Jump to content

Talk:Union School of Theology: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
I.Casaubon (talk | contribs)
Line 8: Line 8:
:I really don't understand how ''either'' the [[British Centre for Science Education]] website ''or'' ''[[Evangelicals Now]]'' qualifies as a self-published source. [[User:StAnselm|<b>St</b>]][[Special:Contributions/StAnselm|Anselm]] ([[User talk:StAnselm|talk]]) 06:50, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
:I really don't understand how ''either'' the [[British Centre for Science Education]] website ''or'' ''[[Evangelicals Now]]'' qualifies as a self-published source. [[User:StAnselm|<b>St</b>]][[Special:Contributions/StAnselm|Anselm]] ([[User talk:StAnselm|talk]]) 06:50, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
::BCSE is a fairly small, volunteer-run organisation, so its website would class as a WP:SPS or close equivalent (it certainly lacks the stature of its US equivalent, the [[National Center for Science Education]]). The ''Evangelicals Now'' article is by the WEST principal, so hardly third-party. <font face="Antiqua, serif">''[[User:Hrafn|Hrafn]]<sup>[[User talk:Hrafn|Talk]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Hrafn|Stalk]]</sub><sup>''('''[[M:Precisionism|P]]''')</sup></font> 07:36, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
::BCSE is a fairly small, volunteer-run organisation, so its website would class as a WP:SPS or close equivalent (it certainly lacks the stature of its US equivalent, the [[National Center for Science Education]]). The ''Evangelicals Now'' article is by the WEST principal, so hardly third-party. <font face="Antiqua, serif">''[[User:Hrafn|Hrafn]]<sup>[[User talk:Hrafn|Talk]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Hrafn|Stalk]]</sub><sup>''('''[[M:Precisionism|P]]''')</sup></font> 07:36, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

*[[Evangelicals Now]] does not appear to be self-published. It's not like all Evangelicals were linked in a giant Protocols of the Elders of Evangelicalism, or something. It is an independent publication with a board of directors, etc. As is [[Evangelical Times]].[[User:I.Casaubon|I.Casaubon]] ([[User talk:I.Casaubon|talk]]) 00:34, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:34, 25 May 2011

WikiProject iconWales Stub‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconReformed Christianity Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Reformed Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Reformed Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Sourcing

It should be noted that this article is sourced solely to WP:SPS & affiliated sources. This means that notability has not been established. It also means that the article is in violation of WP:SELFPUB: "the article is not based primarily on such sources." HrafnTalkStalk(P) 05:43, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I really don't understand how either the British Centre for Science Education website or Evangelicals Now qualifies as a self-published source. StAnselm (talk) 06:50, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
BCSE is a fairly small, volunteer-run organisation, so its website would class as a WP:SPS or close equivalent (it certainly lacks the stature of its US equivalent, the National Center for Science Education). The Evangelicals Now article is by the WEST principal, so hardly third-party. HrafnTalkStalk(P) 07:36, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Evangelicals Now does not appear to be self-published. It's not like all Evangelicals were linked in a giant Protocols of the Elders of Evangelicalism, or something. It is an independent publication with a board of directors, etc. As is Evangelical Times.I.Casaubon (talk) 00:34, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]