User talk:Tgandz

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Tgandz, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one of your contributions does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  Tiamut^talk 13:48, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Sorry, but facts are purely neutral.

1 revert rule

All Arab-Israeli conflict articles are on a 1 revert rule per 24 hours, [1] you have violated it on List of indigenous peoples. Please self revert. --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 21:54, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

You want me to voluntarily re-insert a lie into an article? No thanks. Have you even bothered to read my arguments?

You are advised that the List of indigenous peoples article "is currently subject to active arbitration remedies, as laid out during a 2008 Arbitration case, and supplemented by community consensus in November 2010." DieWeisseRose (talk) 06:32, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

Hi, Tgandz, and welcome to Wikipedia; we hope you enjoy editing and decide to stay. As an encyclopedia, Wikipedia is based on reliable sources rather than the personal analysis of individual users. This edit removed sources, but did not replace them with better sources. Wikipedia is also a collaborative project, and describing other users as liars and disparaging their ethnicity, as you did here, is expressly forbidden. Please comment on the content, not the contributor. On one final note - people have been fighting about issues related to Israel/Palestine since well before this site was founded; the related articles have been subject to significant disruption; please heed the above warning, or you are likely to be blocked from editing. - 2/0 (cont.) 07:22, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

Your Recent Edits of List of indigenous peoples

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to List of indigenous peoples, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. DieWeisseRose (talk) 04:25, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

Blocked

To enforce an arbitration decision, you have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for personal attacks and disparaging the presumed ethnicity of other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing arbitration enforcement blocks and follow the instructions there to appeal your block. - 2/0 (cont.) 19:03, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

---

Notice to administrators: In a March 2010 decision, the Committee held that "Administrators are prohibited from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as WP:AN or WP:ANI). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the proper page. Any administrator that overturns an enforcement action outside of these circumstances shall be subject to appropriate sanctions, up to and including desysopping, at the discretion of the Committee."