User talk:KelleyCook: Difference between revisions
Caution: Page blanking, removal of content on AC power plugs and sockets. using TW |
KelleyCook (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
== February 2009 == |
== February 2009 == |
||
[[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia{{#if:AC power plugs and sockets|, as you did to [[:AC power plugs and sockets]],}} without giving a valid reason for the removal in the [[Help:Edit summary|edit summary]]. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]]. Please make use of the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]] if you'd like to experiment with test edits. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-delete2 --> ''Wikipedia operates by [[WP:CON|consensus]]; it is not okay for you to unilaterally remove entire sections because you feel they're "pointless". If you object to the presence of a section in an article, you need to raise the issue on the article's talk page.'' [[User:Scheinwerfermann|Scheinwerfermann]] ([[User talk:Scheinwerfermann|talk]]) 03:28, 10 February 2009 (UTC) |
[[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia{{#if:AC power plugs and sockets|, as you did to [[:AC power plugs and sockets]],}} without giving a valid reason for the removal in the [[Help:Edit summary|edit summary]]. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]]. Please make use of the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]] if you'd like to experiment with test edits. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-delete2 --> ''Wikipedia operates by [[WP:CON|consensus]]; it is not okay for you to unilaterally remove entire sections because you feel they're "pointless". If you object to the presence of a section in an article, you need to raise the issue on the article's talk page.'' [[User:Scheinwerfermann|Scheinwerfermann]] ([[User talk:Scheinwerfermann|talk]]) 03:28, 10 February 2009 (UTC) |
||
:The information was duplicated from Type A: Nema 1-15. The only reason for its inclusion was to include a photograph that did NOTHING to improve the encyclopedia content of the article. -- [[User:KelleyCook|KelleyCook]] ([[User talk:KelleyCook#top|talk]]) 14:39, 10 February 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 14:39, 10 February 2009
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 28 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Template:USRD-news-subscription
iPhone 3G
Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow or move it unilaterally while discussion about it is underway, as you did to iPhone 3G. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JCDenton2052 (talk • contribs) 17:13, June 10, 2008 (UTC)
Thanks!
...for the clarification on ND's redshirting policy. I'm a bit flabbergasted (if that's possible); in my day and for at least several subsequent decades, ND took great pride in NOT redshirting, and the only players granted extra eligibility were those who, like Montana, were injured and could not perform. I'm sure that someone will come along and amend my comment on Joe - although I hope properly. Though in effect he was redshirted, as you likely know theterm originated at Nebraska where in the days of Devaney they kept whole cohorts back a year. We never did that -back then. Jim Moran '71 aka Sensei48
February 2009
Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to AC power plugs and sockets, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Wikipedia operates by consensus; it is not okay for you to unilaterally remove entire sections because you feel they're "pointless". If you object to the presence of a section in an article, you need to raise the issue on the article's talk page. Scheinwerfermann (talk) 03:28, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
- The information was duplicated from Type A: Nema 1-15. The only reason for its inclusion was to include a photograph that did NOTHING to improve the encyclopedia content of the article. -- KelleyCook (talk) 14:39, 10 February 2009 (UTC)