Talk:Consumption (economics): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m add header
macro vs micro and merging
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject Economics|class=stub|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Economics|class=stub|importance=High}}



==other consumption==
The other consumption talks about it economically, so the distinction fails.
The other consumption talks about it economically, so the distinction fails.


Line 9: Line 9:


I looked up the books on the reference list. Some info I found doesn't agree with the references as listed, so I've put the references with a question mark on the list. If you know which sources were used, could you fix the list, please? --[[User:Foggy Morning|Foggy Morning]] ([[User talk:Foggy Morning|talk]]) 02:48, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
I looked up the books on the reference list. Some info I found doesn't agree with the references as listed, so I've put the references with a question mark on the list. If you know which sources were used, could you fix the list, please? --[[User:Foggy Morning|Foggy Morning]] ([[User talk:Foggy Morning|talk]]) 02:48, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

==macro vs micro and merging==
Until [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Consumption_(economics)&diff=233517002&oldid=226049946 this edit], this article had a largely macro orientation. Maybe it should be re-labeled to indicate that it's macro-specific, and anything which is micro be moved to [[consumer theory]] and/or [[demand (economics)]]. [[User:Cretog8|C<small>RETOG</small>8]]([[User_talk:Cretog8|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/Cretog8|c]]) 11:38, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:38, 22 August 2008

WikiProject iconEconomics Stub‑class High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.


The other consumption talks about it economically, so the distinction fails.

Both consumption and spending need a lot of work. Merging them would be a start JQ 12:24, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reference list

I looked up the books on the reference list. Some info I found doesn't agree with the references as listed, so I've put the references with a question mark on the list. If you know which sources were used, could you fix the list, please? --Foggy Morning (talk) 02:48, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

macro vs micro and merging

Until this edit, this article had a largely macro orientation. Maybe it should be re-labeled to indicate that it's macro-specific, and anything which is micro be moved to consumer theory and/or demand (economics). CRETOG8(t/c) 11:38, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]