Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Starwood/Proposed decision

Arbitrators

Arbitrators active on this case

• Fred Bauder
• Jdforrester
• Charles Matthews
• Mackensen
• SimonP

Arbitrators recused or inactive on this case

• Blnguyen (recused)
• Morven (recused)
• Raul654 inactive as of March 1

New arbitrators inactive on this case

The newly appointed arbitrators as of the beginning of 2007 are assumed by default to be recused from cases already open at the time they took office. If an arbitrator becomes active on this case (by declaration or activity), his/her name will be moved to the active list and the majority adjusted accordingly.

• Flcelloguy
• Kirill Lokshin
• Paul August
• UninvitedCompany
• Jpgordon
• FloNight

At this time, there are 5 participating arbitrators, so 3 are a majority.

FloNight recuse

I edited this article so I'm not going to undo my inactive state. [1] FloNight 15:50, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Rosencomet's recent activity - Concerns

I ask that the Arbitrators please see the details I've added to my statement today, under Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Starwood#Semi-Statement by Kathryn NicDhàna at the bottom: "Update, 3-19-07". I've also dropped a note about this on Fred's talk page. Thank you. - Kathryn NicDhàna ♫♦♫ 23:39, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

My last update

As long as Kathryn has mentioned the most recent info on Rosencomet's actions around the Starwood article, I might as well remind folks of my last update on 2/28/07 to my evidence statement: Beyond the Valley of the Concluding remarks and as a diff [2]. Also of note is Rosencomet's comment/response within my evidence statement.[3] This is somewhat old news and, considering this arbitration is all but closed, perhaps not entirely relevent but I wanted to make sure it wasn't overlooked. The reason I added the info to my evidence rather than the workshop area is because the workshop had become very difficult to navigate. Thanks. --Pig^man_dialogue 06:16, 21 March 2007 (UTC)