Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism

Report active, obvious, and persistent vandals and spammers here.

Before reporting, read the spam and vandalism pages, as well as the AIV guide. To submit, edit this page and follow the instructions at the top of the "User-reported" section. For other issues, file a request for administrator attention. Important! The edits of the user must be obvious vandalism or obvious spam. Except for egregious cases, the user must have been given enough warning(s). The warning(s) must have been given recently and there must be reasonable grounds to believe the user(s) will further disrupt the site in the immediate future. If you decide that a report should be filed place the following template at the bottom of the User-reported section: * {{Vandal|Example user or IP}} Your concise reason (e.g. vandalised past 4th warning). ~~~~ Requests for further sanctions against a blocked user (e.g., talk page, e-mail blocks) should be made at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Reports of sockpuppetry should be made at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations unless the connection between the accounts is obvious and disruption is recent and ongoing. This noticeboard can grow and become backlogged. Stale reports are automatically cleared by MDanielsBot after 4–8 hours with no action. You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

This page was last updated at 08:51 on 23 May 2024 (UTC). if it is out of date.

Alerts

User-reported

• Hayousef (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) - On Pixel Soft; account is being used only for promotional purposesVrenator (talk) 15:14, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Note: No edits since final warning. Re-report if the same kind of editing happens again. JamesBWatson (talk) 18:25, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

• MB412 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) - On Alexis Love (diff); vandalism after final warningNymf _hideliho! 18:28, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Note: (1) It is not clear to me why the edits should be regarded as vandalism. If there really are grounds for that view then please explain why. If it is just a question of disagreeing with the edits then that is not vandalism. (2) "Vandalism after final warning"? Last edit was at 17:42, 20 June 2011. Final warning was at 17:56, 21 June 2011. This sort of thing happens all the time. Do people think that administrators don't check? JamesBWatson (talk) 19:10, 21 June 2011 (UTC)