User talk:AnmaFinotera

Image orientation in Nightshade - and Wiki in general

Hi there.

Whereabouts does it state that an image should be right-aligned after a header? I've checked MOS, and can't see anything that states this. Just curious - not picking a fight or anything. a_man_alone (talk) 15:23, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

See MOS:IMAGES. Images should be right aligned when they directly follow any second level heading, though this is apparently now disputed and being discussed at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style#Question (and it appears it was removed prematurely but is back now) -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 15:34, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

The Gundam related articles you reverted.

The articles in question (METEOR (Gundam) and Support ship Eternal) where revised to remove bad merge templates. There is still no discussion of the merge and the templates have been there a long time. Please consider the possibility that the placement of these templates may have been an act of vandalism. It is my understanding that there are two options to merging. First: Merge the articles without discussion. Second: Use the relevant merge templates and start the discussion with the reason why you believe that the articles should be merged. 97.115.129.240 (talk) 00:40, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

A discussion is not required with the merge template unless the merge is controversial. And no, the placement was not vandalism and there is no valid reason to even think it might be. As the templates have been in place for such a long time, it seems clear that there is no actual opposition to the merging and the merge can be done at any time without discussion. However, as neither is notable, they have been tagged for deletion instead. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 00:42, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

The placement of merge templates without providing a reason is at the very least rude, and yes I did note the WP:PRODs (Proposals for deletion) on those articles. 97.115.129.240 (talk) 01:11, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

Not really rude...and a reason may have been noted in the edit summary when they were placed (I didn't check the history to see). -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 01:13, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

It looks like it was Silver Edge (talk) who placed the merge templates. 97.115.129.240 (talk) 01:36, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

He seems to be an established editor, and very active in the video game and Gundam areas. Looking at his contribs around the time, it seems like the tagging was done as part of a lot of clean up being done in the Gundam articles with many being tagged for merging. Most likely, they were just forgotten during these efforts. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 01:46, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

Okay, and thank you for your time. Allen 97.115.129.240 (talk) 01:56, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the welcome letter and instructions!

Dear Collectonian,

Thanks for the welcome letter and instructions! It would be my honor to learn from you and other members. I will definitely ask your expert advice and help.

Thanks again for your contribution to Wikipedia and the world!--Garbolia (talk) 06:49, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

FAR

Templates indicating problems on an article don't mean anything, so there's no need to worry, as the owners of the article have already been made aware of what people think YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 01:59, 21 September 2009 (UTC)