User talk:Are You The Cow Of Pain?: Difference between revisions
harassing message deleted unread |
|||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
Consider this formal notice that I preemptively object to each and every PROD nomination that you make 1) regarding a fictional element identified with a notable franchise, which 2) does not articulate a clear reason why deletion is a better result than merging or redirecting the page in question. [[WP:BEFORE]], [[WP:ATD]], and [[WP:PROD]] are all clear that merging or redirecting content is generally preferable to outright deletion. Since one of the key elements of PROD deletions is that they be uncontroversial, any future PRODs you might be tempted to place will be invalid--I've told you, in advance, that I object and why. Feel free to take any article you would have PRODed that fits these criteria straight to AfD, individually or ''en masse'', but PROD is not simply a sneaky/easy way to delete content when others object to such deletion. Cheers, [[User:Jclemens|Jclemens]] ([[User talk:Jclemens|talk]]) 20:27, 11 September 2010 (UTC) |
Consider this formal notice that I preemptively object to each and every PROD nomination that you make 1) regarding a fictional element identified with a notable franchise, which 2) does not articulate a clear reason why deletion is a better result than merging or redirecting the page in question. [[WP:BEFORE]], [[WP:ATD]], and [[WP:PROD]] are all clear that merging or redirecting content is generally preferable to outright deletion. Since one of the key elements of PROD deletions is that they be uncontroversial, any future PRODs you might be tempted to place will be invalid--I've told you, in advance, that I object and why. Feel free to take any article you would have PRODed that fits these criteria straight to AfD, individually or ''en masse'', but PROD is not simply a sneaky/easy way to delete content when others object to such deletion. Cheers, [[User:Jclemens|Jclemens]] ([[User talk:Jclemens|talk]]) 20:27, 11 September 2010 (UTC) |
||
:Please reread the above message more carefully: it contains neither any "declaration of intent to disrupt the project" nor any personal attack upon you. I do not think that you are being sneaky, I think you misunderstand the intent of the PROD process, which is why I provided several links that demonstrate that you are attempting to use it in a manner contrary to its intended purpose. I will, however, comply with your request to stay off your talk page to the extent that it does not interfere with me, as an administrator, handling PRODs and providing direct feedback to you. [[User:Jclemens|Jclemens]] ([[User talk:Jclemens|talk]]) 20:46, 11 September 2010 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 20:47, 11 September 2010
Not a Barn...
|
The LGBT Barnstar | |
| For your extensive editing related to LGBT articles, categories and posts, I hereby award you this barnstar. Well Done! :) - Neutralhomer • Talk • 07:52, 4 September 2010 (UTC) |
The "the" in Lazio
In accordance with your suggestion, I have included all of the "the Lazio" categories in the discussion at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2010 September 3#Category:Cuisine of the Lazio, and I have marked all of them with a CFR template pointing to the discussion. --Bejnar (talk) 18:24, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
WP:PROD of fictional elements
Consider this formal notice that I preemptively object to each and every PROD nomination that you make 1) regarding a fictional element identified with a notable franchise, which 2) does not articulate a clear reason why deletion is a better result than merging or redirecting the page in question. WP:BEFORE, WP:ATD, and WP:PROD are all clear that merging or redirecting content is generally preferable to outright deletion. Since one of the key elements of PROD deletions is that they be uncontroversial, any future PRODs you might be tempted to place will be invalid--I've told you, in advance, that I object and why. Feel free to take any article you would have PRODed that fits these criteria straight to AfD, individually or en masse, but PROD is not simply a sneaky/easy way to delete content when others object to such deletion. Cheers, Jclemens (talk) 20:27, 11 September 2010 (UTC)