User talk:SlimVirgin

RfA candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report Elli 0 0 0 16:53, 7 June 2024 6 days, 6 hours no report RfB candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report Last updated by cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online at 09:53, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

Question

I know you're probably super busy. I just wanted to know if you had ever had a chance to follow up on that request about showing I'm not a sock to Jclemens. I'm not sure how it works, so if its already happened, I didn't mean to press it. I'm not really certain what to ask, but I appreciate your help either way. -- Avanu (talk) 00:22, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

I don't recall what this was about. I'll look again at the link you sent me, but I'm assuming it's sorted out by now. SlimVirgin ^{TALK|CONTRIBS} 17:35, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

Thanks. -- Avanu (talk) 17:44, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

RfC/U: Cirt

Dear SlimVirgin, further to the recent Political activism request for arbitration and various arbitrators' comments at that request to the effect that there had not been to date an RfC/U on Cirt, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Cirt. Best, --JN466 13:37, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

Just a note Slim the comment in reply to DGG might be better incorporated into your statement... it seems a bit large for just endorsing DGG's statement. Best The Resident Anthropologist (talk)•(contribs) 19:54, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

I didn't make a separate statement, RA, so I was hoping just to highlight those issues in an endorsement of someone else's statement. SlimVirgin ^{TALK|CONTRIBS} 19:59, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

I know you didnt, and I would like to add an Endorsement to the concerns you raised. The Resident Anthropologist (talk)•(contribs) 20:13, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

Actually, we got an edit conflict there. I was in the middle of posting here that I've linked to the comment instead. See here. Not sure which is best. SlimVirgin ^{TALK|CONTRIBS} 20:14, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, SlimVirgin. You have new messages at File talk:Selection Birkenau ramp.jpg.
Message added 18:37, 28 June 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Regarding whether it was sunny in the image I altered. (Hohum ^@) 18:37, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

Discussion of link.

I see you've continued to re-add a link on the Wikibombing page without any kind of discussion. That it discusses the impact of the main page is interesting but not relevant to the issue. You've ignored discussion on the talk page and you've previously ignored my request here for you to discuss the issue. Could you either discuss or self-revert? Hobit (talk) 01:18, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

I did leave an explanation, Hobit, namely that the essay includes guidance about over-use of the main page, and this is further reading about the value of main-page exposure, placed in the Further reading section. Not sure what else there is to say really. SlimVirgin ^{TALK|CONTRIBS} 01:24, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

You didn't discuss as far as I can tell--that is respond to concerns. Did you miss the section in the essay's talk page on this? You did edit the section right above it. Could you either respond there so a discussion can be had or self-revert? Thanks, Hobit (talk) 11:10, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

I've added a comment. SlimVirgin ^{TALK|CONTRIBS} 19:21, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

I WILL SUE YOU!