User talk:Kirill Lokshin

Please sign your posts with four tildes (~~~~) and add comments on a new topic in a new section. I will respond on your talk page unless you request otherwise. Threads older than five days are automatically archived. Questions, requests, criticism, and any other comments are always welcome!	Archives June 2005–June 2006 June 2006–November 2006 November 2006–February 2007 February 2007–
I am open to recall as an administrator. I do not place any restrictions on the petitioners beyond the standard ones found here; however, I reserve the right to disregard any petition that is unrelated to my use of administrative tools or my behavior as an administrator.

help

Hi,I received some vandalism warnings few days ago and I dont know why. I think somebody is using my username to vandalise articles. Is this possible? If yes, how can I stop him? Should I change my username? Wikipedia is one of my hobbies and im trying to have as much good contributions as I can.Please help me fix this problem, cheers. Eurocopter Tigre 20:50, 15 March 2007 (EET)

help 2

Thanks for your help. Im a bit less stressed now. Hope nobody will block me if the vandals are using my username again, cheers.

PS: Military history is one of my hobbies and I really like your articles about the Battle of Ceresole and Italian War of 1521. Eurocopter Tigre 21:14, 15 March 2007 (EET)

request

Can you please delete the Dorin Danilă article. The real name of the chief of the Romanian Naval Forces is Dorin Dănilă(I also created an article with his real name). Cheers, Eurocopter Tigre 16:27, 17 March 2007

Signpost updated for May 21st, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 3, Issue 21	21 May 2007	About the Signpost

Corporate editing lands in Dutch media	Spoiler warnings may be tweaked
WikiWorld comic: "Disruptive technology"	News and notes: LGBT project mention, milestones
Features and admins	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:20, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

ArbCom case involving Zeq and Zero0000

"No evidence that this is necessary; [Zeq] seems to have kept in line with his existing probation since last August."

Zeq has been blocked 9 times since his probation was enacted (and only twice by Zero0000). Not to mention the endless edit warring and POV-pushing that have consistently characterized his editing since day 1 (and continues to this day). How is that acceptable? If he makes it through this ArbCom with no remedy against him, I will be astonished. Kaldari 17:21, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Portal:Dinosaurs:

Hi Kirill! The portal is going great, I'm back from my Wikibreak & everything's going great. How are you? Anyway, I was wondering if you could created a new box on the Dinosaur portal: A notice board at the top of the page (probably like the one on my user page, except you'd be able to edit it). I'd do it myself, but the browse bar keeps on going funny - also, should the browse bar be above this notice board, under neath it, or should we even have a notice board at all??? Cheers Kirill! :) Spawn Man 02:08, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

E104421-Tajik

Thanks for getting to this. I had expected more of a delay between the suspension and voting so I could actually offer evidence in this case, or perhaps I just missed it. In any case, I don't think it would be wise to close the case on the basis of Tajik's sockpuppetry without addressing the other issues, mainly E104421's edit warring, which was equally problematic in leading to the arbitration. I've added two findings of fact to the workshop at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/E104421-Tajik/Workshop#Proposed findings of fact and I hope they can make their way into the decision with an associated remedy or remedies. Thanks. Dmcdevit·t 02:32, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Hm, I didn't really think that there was much difference between the two. Tajik used a sockpuppet (not to war with E104421), but that doesn't make E104421 any better. Based on his history, I have no confidence that E104421 won't immediately resume warring... Dmcdevit·t 05:57, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Yes, and it turned out to be an abject failure. He used it to justify reverts, he reverted pages once a day repeatedly, he still neglected to give any rationale for reverts, and, the parole was limited to a small set of articles, so he simply shifted to other ones. That was the reason for my subsequent block afterwards, which was (inexplicably, in my opinion) reversed, when it was clear he was following the letter, not the spirit. Dmcdevit·t 06:04, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/TingMing

Sorry to bother you, however I'd appreciate it if you could take a look at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/TingMing. The arbitration has been stalled for a long time, while the situation on ROC/Taiwan related articles continues to deteriorate. Penwhale was initially assigned the case, but has recently indicated that he feels unable to proceed due to a potential conflict of interest [1]. Any help you could provide to keep this from spinning out of control would be appreciated. Thanks. -Loren 08:28, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Thank you. -Loren 16:59, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Nothing is spinning out of control. Stop over exaggerating and recruiting users to your cause, Loren36. Please assume good faith and stop violating the Wikipedia rules. Thanks TingMing 00:08, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Hkelkar 2

I have produced my evidence. It is available here – Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Hkelkar 2/Evidence#Evidence produced by Sir Nicholas. After viewing it, I hope you will consider changing your propositions on the Proposed decision page. — Nearly Headless Nick ^{C} 09:02, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Italian Wars

I share your feelings for unmotivated, mechanical reverts, but please make no mistake here. I wish you could cut Wetman (of all people) a bit of slack, given his huge amount of vandal fighting. Please don't take the incident to heart, the guy is one of the greatest assets of the project and the model of civility (most of the time). --Ghirla^-трёп- 14:13, 25 May 2007 (UTC)