User talk:Favonian: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 14:10, 29 October 2010

This is Favonian's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58: 31 days

Reverts

Hi, you have heroically reverted so much IP vandalism on Mary (mother of Jesus) that you might as well semi-protect it. Cheers. History2007 (talk) 20:35, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tempting! It might get me a place in Heaven, but at present the level of vandalism doesn't quite merit a block. Favonian (talk) 22:20, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Good, that was a classy piece of humor, playing on salvation and temptation. And perhaps also subject to discussion, for the causative view of salvation may run into the statement in the Epistle to the Romans 9:16 which suggests another view. But that is another story. Cheers. History2007 (talk) 23:33, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Our eggnog editor is back

Hello Favonian. I hope that you are enjoying your wikibreak. When you return would you please take a look at this message User talk:MarnetteD#Eggnog and overlinking that I received. The new IP also geolocates to the Philippines so I am pretty sure that it is the same person so we can now and block evasion to their list of disruptive editing. Thanks for your time in looking into this and welcome back when you get back. MarnetteD | Talk 17:54, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for catching the latest instance of this consummate whack job. Though activity seems to have stopped, I've blocked the IP for a month as a clear case of block evasion. Favonian (talk) 16:39, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking care of this. As I wrote on Colin's talk page the IP's vendetta against eggnog is odd. Maybe they had a nightmare about a cow, a chicken and a bottle of rum at some point in their life :-) Cheers. MarnetteD | Talk 18:16, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Found a new IP doing the same link removal today. Here is a link to their edit history page [1] Looks like they are going to be a persistant pest. Thanks ahead of time for looking into this new IP. MarnetteD | Talk 17:10, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jeez! I'll end up having to develop a taste for that stuff out of solidarity. Favonian (talk) 17:30, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possible sock of user Megaproject

Megaproject (talk · contribs)
Riskrisk (talk · contribs)
Rcfrcf (talk · contribs)
Cheapskate08 (talk · contribs)
Pilgaard (talk · contribs)
flyvbjerg.plan.aau.dk: Linksearch en - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • MER-C Cross-wiki • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced • COIBot-Local - COIBot-XWiki - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.org • Live link: http://www.flyvbjerg.plan.aau.dk

What do you think? 85 links makes me think there might be others as well. --Ronz (talk) 17:02, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've taken this to Wikiproject Spam. It's a big mess that will require much more time than I have just find the extent of the problems. --Ronz (talk) 17:46, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A quick request

Hello! Some time back, I created a user subpage to work on an article, and now I am buggered if I can remember how to find it. I checked what links here, and that got me nowhere, and I tried every permutation of the article name I could think of. Do you have any ideas? I should have created a link on my userpage, which I will do, if we find the article. Anyway, your thoughts? Thanks. ---RepublicanJacobite_{The'FortyFive'} 16:42, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Could it be on this list? The link to your subpages is found at the bottom of your contribution list. Favonian (talk) 16:46, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, bloody hell! Yes, I forgot about that. I knew I was missing something really basic, and would feel like a numbskull when it was pointed out to me. Alas... Well, thank you. ---RepublicanJacobite_{The'FortyFive'} 16:48, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. It took me a long time as well to locate that link. Favonian (talk) 16:50, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Request for blank/privacy on Deleted page for living person

Hi,

I'm checking to see if Harvey Silverman's page can have the discussion items about deletion hidden, because he has had people look for him on Wikipedia and then find his page having been removed for unambiguous promotion. He's a dentist here in Cleveland and doesn't want people to think badly of him.

In the Deletion section, there's a listing for how to hide the comments, but I can no longer reach this article, so would it be possible for an admin to do it, or could I get a temporary access to the page to blank and hide the comments?

Thank you so much for your help! Lmitro2010 (talk) 18:44, 1 October 2010 (UTC)lmitro2010[reply]

I assume we are talking about the deletion log for the article. To the best of my knowledge, this cannot be hidden, but if you have found evidence that it is possible, please tell me. Wikipedia is a complex system, and I don't pretend to know every nook and cranny. Personally, I don't see how this is such a big deal. Readers will have to make a pretty determined effort to see the log; especially since, according to this, no articles link to the deleted biography. Favonian (talk) 20:32, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - Thank you for your reply.

He said someone clicked his name from the Washington University Alumni page and it said he had been deleted for self promotion. I tried to make a privacy link, but it seems there's no way to erase the deletion. I tried to make a blank page but within minutes someone deleted it again saying there was no substantive information. Can I remove the link on Univ. of Washington Alumni page? I'm also asking the person who just re-deleted things. Thank you! Lmitro2010 (talk) 19:19, 3 October 2010 (UTC)lmitro2010[reply]

Sure, you can just remove the brackets. The red link is useless anyway. Favonian (talk) 19:22, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yay! Thank you - it worked! Have a great day! :) Lmitro2010 (talk) 19:23, 3 October 2010 (UTC)lmitro2010[reply]

User talk:71.178.152.143

Hello

I notice that you recently blocked this IP. I thought I should let you know that they seem to have taken to vandalising their talk page now :) --5 albert square (talk) 21:57, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) Thanks, but Courcelles got there first, as always. Favonian (talk) 22:03, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Why? Because you're worth it tosses hair Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 18:52, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot! (trying to toss my hair, but the result is not convincing) Favonian (talk) 18:54, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

So who was he?

Clearly he was a sock, but I can't be bothered to think of who. HalfShadow 21:01, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Our new best friend, Zarapastroso (talk · contribs). Perfect waste of time and space. Favonian (talk) 21:03, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Never heard of him. HalfShadow 21:05, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Block of Ur0s

You blocked User:Ur0s for vandalism, apparently due to persistently posting claims that Lady Gaga's song "Bad Romance" was plagiarised from Mozart. However, this claim has been given some currency on the internet, apparently starting with a video which is shown at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=650r-bU7TNM. It is therefore entirely likely that Ur0s was editing in good faith, even though the claim shows every sign of having been intended as a joke. As far as I know the editor has no previous history of disruptive editing. You may like to consider reducing the length of the block. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:47, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Seems reasonable. How about 24 hours for edit warring? Favonian (talk) 10:48, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Seems reasonable. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:07, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Undelete the "Camaron Stevenson" Page

I saw that you deleted the page, "Camaron Stevenson" because there was no website backing who he was. Well, here is a legitimate website!

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm4093861/

So you can put the page back up. Thank you!

-camorama66 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Camorama66 (talk • contribs) 16:22, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article was deleted because it did not creditably assert notability of the person in question. The IMDb link you provide states that a person of this name was a publicist for the film El extraño. First of all, that doesn't really match the brief description in the original article, and secondly it is not even close to the requirements for coverage in reliable sources. I therefore have to decline your request. Favonian (talk) 16:31, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jonathan Doria Pamphilj

Would be great if administrators could genuinely engage in discussion so that arguments are clearly set out in an open and transparent way. That way we can actually improve articles. I've demonstrated that JDP has had reasonable coverage in mainstream reliable sources and that he is notable for several reasons, one of which is that he is a prince with a papal title. Contaldo80 (talk) 15:11, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sandbox

Sorry- Didn't know about the sandbox. I was teaching my 4th graders a lesson about using Wikipedia for research. Mssipress (talk) 16:40, 5 October 2010 (UTC)mssipress[reply]

Great work!

		The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
		For your tireless reverting of vandalism. Tyrol5 [Talk] 20:52, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And, might I add, you've done a fantastic job cleaning up my trail of csd tags over the past few months since getting your mop. Keep it up! Tyrol5 [Talk] 20:52, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, thank you! Keep the deliveries coming

Favonian (talk) 21:36, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Arthur Rubin

Hello there Favonian, thanks for the feedback I am just perplexed about how Arthur's page has survived...

1. There seems to be very little which is notable in his profile 2. What has he actually ACHIEVED which is notable? 3. The statements used smack of peacock.... 4. There has been NOTHING since the 80s!

An outside simple cannot imagine any reason why this page has survived if he wasn't an administrator of Wikipedia...

So how do I go through the process once again to propose deletion? I'm having trouble figuring it out... —Preceding unsigned comment added by B-Objective (talk • contribs) 09:53, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The instructions are at WP:AFD. Regarding notability, have a look at the three previous discussions, the latest of which is found at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arthur Rubin (3rd nomination). Favonian (talk) 09:57, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2008 South Ossetia war

Occupation of Gori was not. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Жека Михайлов (talk • contribs) 15:42, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure what you mean by this, but if you think that whole sections of the article should be removed, you had better discuss this on the talk page. If you delete contents again without seeking consensus, you will be blocked from editing. Favonian (talk) 15:50, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gleisinger Corporation

I was about to delete as a hoax - the sites they'd built included Battersea Power Station (famous, non-nuclear) and Springfield Nuclear Power Plant (from The Simpsons). The contact details looked really dubious, as well... TFOWR 09:38, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I had my tongue firmly planted in my cheek while deleting. Author seems a bit unpleasant from looking at his messages to our colleagues. Favonian (talk) 09:40, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dangerous Mice

Ta for that. Peridon (talk) 11:53, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Miauw! Favonian (talk) 11:55, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

He's now blanked his own userpage (which makes a total of five altogether...). I think I detect a hint of COI, and he might have given up now. I'll put Goodbody on watch in case another one pops out of a hole. Peridon (talk) 13:19, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Countries of Europe

Hello, Favonian. You have new messages at Template:Countries of Europe#England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Daicaregos (talk) 06:57, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

92.29.112.82

Thanks for catching this IP - Can I revert the edits (inc the PROD removes) that this editor has made ? Codf1977 (talk) 14:41, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The PROD may be a little tricky, since Rangoon11 has "only" been blocked, not banned. Well, WP:IAR and go ahead. Favonian (talk) 14:43, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I will make sure that I link to the SPI in the edit sum of the undo. Codf1977 (talk) 14:44, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Amit Kumar Khare

shake that salt! Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 08:41, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, salt, block! Favonian (talk) 08:44, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Salt can be "sweet".. dude. thanks. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 08:44, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Emraanhashmi

Hiya, that was quick! But please can you also check here, because something may have gone wrong with the report... Wikipedia talk:Sockpuppet investigations#Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Emraanhashmi. Thanks, Chzz ► 09:50, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not as impressive as it looks. I have had this sockpuppeteer in my telescopic sight for some days, blocking and deleting as the puppets appeared. The report is in place and duly registered, but your rationale consists only of your signature. I've added a couple of entries and made a note about the naming of the case. Favonian (talk) 09:54, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Vandal

This person has been vandalising the Kendall Francois page [4]- Est.r (talk) 06:30, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And you have very appropriately reverted the vandalism. Thanks! Favonian (talk) 10:45, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

... for your help in dealing with the fake sockpuppet accuser. JamesBWatson (talk)

My pleasure. Suspect we'll have the opportunity to deal with him in the future. Favonian (talk) 11:43, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:05, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And so it is: [5]. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:24, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What a great loss to mathematics! Favonian (talk) 14:32, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Apology

I had already apologised for my disruptive editing. I'm sorry but I think it's a bit hypocritical about deleting various information. I'm a new member so I still don't fully understand the Community Guidelines of this site. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sweep12 (talk • contribs) 21:53, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Apology accepted, though I'm not really sure how that was hypocritical. When you persistently remove entries from another editor's talk page after being told to cease and desist, then voices will be raised. That being said, there are indeed a lot of guidelines to learn, and I haven't mastered all of them either. Favonian (talk) 21:58, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Account Deletion

Could you please inform me how to delete my account as I admit I've had a bit of shameless behaviour recently? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sweep12 (talk • contribs) 22:00, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Strange as it may sound, you can't actually delete an account. You can stop using it, and if you are concerned about somebody else using it in your absence by, say, guessing your password, you can just change the password to some random gibberish which not even you can remember. Favonian (talk) 22:06, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake

My bad with the Gigi Buffon edit, I'm new to this Wikipedia stuff and thought I was in sandbox mode. Could you show me where the sandbox is so I can work on my editing over there without screwing up other articles. Also, bro, could you hook me up with a link to where I can learn what special formats are needed in edits? I need to learn the codes for how to make links and all that good stuff. Thanks, bro BiGg3st iTaLiAn0 (talk) 17:55, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The sandbox is at Wikipedia:Sandbox, and I've added a welcome message to your talk page with several useful links. Favonian (talk) 18:09, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks broski, I'll have to thank you when I get nominated for admin haha. Happy editing! BiGg3st iTaLiAn0 (talk) 18:11, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oscar Wilde

Just a note to say thanks for protecting Oscar's page. I was online earlier when there were just a few edits going on so I was amazed at all that has happened since. This is his birthday (its my mom's too but she doesn't have a wikipage to protect :->) but in my five+ years here I haven't seen this happen on the other Oct 16ths. If we are both here next year I might drop a reminder note so we don't have to go through this again. Cheers. MarnetteD | Talk 20:04, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Einstein's theory versus Newton Law's

Dear Mr. Favonian: Please allow me to edit the text in the Newton's Law's section. The writing is extremely biased towards Einstein's General Releativity Theory. Granted there are many scientists that believe that this theory is a law, there are many the do not. I have not added any comments to the Einstein relativity wiki, only to the Newton section. There have been some recent papers that caste a doubt on Einstein's theory and reinforce Neton's Law's, so please allow me to point this out. I have kept in place any mention of Einstein as another theory in the interest of fairness, even though I believe that General Relativity has been invalidated, since it predicts a non-existant precession of Mercury.

Perhaps we can come to a compromise in the wording that doesn't make Newton's Law's sound like a "fringe theory". Afterall, these laws have been around for much longer than Einstein's theory, and our space agency uses these laws, not Einstein's for our satellite calculations.

Regards,

Dave Weber —Preceding unsigned comment added by D c weber (talk • contribs) 20:12, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think anybody refers to Newton's laws as "fringe". You need to present your proposal at Talk:Newton's law of universal gravitation to obtain consensus. Favonian (talk) 20:15, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is DGG's unblocking of Rangoon11. Thank you. Codf1977 (talk) 07:02, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

NOINDEX

Re User:Lew Loot/What Men Know that Women Don't. Sorry, I didn't realize it was transcluded in the draft banner. Best, Voceditenore (talk) 12:02, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Heymid and ANI

An incident with which you may have been involved, etc etc. Sad it came to this: WP:ANI#User:Heymid, User:AIK IF 2010. Thanks for spotting it and blocking so quickly. TFOWR 22:40, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Darn! I must work on my typing skills, but thanks for completing this unpleasant task. Favonian (talk) 22:44, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proof ataturk was a Yörük Turkmen stop edit about ataturk was a "albanian or macedonian"!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3vOvaHyE4To

Atatürk's family tree

http://www.kanalkultur.com/yolalevi/i...

Yörük Turkmen in Balkan http://balkanpazar.org/yorukler.asp

His ancestors were Turcomans of Karaman who were settled into the Balkans in order to increase the numbers of Turkics in the region.

Profesori turk Enver Behnam Shapolyo shkruan: "Për gjyshërit e Ataturkut kisha pyetur një shok shkolle të Ataturkut, që ka qenë deputet, i quajtur Haxhi Mehmeti. Ai më tha: -Gjyshërit e Ataturkut janë nga komuna e Dibrës, Koxhshëk, të cilët kishin ardhur nga Konja e Anadollit dhe flisnin turqisht, për këtë shkak quheshin edhe "konjarë"...

Mustafa was born as the son of Mr and Mrs Ali Rıza Efendi Turkish and Zübeyde Hanım in Salonika, which was then a part of the Ottoman Empire. It was also home to various peoples in the cosmopolitan Muslims with Jews and Christians lived together peacefully mainly. Mustafa's paternal grandfather, Kızıl Hafız Ahmed was one of the Yörük Türkmen. His mother was the daughter of an old peasant, originally from Konya, Karaman-derived family of the little town Langasa (now Langadas) in Thessaloniki. The parents were married 1871,

"Efendiler, benim atalarım Anadolu'dan Rumeli'ye gelmiş Yörük Türkmenler'dendir " M.Kemal Atatürk

"Gentlemen, my ancestors came from Anatolia to Rumelia is from the Turkmen Yörük " M. Kemal Ataturk —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sahindakan (talk • contribs) 18:19, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Page creation

Hello. It was a different article with new references and search for attributions and notability. I checked all the rules and they said that it is possible to recreate an article as long as it is not exactly the same as the one deleted. It was not the same as it focused on poetry in recognised journals and journalism - two things that were not referenced very well in the deleted article. Also the other article was deleted very quickly before I had chance to prepare an argument showing notability. Alwayssoma (talk) 01:44, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

G4 says: A sufficiently identical and unimproved copy, having any title, of a page deleted via a deletion discussion. This excludes pages that are not substantially identical to the deleted version, pages to which the reason for the deletion no longer applies, and content moved to user space for explicit improvement (but not simply to circumvent Wikipedia's deletion policy). This criterion also excludes content undeleted via deletion review, or which was deleted via proposed deletion or speedy deletion (although in that case the previous speedy criterion, or other speedy criteria, may apply.

It was not the same as the one deleted, I was at pains to re-source all the references and focus on only the things that could be proved as notable using adequate references. It was not identical as I made sure none of the things that were problematic were still there. I am sorry if I did this wrong, I thought it was adequate. Alwayssoma (talk) 01:49, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also - sorry I have messed up your talk page, I am still learning.Alwayssoma (talk) 01:52, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sock of Daveygp?

Hi, there is a user Bradleybranning (talk · contribs) who might possibly be a sock of Daveygp (talk · contribs); I suspect this because he's recreated several articles on actors which were previously deleted, and I'm pretty sure that Daveygp, or a known sock of his was involved in those same actor pages prior to their deletion. What should I do? --Redrose64 (talk) 13:07, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yes, that's him alright. Thanks for catching it! Favonian (talk) 13:10, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Can you clear my article again?

Thanks for your help before. I had to take the Diversified Global Graphics Group page down to do some editing offline, and it needs to be cleared again. I put in the Request for Feedback last week, made the suggested changes, but it hasn't been approved. Do you have time to take a look? Backburnercomics (talk) 13:09, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The way I read the RfF is not so much that it hasn't been approved as that it hasn't been disapproved, if you see what I mean. The article isn't perfect and it needs some more work on the references, but I doubt that it would be deleted if it came to an AfD. In other words, I suggest you leave it in article space and keep working on it. Favonian (talk) 13:27, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, sounds good. I didn't have the RfF banner the last time the article was public, so it had me a little worried. Thanks.Backburnercomics (talk) 16:56, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kate Middleton

Sorry to upset you (I am being polite) but I was only trying o bring a smile to the faces of those unfortunate members of the community who actually do something (I am being constructive).

Lighten up a little! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.142.211.3 (talk) 19:18, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hilarious — especially compared to your other contribution. There are other websites more suitable for making jokes. Favonian (talk) 19:21, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

International Kissing Day

Does exist, but not in October =) Gwen Chan 13:26, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

How sweet, but, alas, only a local observance

Favonian (talk) 13:29, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, I should strike that. It is now global. I can hardly wait. Favonian (talk) 13:30, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This IP needs banning

for destructive editing: 92.232.87.91. He has established a pattern of bad faith edits [6]. Should be blocked for a couple of days.--Zucchinidreams (talk) 15:06, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That IP has not edited in over a year; did you misread the year in the date? p.s. I'm not intentionally following you around, I just happened to look at your talk page a few minutes ago to see if you'd replied to my other edit. —Soap— 15:17, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That's cool, thanks for all the help.--Zucchinidreams (talk) 15:20, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

LouisPhilippeCharles

LouisPhilippeCharles Thanks. -- PBS (talk) 18:59, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

See User talk:LouisPhilippeCharles#Both warnings. His behaviour since his unblock in ignoring the second warning comes as little surprise, but I think he abused you good faith, as he knew there were two warnings and it seems he exploited the slight miswording by user:JohnCD to knowingly deceive you. -- PBS (talk) 12:35, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That is rather disappointing, and I'm sorry to have overlooked the other half of the conditions. He deserves to get reblocked, but thanks to his maneuvering we will now look a bit bureaucratic when we block him. Wouldn't ANI be the right place to get a decision with a broader base? Favonian (talk) 13:29, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am involved in my own ANI dispute at the moment, and the last thing we need is for that to get mix up in this, so it would be better if someone else took the lead on this. Will you do it -- PBS (talk) 19:24, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You

Thank you for reviewing the 618th Tanker Airlift Control Center page and partially locking it due the recent vandalism issues. There is one specific person out there who has been making all of the changes, and while the vandalism administrators have been great about blocking his account, that person keeps creating new account names to continue vandalising the page. I appreciate your help! Brockhjm (talk) 23:09, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Basque Country (autonomous community)

Hi Favonian, I noticed you made a revert here the other day - that's why I'm writing to you. This page was semi-protected a while ago (by Lar, upon my request), now that the protection has expired drive-by mapchanges from various ip's has resumed. Could you please semi it again. Best regards, Finn Rindahl (talk) 22:19, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your comment on my talk page

Sorry, I am not aware of any content or template from Wikipedia that I'm supposed to have removed or blank paged. Please explain Justus Maximus (talk) 14:34, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. Favonian (talk) 14:36, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit conflict

You shmooshed Born2Cycle's last AN/I post -- could you fix it? :-) --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 17:15, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gawd!! I hate when that happens. I have repaired the damage. Thanks a bundle for catching it! Favonian (talk) 17:19, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Should have fixed it myself, but I didn't want to encourage that line of discussion.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 17:23, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Huggle

When are you going to use Huggle again? Wayne Olajuwon chat 21:25, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure. I'm sort of ambivalent about that tool. Very productive, but (for me at least) it's too easy to make errors that have to be frantically reverted. May I ask the reason for your inquiry? Favonian (talk) 21:30, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I was just asking. Wayne Olajuwon chat 22:01, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am Peter The Roman, pretty sure

Warning

Mr. or Mrs. Favonian,

With your last actions You Sinned Seriously, Pretty Sure.

If you can and you do not unprotect the Prophecy of the Popes article, You Are Seriously Sinning, More Seriously As Time Passes, Pretty Sure.

Somebody Who Gave The Order Is More Seriously Sinning that The Executor, Pretty Sure.

The Inductor Is More Seriously Sinning that Who Gave The Order, Pretty Sure.

The Ultimately Responsible Is More Seriously Sinning that The Inductor, Pretty Sure.

The Torture of God

Perhaps God will finally apply a Dream of Torture to all Persons in The World, beyond a certain threshold, with a Power and Duration proportional to The Sins.

Perhaps, The Apocalypse will occur.

Prayer, Pretty Sure

God Please Forgive Me For My Lies.

God Please Forgive Me For My Selfishness.

God Please Forgive Me For My Vanity.

God Please Forgive Me For My Laziness.

God Please Forgive Me For My Lust.

God Please Forgive Me For My Gluttony.

God Please Forgive Me For My Greed.

God Please Forgive Me For My Envy.

God Please Forgive Me For My Pride.

God Please Forgive Me For My Wrath.

God Please Forgive Me For My Hate.

God Please Forgive Me For Yielding To The Devil.

God Please Forgive Me For Humiliating Devil.

God Please Forgive Me For Venerating Devil.

God Please Forgive Me For Asking Forgiveness From Devil.

God Please Forgive Me For Forgiving Devil.

God I Do Not Want To Be Submitted To Devil.

God Please Protect Me From Temptations Of Devil.

God Please Protect Me From Actions Of Devil.

God Please Forgive Me For All My Sins.

God Please Forgive All The Mortal Sins Of The Universe, If You Desire.

I Am Not God.

I Ask God Justice and Love.

Peter The Roman, pretty sure.

I just saw this pop up in the recent changes log and I wanted to say WTF? I can't believe that someone took the time to write this.Funnyfarmofdoom _{(talk to me)} 14:09, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]