Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
→‎File:CentauriDawnCover.jpg: {{subst:UND|d}} --~~~~
→‎Ji Chang-wook: new section
Line 512: Line 512:


<!-- Begin Template:UND -->[[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] '''Done'''<!-- End Template:UND - d --> --[[User:B|B]] ([[User talk:B|talk]]) 01:17, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
<!-- Begin Template:UND -->[[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] '''Done'''<!-- End Template:UND - d --> --[[User:B|B]] ([[User talk:B|talk]]) 01:17, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

== Ji Chang-wook ==


*{{revisions| Ji Chang-wook }}
<i></i>Original author [https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ACaliforniaAliBaba&action=historysubmit&diff=438838031&oldid=438761512 contacted me to ask for help] after I [https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w/index.php?title=Yoon_Kye-sang&action=historysubmit&diff=438765732&oldid=438736417 expanded one of his other articles] which is at AfD. This one also seems to have sufficient news sources in Korean to write a much better article: {{find|지창욱}}. Can you put it in my userspace so I can work on it until it clearly demonstrates notability? Thanks. -[[User:CaliforniaAliBaba|cab]] ([[User talk:CaliforniaAliBaba|call]]) 03:52, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:52, 11 July 2011


Note: This page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions nor to address the pending deletion of any page.
Shortcuts

Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as CSD G6), or in articles for deletion debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other XfD processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process.

This page is only for requesting undeletion of articles which have already been deleted. If the article you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions on the template or on your talk page.

Note that requests for undeletion is not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here.

float
float
float
float
Enter the page's title to request its undeletion:

Deletion discussions
Articles
Templates and modules
Files
Categories
Redirects
Miscellany
Speedy deletion
Proposed deletion

Blood On The Dance Floor(Band)

I wish to have an article about this band. I feel that if this article were to be undeleted and people were not following guidelines or being absurd with this article that you ban the user. I feel that this article should be made for many peoples veiwing and treated right. I hope you can understand that i would like an article about this on the site and maintained right.

Thank you for your time.

sincerely, Zack — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.117.184.180 (talk • contribs)

 Not done. The reason that articles about this band have been repeatedly deleted - see the deletion logs 1, 2 - is that there is no indication that they meet Wikipedia's requirements explained at WP:BAND. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blood on the dance floor (band), Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Bdb484/Blood on the dance floor. JohnCD (talk) 08:24, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Prog-Sphere.com

It's very good source of information about progressive rock, psychedelic rock, jazz fusion bands and artists from all around the world -AstralliS (talk) 11:48, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who implemented the deletion request, user Kudpung (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Salvio Let's talk about it! 12:21, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kyle Creed

Kyle Creed was a highly influential clawhammer banjo player and luthier. Many of his peers — including Fred Cockerham and Tommy Jarrell — are represented here, and there are several links back to the deleted article. The original article was deleted as A7 bio and may have lacked the necessary references at the time. -scruss (talk) 13:35, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Not done My own quick google search shows that he may be notable which means it's likely possible to write an article about him but what was deleted was nowhere close to being an article. However, you or anybody else is free to write one and I'll be glad to userfy the deleted text if you think it would be useful. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 13:47, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Employment Law Alliance

Reasoning is based on several issues: 1) Page in question was recently brought into compliance with respect to the addition of numerous third-party references both a) confirming the identity of the organization; and b) highlighting polls done by the organization which, in and of themselves, meet the definition of notable. 2) If you review the page's content you will see that no content is intended to be promotional or construed as an advertisement. This organization is identical in nature to that of an alliance of airlines such as the Star alliance. Timestaking efforts to ensure that the page was in compliance were made. Zero constructive criticism was levied. Rather, a blunt deletion occurred which is counter to the nature of this enterprise. A claim that somehow this is similar to a situation where "a sells concrete and b pours it" is neither accurate nor logical. By this logic, when Delta sells a plane ticket and a person flies on a partner airline then a similar situation occurs. And yet, Delta's airline alliance page is not called in to question. Please reconsider this deletion as it severely shakes my confidence in this platform and in the open, free democratic information exchange that this site aims to foster.-Mabond17 (talk) 15:39, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Article's deleted by AFD are beyond the scope of this board. However, the AFD was closed with only 1 "delete" !vote so it's possible that if you discuss this issue with Cirt, he would be more then happy to undelete the article and relist the discussion. However, I'm curious as to why you didn't speak up at the afd discussion for this article as according to your contrubutions you were informed about the AFD and were editing the article while the discussion was running. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 15:54, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

coralmyn

reasoning -70.232.243.107 (talk) 18:05, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Not done. Only one article with that name existed and the text started out by saying Alright so this is how it works your nose gose red yo, and you can't even feel nothin yo Then yo feet slowly get bigga in size yo.Yo yo yo. It was rightfully deleted as "vandalism" back in February. Are you sure this is the article you want back, perhaps you misspelled it. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 18:17, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

SDI Group

This page has been created as an information source for the logistics industry. Similar to the way in which organisations such as Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Sainsbury's, Debenhams etc have Wikipedia pages providing such details. Permission from the company owner has been provided to Wikipedia, & acknowledged by Chris Kelly (28/06/2011). -Amandadowsett (talk) 11:23, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. This was not deleted for copyright reasons but because it is a blatant advertisement, clearly written by the company: "Our consultants... We can help to add value... " and written in undiluted marketing-speak full of "peacock terms" designed to promote: "leading provider... impressive growth... strength and expertise of the Group... wealth of knowledge... unrivalled levels of repeat business... strong consultancy skill... responsive and flexible solution... unrivalled capability... " That is an advertisement, and anything like that is deleted from Wikipedia at sight. It is nothing like an encyclopedia article, which requires a WP:Neutral point of view and should consist of plain facts verifiable from reliable sources. Wikipedia is specifically not for advertising or promotion of any kind: as the Marketing Manager of SDI Group Ltd you have a WP:Conflict of interest which means you are the last person who should be writing about it here. I am sorry to be blunt: we do not do enough to make clear to new users in advance that Wikipedia is not a notice-board for free advertising, but it is not. JohnCD (talk) 13:02, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Erathia

Though it is the name of a fictional place it is related to some nation's mythology and has been used in novels and video games. I feel it has a place alongside the various pages on Wikipedia for gods of Greek and Norse mythology. -68.195.168.42 (talk) 17:51, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

North-South Center

reasoning -Blotz1 (talk) 18:10, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rock Hill Galleria

Tagged as A7 but there is an obvious WP:BEFORE failure, as I easily found several sources on Google News. -Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 02:14, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Done. Seems like a totally reasonable request and I don't think you should have to go through DRV. If you can add the sources you found that would be awesome, but there is no rush. Protonk (talk) 02:19, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

astral projection (group)

The deleted article is about a psychedelic trance group who has been very significant in the trance scene. Although it lacked references, they group has had a big influence on the music and is fairly well-known in asia and europe. There are certainly more deserving of a wikipedia page than many groups scrambling to make articles. Please restore the article. I can add sources if needed. -Rsage (talk) 04:57, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done Any article must be referenced before being "live" on Wikipedia. I see nothing to state its notability. Find references; make a WP:USERSPACEDRAFT and check with someone before moving it into articlespace. Using a WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS argument won't get you far. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:16, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

František Vyskočil

His CV IS WELL DOCUMENTED,(last time today). Please remove the warning from the title page of his record. regards,

Dr. F. Kinac, author of the FV record -90.180.229.91 (talk) 10:59, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done The article in question is not up for deletion, nor has it ever been deleted. It is, however, a c.v. and not an encyclopedia article. It does not use citations at any point, and I do not yet see the notability. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:19, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:In the darkness.ogg

The file was deleted as it was listed under non-free content criteria but without explanation. I wish to add the explanation. -78.86.186.215 (talk) 15:36, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • This file was deleted fairly recently. Do you have a rationale on hand? If so I'll restore the file and re-link it to the appropriate article. Protonk (talk) 20:33, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

FORWARD Project (EU Project)

Subjectivity of concerns that lead to deletion. -139.91.70.46 (talk) 16:19, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]


The page was deleted in last April after the following expressed concern: 

 Original research, unreferenced article about another non-notable EU sponsored project.

I think that this concern is largely unjustified because:

  • There is no wikipedia policy I'm aware of against informational pages about EU sponsored projects.
  • In fact there is a whole category about EU funded projects, most of which are of comparable quality with the deleted page.
  • The reporting user is a US resident with no stated knowledge on ICT Security (the subject of FORWARD). Given this background, his assessement of the FORWARD Project as "another not-notable EU sponsored project" seems largely subjective, unfounded and US-centric. In fact the project (funded with ~1M Euros) was successful enough for the EU to fund a follow-up project [1].

Regarding the "Original research" concern, there are plans to update the article to bring it up to par with the wikipedia standards as we did in the past when similar concerns were expressed.

Thank you for your time.

A lot of anti-WP:AGF comments there. Two questions: who is "we", and what's your relationship to the project? (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 16:28, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pluto-RedlightSyndrome.jpg

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Redlight Syndrome. -Zundark (talk) 21:12, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. JohnCD (talk) 21:41, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Finish Ticket

The Finish Ticket page was deleted for failing to demonstrate the band's notability. However, in 2010 the band won the Not So Silent Night Local Band Competition which is a major music competition, and makes Finish Ticket the most prominent local band of the San Francisco area. Therefore the band meets two of the criteria for notability required of ensambles so their page should not have been deleted, let alone immediately deleted. -Bwallace722 (talk) 00:34, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Done I'm going to use "admin's discretion" and undelete this for 2 reasons. 1. The deleting admin did not make it clear in his deletion rationale if he was deleting it as an "expired prod" or as an A7. 2. The PRODing editor didn't think it was an A7 candidate and the article had 2 sources hidden at the bottom of a bunch of whitespace that appear to be "significant coverage". Therefore I think an AFD is needed to judge whether or not they are "reliable". --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:51, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chapter1learning.jpg

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Early Recordings (album series). -Zundark (talk) 15:50, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. JohnCD (talk) 21:26, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pseudonym (Indian Band)

Pseudonym is band based in Kolkata, West Bengal, India. The band has performed LIVE in various places and performs at Someplace Else, Kolkata on every Wednesdays from 11:30 PM onwards. The article is based on reliable, published sources; and, all majority and significant minority views.
This article also had references/citations before the deletion.
Citations/Reliable Sources: 

 Publishers of the work: Hindustan Times, The Telegraph, The Times of India.
 All the above are broadsheet daily newspaper in India.

The article also meets WP:MUSIC featured in multiple non-trivial published works in reliable and reputable media.
With regards,
Iamgymman123 (talk) 16:25, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. I have userfied the page for you to User:Iamgymman123/Pseudonym (Indian Band) where you can work on it to add references. Then you should approach user Atama (talk), the admin who deleted it, to see if he will agree to restore it to the main space. Then, if you are not happy, you can go to WP:Deletion review. In my opinion, with your extra sources there is enough to avoid speedy deletion, but I do not think it would withstand a challenge at WP:Articles for deletion - check out WP:BAND. JohnCD (talk) 13:39, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rob Cage

The article is information about a British entertainer, where information about him is well documented online. -Jedi Pharmacist (talk) 17:01, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Salvio Let's talk about it! 11:50, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Broomstones Curling Club

New Information that should meet notability -GormtheDBA (talk) 18:26, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A previous article about the BCC was deleted with only a small handful of comments, some of which noted that the article was verifiable, just perhaps not notable enough. The Broomstones Curling Club has been selected as the host site for one of the 2012 US National Championships, which directly enters to the world curling championships and has impact upon the Olympics, and as such meets the working guidelines for presumed notability being proposed by the Curling Wikiproject. Additionally, there are other citations available that should meet WP:NOTABILITY, and I intend to include them, but need the article in order to preserve the original, almost good enough, content. I am perfectly okay with the article being restored to my userspace pending the cleanup. Thank you GormtheDBA (talk) 18:26, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. In view of the low participation, the closing administrator at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Broomstones Curling Club said that his close should be treated as a PROD, i.e. the article should be restored on request. Please add your new sources as soon as convenient. JohnCD (talk) 19:20, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

low dose naltrexone

Information has been removed and should be replaced. Pharmacology of 'naltrexone' belongs under 'naltrexone', not 'low dose naltrexone'. Science is first and foremost about observation. Scientists may 'observe' published clinical trial results but should also 'observe' actual patient outcomes reported by general practitioners and patients. Science is not supposed to be 'selective' about what it chooses to 'observe'. -220.237.76.147 (talk) 20:08, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This page is only for requesting restoration of pages which have been deleted. What you have here is a content dispute: you should discuss it on the article talk page, and try to reach WP:Consensus with other editors. If you cannot reach consensus, use WP:Dispute resolution. See also WP:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle. JohnCD (talk) 20:36, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you John. I entered the request here because a large proportion of content has recently been deleted and needs to be restored.

No worries. This is a confusing maze, but we do our best to help people navigate it. JohnCD (talk) 21:23, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

content added on wrongly submitted blank page, now corrected

wrong page was initially submitted (without content)by error click . It has been since corrected with appropriate content . -Jurnalist (talk) 20:53, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This page is for undeletion of pages that are currently deleted. This article exists and so this project page has no applicability to it. The prior deletion for having no content has no affect on the page now. However, the reasons stated in the disputed prod tag, that the subject lacks notability, may arise again at an articles for deletion debate so it may yet be subject to deletion, but again, that is not applicable here. The article is not written in very comprehensible English but that can be fixed.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:25, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hangout Music Festival

I do not believe there was an reason for the article to be deleted in the first place, it had citations, and followed the same format as all other major music festival articles. As a major music festival, the Hangout Music Fest needed a wikipedia entry and I thought the starter one I put up was a sufficient jumping off point for future contributions. -Srt252 00:27, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Done I suggest adding good citations, or the article may be nominated for deletion via AfD. LadyofShalott 00:39, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I have also notified the deleting admin of the restoration. LadyofShalott 00:44, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Escape Training Tower Pearl Harbor.jpg

Photo is from USNAVSUBASENLON archive, photo by Naval photographer, no other source for this picture is likely to exist, work of the United states government, public domain image -User:Pedant (talk) 05:54, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. I have reset the timer, which gives you a week to add appropriate license information - see Help:File page. If this is established as PD, consider moving it to Commons. JohnCD (talk) 13:20, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Not gonna work on a timer, I've been out of the navy for decades. This is already established as a public domain work taken by a US Naval Photographer, it's original was somewhere in the archives at the sub Base in Groton. It would be a nontrivial matter to provide more than this. Same goes with the picture of the escape training tower, which was also listed for deletion. I object to pictures with valid permissions being retroactively invalidated by new bureaucratic processes and deletionist editors. Either just reinstate the picture on my say-so, or contact USNAVSUBASENLON and ask them. User:Pedant (talk) 22:27, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:David Allan Coe - Nothing Sacred.jpg

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Nothing Sacred (David Allan Coe album). -Zundark (talk) 13:04, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. JohnCD (talk) 13:24, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rachel Bright

reasoning -90.207.81.111 (talk) 14:27, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. References were added after the BLPprod, so it could have been removed. It would be useful to add more references if available, as I am not sure this shows notability to the standard required by WP:NACTOR. JohnCD (talk) 09:39, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ozormesis

revised article -Lambertore (talk) 16:50, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ozormesis, or Ozo-hormesis, is the term proposed to describe the paradoxical effect induced by low doses of ozone. The word hormesis, from which it derives, refers to an adaptive phenomenon of the organism. Since the ozone molecule is a potent oxidizing agent, the adaptive response of the organism consists in an antioxidant response due to the modulation of the synthesis of some mitochondrial enzymes like superoxide dismutase (SOD) [1]. The phenomenon has wisely been anticipated 500 years ago by Paracelsus with the famous sentence « Omnia venenum sunt: nec sine veneno quicquam existit. Dosis sola facit, ut venenum non fit »[2]. The phenomenon hormesis has recently been described and also studied by the toxicologist Edward J. Calabrese [3]. The term Ozormesis has been proposed for the first time in 2008 and published in the Bulletin of the Medical Association of Ancona, Italy[4].

Not done and will not be done You yourself wrote, "We are trying to introduce a new definition, never used before, to name for the first time". Wikipedia is not a place to attempt to promote your neologism. --Orange Mike | Talk 17:34, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your suggestion. Some work are in progress regarding the topic and I hope to come back to you and Wikipedia when strong evidences will be published on peer reviewed int journal. Thank you again and sorry for that.Lambertore (talk) 06:28, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Erin (Miguzi)

I searched for this forever just to find it has been deleted. There may be others like me. I was looking for a page about Cartoon Network's cancelled Miguzi segments, and there are NO MENTIONS in the Cartoon Network article. If you wanted to find the people interested in it, put a link there, as well as connect to broken links such as in Static Shock. -64.178.115.126 (talk) 18:42, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Cartoon Network programing blocks, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Courcelles (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. --B (talk) 18:27, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The_HAB_Theory

The author Allan_W._Eckert died today. That's how I discovered the deletion. Outrage is an understatement.

Seven of the author's books have been nominated for the Pulitzer Prize in literature. He received an Emmy Award.

The_HAB_Theory book was certainly controversial. It was written to be.

It is the only one of Mr. Eckert's books to have been deleted from Wikipedia - something I find exceedingly odd.

This book sold well, perhaps because it asked many difficult questions.

It is quite easy to understand why some troll might nominate this page for deletion, but to allow deletion is to my eye a massive error.

For value as a wikipdeia page, I suggest a glance at the Amazon.com page for the re-print and original paperback. There was also a hardcover edition, not currently listed, but I've seen these sell for $150-$300.

http://www.amazon.com/dp/0595008208/ (72 5-star reviews, vs 15 4-1 star review)

http://www.amazon.com/dp/B000GR73O8/ (Used 1977 paperback ask: $9.97) 

-rosebud (talk) 22:48, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
You completely misunderstand and your outrage is misplaced. It was not deleted because it is not a worthy topic or shouldn't or cannot have an article. There are millions of worthy topics for articles that have not been created. The act of creation is not sacrosanct (though some very wrongheaded users here feel otherwise). No, what happened here was that though a good article could be made on this subject this wasn't it. Instead, this was an unsourced book review with threadbare content and some unencyclopedic personal opinion material that has no place in an encyclopedia. It is often better for Wikipedia to have no article than a bad one. Because this was deleted via the prod process I will restore, and make some edits to improve the content.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 02:00, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Zeeshan Jawed Shah

Hi I added my name in the wikipedia list and it got deleted, but now who ever searches my name the deletionpedia shows my name there, which is really embarrassing for me, because I am losing my jobs contact with that. please remove my name from deletionpedia as well -Venomx79 (talk) 23:32, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Sorry to hear about your troubles but we are completely unaffiliated with deletionpedia and have no control over their content.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 01:12, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jeff_Harris_(soldier)

reasoning -LimeyTart (talk) 00:50, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]


As I was editing the article to include information from the following sources, some fool had added extraneous inflammatory (and false) information. Without those unnecessary additions, the article was factual.

See: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:z5LsJd_XKZ0J:www.kinston.com/news/kinston-74888-recalls-army.html+Jeff+%22Rock%22+Harris+refuses+to+display+his+medals+and+honors+in+his+Kinston+home.&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&source=www.google.com

http://www.kinston.com/news/story-74947-ranger-contest.html


Thanks!

 Not done The very first revision on the article had unsourced, extremely negative content, i.e., before anyone fool added "extraneous inflammatory (and false) information". The next edit by an IP was obvious vandalism, which may be what you are referring to, but your original content, before the change, was properly deleted under section g10 of the criteria for speedy deletion, and will not be undeleted. By the way, why have you created a second account? Please see our policy on sockpuppetry.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 01:21, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]


I have only one account. The first article/revision was not done by me. When I made my revision, adding information from the articles and removing the garbage about a "7 inch penis" - I was an unregistered user. When I submitted, I was taken to the page stating that the article had been deleted. I subsequently registered and came here to request that the deletion be reviewed.

The two edits by the same IP to the article were each vandalism. I can see every revision and see from each one what was added. The only possibility, if you actually added good content, was if those edits were oversighted, hiding them from my view (which is not likely here). It's also possible that you edited the article to improve it, but you previewed your edit rather than saving, or when you clicked save page it did not take (which does happen). In any event, there is not a single version of this article that is not a BLP violation—in fact, every version meets the definition of an attack page. If the subject is notable (see Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Notability guide here) then you can create it afresh. Undeletion is out of the question though.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 02:46, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Given your classification of them as violations, I don't believe that I made either of the two edits that you are referring to, so my assumption is that my save did not take. Some of what I did see on the page when I went in to edit certainly fell under the guidelines that were given for the deletion. My edits simply recounted the publishing of the article and the claims made by Harris in the article. And removed the information I previously referred to as extraneous and inflammatory.

The IP that you are referring to - by "same" do you mean it is the same as mine or it is the same for the two edits?

I will follow your suggestion and look into the military history area. I think Harris might also have a place in the Military Impostor section of the Impostor page. This story seems to fit right in there. Regardless, thanks for your time and suggestion.

I mean that there are two revisions total by one IP address (which geolocates to Munich, Germany--I assume that is not you:-). The "penis" vandalism you saw was added in the first edit, and similar crap was added in the second edit. There were no other edits by logged out users, so your [attempted] edit is not recorded.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 03:40, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, yes, I'm most certainly not in Munich! I'm somewhere that could be classified as the polar opposite of Munich, I think. Thanks for the clarification and walking through this with me in a very helpful manner. I appreciate it.

File:Chicagosparta-opencupwinners-1938.jpg

source http://www.illinoissoccer.org/ -Ceezmad (talk) 02:22, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karel_Martens

He his a great inspiration to every designer I have ever met, teachers talk about his in class and I have referenced his work in some of projects for inspiration. The deletion of this page goes against the values of Wikipedia, pages should not be deleted because someones opinion believes they not notable, people should be allowed to have the right to view any material regardless of someones personal opinion, thank-you for your time -118.209.37.172 (talk) 03:25, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Not done While deleted by PROD the article was an unsourced BLP. However, any logged in editor is free to write a new sourced article. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:50, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Top of the Pops, Volume 18

This album was number 1 in the national LP charts in 1971. For that fact alone it is notable. It has latterly been reissued both on CD and iTunes. -86.177.93.204 (talk) 12:30, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

    • Not done - this page has not yet been deleted. you can just reverse the convert to a redirect. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:07, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Top of the Pops, Volume 20

This LP was number 1 on the UK national album charts in 1971. It has been re-issued lately on CD. It is notable by virtue of its chart success. -86.177.93.204 (talk) 12:31, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not done - this page has not yet been deleted. you can just reverse the convert to a redirect. Click on the history link above, and click undo next to the latest revision by SilkTork, and supply your reasoning in the edit summary. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:09, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Day Pitney LLP

would like to expand the article to be more comprehensive and in line with content guidelines -Tabajek (talk) 17:00, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Already done. The article was already userfied by Cirt and it's now located here. Please, before moving the page back to mainspace, ask for feedback at WP:FEEDBACK, so that your article will not be deleted again. Happy editing. Salvio Let's talk about it! 23:36, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fire ProWrestling S - 6Men Scramble Coverart.png

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Fire Pro Wrestling S: 6 Men Scramble. -Zundark (talk) 21:13, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:16, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I%27m_not_sad_today

This movement has saved so many people. The least you can do is let a Wikipedia page be about it. -71.12.205.125 (talk) 00:44, 9 July 2011 (UTC) "[reply]

Qaiser Rafique Yasser

reasoning -Qryasser (talk) 04:35, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who implemented the deletion request, user JohnCD (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. January (talk) 11:47, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Afterfilm.jpg

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in After... (film). -Zundark (talk) 08:46, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done January (talk) 11:42, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dekemvriana 1944 SYNTAGMA.jpg

Did not have the time to provide a 'fair use' rational. -Sperxios (talk) 10:14, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This was the article's deletion log-line:

00:00, 29 June 2011 Fastily (talk | contribs) deleted "File:Dekemvriana 1944 SYNTAGMA.jpg" ‎ (Deleted because "F6: Non-free media file with no non-free use rationale". (TW))

User User:Sfan00_IMG: indeed notified me about the forthcoming speedy deletion due to missing fair-use rational, but i did not had the time to review it. Now that i have the time, i can add the rational. I also claim that it ishould not have been deleted according to WP:CSD criteria.

Fair-use rational
Non-free media rationale for Greek Civil War
Article

Greek Civil War

Purpose of use

The photo accurately depicts a defining moment of modern greek history, the "dekemvriana", exactly at the moment the greek and english troops starting shooting against the demonstation of ~300.000 Athenians, just 3 months after the Germans had retreated from the country, on 3 Decemeber 1944. This episode was the major cause of the Greek Civil War that followed, some 1 and half years later.

Replaceable?

Cannot replace this historical shot.

Page was unfit for *speedy* deletion

It is also unfortunate that this picture was speedy-deleted since it had already survived a deletion discussion. If i remember correctly(cannot access history), the deletion-discussion was on the history of that page(or its discussion page) due to licesing problems, and the controversy had been fixed. Therefore, according to the opening paragraphs of WP:CSD, it should not have been *speedy* deleted.

  • Done. I have restored the image and reset the timer. Please add your fair use rationale to the image description page and remove the template once you have done so. Please note that your rationale should include not just what the image depicts, but an explanation of how "its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding" (see WP:NFCC#8). --B (talk) 18:19, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Petkim.png

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Petkim. -Zundark (talk) 10:51, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done January (talk) 11:42, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ACR Carpets

informative -Ropez81 (talk) 15:29, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]


How can other businesses such as pimlico plumbers have a business page and we can't? Is it because Max Clifford is their PR?

Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. Articles about companies are included based on the notability of the topic - not based on the kind of work they do. A large plumbing company that is covered in the news media may be appropriate for inclusion, while a small family-owned company may not be. This is not a value judgment as to the quality of the work or any such thing - only a reflection of what appears to be notable based on coverage in reliable secondary sources. --B (talk) 18:13, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tomori Berat.png

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in KS Tomori Berat. -Zundark (talk) 15:42, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done --B (talk) 18:05, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Gucci (Modern term)

  • Gucci (Modern Term) · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]. The use of the phrase "Gucci" is becoming more and more popular among the teenage crowd as each day goes by! I firmly stand my ground when i state that this page deserves to be a part of Wikipedia. It was deleted on accounts of Vandalism, but in my defense, I would never publish an article/ edit previous work for the defecation of this website. I personally owe too much to this website to ever desire to hurt it in any way. I was merely adding to its richness by creating this entry because as soon as someone hears this phrase for the first time, they are likely to "google" it, and I want our page to come up first. Thank you. -Thommanator (talk) 16:47, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Not done and will not be done. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a site for things made up in school one day. --B (talk) 18:03, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • For more reasons why this is not the sort of thing Wikipedia is for, see WP:NAD: "Wikipedia is not a dictionary or a slang, jargon or usage guide", particularly the section WP:NEO. Try Urban Dictionary. JohnCD (talk) 18:26, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Three Star Club.png

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Three Star Club. -Zundark (talk) 18:03, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done. I have restored the smaller version of the image (per NFCC#3). --B (talk) 18:09, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Certified Information Systems Security Professional

The article is worth reading for any individual who is seeking a certification in computer security profile. It is common in wikipedia to provide knowledge about various certifications and organisations providing them. Who ever comments this as "this is just an advert for a certification" should concern about deleting the following topics also. 1.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Hat_Certified_Engineer#Red_Hat_Certified_Engineer_.28RHCE.29 2.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CCIE#Cisco_Certified_Internetwork_Expert_.28CCIE.29 -124.124.95.15 (talk) 09:33, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

3.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_Technology_Infrastructure_Library.

  •  Not done The article in question is not deleted yet, it has been WP:PROD. At this point, it is simple of matter of you (or any other editor) fixing the concerns (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:27, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Premiere Devolopment Bank logox.png

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Premiere Development Bank. -Zundark (talk) 14:24, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. JohnCD (talk) 19:26, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Request to userify

Could the following deleted page be placed in my userspace please?

Thanks Mathewignash (talk) 18:14, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kyle Ward

Please check the deletion log. It appears that a user simply didn't like Kyle Ward's music and only because of that proposed a deletion of his wiki page. Many do not agree on that, and it's a invalid argument for deleting a page. I hereby request his wiki page to be brought back. -90.129.58.213 (talk) 21:02, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Salvio Let's talk about it! 21:14, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quantech ATZ

academic investigation transference successful case -Ajzurdo (talk) 21:08, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion G11. If you believe that this decision was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who implemented the deletion request, user Atama (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Salvio Let's talk about it! 21:13, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nabil Ayad

Notability is now asserted very well please see below -Jarral 99 (talk) 21:25, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Hi Athaenara

I just noticed that you have deleted the page on Dr. Nabil Ayad at http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nabil_Ayad&action=edit&redlink=1 quite surprisingly for your concern that 'Notability is not asserted'. I find it hasty and reckless because Dr. Ayad is a notable and distinguished personality of worldwide recognition and repute.

If you had just googled his name you probably would not have proceeded to delete the page.

Dr. Ayad is the founder head of the Diplomatic Academy of London which is world's top school of diplomacy and the only one of its kind. DAL has taught and trained generations of diplomats for over three decades and Dr. Ayad is the founder leader of the school. He has worked with Sir Peter Marshall and written a number of books on the subject. A detailed description of his achievement and contributions is available on the website of Global Diplomacy Academy. Please follow the links below for references:

http://www.globaldiplomaticacademy.com/bio.htm

http://www.globaldiplomaticacademy.com/symposia.htm

http://www.genevagsg.com/2010/12/dr-nabil-ayad/

http://culture-multicultures.blogspot.com/2010/11/interview-with-mr-nabil-ayad.html

Currently, he is Director, London Academy of Diplomacy, University of East Anglia, London and Professor of Diplomatic Studies, Nyenrode Business University , The Netherlands: http://www.uea.ac.uk/london/lad .

I hope you can restore the page with appropriate changes/additions/citations. Once it's back on the site, I'd add further details. I'll be looking forward to your quick response. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jarral 99 (talk • contribs) 17:09, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

That article was tagged for {{proposed deletion}} at 07:32, 21 June 2011 (UTC) by Fayenatic london (talk · contribs) with the edit summary Propose deletion as insufficiently notable and the concern Notability not asserted, see WP:ACADEMIC. Per WP:PROD seven days passed during which time, if independent reliable sources existed per Wikipedia:Notability (academics) (there had been none since December 2009), other editors might have found and added them. That did not happen, so it was deleted a week later. You are free to consider Requests for undeletion. – Athaenara ✉ 22:33, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Salvio Let's talk about it! 21:29, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:CentauriDawnCover.jpg

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Centauri Dawn. -Zundark (talk) 22:23, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done --B (talk) 01:17, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ji Chang-wook

Original author contacted me to ask for help after I expanded one of his other articles which is at AfD. This one also seems to have sufficient news sources in Korean to write a much better article: Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL. Can you put it in my userspace so I can work on it until it clearly demonstrates notability? Thanks. -cab (call) 03:52, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  1. ^ HH Ajamieh et Al, Role of Protein Synthesis in the Protection Conferred by Ozone-Oxidative-Preconditioning in Hepatic Ischaemia/Reperfusion, Transplant International, 18, 604-612, 2005
  2. ^ Opera Omnia, op. cit., p. 254
  3. ^ Calabrese E.J., Baldwin L.A., 2000, Tales of two similar hypotheses: the rise and fall of chemical and radiation hormesis, Hum. Exp. Toxicol., 19(1), 85–97
  4. ^ http://www.ordinemedici.ancona.it/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_download&gid=576&Itemid=87
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion&oldid=438851869"