User talk:Viriditas: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 06:14, 26 October 2010

In this world, hatred has never been defeated by hatred. Only love can overcome hatred. This is an ancient and eternal law. –Dhammapada (1:5)

This is Viriditas's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37

thanks

Thanks for the comments. I appreciate that. :) Malke 2010 (talk) 03:00, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. Enjoy your day. Viriditas (talk) 03:04, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Alice in Wonderland (2010 film)

I found your article to be well written, and found no problems in promoting it to GA. Congratulations! Wildroot (talk) 05:39, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That's great, but I didn't write it. Using this utility, you can see that the top active editors are User:MikeAllen, User:Bovineboy2008, and User:Emtigereyes. I'm only the nominator. Viriditas (talk) 05:42, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Conduct

I'm concerned with the attitude you have been showing to other editors. Not just me, but Davidpatrick and Veriss1. You are removing article talk page material, you are not retaining material in your own Talk Page archive, and you are hindering discussion intended to improve the Juan Williams article. I would like to be given a good reason why I shouldn't block you for a few days to give you time to review Wikipedia:WikiBullying, Wikipedia:No angry mastodons, and WP:CIVIL as suggested to you elsewhere. 23skidoo (talk) 05:45, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm more concerned that you returned to Wikipedia after a four month absence to disrupt the talk page as a meat puppet for Davidpatrick and Veriss1, in the process restoring false BLP-damaging claims about Juan Williams that were made a year ago to a thread that is not longer active or relevant. I'm also concerned that you failed to acknowledge that I specifically require permission ("deemed appropriate") to move my comments, and that Davidpatrick did not ask for it. This is enshrined in the talk page guidelines and is best practice, so you should already be aware of this. As for bullying, you appear to be threatening to use admin tools in a conflict you are evidently involved in on some level or another, and specifically using those tools to further harm caused to a BLP by reinserting false claims about a living person on the talk page and restoring off topic comments and personal attacks tells me that you have lost sight of the forest for the trees. First, do no harm, that's what you need to remember here. I also fail to see how your edits have improved the discourse on the talk page or coverage of our article on Juan Williams. If anything, you have enabled two editors who have been inserting problematic content in main space, and you have encouraged the addition of false negative material about BLP's by restoring a year-old discussion, and by repeatedly restoring personal attacks against talk page guidelines. I'm really confused at what you are trying to achieve here. Viriditas (talk) 05:55, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your accusation of me being a "meat puppet", along with your abusive posts on other people's talk pages and summaries beyond the scope of WP:CIVIL has earned you a one-week block. 23skidoo (talk) 06:14, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 26: / Line 26: @@
 I'm concerned with the attitude you have been showing to other editors. Not just me, but Davidpatrick and Veriss1. You are removing article talk page material, you are not retaining material in your own Talk Page archive, and you are hindering discussion intended to improve the Juan Williams article. I would like to be given a good reason why I shouldn't block you for a few days to give you time to review [[Wikipedia:WikiBullying]], [[Wikipedia:No angry mastodons]], and [[WP:CIVIL]] as suggested to you elsewhere. [[User:23skidoo|23skidoo]] ([[User talk:23skidoo|talk]]) 05:45, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
 :I'm more concerned that you returned to Wikipedia after a four month absence to disrupt the talk page as a meat puppet for Davidpatrick and Veriss1, in the process restoring false BLP-damaging claims about [[Juan Williams]] that were made a year ago to a thread that is not longer active or relevant.  I'm also concerned that you failed to acknowledge that I specifically require permission ("deemed appropriate") to move my comments, and that Davidpatrick did not ask for it.  This is enshrined in the talk page guidelines and is best practice, so you should already be aware of this.  As for bullying, you appear to be threatening to use admin tools in a conflict you are evidently involved in on some level or another, and specifically using those tools to further harm caused to a BLP by reinserting false claims about a living person on the talk page and restoring off topic comments and personal attacks tells me that you have lost sight of the forest for the trees.  First, do no harm, that's what you need to remember here.  I also fail to see how your edits have improved the discourse on the talk page or coverage of our article on [[Juan Williams]].  If anything, you have enabled two editors who have been inserting problematic content in main space, and you have encouraged the addition of false negative material about BLP's by restoring a ''year-old'' discussion, and by repeatedly restoring personal attacks against talk page guidelines.  I'm really confused at what you are trying to achieve here. [[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] ([[User talk:Viriditas#top|talk]]) 05:55, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
+* Your accusation of me being a "meat puppet", along with your abusive posts on other people's talk pages and summaries beyond the scope of [[WP:CIVIL]] has earned you a one-week block. [[User:23skidoo|23skidoo]] ([[User talk:23skidoo|talk]]) 06:14, 26 October 2010 (UTC)