User talk:Catlover324: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Level 2 warning re: Domestic rabbit (HG)
Line 56: Line 56:


[[Image:Information.png|25px]] The <span class="plainlinks">[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domestic_rabbit?diff=394650809 recent edit]</span> you made to [[:Domestic rabbit]] constitutes [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]], and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]] for testing. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-huggle2 --> [[User:Alansohn|Alansohn]] ([[User talk:Alansohn|talk]]) 20:26, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
[[Image:Information.png|25px]] The <span class="plainlinks">[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domestic_rabbit?diff=394650809 recent edit]</span> you made to [[:Domestic rabbit]] constitutes [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]], and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]] for testing. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-huggle2 --> [[User:Alansohn|Alansohn]] ([[User talk:Alansohn|talk]]) 20:26, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

{{uw-vandal2}}. [https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w/index.php?title=Domestic_rabbit&diff=394652178&oldid=394650852 Diff]. This edit does not meet the [[WP:MOS|quality standards]] for the encyclopedia. Maybe if you rephrased it and wrote it well, and [[WP:CITE|cited your source properly]], the content could be judged for inclusion; but if you continue to add your content in this way, you may be blocked for disrupting Wikipedia. [[User:Nimur|Nimur]] ([[User talk:Nimur|talk]]) 20:35, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:35, 3 November 2010

Welcome!

Hello, Catlover324, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Why to keep your cat inside, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Bihco (talk) 21:17, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Why to keep your cat inside, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Bihco (talk) 21:17, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page User:Bihco has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Nsaa (talk) 21:21, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]


my change is not unconstructive.

This kind of content would never belong in an article by itself. We already have Cat health, which covers the same topic and a lot more. Moreover, claims like "...to protect your cat from cat haters" are not reasonably possible to ever verify with reliable medical sources (because that's what we'd need) and therefore couldn't fit in any article. So if you remove that, it's basically just a sentence or two on cat health and maybe cat behavior. Soap 21:30, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Catlover324, you need to understand a few things about how Wikipedia works, which is stuff you should have had a basic grasp of from taking a quick scan at the links in the welcome banner on top of the page:

  1. Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought – we strive to provide information that is verifiable and by reliable secondary independent sources.
  2. Wikipedia is not your own web host – Please set up your own blog or use another website if you wish to express your personal opinions on stuff; Wikipedia is not the place for that.
  3. The pages you edit and create are not your articles – once you hit that "Save page" button, they become the community's articles, and they may be edited in any way, shape, or form within common sense and basic guidelines.

If you are not able to understand these basic premises about Wikipedia, then you will not be able to edit here constructively. Regards, –MuZemike 21:35, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

why was the change i made to Bihco's userpage undone?

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Mary Bale. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. The Thing // Talk // Contribs 13:16, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have also reverted your second edit to the Mary_Bale page. The original page correctly redirects to a section of an article that describes her notability and the event she was involved in. If you believe that this should change then please use the article's talk page to discuss your proposed changes with other editors before making them. Thanks and happy editing! CaptRik (talk) 14:37, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 13:57, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Cat health. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Bihco (talk) 22:54, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Domestic rabbit, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Domestic rabbit was changed by Catlover324 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.972262 on 2010-11-03T20:24:13+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:24, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Domestic rabbit constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 20:26, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.. Diff. This edit does not meet the quality standards for the encyclopedia. Maybe if you rephrased it and wrote it well, and cited your source properly, the content could be judged for inclusion; but if you continue to add your content in this way, you may be blocked for disrupting Wikipedia. Nimur (talk) 20:35, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]