[User talk:Tournesol|talk]]) 18:09, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:09, 27 June 2010

Reviewer (add request)

Shortcut

User:Mblumber

I've been an editor for a while and I enjoy patrolling and reviewing changes to pages. Plus I'd like to try out the new feature. Thanks Mblumber (talk) 03:42, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Duff

I am an experienced editor, might be able to help with this work, and would like to check out the new tools. Duff (talk) 05:46, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Done, please make sure you have read Wikipedia:Reviewers before reviewing. The Helpful One 11:46, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:STATicVerseatide

I have made over 4,000 constructive edits and would like to help with the current PC process STAT -Verse 05:52, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Done, please make sure you have read Wikipedia:Reviewers before reviewing. The Helpful One 11:47, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Doc Strange

I'm an experienced editor/recent changes patroller and I am highly interested in this new feature that doesn't seem too dissimilar to what I already do with a large chunk of my spare time anyway. Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 06:21, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Done, please make sure you have read Wikipedia:Reviewers before reviewing. The Helpful One 11:49, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Fair Shannon

I've been editing for some time now and I've always been a regular vandal fighter, helping to keep articles clean and constructive. I would like reviewer rights so that I may further assist by patrolling pending changes on the specified protected pages. Shannon! talk 07:23, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Done, please make sure you have read Wikipedia:Reviewers before reviewing. The Helpful One 11:49, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:AlexWelens

Alex Welens (talk) 07:49, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Question: What will you do if you are granted access to the tool, this month you have only made 3 edits, so if you get the reviewer right will you actually use it? Thanks, The Helpful One 11:57, 26 June 2010 (UTC) (P.S. If other admins disagree, feel free to grant the right)[reply]
Not many recent contributions, but no worries, so  Done —DoRD (talk) 15:58, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Drahreg01

I'm a sysop on de: and quite familiar with flagged revisions. Drahreg01 (talk) 09:26, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Question: You haven't seem to have edited much over the past few months, I don't know if I need to ask this, but will you be using the reviewer tool frequently? The Helpful One 11:51, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think it really matters. He's trustworthy, so  Done. NW (Talk) 14:54, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Dylanfromthenorth

I'm a regular editor who reverts vandals as a matter of course, this new tool should make it a lot easier Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 11:00, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Done, please make sure you have read Wikipedia:Reviewers before reviewing. The Helpful One 11:56, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Dpmuk

Although I don't do that much new page patrolling I quite often find myself commenting on and trying to help out at problematic pages. Although these pages are unlikely to be included in the trial I would like to see how it works in case it is rolled out more widely, in which case I would imagine these sort of pages may well be included. I could also see me "patrolling" pending changes in future. Dpmuk (talk) 11:41, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Done, please make sure you have read Wikipedia:Reviewers before reviewing. The Helpful One 11:59, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:ZScarpia

I would like to take part and think that I fulfil the criteria listed at Becoming a Reviewer.     ←   ZScarpia   13:30, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Done, please make sure you have read Wikipedia:Reviewers before reviewing. The Helpful One 14:34, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Porturology

I have been an editor for 5 years with nearly 8000 edits Porturology (talk) 14:13, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Done, please make sure you have read Wikipedia:Reviewers before reviewing. The Helpful One 14:37, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Peasantwarrior

I think I'm quite an experienced user - 15 months now, although not really active. Never had any problems with the rules whatsoever. Patrolling recent changes from time to time so this may come in helpful. Peasantwarrior (talk) 14:41, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Done, please make sure you have read Wikipedia:Reviewers before reviewing. The Helpful One 14:57, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:FallenAngelsandDemons

I have edited for quite a while. This is an interesting new addition to Wikipedia I would like to explore, and hopefully to be helpful to the cause. FallenAngelsandDemons (talk) 16:28, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done With <50 edits, I'm afraid you don't yet have the necessary experience to use this tool properly. Consider editing around for a little while, then come back and request the tool again. -FASTILY (TALK) 17:58, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Tea with toast

I frequently patrol new articles, IPs contribs, and the many articles on my watchlist. I am also very active in copyediting and assessing articles for various WikiProjects. I would like to help in the effort to review articles in order to fight vandalism and ensure the quality of content on wikipedia. Tea with toast (talk) 17:16, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Done -FASTILY (TALK) 17:56, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Joe Gazz84

I strongly believe that Wikipedia is a great place for information as long as it is reviewed. I know the many ways to verify information and assure it is accurate before accepting it and I believe students can use Wikipedia as a good answer source as long as it is reviewed well. I have the time and skills to review and believe I can help make Wikipedia a great information place. I have been watching the recent changes list and making changes here and there. Joe Gazz84 (talk) 19:54, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Alfie66

I'm a reviewer in my home-wiki (German WP) for quite a while - I like the concept. →Alfie±Talk 20:32, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:54, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
THX! →Alfie±Talk 20:56, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Tyw7

I occassional scan for new edits and would like to try this new feature. Tyw7  (☎ Contact me! • Contributions)   Changing the world one edit at a time! 00:48, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 01:10, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Rockstone35

I enjoy reviewing changes to Articles and determining the quality of an article as well as fighting the vandals that stalk our great website I also have rollback permissions. Rockstonetalk to me! 01:04, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 01:09, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Fridae'sDoom

I am tired of seeing vandals defame pageson ceebrities, religious figures and other pages of notability and other pages, I will do this job to the best of my ability and I have read the guide on how to be a good reviewer, I am confident I can put my skills to use at home, school and work. Fridae'§Doom 01:09, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 01:13, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Mr. Vernon

I've been on new page patrol for a while, recently more interested in fighting vandalism. I'd like to help out. Mr. Vernon (talk) 03:26, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Done -FASTILY (TALK) 05:05, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:NYKevin

I occasionally do vandalism patrol, and feel this would be helpful to have. BTW I already have rollback rights. I know I don't edit that often nowadays, but I don't think there's a question of trust... (of course, that's for the reader to decide) NYKevin @275, i.e. 05:36, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Done, looks fine. ~ mazca talk 09:18, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jamesooders

I believe in the Wikimedia Foundation, I've been an RC Patroller for a while and I would like to do more to help. Thankyou James'ööders 09:18, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Done, looks fine. ~ mazca talk 09:20, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Nathan.tang

I have been editing Wikipedia for quite a few years and think this is a very good idea to stop vandalism - it is much better than the original protection (semi-protect etc.) Even though I may not have edited a lot recently, I'd like to help out. Nathan.tang (talk) 11:55, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Mahjongg

I'm an experienced editor since 2002, with over 5000 article edits, who likes to help solving edit conflicts Mahjongg (talk) 13:05, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Done, please make sure you have read Wikipedia:Reviewers before reviewing. The Helpful One 13:24, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:AshleyMorton

I've been around for a while, and think that I could do a decent job of this. Hope the powers that be agree! AshleyMorton (talk) 13:07, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Done, please make sure you have read Wikipedia:Reviewers before reviewing. The Helpful One 13:26, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Heymid

Definitely something for me! /HeyMid (contributions) 18:01, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I believe it would be a grave error to give access to any tools to Heymid, who has been permbanned at Swedish Wikipedia. - Tournesol (talk) 18:09, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_permissions/Pending_changes_reviewer/Historical&oldid=370452822"